gay marriage essay ielts

Band 9: The issue of gay marriage remains controversial. Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage. Should gay marriage be legal?

The issue of gay marriage remains one of the most controversial and divisive topics in today’s society. While some argue that it has adverse effects on the fabric of society, others believe that it is a natural trend and a basic human right. The question of whether gay marriage should be legal is a complex and deeply personal one. Ultimately, however, it is crucial to recognize that everyone deserves equal rights in marriage, regardless of their sexual orientation.

Those who oppose legalizing gay marriage often argue that it undermines the sanctity of traditional marriage and the institution of the family. They claim that the primary purpose of marriage is procreation, and since same-sex couples cannot naturally conceive children, their unions are somehow less meaningful or legitimate. Additionally, opponents argue that allowing gay couples to marry could open the door to further redefinition of marriage, such as polygamy or incestuous relationships.

However, these arguments fail to recognize the fundamental principles of equality and human rights. Marriage is a deeply personal and emotional commitment between two individuals who wish to spend their lives together, irrespective of their ability to conceive children. Denying same-sex couples the right to marry not only perpetuates inequality but also disregards the love, commitment, and legal protections that marriage provides.

Furthermore, it is essential to acknowledge that marriage has already evolved throughout history. Previously, women were considered property and interracial marriages were seen as taboo. Society has grown to recognize that love and commitment should not be restricted by gender or race. In the same vein, legalizing gay marriage would acknowledge the natural evolution of a more inclusive and progressive society.

Legalizing gay marriage also has numerous benefits for society as a whole. It promotes social cohesion by recognizing and valuing the relationships of all individuals in society, regardless of their sexual orientation. Studies have consistently found that legalizing gay marriage leads to improved mental and physical health outcomes for same-sex couples. It provides them with the legal protections and benefits that heterosexual couples often take for granted, such as inheritance rights, healthcare decisions, and tax benefits.

Moreover, recognizing gay marriage can have positive economic effects. Legalizing same-sex marriage encourages further social integration and acceptance, which in turn stimulates economic growth. It opens up new business opportunities, such as wedding planning, tourism, and hospitality, benefiting both the community and the economy at large.

Critics may argue that legalizing gay marriage could infringe upon the freedom of religious institutions who oppose such unions. However, it is crucial to draw a distinction between civil and religious marriages. Legalizing gay marriage would primarily impact civil marriages, as religious institutions maintain the right to define and perform religious marriages according to their beliefs. Ensuring this separation protects the religious freedom of institutions while upholding equal rights for all individuals.

In conclusion, the issue of gay marriage remains highly contentious, with strong arguments on both sides. However, it is imperative to recognize that denying same-sex couples the right to marry is a form of discrimination that perpetuates inequality. Legalizing gay marriage would mark a significant step towards creating a more inclusive, equal, and compassionate society. By embracing diversity and granting equal rights to all citizens, we can build a more harmonious and prosperous future for everyone.

Check Your Own Essay On This Topic?

Generate a band-9 sample with your idea, overall band score, task response, coherence & cohesion, lexical resource, grammatical range & accuracy, other topics:, some people think that the government should not spend money to build theaters and sports stadiums. instead, the country should spend more money on health care and education. do you agree or disagree.

In contemporary society, there still exists a controversial topic about the government should spend more money on medical care and education instead of on theatres and sports amphitheaters or not. From my point of view, every problem has two opposite sides and it is true for this topic. On the one hand, authorities have to […]

People are surrounded by advertising, which has an increasing effect on our lives.Do you think the positive effects of this overweight the negative effects?

In recent times, the number of advertisements has grown significantly and they have begun to affect people’s lives. However, there are some positive sides of this trend such as helping people to find a product which they were looking for, in my opinion, the negative effects are more crucial and outweigh the positive ones. To […]

In this contemporary society, there still remains a controversial topic about whether the government should invest in theaters and sports stadiums or not. It seems to me that everything has two opposite sides – advantages and disadvantages which will be discussed below. To begin with, spending money on playhouses and sports arenas will bring great […]

stress is becoming a major problems in many cities around the world. give some suggestions to control this trend

With the expansion of urban areas, most are seen migrating to city areas in search of better opportunities. Due to the same reason peoples are seen running back and forth making their life too busy which ultimately leads to stressful lifestyle. There are number of causes of stree that I will be pointing out moving […]

Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty - five can continue to live full and active lives. In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make?. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In recent years, our elderly people’s health has dramatically improved due to advancement in modern medicine. For this reason, individuals who age of 65 can live long in vibrant and active life. There are many advantages of higher living age to society such as increase volunteers and life experiences. To begin with, one of the […]

The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In modern times, the issue of using mobaile phones and smoking in certain places has become highly controversial. It is say that they should band both. In my perspective, i disagree with this statement. One the one hand, smoking is as antisocial as work in a certain place. Because it it harmful for every human […]

Plans & Pricing

• Listening Tests
• Academic Tests
• General Tests
• IELTS Writing Checker
• IELTS Writing Samples
• Speaking Club
• IELTS AI Speaking Test Simulator
• Latest Topics
• Vocabularying
• 2024 © IELTS 69

The issue of gay marriage remains controversial. Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage. Should gay marriage be legal?

IELTS essay The issue of gay marriage remains controversial. Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage. Should gay marriage be legal?

• Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
• ? One main idea per paragraph
• Include an introduction and conclusion
• Support main points with an explanation and then an example
• Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
• Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
• Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
• Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
• Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
• Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
• Check your writing for errors
• Answer all parts of the question
• ? Present relevant ideas
• Fully explain these ideas
• Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
• ? Currently is not available
• Meet the criteria
• Doesn't meet the criteria
• 6 band In recent years, people in many countries have been able to afford more material possessions such as electronic kitchen appliances, computers, and vehicles. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this increased level of affluence, and give your opinion about whether this is a positive or negative development. It is argued that in today’s society consumer goods such as electronic devices, kitchen appliances, vehicles, . . . have become more reasonable and are utilized widely in the world. This essay will first demonstrate that improving people’s quality of life is the primary advantage, followed by a disc ...
• 6.5 band Several countries disburse salaries to jobless persons on a specific time frame basis. Some may say that it shows a positive impact on society, but in my opinion, it shouldn’t be done because it creates laziness among them and decreases the rate of employment. Several countries disburse salaries to jobless persons on a specific time frame basis. Some may say that it shows a positive impact on society, but in my opinion, it shouldn’t be done because it creates laziness among them and decreases the rate of employment. Expenditure of the country when they a ...
• One who speaks only one language is one person, but one who speaks two languages is two people. Turkish proverb
• 5.5 band Along with making money, businesses do have social responsibilities. What are these social responsibilities? How can be it done? Though making a profit is one of the reasons why business able to exist in the market, but there many other responsibilities they have, such as social responsibilities. Most important social responsibilities that corporations have been trying to do is to protect the environment. In addition to this, ...
• 5.5 band Some people spend money on sport and cultural event. Do you think this is good or bad? These days, the colossal upsurge in the interest of people towards sporting and cultural events is quite alarming. While some see it as beneficial, others are of a contrary opinion. Personally, I completely agree that it is significant due to its individual and economic benefits. The remainder of th ...
• Language is the blood of the soul into which thoughts run and out of which they grow. Oliver Wendell Holmes
• 6 band Advantages and disadvantages using internet in the modern era In this modern era, the Internet is revolutionizing every aspect of life. Everyone gets all information with the help of this technology and by getting knowledge from it. Like the two sides of a knife, a knife has advantages and disadvantages. The internet has many advantages. Nowadays, everyone ha ...
• 5.5 band Positive and Negative Development Essay These days, numerous humans are selecting to chat with people online rather than face to face communication. This essay will discuss folks in large number preferring to communicate with Net rather than face to face. First of all, in today's modern life where new technologies are done for people's ne ...

• No, 49/A Aruna Jagadeesan Garden, Karaikal Main Road, Kumbakonam – 612401.
• (+91) 78714 04796 (+91) 9566637966

• Academic Tests
• General Training Tests
• Listening Tips
• Reading Tips
• Speaking Tips
• Writing Tips
• IELTS Listening Service
• IELTS Reading Service
• Writing Evaluation
• Speaking Evaluation
• IELTS Explained Videos
• Online Classes
• Testimonials
• Immigrations

Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?

• April 21, 2020
• Posted by: ielts
• Category: Writing Tips

Topic: The issue of gay marriage remains controversial. Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage. Should gay marriage be legal?

Sample answer

In recent years, gay marriage has caused public controversy around the world. Although this trend is not gained by a number of people, the returns are highly justifiable.

on the one hand, it is clear that an acceptance of gay marriage will benefit not only those who belong to this kind of gender but also the whole society. First, by being applauded by the community, it is clear that gays will have more opportunities to make friends and seek a suitable marriage partner. In this way, they definitely gain a perfect marriage that leads to a happy life. Second, If gays can live with their true sexes and be respected by the society, they will study and work creatively and productively that benefits themselves and the society, especially in economic areas.

On the other hand, there are several reasons why the government should not ban gay marriage. First, it can deny that the third-gender-people are not guilty since they can not be chosen their gender since they were birth. they, therefore, have to have their human rights, including the right to choose their partner to get married. second, if gay marriage is illegal and gays are stigmatized, they will feel a sense of social isolation that may lead to the social problem or even crime. for example, in a number of nations where gay marriage is banned and the third-gender-people are considered as a kind of guilty, they will find it difficult to seek a job that allows them to cover their basic needs, they, therefore, have no choice but committing crime to survive.

(Written by Nguyễn Thư )

——————————

Corrected Essay

In recent years , gay marriage has caused public controversy around the world. Although this trend is not gained by a number of people, the returns are highly justifiable.

• The second sentence is very ambiguous. It’s hard to know which opinion the author is of. Unclear introduction will severely damage your score in Task Response.
• No need to start your essay with “in recent years”. It is a weasel word that contributes nothing to the essay’s writing quality. If you are worry that you cannot meet the 250 words requirement, I suggest you put the time expression at the end of the sentence.

On the one hand, it is clear that an acceptance of gay marriage will benefit not only those who belong to this kind type of gender but also the whole society. First, by being applauded accepted by the community, it is clear that gays will have more opportunities to make friends and seek a suitable marriage partner. In this way, they definitely gain a perfect marriage that leads to a happy life homosexuals can marry each other and have their happy lifes. Second, if gays can live with their true sexes sexual orientations and be respected by the society, they will study and work creatively and productively that benefits themselves and the society, especially in economic areas .

• The last phrase does not make sense with the whole sentence.
• The idea is okay, but the wording is too lengthy. Try to shorten your sentences.
• Words that express strong certainty like “definitely” or “perfect” are generally frowned in an IELTS exam. Avoid using them.

On the other hand Furthermore, there are several reasons why the government should not ban gay marriage. First, it can deny is undeniable that the third-gender-people are not guilty since they can not be chosen were not be able to choose their gender since they were birth. Therefore, they, therefore, have to have their human rights, including the right to choose their partner to get married. Second, if gay marriage is illegal and gays are stigmatized, they homosexuals will feel a sense of social isolation that may lead to the social problem or even crime. for For example, in a number of some nations where gay marriage is banned and the third-gender-people are considered as a kind of guilty criminals, they will find it difficult to seek a job that allows them to cover their basic needs , . they, therefore, Consequently, they have no choice but committing to commit crimes to survive.

• Why do you use “on the other hand”, when you are on the same side with the argument in the first body paragraph? Use different connectives such as “furthermore”.
• According to Wikipedia, English speakers (and Westerners in general) rarely use the term “third gender” to describe a homosexual person. I suggest you just use the word “gay” or “homosexual”, since over-rephrasing keywords creates confusion to the readers.
• “They, therefore, have to” is a structure that is more suitable for speaking contexts. Putting the connectives “therefore” after “they” means that the modal verb “have to” has to stay far from the subject “they”, which is not encouraged in writing.
• Avoid using “they” too much. It makes your writing unclear
• Where is the conclusion?

Overall: 4.5

• Task Response: 4

✓ responds to the task only in a minimal way or the answer is tangential; the format may be inappropriate (the author has written more than 250 words and provided some relevants ideas. However, he did not write any conclusion, and his introduction is also inadequate).

✓ presents a position but this is unclear (due to the unclear introduction)

✓ presents some main ideas but these are difficult to identify and may be repetitive, irrelevant or not well supported (the second body paragraph doesn’t link well to the first one)

• Coherence and Cohesion: 4

✓ presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in the response ✓ uses some basic cohesive devices but these may be inaccurate or repetitive (the author only uses “on the other hand” and “therefore”, and the accuracy is off too.)

✓ may not write in paragraphs or their use may be confusing

• Lexical Resource: 5

✓ uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task ✓ may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader

• Grammatical Range and Accuracy:

✓ uses only a limited range of structures ✓ attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences ✓ may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader

Morning Rundown: Aid group pauses Gaza operations after workers killed, flood watch as storms head east, lawmakers allude to 'chemtrails' conspiracy

Russian constitution change ends hopes for gay marriage

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia — At the Lagutenko wedding in 2017, the couple exchanged vows, rings and kisses in front of friends and relatives, then took a traditional drive in a limousine, stopping at landmarks for photos.

But because they were both women, the wedding wasn’t legal in Russia.

If Irina and Anastasia Lagutenko had any hopes they could someday officially be married in their homeland, the possibility vanished on July 1 when voters approved a package of constitutional amendments, one of them stipulating that marriage is only between a man and a woman .

Unlike many LGBTQ people in Russia who keep low profiles because of pervasive enmity against nontraditional sexuality, they live openly as a same-sex couple with a 21-month-old boy, named Dorian, who was born to Irina.

They lack, and probably never will receive, those rights accorded to heterosexual couples. They won’t be allowed to refuse to testify against their partner in court, they won’t automatically inherit from each other, and they can’t see each other in hospitals that only allow visits by family members. Anastasia is not a legal guardian for Dorian and can’t become one.

“I want to have the same legal rights for the child,” Anastasia told The Associated Press as Dorian played in her lap in their apartment.

“I planned this child. We went all the way of the pregnancy and the childbirth together, and now, I am 100 percent, 200 percent involved in the process of upbringing, and I consider him mine,” she said.

NBC OUT Russian voters back referendum banning same-sex marriage

Although Russia decriminalized homosexuality decades ago, animosity against gays remains high. In 2012, the Moscow city government ordered that gay pride parades be banned for the next 100 years. The following year, the parliament unanimously passed a law forbidding “propaganda of nontraditional sexual relationships” among minors.

Attacks on the gay community persist. Last summer, the murder of Yelena Grigoryeva , an LGBTQ activist in St. Petersburg, made national headlines. Dozens of other activists received death threats from an obscure anti-gay group that claimed responsibility for the killing of Grigoryeva, who was stabbed repeatedly and showed signs of strangulation.

In 2017, reports of extrajudicial arrests, torture and killings of gay men in the republic of Chechnya drew international condemnation.

Last year, Andrei Vaganov and Yevgeny Yerofeyev, a couple raising two adopted children, had to flee Russia after a doctor reported them to police and authorities opened a criminal case. Adoption by same-sex couples is banned in Russia, but Vaganov had applied as a single father.

Max Olenichev, a lawyer with the Coming Out gay rights group, said there are instances of tolerance by some courts. He said he has worked on seven custody cases in which judges refused to take away custody, saying that sexual orientation doesn’t play a role in a child’s upbringing.

But he is concerned that the constitutional changes will encourage anti-gay views.

Previously, “the state had to create equal opportunities for all people that live in Russia, both for LGBT people and non-LGBT people. When these amendments come into effect, then in fact the state will only support conservative values and promote them. LGBT people will be left behind,” he said.

“Our society really looks up to what the government does, so any kinds of public actions promoting homophobia, transphobia, biphobia, many people may perceive as a call for action. And we believe that there will be more hate speech and hate crimes, and that LGBT people will suffer more violence,” Olenichev said.

Pyotr Tolstoy, a parliament member who supported the changes to the constitution, says Russia is “a stronghold of traditionalism,” reflecting the widespread view that the country is under siege from decadent foreign influences.

The amendments will allow Russia “not to repeat the mistakes that exist in the West,” he told the AP. “These mistakes, in my opinion, are fundamental, when certain people — the LGBT community or certain race groups — are being given additional, special rights. More rights than the majority.”

NBC OUT Polish president proposes constitutional ban on gay adoption

President Vladimir Putin has rejected criticism of the constitutional amendments and the gay propaganda law.

He said that in some countries, “criminal law provisions still exist under which people of nontraditional sexual orientation can be persecuted criminally, as it was in the Soviet Union. We don’t have anything similar to that.” Putin’s remarks came after passage of the amendments package, which also allows him to seek two more terms in office.

Tolstoy, who is a deputy speaker in the lower house of parliament and heads the Russian delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, rejects the idea that the provision outlawing same-sex marriages in the constitution promotes intolerance.

“In our country, people are tolerant to all communities, as long they don’t demand any special rights,” he said.

For Irina and Anastasia Lagutenko, it is not about any kind of special rights. Anastasia says she just wants basic rights given to every parent — the “reassurance” that she is “a lawful parent, like parents in a traditional family.”

“When you have a legal right for a child, you feel safe,” she said.

“I want people who think that families like ours don’t exist to see us — (to see) that our family is complete, we have an excellent child, and to accept this fact.” Irina said. “We don’t have a fear of living in the open and we won’t hide, because we are the same people and we have the same rights.”

Follow NBC Out on Twitter , Facebook & Instagram

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

• Skip to content
• Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

• IELTS Sample

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

Ielts writing task 2 sample 63 - marriages are arranged by the parents but in other cases, people choose their own marriage partner, ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay:, in some countries, marriages are arranged by the parents but in other cases, people choose their own marriage partner..

• IELTS Essay

IELTS Materials

• IELTS Bar Graph
• IELTS Line Graph
• IELTS Table Chart
• IELTS Flow Chart
• IELTS Pie Chart
• IELTS Letter Writing
• Academic Reading

Useful Links

• IELTS Secrets
• Band Score Calculator
• Exam Specific Tips
• Useful Websites
• IELTS Preparation Tips
• Academic Reading Tips
• Academic Writing Tips
• GT Writing Tips
• Listening Tips
• Speaking Tips
• IELTS Grammar Review
• IELTS Vocabulary
• IELTS Cue Cards
• IELTS Life Skills
• Letter Types

• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Copyright Notice
• HTML Sitemap

How to Write ‘Compare and Contrast’ Type of Essay in IELTS Writing Task 2?

In ‘compare and contrast’ type of essay, IELTS examiners want you to discuss the points of comparing and contrasting the two things i.e. similarities and differences between the two. Therefore, it is important that you find out relevant points of similarities and differences of the two mentioned things after reading the question for IELTS Writing . Let’s look at an example:

Some people want to live in a house while others prefer living in an apartment.

Does living in a house bring more advantages than living in an apartment.

With this type of essay for IELTS Writing , you have two points to be discussed as follows:

• Benefits of living in a house/apartment
• Issues of living in an house/apartment

You must discuss both of them by giving reasons and support them with examples. And at the end, mention which of the two is better and why. If you do not discuss any of the above two points in the essay, you will lose marks.

So, in this type of essay, you must explain both the points.

How to structure IELTS Writing asnwer?

The essay can be structured mainly in 4 paragraphs as follows:

Paragraph 1: Introduction

Paragraph 2: Benefits of living in a house/apartment

Paragraph 3: issues of living in a house/apartment, paragraph 4: conclusion.

Further structuring of the paragraphs can be done as follows:

a. Paragraph 1- Introduction

Sentence 1- Paraphrase the Question

Sentence 2-Outline the sentence

b. Paragraph 2- Body Paragraph 1 (Apartment)

Sentence 1- State the benefit

Sentence 2- Explain how it brings this benefit

Sentence 4- Write an example

c. Paragraph 3 – Body Paragraph 2 (House)

Sentence 1- State the issue

Sentence 2-Explain how it leads to this issue

Sentence 3- Write an example

d. Paragraph 4- Conclusion

Sentence 1- Summary of the main point to conclude which is better and why Four paragraphs are sufficient to explain your point of view. You may use any other structure you are comfortable with but this structure is approved by the IELTS examiners to help the students write in an effective and cohesive manner.

Vocabulary:

Useful vocabulary for comparison points.

• to be the same as
• neither… nor…
• not only… but also…
• to be alike
• just like (+ noun)
• to be similar (to)
• similar to (+ noun)
• to compare (to/with)

Useful vocabulary for Contrasting points

• in contrast
• by comparison
• in comparison
• on the other hand
• to differ from
• to be dissimilar to
• to be different (from)
• to be unlike

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer:

There are many people who believe that living in a house is the best. However, some people disagree with this opinion and instead prefer to live in an apartment. This essay makes comparison of the two and chooses the most preferred option.

To begin with, living in a flat definitely brings several advantages to a resident. One of the most important reasons behind this is the huge convenience it offers. An apartment is a part of large building giving a feel of living in a small societal association which takes responsibility of any fix or repair or maintenance required. For example, if one needs to repair the roof, the maintenance charges are borne by the landlord. Moreover, various facilities as well as amenities are available nearby including shopping mall, tuition centre, medical store, bus station and so on.

On the other hand, living in an owned house does not offer the facilities that one can avail while living in an apartment. One reason for this is that it is quite lonely to stay in a house which occupies a large land area bringing boredom and snatching the joy of living with so many people around. For example, it would be such a dull experience of sitting alone in the garden with no one around to share life experiences. In addition to this, maintenance and cleanliness of the house are borne by the owner and thus it is costly to live in a house.

Conclusively, living in an apartment is comparatively better than staying lonely in a house. Though a house provides a large spacious area to move around but living in an apartment enhances more social interaction and adds more excitement to life.

(283 words)

Write an essay with minimum 250 words. Use the above mentioned vocabulary. 1. Some people think that learning online is more efficient. However, according to some other people, studying from books is still the preferred method. Which is the better method of learning out of the two?

2. Distance education is gaining popularity day by day and more students are enrolling through distance mode than full-time course in colleges. Make comparison of distance education and full-time course to find which is better and why.

3. A growing number of people own personal vehicle as they find it a convenient mode of transport in comparison to public transport. Compare the public and private mode of transportation and state which is better out of the two.

Share with friends

Scan below qr code to share with your friends, related ielts tips.

Collocations describing Physical Appearance

Today, we are about to share with you some collocations about physical...

Traffic and accommodation problems

Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should...

9 Academic IELTS Writing tips on how to get Band 7

This is the article from one student, Band 7 in IELTS, and here he shares...

How to Write ‘Causes (Reasons) and Effects’ Type of Essay in IELTS Writing Task 2

In “causes and effects” type of essay, IELTS examiners want...

How to Use Commas Correctly in an IELTS Test

One of the common mistakes in IELTS writing is the wrong use of punctuations,...

Thank you for contacting us!

We have received your message.

We will get back within 48 hours.

You have subscribed successfully.

Thank you for your feedback, we will investigate and resolve the issue within 48 hours.

Your answers has been saved successfully.

Add Credits

You do not have enough iot credits.

Your account does not have enough IOT Credits to complete the order. Please purchase IOT Credits to continue.

A viral essay about marriage spawned thousands of hate clicks — and exposed a harsh reality

M arriage is having a moment in American discourse. TikTok videos extol the virtues of being a stay-at-home wife and mother who also feeds chickens, makes sourdough bread and has five children.

Magazines and newspapers are filled with articles and columns exhorting people to just suck it up and marry . Or even offer up marriage as the solution to the inequality in our nation . And these stories are focused on women, because it’s young women who are more likely to opt out of marriage and it’s older women who are divorcing their husbands .

Recently, an essay published in New York Magazine’s The Cut even argued for marriage as a feminist reclamation. Marriage, as the author described it, is a protectorate, wherein she is taken care of and pampered. It truly sounds nice given the level of exhaustion American women are experiencing, after carrying the weight of cognitive and domestic labor , and doing the work of the social safety net . But it’s worth pointing out that gilded cages are still cages. 

The “just get married” discourse feels like a tightening rope around women who are already seeing their rights reversed through the rollback of Roe. Women who saw the vast lack of a social safety net during the pandemic and saw America take back whatever advances we made that helped families, while rolling out the war machine. Women are dying because we don’t have choices. Still, the answer that is shouted back at us is “just marry.”

But marriage has never been a safe space for women. And any argument that marriage provides comfort and equality under the benevolent protectorship of a husband isn’t borne out by the history of marriage — or the reality of it.

Even now, with all of its supposed advantages, marriage can be a trap for women, who are more likely than men to experience physical and emotional abuse in marriage. And nearly 20% of marriages involve violence . In 2021, 34% of female murder victims were killed by their intimate partner, compared to only 6% of male murder victims.

Marriage as an institution has been more about keeping some people out and locking others in. Founded on the laws of coverture, historically in marriage a woman’s identity was subsumed under her husband. But, of course, this relative safety of the marital relationship was only afforded to wealthy women. Poor people, the enslaved, queer or disabled people have been historically excluded from the benefits of marriage. Enslaved women , often forced into marriage, only kept those relationships at the whims of their enslavers, and were subject to sexual and racial violence as a result. Today, mass incarceration that targets Black men makes keeping a marriage together harder . Additionally, staying together as a family becomes difficult when the child welfare system targets Black families . And for centuries, until 1967, when the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court ruling legalized interracial marriage, marriage was a means of policing racial purity. Also, it wasn’t until 2014, when the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges, that gay marriage was made equal in the United States. People who are disabled were excluded from marriage because historically they were often institutionalized. Today, people who are disabled are often barred from the institution of marriage because they can lose access to life-saving benefits .

And you don’t have to look too far back in American history to see how wives were viewed under the law. It wasn’t until 1993 that marital rape was finally outlawed in all 50 states. 

In response to these statistics, critics often accuse women of simply choosing to marry the wrong person. As if you can choose your way out of systemic inequality and an institution that was founded on the fundamental loss of personhood. In sum, marriage never has been, nor ever will be, a form of freedom. 

It’s tempting, in a world beleaguered by a pandemic, where women still earn less than men, and where there is no affordable childcare, to see marriage as an appealing way of opting out of the ceaseless grind of capitalism. Better to work for a man who loves you rather than "the man," the logic goes. But it’s an upsetting logic, presuming that marriage is still the work of a woman, rather than a partnership of equals. Plus, that logic doesn’t parse. All it does is economically isolate women. A wife is far more likely to be abused by her husband than a stranger, and stay-at-home moms are more likely to be depressed and anxious .

In “The Second Sex,” Simone de Beauvoir argued that marriage is premised on a man treating a woman as a person enslaved while making her feel like a queen. She also notes, “It is more comfortable to endure blind bondage than to work for one’s liberation; the dead, too, are better suited to the earth than the living.” Beauvoir’s words feel like a face slap from the past, reminding modern women how long we’ve been struggling to be free from the unpaid labor of marriage and how much farther we have to go. Freedom isn’t found under the guardianship of a marriage, it’s found when we are seen as equal partners and given equal opportunities to earn money and control our bodies and our destinies.

Partnership, when executed with mutual respect, can be amazing. But marriage as an institution has never been about a woman’s freedom. And it won’t be until we have full equality.

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Moving To Gay Idaho? Thing To Know Before Relocating Here As An LGBT Person.

Posted on Last updated: December 4, 2023

Categories Gay Real Estate , Moving To LGBT USA

Louise Lopez expertly guides queer individuals to vibrant, inclusive U.S. and North American neighborhoods with 15+ years of dedicated experience, ensuring they find not just a home, but a community where their authenticity is celebrated and protected.

If you’re a member of the LGBTQ+ community, the decision to relocate to a new state can be daunting, especially when you’re unsure of the level of acceptance you’ll receive. It’s a legitimate concern to have, and unfortunately, in this day and age, it’s still a reality that not all places are equally welcoming. However, with the rise of queer-friendly cities and states, the process of moving can be made more comfortable and reassuring.

By conducting research and tapping into resources, queer people can identify places where they can live their lives authentically and thrive. So, if you’re thinking of relocating, don’t let the fear of not being accepted hold you back. With some planning and support, you can find a new home where you’re celebrated for who you are.

To help queer folx who are considering moving to Gay Idaho, we have put together this guide from experts on the ground, considering the pros and cons of life here, discussing LGBT rights in Idaho and whether Idaho embraces our community.

We also take a look at the most gay-friendly cities in Idaho and LGBT community organizations in Idaho that you should be aware of!

Many distinctive cultural groups and events support Idaho’s LGBT culture, such as the Idaho Gay Rodeo Association in Boise and Boise Pridefest, which has attracted over 50,000 attendees in recent years. Boise stands as the state’s most gay-friendly community, with a variety of LGBT nightlife options providing welcoming spaces for gathering and socializing.

In addition, the city of Pocatello , Idaho, is emerging as a burgeoning center of LGBT culture, with initiatives like the Pocatello Pride organization fostering a sense of community and inclusivity. This growth in Pocatello reflects the broader trend of increasing LGBT acceptance across Idaho, contributing to a more diverse and vibrant cultural landscape throughout the state.

Despite the fact that same-sex unions have been legal in the state since 2014, discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation is still not prohibited by state law. Some cities, including Boise and Coeur d’Alene, have their own anti-discrimination laws.

Even so, there’s a reason why Idaho is fast becoming one of the most popular states in the country. Some aspects that make it attractive include its stunning wildlife and natural beauty. As a member of the LGBT community, we all know however that this means nothing if the state isn’t friendly to its LGBT population. 

To reduce the stress of your relocation, we recommend engaging a gay realtor in Idaho early in the process to help you find your new perfect home there. They will have up-to-the-minute information on the best cities and areas for LGBT people and be able to match your needs to a neighborhood most suited to you.

You can just start with a no-obligation conversation, and if you decide to continue with your move to Idaho – they will not only have your best interests at heart but also ensure you are treated with dignity and respect throughout the entire process.

In this article we will cover...

Highlights Of Moving To Gay Idaho

Lgbtq+ rights in the usa, does idaho embrace the lgbtq community .

• Is Idaho An Expensive State To Move To?

LGBTQ+ Community Organizations In Idaho

Finding gay realtors in idaho.

Different aspects of every state make it a unique and tempting proposition to transplants, locals, and visitors – and residents of Idaho are well aware that their state is brimming with hidden gems. After all, this is why many chose to live here.

Once you move here, you’ll be able to quickly befriend locals and spend your free time discovering the best sights and culture Idaho has to offer. On top of this, thanks to an offbeat yet deeply engaged LGBT community, which congregates at a few fabulous queer hot spots, securing a relocation to Idaho should allow you to meet queer people with similar interests.

We are certain they will have many more to add, but to get you started here are a few highlights of moving to LGBT Idaho.

Gay Scene in Idaho

Many distinctive cultural groups and events support Idaho’s LGBT culture, including the Idaho Gay Rodeo Association in Boise. The most gay-friendly community in the state is found in Boise, where a variety of LGBT nightlife alternatives offer a place to congregate and socialize.

Despite the fact that same-sex unions have been legal in Idaho since 2014, discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is still not prohibited by state law. Some cities, including Boise and Coeur d’Alene, have their own anti-discrimination laws.

Gay-Friendly Nightlife and Dining

Idaho provides a variety of cuisines, from regional favorites like finger steaks and huckleberry ice cream to Basque dishes like paella and croquetas. Due to a concentration on Northwest ingredients and traditional techniques, the dining scene in Idaho, and especially Boise, is particularly hot.

While there aren’t many gay pubs in Idaho, you can discover a close-knit community in downtown Boise, where a few clubs can keep you engaged well into the night.

The laws governing lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people have altered considerably over time in the United States and vary from state to state. In many ways, LGBT rights are some of the best in the world – but the devil is in the detail, and some places are much more hostile to queer life than others.

While same-sex marriage has been legal in every state since the landmark Obergefell v. Hodges ruling on June 26, 2015 (before Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex marriage was legal in 36 states and Washington, D.C. ), LGBT people are still treated differently in different states – both societally and as inequality under the law.

Over half of all states still allow discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity/expression, while counties and cities within states often have distinct laws as well. While some states permit adoption by all couples, others forbid it for all unmarried couples.

This is all to say what most of us already know is that LGBT rights and equality differ greatly across the USA, and the specifics of family, marriage and anti-discrimination laws are different in every state.

Thus, while it is comforting to know that you can choose to marry whoever you love across the USA (and have it recognized as such) and are protected against hate crimes based on sexual orientation or gender identity (which can be punished under Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr.

Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009), there are still many questions you will likely have about moving to Idaho and what you can expect of LGBT life there.

Idaho’s magnificent natural scenery and lovely sunsets are completely gender-neutral and unconcerned with your sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression.

That’s part of what makes the Gem State so appealing: pretty much everything that residents of the non-LGBT community find appealing about the state can also be enjoyed by members of the LGBT community, including easy access to outdoor recreation, reasonably priced real estate, a boatload of must-see attractions, entertainment, charming downtowns, and friendly locals.

As you might expect, there are patches of discrimination or ignorance in some areas, as well as politicians and religious leaders who continue to steadfastly oppose what they feel is different. However, there are also more people who are working to promote equality or, at the bare minimum, make it easy for those who are different to be left alone. 

There has been an increasing push for cities to enact their own laws against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation in housing and employment since 2012. Presently, 12 cities in the state have done so. 

Therefore, whether you’re thinking about moving to a new area to support the cause and get involved in civil rights concerns, or you just want to relax with your family and enjoy skiing and fishing, you should definitely give Idaho a chance. 

Additionally, Idaho is one of 26 states that penalize acts that have a low or negligible risk of transmitting HIV, and one of nine states that explicitly forbid Medicaid coverage for transition-related healthcare for transgender people. 

Such regulations are regarded as antiquated and frequently result in misuse and discrimination against people who are HIV-positive, harming public health initiatives.

Since sexual orientation and gender identity are not protected by Idaho’s civil rights laws, LGBT residents of the state are at risk of prejudice. The state of Idaho could protect LGBT individuals by adding these provisions to its current laws, and doing so would not be expensive or onerous.

Is Idaho An Expensive State To Move To ?

You won’t be looking at a very pricey or potentially affordable lifestyle if you relocate to Idaho. The state has the 25th-lowest cost of living in the country, ranking at the center of all 50 states and the District of Columbia, as per data collected in the third quarter of 2021.

Housing . Homes in Idaho cost, on average, $263,900, roughly $30,000 more than homes throughout the US. However, you’ll probably have to pay much more for a home if you want to reside in a well-known city like Boise. Due to the inflow of Californian buyers, the median sales price in the region has increased by 30% to $454,000. Rent costs have also increased 12.4% within a year to roughly $1,050 per month . That is $200 more than Idaho’s monthly median rent of $850.

Food . A recent survey revealed that Idahoans only spend between $3,200 and $3,600 annually on groceries, which is 6% less than the country’s average. Even the sales tax on goods has a tax credit in Idaho. A yearly income tax refund of about $100 per individual is to be anticipated. Additionally, eating out is generally affordable. A plate at a restaurant costs just $9.98 on average.

Utilities . Idaho has the lowest utility expenses out of all the states, which helps to counterbalance the somewhat higher average cost of housing. The average monthly cost for electricity, water, natural gas, cable, and internet for residents in Idaho is $343.70, which is $78.35 less. 

Transport . Expect to pay around $80 a month on car insurance, and approximately $385 a year on regular upkeep and repairs. Additionally, you should budget $100 each month for gas and between $45 and $69 for state vehicle registration.

Healthcare . The yearly healthcare expenditure for the citizens of Idaho is $5,956, which is nearly $1,000 more than the national average. Outpatient services cost about $2,000, while inpatient care costs about $1,194. Prescription costs total $1,019 more. In the event that you require medical attention, you should budget $1,690 for treatment.

Wherever you live, it is essential that you support LGBT organizations in any way you can use so that they can keep reaching out to and assisting other, more vulnerable members of the community. After all, we are stronger when we work together, and each of us will likely have a time in our lives when we require a little extra support.

Thankfully, Idaho has a supportive and diverse LGBTQ community, which has helped the state become more gay-friendly in recent years.

As a result, there are a variety of LGBT resources available to community members, their allies, friends, and families – and you ought to feel free to utilize them or consider giving your support as needed to keep your new home state moving forwards! They are also great places to meet new people and find your queer chosen family in Gay Idaho.

The Community Center Idaho

The Community Center was established in December 1983 and serves the LGBT and related community by offering resources to the LGBT community. The Community Center is dedicated to bringing the LGBT community together through educational and developmental initiatives.

For group meetings and social events, the Community Center offers a secure and welcoming setting for youth groups, LBGT support groups, women’s organizations, and transgender groups. 

TCC is dedicated to bringing the LGBT community together and offers a frequently updated referral list for counseling, medical, and legal support. They also offer information to LGBTQIA people thinking about moving to Idaho, and businesses and groups that want to support diversity.

Pride Foundation

Pride Foundation’s work is based on the straightforward but ground-breaking conviction that everyone should be able to live freely, honestly, and authentically wherever they call home. For over three decades, their innovative leaders have operated on the same tenet.  In the middle of the HIV/AIDS crisis, a small but brave group of individuals established the Pride Foundation in 1985. 

Their goal was to establish a source of hope and light during the previous era of great gloom. In order to achieve this vision, the organization has collectively committed more than $70 million to revolutionary community change. In all communities throughout the Northwest, Pride Foundation supports transformative movements that achieve fairness and justice for LGBTQ+ people. 

They envision a world where all LGBTQ+ people can live openly and safely and be true to who they are in their communities. 

The Most Gay-Friendly Cities In Idaho

In Idaho, there are many wonderful areas to live in, but when relocating to LGBTQ Idaho, you should be cognizant that there are a few cities and gaybourhoods that are nearer to the queer hubs of life. Knowing them will allow you to pull your U-Haul up to your new house in a gay-friendly neighborhood or town that is best suited to your needs.

If you’re a lesbian , gay , bisexual ,  transgender , or otherwise queer person seeking a welcoming neighborhood with facilities you’ll cherish, start with these top gay and gay-friendly Idaho cities to discover your perfect new home, each with its distinct personality.

Give yourself enough time to acquaint yourself with Idaho’s diverse personalities, and remember that there is no one perfect answer when it comes to the most gay-friendly places in Idaho… and just because it does not make our list doesn’t necessarily make it a bad option.

We recommend  speaking to a local LGBT real estate agent  for a more detailed understanding of the best options today. Now, let’s take a look at where these fabulously gay-friendly cities in Idaho are and why you might want to consider them!

Although gay rodeos aren’t  Boise’s biggest draw, it’s important to note that the state where modern rodeos are thought to have originated and where the current governor is a former rodeo champion hosts a well-attended annual cowboy festival that is put on by a vibrant section of the International Gay Rodeo Association. 

The largest city in Idaho is impressively ranked No. 12 on Advocate’s list of the “Queerest Cities in America.” Boise was the site of the first gay bar in Idaho when it opened in 1976, and it now annually hosts Pridefest.

The state’s Human Rights Commission, which is based in Boise, works to ensure that all Idahoans are treated equally.  Boise has had a written anti-discrimination ordinance since 2012. 

From museums and galleries to a zoo and biking trails, this neighborhood offers a wide variety of attractions for visitors of all interests and ages. Each summer, thousands of people attend the Boise Pride Festival, which is past its 32nd year. Drag performance troupe LipsInc has made the Pride celebration enduring for years by frequently performing around the city.

Depending on your tastes and needs, Boise has a wide range of lovely neighborhoods. However, North End is typically the most well-liked among the LGBTQ population. Older, lovely, and character-filled homes with lots of charm may be found in North End. There are several restaurants and businesses around, as well as some of the most popular ones, making the region fairly walkable. 

Both locals and visitors can enjoy the numerous bike trails and green spaces in the area. LGBT people, as well as their friends and allies, come together for Boise Pride to celebrate the distinctive culture and spirit of the LGBTQ+ community.

Because there are so many followers of the Church of Latter-day Saints, a religion that has, over the years, sent contradictory messages to the LGBT community, Southern Idaho is sometimes jokingly referred to as “Northwest Utah .” 

Church leaders backed and contributed to California’s attempts to outlaw same-sex unions, but afterward told their followers not to discriminate in the workplace or on the housing market.

Pocatello, in the midst of all of this, has been praised for its support. It was the second city in the state to approve an anti-discrimination law, coming in only behind Boise on the list of Best Towns in the state that Support Equality Efforts. 

Although the proposition was contested, the majority of voters upheld it. Right after Boise, Pocatello passed its own anti-discrimination legislation, and when these laws were contested, the vast majority of town citizens chose to uphold them.

The University of Idaho’s campus in Moscow, which is located in this politically conservative state, has a reputation as a liberal enclave, which makes the city’s name a bit perplexing. Even though Moscow’s name conjures up evil Communist intentions, the pronunciation is different.

It’s Mos-COW rather than Mos-COE.  The university features a well-known LGBTQA office and a resource center for its students, as well as frequent speakers and open events to support community education. 

Furthermore, Washington State University, one of the country’s Top 25 LGBT-friendly universities, is only 4 miles away and is conveniently located. In addition, Moscow is regarded as one of the state’s safest cities per resident due to its low rate of violent and property crimes, so you don’t have to think too much about violent crime when you live here.

The University of Idaho has distinguished itself as a liberal stronghold in a largely conservative state for a very long time.

Unlike their contemporaries at Washington State University, who spent the majority of the 1970s waging conflicts about whether to acknowledge the group Gay Awareness as an official student committee, students of the University of Idaho were more accepting of the organization. 

It takes a strong person to live in a tiny, rural village while being part of a member of the LGBTQ+ community. Members of the LGBTQ+ community frequently move to cities or other large urban regions in search of a more accepting society.

However, not all LGBTQ+ individuals can or want to make this transition in their way of life. Moscow’s LGBTQ+ population has always been active in its own unique way, but the state still has a long way to go before they feel welcome in rural towns.

Even so. Moscow is regarded as a forward-thinking blue dot in a predominately red state.

When passing through the residential sections or strolling through the downtown area, it’s not unusual to see rainbow flags flying or banners and yard art with similar messages. The movement for a more inclusive community has been ongoing for some time, most notably since the 1970s, and it has taken the city some time to get to this stage.

When looking for the ideal realtor, why would you consider someone’s sexuality? This may seem strange at first, but there are several reasons why contacting a gay realtor in Idaho is a great way to find your dream house.

After all, when it relates to one of life’s most significant transactions, it’s not unreasonable to expect fair, equal, and honest representation from someone who understands the queer community’s particular needs and wishes.

Furthermore, unfortunately, many people (up to a third of Americans) believe that our community does not deserve protection and dignity in housing, adoption, employment, and other areas of life.

So it’s no surprise that LGBT people who use mainstream realtors often describe feelings of discomfort, unnecessary trouble, unenthusiastic representation, or even antagonism or outright contempt. Everyone deserves a pleasant, stress-free home buying or selling experience while being adequately represented, and this is why we feel you should hire a gay realtor to assist you in finding your future home.

LGBTQ realtors are more likely to be familiar with the diverse communities in their area and know which ones may be best suited to you when looking for a home.

That’s not to say a heterosexual realtor isn’t capable, but they’ve probably never had to address many of the issues LGBT people face. Rather than just being concerned with how bustling, fashionable, or up-and-coming a neighborhood is (or what it may appear like), gay realtors conduct extensive research into the neighborhoods in which they sell homes to ensure that clients are safe.

It used to be challenging to locate professional LGBT-friendly real estate agents in Idaho, and it was virtually impossible to find one if you were relocating here from out of state and didn’t have access to a local referral.

You no longer have to search for a realtor without knowing whether or not they are accepting of others because you can use a list of gay, lesbian, and gay-friendly agents in Idaho to do all of your homework for you.

Simply go to the page, and you’ll be presented with a free list of gay, lesbian, and gay-friendly agents who can help you with your relocation as well as other useful information like LGBT+friendly schools, shopping, storage firms, tradespeople, and more.

Read the biographies of LGBT real estate agents, then choose the one who is right for you. It’s critical that you find someone who will be by your side and support you and your family during one of life’s most exciting occasions.

Even better, there is no hidden motive, cost, or obligation whatsoever!

The issue of gay marriage remains controversial. Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage. Should gay marriage be legal?

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

• Paragraph 1 - Introduction
• Sentence 1 - Background statement
• Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
• Sentence 3 - Thesis
• Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
• Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
• Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
• Sentence 2 - Example
• Sentence 3 - Discussion
• Sentence 4 - Conclusion
• Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
• Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
• Sentence 1 - Summary
• Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
• Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ » — a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

• Check your IELTS essay »
• Find essays with the same topic
• View collections of IELTS Writing Samples
• Show IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

Some people believe that it is unnecessary to teach children about handwriting skills in our modern age. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that the government should subsidize fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable. others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead. discuss both views and give your own opinion gives reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge., topic: as well as, making money, business also have social responsibilities., some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. others believe it it more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. discuss both these views and give your own opinion., in some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. what do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them.

• Share full article

For more audio journalism and storytelling, download New York Times Audio , a new iOS app available for news subscribers.

Ronna McDaniel, TV News and the Trump Problem

The former republican national committee chairwoman was hired by nbc and then let go after an outcry..

This transcript was created using speech recognition software. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email [email protected] with any questions.

From “The New York Times,” I’m Michael Barbaro. This is “The Daily.”

[MUSIC PLAYING]

Today, the saga of Ronna McDaniel and NBC and what it reveals about the state of television news headed into the 2024 presidential race. Jim Rutenberg, a “Times” writer at large, is our guest.

It’s Monday, April 1.

Jim, NBC News just went through a very public, a very searing drama over the past week, that we wanted you to make sense of in your unique capacity as a longtime media and political reporter at “The Times.” This is your sweet spot. You were, I believe, born to dissect this story for us.

Oh, brother.

Well, on the one hand, this is a very small moment for a major network like NBC. They hire, as a contributor, not an anchor, not a correspondent, as a contributor, Ronna McDaniel, the former RNC chairwoman. It blows up in a mini scandal at the network.

But to me, it represents a much larger issue that’s been there since that moment Donald J. Trump took his shiny gold escalator down to announce his presidential run in 2015. This struggle by the news media to figure out, especially on television, how do we capture him, cover him for all of his lies, all the challenges he poses to Democratic norms, yet not alienate some 74, 75 million American voters who still follow him, still believe in him, and still want to hear his reality reflected in the news that they’re listening to?

Right. Which is about as gnarly a conundrum as anyone has ever dealt with in the news media.

Well, it’s proven so far unsolvable.

Well, let’s use the story of what actually happened with Ronna McDaniel and NBC to illustrate your point. And I think that means describing precisely what happened in this situation.

The story starts out so simply. It’s such a basic thing that television networks do. As elections get underway, they want people who will reflect the two parties.

They want talking heads. They want insiders. They want them on their payroll so they can rely on them whenever they need them. And they want them to be high level so they can speak with great knowledge about the two major candidates.

Right. And rather than needing to beg these people to come on their show at 6 o’clock, when they might be busy and it’s not their full-time job, they go off and they basically put them on retainer for a bunch of money.

Yeah. And in this case, here’s this perfect scenario because quite recently, Ronna McDaniel, the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee through the Trump era, most of it, is now out on the market. She’s actually recently been forced out of the party. And all the networks are interested because here’s the consummate insider from Trump world ready to get snatched up under contract for the next election and can really represent this movement that they’ve been trying to capture.

So NBC’S key news executives move pretty aggressively, pretty swiftly, and they sign her up for a $300,000 a year contributor’s contract.

Nice money if you can get it.

Not at millions of dollars that they pay their anchors, but a very nice contract. I’ll take it. You’ll take it. In the eyes of NBC execs she was perfect because she can be on “Meet the Press” as a panelist. She can help as they figure out some of their coverage. They have 24 hours a day to fill and here’s an official from the RNC. You can almost imagine the question that would be asked to her. It’s 10:00 PM on election night. Ronna, what are the Trump people thinking right now? They’re looking at the same numbers you are.

That was good, but that’s exactly it. And we all know it, right? This is television in our current era.

So last Friday, NBC makes what should be a routine announcement, but one they’re very proud of, that they’ve hired Ronna McDaniel. And in a statement, they say it couldn’t be a more important moment to have a voice like Ronna’s on the team. So all’s good, right? Except for there’s a fly in the ointment.

Because it turns out that Ronna McDaniel has been slated to appear on “Meet the Press,” not as a paid NBC contributor, but as a former recently ousted RNC chair with the “Meet The Press” host, Kristen Welker, who’s preparing to have a real tough interview with Ronna McDaniel. Because of course, Ronna McDaniel was chair of the party and at Trump’s side as he tried to refuse his election loss. So this was supposed to be a showdown interview.

From NBC News in Washington, the longest-running show in television history. This is “Meet The Press” with Kristen Welker.

And here, all of a sudden, Kristin Welker is thrown for a loop.

In full disclosure to our viewers, this interview was scheduled weeks before it was announced that McDaniel would become a paid NBC News contributor.

Because now, she’s actually interviewing a member of the family who’s on the same payroll.

Right. Suddenly, she’s interviewing a colleague.

This will be a news interview, and I was not involved in her hiring.

So what happens during the interview?

So Welker is prepared for a tough interview, and that’s exactly what she does.

Can you say, as you sit here today, did Joe Biden win the election fair and square?

He won. He’s the legitimate president.

Did he win fair and square?

Fair and square, he won. It’s certified. It’s done.

She presses her on the key question that a lot of Republicans get asked these days — do you accept Joe Biden was the winner of the election?

But, I do think, Kristen —

Ronna, why has it taken you until now to say that? Why has it taken you until now to be able to say that?

I’m going to push back a little.

McDaniel gets defensive at times.

Because I do think it’s fair to say there were problems in 2020. And to say that does not mean he’s not the legitimate president.

But, Ronna, when you say that, it suggests that there was something wrong with the election. And you know that the election was the most heavily scrutinized. Chris Krebs —

It’s a really combative interview.

I want to turn now to your actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election.

And Welker actually really does go deeply into McDaniel’s record in those weeks before January 6.

On November 17, you and Donald Trump were recorded pushing two Republican Michigan election officials not to certify the results of the election. And on the call —

For instance, she presses McDaniel on McDaniel’s role in an attempt to convince a couple county commissioner level canvassers in Michigan to not certify Biden’s victory.

Our call that night was to say, are you OK? Vote your conscience. Not pushing them to do anything.

McDaniel says, look, I was just telling them to vote their conscience. They should do whatever they think is right.

But you said, do not sign it. If you can go home tonight, do not sign it. How can people read that as anything other than a pressure campaign?

And Welker’s not going to just let her off the hook. Welker presses her on Trump’s own comments about January 6 and Trump’s efforts recently to gloss over some of the violence, and to say that those who have been arrested, he’ll free them.

Do you support that?

I want to be very clear. The violence that happened on January 6 is unacceptable.

And this is a frankly fascinating moment because you can hear McDaniel starting to, if not quite reverse some of her positions, though in some cases she does that, at least really soften her language. It’s almost as if she’s switching uniforms from the RNC one to an NBC one or almost like breaking from a role she was playing.

Ronna, why not speak out earlier? Why just speak out about that now?

When you’re the RNC chair, you kind of take one for the whole team, right? Now, I get to be a little bit more myself.

She says, hey, you know what? Sometimes as RNC chair, you just have to take it for the team sometimes.

Right. What she’s really saying is I did things as chairwoman of the Republican National committee that now that I no longer have that job, I can candidly say, I wished I hadn’t done, which is very honest. But it’s also another way of saying I’m two faced, or I was playing a part.

Ronna McDaniel, thank you very much for being here this morning.

Then something extraordinary happens. And I have to say, I’ve never seen a moment like this in decades of watching television news and covering television news.

Welcome back. The panel is here. Chuck Todd, NBC News chief political analyst.

Welker brings her regular panel on, including Chuck Todd, now the senior NBC political analyst.

Chuck, let’s dive right in. What were your takeaways?

And he launches right into what he calls —

Look, let me deal with the elephant in the room.

The elephant being this hiring of McDaniel.

I think our bosses owe you an apology for putting you in this situation.

And he proceeds, on NBC’S air, to lace into management for, as he describes it, putting Welker in this crazy awkward position.

Because I don’t know what to believe. She is now a paid contributor by NBC News. I have no idea whether any answer she gave to you was because she didn’t want to mess up her contract.

And Todd is very hung up on this idea that when she was speaking for the party, she would say one thing. And now that she’s on the payroll at NBC, she’s saying another thing.

She has credibility issues that she still has to deal with. Is she speaking for herself, or is she speaking on behalf of who’s paying her?

Todd is basically saying, how are we supposed to know which one to believe.

What can we believe?

It is important for this network and for always to have a wide aperture. Having ideological diversity on this panel is something I prided myself on.

And what he’s effectively saying is that his bosses should have never hired her in this capacity.

I understand the motivation, but this execution, I think, was poor.

Someone said to me last night we live in complicated times. Thank you guys for being here. I really appreciate it.

Now, let’s just note here, this isn’t just any player at NBC. Chuck Todd is obviously a major news name at the network. And him doing this appears to just open the floodgates across the entire NBC News brand, especially on its sister cable network, MSNBC.

And where I said I’d never seen anything like what I saw on “Meet the Press” that morning, I’d never seen anything like this either. Because now, the entire MSNBC lineup is in open rebellion. I mean, from the minute that the sun comes up. There is Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.

We weren’t asked our opinion of the hiring. But if we were, we would have strongly objected to it.

They’re on fire over this.

believe NBC News should seek out conservative Republican voices, but it should be conservative Republicans, not a person who used her position of power to be an anti-democracy election denier.

But it rolls out across the entire schedule.

Because Ronna McDaniel has been a major peddler of the big lie.

The fact that Ms. McDaniel is on the payroll at NBC News, to me that is inexplicable. I mean, you wouldn’t hire a mobster to work at a DA’s office.

Rachel Maddow devotes an entire half hour.

It’s not about just being associated with Donald Trump and his time in the Republican Party. It’s not even about lying or not lying. It’s about our system of government.

Thumbing their noses at our bosses and basically accusing them of abetting a traitorous figure in American history. I mean, just extraordinary stuff. It’s television history.

And let’s face it, we journalists, our bosses, we can be seen as crybabies, and we’re paid complaining. Yeah, that’s what we’re paid to do. But in this case, the NBC executives cannot ignore this, because in the outcry, there’s a very clear point that they’re all making. Ronna McDaniel is not just a voice from the other side. She was a fundamental part of Trump’s efforts to deny his election loss.

This is not inviting the other side. This is someone who’s on the wrong side —

Of history.

Of history, of these moments that we’ve covered and are still covering.

And I think it’s fair to say that at this point, everyone understands that Ronna McDaniel’s time at NBC News is going to be very short lived. Yeah, basically, after all this, the executives at NBC have to face facts it’s over. And on Tuesday night, they release a statement to the staff saying as much.

They don’t cite the questions about red lines or what Ronna McDaniel represented or didn’t represent. They just say we need to have a unified newsroom. We want cohesion. This isn’t working.

I think in the end, she was a paid contributor for four days.

Yeah, one of the shortest tenures in television news history. And look, in one respect, by their standards, this is kind of a pretty small contract, a few hundred thousand dollars they may have to pay out. But it was way more costly because they hired her. They brought her on board because they wanted to appeal to these tens of millions of Americans who still love Donald J. Trump.

And what happens now is that this entire thing is blown up in their face, and those very same people now see a network that, in their view, in the view of Republicans across the country, this network will not accept any Republicans. So it becomes more about that. And Fox News, NBC’S longtime rival, goes wall to wall with this.

Now, NBC News just caved to the breathless demands from their far left, frankly, emotionally unhinged host.

I mean, I had it on my desk all day. And every minute I looked at that screen, it was pounding on these liberals at NBC News driving this Republican out.

It’s the shortest tenure in TV history, I think. But why? Well, because she supports Donald Trump, period.

So in a way, this leaves NBC worse off with that Trump Republican audience they had wanted to court than maybe even they were before. It’s like a boomerang with a grenade on it.

Yeah, it completely explodes in their face. And that’s why to me, the whole episode is so representative of this eight-year conundrum for the news media, especially on television. They still haven’t been able to crack the code for how to handle the Trump movement, the Trump candidacy, and what it has wrought on the American political system and American journalism.

We’ll be right back.

Jim, put into context this painful episode of NBC into that larger conundrum you just diagnosed that the media has faced when it comes to Trump.

Well, Michael, it’s been there from the very beginning, from the very beginning of his political rise. The media was on this kind of seesaw. They go back and forth over how to cover him. Sometimes they want to cover him quite aggressively because he’s such a challenging candidate. He was bursting so many norms.

But at other times, there was this instinct to understand his appeal, for the same reason. He’s such an unusual candidate. So there was a great desire to really understand his voters. And frankly, to speak to his voters, because they’re part of the audience. And we all lived it, right?

But just let me take you back anyway because everything’s fresh again with perspective. And so if you go back, let’s look at when he first ran. The networks, if you recall, saw him as almost like a novelty candidate.

He was going to spice up what was expected to be a boring campaign between the usual suspects. And he was a ratings magnet. And the networks, they just couldn’t get enough of it. And they allowed him, at times, to really shatter their own norms.

Welcome back to “Meet the Press,” sir.

Good morning, Chuck.

Good morning. Let me start —

He was able to just call into the studio and riff with the likes of George Stephanopoulos and Chuck Todd.

What does it have to do with Hillary?

She can’t talk about me because nobody respects women more than Donald Trump.

And CNN gave him a lot of unmitigated airtime, if you recall during the campaign. They would run the press conferences.

It’s the largest winery on the East Coast. I own it 100 percent.

And let him promote his Trump steaks and his Trump wine.

Trump steaks. Where are the steaks? Do we have steaks?

I mean, it got that crazy. But again, the ratings were huge. And then he wins. And because they had previously given him all that airtime, they’ve, in retrospect, sort of given him a political gift, and more than that now have a journalistic imperative to really address him in a different way, to cover him as they would have covered any other candidate, which, let’s face it, they weren’t doing initially. So there’s this extra motivation to make up for lost ground and maybe for some journalistic omissions.

Right. Kind of correct for the lack of a rigorous journalistic filter in the campaign.

Exactly. And the big thing that this will be remembered for is we’re going to call a lie a lie.

I don’t want to sugarcoat this because facts matter, and the fact is President Trump lies.

Trump lies. We’re going to say it’s a lie.

And I think we can’t just mince around it because they are lies. And so we need to call them what they are.

We’re no longer going to use euphemisms or looser language we’re. Going to call it for what it is.

Trump lies in tweets. He spreads false information at rallies. He lies when he doesn’t need to. He lies when the truth is more than enough for him.

CNN was running chyrons. They would fact check Trump and call lies lies on the screen while Trump is talking. They were challenging Trump to his face —

One of the statements that you made in the tail end of the campaign in the midterms that —

Here we go.

That — well, if you don’t mind, Mr. President, that this caravan was an invasion.

— in these crazy press conferences —

They’re are hundreds of miles away, though. They’re hundreds and hundreds of miles away. That’s not an invasion.

Honestly, I think you should let me run the country. You run CNN. And if you did it well, your ratings —

Well, let me ask — if I may ask one other question. Mr. President, if I may ask another question. Are you worried —

That’s enough. That’s enough.

And Trump is giving it right back.

I tell you what, CNN should be ashamed of itself having you working for them. You are a rude, terrible person. You shouldn’t be working for CNN.

Very combative.

So this was this incredibly fraught moment for the American press. You’ve got tens of millions of Trump supporters seeing what’s really basic fact checking. These look like attacks to Trump supporters. Trump, in turn, is calling the press, the reporters are enemies of the people. So it’s a terrible dynamic.

And when January 6 happens, it’s so obviously out of control. And what the traditional press that follows, traditional journalistic rules has to do is make it clear that the claims that Trump is making about a stolen election are just so abjectly false that they don’t warrant a single minute of real consideration once the reporting has been done to show how false they are. And I think that American journalism really emerged from that feeling strongly about its own values and its own place in society.

But then there’s still tens of millions of Trump voters, and they don’t feel so good about the coverage. And they don’t agree that January 6 was an insurrection. And so we enter yet another period, where the press is going to have to now maybe rethink some things.

In what way?

Well, there’s a kind of quiet period after January 6. Trump is off of social media. The smoke is literally dissipating from the air in Washington. And news executives are kind of standing there on the proverbial battlefield, taking a new look at their situation.

And they’re seeing that in this clearer light, they’ve got some new problems, perhaps none more important for their entire business models than that their ratings are quickly crashing. And part of that diminishment is that a huge part of the country, that Trump-loving part of the audience, is really now severed from him from their coverage.

They see the press as actually, in some cases, being complicit in stealing an election. And so these news executives, again, especially on television, which is so ratings dependent, they’ve got a problem. So after presumably learning all these lessons about journalism and how to confront power, there’s a first subtle and then much less subtle rethinking.

Maybe we need to pull back from that approach. And maybe we need to take some new lessons and switch it up a little bit and reverse some of what we did. And one of the best examples of this is none other than CNN.

It had come under new management, was being led by a guy named Chris Licht, a veteran of cable news, but also Stephen Colbert’s late night show in his last job. And his new job under this new management is we’re going to recalibrate a little bit. So Chris Licht proceeds to try to bring the network back to the center.

And how does he do that?

Well, we see some key personalities who represented the Trump combat era start losing air time and some of them lose their jobs. There’s talk of, we want more Republicans on the air. There was a famous magazine article about Chris Licht’s balancing act here.

And Chris Licht says to a reporter, Tim Alberta of the “Atlantic” magazine, look, a lot in the media, including at his own network, quote unquote, “put on a jersey, took a side.” They took a side. And he says, I think we understand that jersey cannot go back on him. Because he says in the end of the day, by the way, it didn’t even work. We didn’t change anyone’s mind.

He’s saying that confrontational approach that defined the four years Trump was in office, that was a reaction to the feeling that TV news had failed to properly treat Trump with sufficient skepticism, that that actually was a failure both of journalism and of the TV news business. Is that what he’s saying?

Yeah. On the business side, it’s easier call, right? You want a bigger audience, and you’re not getting the bigger audience. But he’s making a journalistic argument as well that if the job is to convey the truth and take it to the people, and they take that into account as they make their own voting decisions and formulate their own opinions about American politics, if tens of millions of people who do believe that election was stolen are completely tuning you out because now they see you as a political combatant, you’re not achieving your ultimate goal as a journalist.

And what does Licht’s “don’t put a jersey back on” approach look like on CNN for its viewers?

Well, It didn’t look good. People might remember this, but the most glaring example —

Please welcome, the front runner for the Republican nomination for president, Donald Trump.

— was when he held a town hall meeting featuring Donald J. Trump, now candidate Trump, before an audience packed with Trump’s fans.

You look at what happened during that election. Unless you’re a very stupid person, you see what happens. A lot of the people —

Trump let loose a string of falsehoods.

Most people understand what happened. It was a rigged election.

The audience is pro-Trump audience, was cheering him on.

Are you ready? Are you ready? Can I talk?

Yeah, what’s your answer?

Can I? Do you mind?

I would like for you to answer the question.

OK. It’s very simple to answer.

That’s why I asked it.

It’s very simple. You’re a nasty person, I’ll tell you that.

And during, the CNN anchor hosting this, Kaitlan Collins, on CNN’s own air, it was a disaster.

It felt like a callback to the unlearned lessons of 2016.

Yeah. And in this case, CNN’s staff was up in arms.

Big shakeup in the cable news industry as CNN makes another change at the top.

Chris Licht is officially out at CNN after a chaotic run as chairman and CEO.

And Chris Licht didn’t survive it.

The chief executive’s departure comes as he faced criticism in recent weeks after the network hosted a town hall with Donald Trump and the network’s ratings started to drop.

But I want to say that the CNN leadership still, even after that, as they brought new leadership in, said, this is still the path we’re going to go on. Maybe that didn’t work out, but we’re still here. This is still what we have to do.

Right. And this idea is very much in the water of TV news, that this is the right overall direction.

Yeah. This is, by no means, isolated to CNN. This is throughout the traditional news business. These conversations are happening everywhere. But CNN was living it at that point.

And this, of course, is how we get to NBC deciding to hire Ronna McDaniel.

Right. Because they’re picking up — right where that conversation leaves off, they’re having the same conversation. But for NBC, you could argue this tension between journalistic values and audience. It’s even more pressing. Because even though MSNBC is a niche cable network, NBC News is part of an old-fashioned broadcast network. It’s on television stations throughout the country.

And in fact, those networks, they still have 6:30 newscasts. And believe it or not, millions of people still watch those every night. Maybe not as many as they used to, but there’s still some six or seven million people tuning in to nightly news. That’s important.

Right. We should say that kind of number is sometimes double or triple that of the cable news prime time shows that get all the attention.

On their best nights. So this is big business still. And that business is based on broad — it’s called broadcast for a reason. That’s based on broad audiences. So NBC had a business imperative, and they argue they had a journalistic imperative.

So given all of that, Jim, I think the big messy question here is, when it comes to NBC, did they make a tactical error around hiring the wrong Republican which blew up? Or did they make an even larger error in thinking that the way you handle Trump and his supporters is to work this hard to reach them, when they might not even be reachable?

The best way to answer that question is to tell you what they’re saying right now, NBC management. What the management saying is, yes, this was a tactical error. This was clearly the wrong Republican. We get it.

But they’re saying, we are going to — and they said this in their statement, announcing that they were severing ties with McDaniel. They said, we’re going to redouble our efforts to represent a broad spectrum of the American votership. And that’s what they meant was that we’re going to still try to reach these Trump voters with people who can relate to them and they can relate to.

But the question is, how do you even do that when so many of his supporters believe a lie? How is NBC, how is CNN, how are any of these TV networks, if they have decided that this is their mission, how are they supposed to speak to people who believe something fundamentally untrue as a core part of their political identity?

That’s the catch-22. How do you get that Trump movement person who’s also an insider, when the litmus test to be an insider in the Trump movement is to believe in the denialism or at least say you do? So that’s a real journalistic problem. And the thing that we haven’t really touched here is, what are these networks doing day in and day out?

They’re not producing reported pieces, which I think it’s a little easier. You just report the news. You go out into the world. You talk to people, and then you present it to the world as a nuanced portrait of the country. This thing is true. This thing is false. Again, in many cases, pretty straightforward. But their bread and butter is talking heads. It’s live. It’s not edited. It’s not that much reported.

So their whole business model especially, again, on cable, which has 24 hours to fill, is talking heads. And if you want the perspective from the Trump movement, journalistically, especially when it comes to denialism, but when it comes to some other major subjects in American life, you’re walking into a place where they’re going to say things that aren’t true, that don’t pass your journalistic standards, the most basic standards of journalism.

Right. So you’re saying if TV sticks with this model, the kind of low cost, lots of talk approach to news, then they are going to have to solve the riddle of who to bring on, who represents Trump’s America if they want that audience. And now they’ve got this red line that they’ve established, that that person can’t be someone who denies the 2020 election reality. But like you just said, that’s the litmus test for being in Trump’s orbit.

So this doesn’t really look like a conundrum. This looks like a bit of a crisis for TV news because it may end up meaning that they can’t hire that person that they need for this model, which means that perhaps a network like NBC does need to wave goodbye to a big segment of these viewers and these eyeballs who support Trump.

I mean, on the one hand, they are not ready to do that, and they would never concede that that’s something they’re ready to do. The problem is barring some kind of change in their news model, there’s no solution to this.

But why bar changes to their news model, I guess, is the question. Because over the years, it’s gotten more and more expensive to produce news, the news that I’m talking about, like recorded packages and what we refer to as reporting. Just go out and report the news.

Don’t gab about it. Just what’s going on, what’s true, what’s false. That’s actually very expensive in television. And they don’t have the kind of money they used to have. So the talking heads is their way to do programming at a level where they can afford it.

They do some packages. “60 Minutes” still does incredible work. NBC does packages, but the lion’s share of what they do is what we’re talking about. And that’s not going to change because the economics aren’t there.

So then a final option, of course, to borrow something Chris Licht said, is that a network like NBC perhaps doesn’t put a jersey on, but accepts the reality that a lot of the world sees them wearing a jersey.

Yeah. I mean, nobody wants to be seen as wearing a jersey in our business. No one wants to be wearing a jersey on our business. But maybe what they really have to accept is that we’re just sticking to the true facts, and that may look like we’re wearing a jersey, but we’re not. And that may, at times, look like it’s lining up more with the Democrats, but we’re not.

If Trump is lying about a stolen election, that’s not siding against him. That’s siding for the truth, and that’s what we’re doing. Easier said than done. And I don’t think any of these concepts are new.

I think there have been attempts to do that, but it’s the world they’re in. And it’s the only option they really have. We’re going to tell you the truth, even if it means that we’re going to lose a big part of the country.

Well, Jim, thank you very much.

Thank you, Michael.

Here’s what else you need to know today.

[PROTESTERS CHANTING]

Over the weekend, thousands of protesters took to the streets of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem in some of the largest domestic demonstrations against the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since Israel invaded Gaza in the fall.

[NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

Some of the protesters called on Netanyahu to reach a cease fire deal that would free the hostages taken by Hamas on October 7. Others called for early elections that would remove Netanyahu from office.

During a news conference on Sunday, Netanyahu rejected calls for early elections, saying they would paralyze his government at a crucial moment in the war.

Today’s episode was produced by Rob Szypko, Rikki Novetsky, and Alex Stern, with help from Stella Tan.

It was edited by Brendan Klinkenberg with help from Rachel Quester and Paige Cowett. Contains original music by Marion Lozano, Dan Powell, and Rowan Niemisto and was engineered by Chris Wood. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly.

That’s it for “The Daily.” I’m Michael Barbaro. See you tomorrow.

• April 2, 2024   •   29:32 Kids Are Missing School at an Alarming Rate
• April 1, 2024   •   36:14 Ronna McDaniel, TV News and the Trump Problem
• March 29, 2024   •   48:42 Hamas Took Her, and Still Has Her Husband
• March 28, 2024   •   33:40 The Newest Tech Start-Up Billionaire? Donald Trump.
• March 27, 2024   •   28:06 Democrats’ Plan to Save the Republican House Speaker
• March 26, 2024   •   29:13 The United States vs. the iPhone
• March 25, 2024   •   25:59 A Terrorist Attack in Russia
• March 24, 2024   •   21:39 The Sunday Read: ‘My Goldendoodle Spent a Week at Some Luxury Dog ‘Hotels.’ I Tagged Along.’
• March 22, 2024   •   35:30 Chuck Schumer on His Campaign to Oust Israel’s Leader
• March 21, 2024   •   27:18 The Caitlin Clark Phenomenon
• March 20, 2024   •   25:58 The Bombshell Case That Will Transform the Housing Market
• March 19, 2024   •   27:29 Trump’s Plan to Take Away Biden’s Biggest Advantage

Hosted by Michael Barbaro

Featuring Jim Rutenberg

Produced by Rob Szypko ,  Rikki Novetsky and Alex Stern

With Stella Tan

Edited by Brendan Klinkenberg ,  Rachel Quester and Paige Cowett

Original music by Marion Lozano ,  Dan Powell and Rowan Niemisto

Engineered by Chris Wood

Listen and follow The Daily Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music

Ronna McDaniel’s time at NBC was short. The former Republican National Committee chairwoman was hired as an on-air political commentator but released just days later after an on-air revolt by the network’s leading stars.

Jim Rutenberg, a writer at large for The Times, discusses the saga and what it might reveal about the state of television news heading into the 2024 presidential race.

On today’s episode

Jim Rutenberg , a writer at large for The New York Times.

Background reading

Ms. McDaniel’s appointment had been immediately criticized by reporters at the network and by viewers on social media.

The former Republican Party leader tried to downplay her role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. A review of the record shows she was involved in some key episodes .

There are a lot of ways to listen to The Daily. Here’s how.

We aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication. You can find them at the top of the page.

The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Lisa Chow, Eric Krupke, Marc Georges, Luke Vander Ploeg, M.J. Davis Lin, Dan Powell, Sydney Harper, Mike Benoist, Liz O. Baylen, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Rachelle Bonja, Diana Nguyen, Marion Lozano, Corey Schreppel, Rob Szypko, Elisheba Ittoop, Mooj Zadie, Patricia Willens, Rowan Niemisto, Jody Becker, Rikki Novetsky, John Ketchum, Nina Feldman, Will Reid, Carlos Prieto, Ben Calhoun, Susan Lee, Lexie Diao, Mary Wilson, Alex Stern, Dan Farrell, Sophia Lanman, Shannon Lin, Diane Wong, Devon Taylor, Alyssa Moxley, Summer Thomad, Olivia Natt, Daniel Ramirez and Brendan Klinkenberg.

Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly. Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Paula Szuchman, Lisa Tobin, Larissa Anderson, Julia Simon, Sofia Milan, Mahima Chablani, Elizabeth Davis-Moorer, Jeffrey Miranda, Renan Borelli, Maddy Masiello, Isabella Anderson and Nina Lassam.

Jim Rutenberg is a writer at large for The Times and The New York Times Magazine and writes most often about media and politics. More about Jim Rutenberg

Advertisement

The issue of gay marriage remains controversial Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage Should gay marriage be legal

The issue of gay marriage remains controversial. Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage. Should gay marriage be legal?

Being at the modern and developing era, gay marriage has been a controversial topic since the last decades. While it can be seen as a natural trend and right of the people to choose this type of marriage, many others claim it has some certain adverse effects towards the society. Personally, I completely suppose that this trend will defimitly benefit the society. And, this essay below will explain and state more about my points of view. To begin with, gay marriage has caused emotional conflicts between supporters and non-supporters. In fact, having supports from the community, it is clear that gay persons will have more opportunities to make friends and find suitable partners leading to a happy life. If being able to live as their true themselves, they could be more productive and happier, that would eventually be beneficial for themselves and the society. For instance, when the two same genders come to creat a happy life together, they two can share, care or support to each other to be more perfect in both career and successful path. As for that result, many people advise others to choose the best thing in their journey life without having more pressures about gender-picking suitably as nature. Moreover, there are many a point which states that choosing the person who wants to share life with is one of the most important decisions that any of people have to make. There is not a true belief about the traditions or customs, because they have been handed down for many generations with the mondernized and civilized development. Through the certain observations and analysis, when people find that anything can be agreed with conductive reasons for the good and beneficial to the society, they could consider to accept and live up to. In conclusion, it would be beneficial for the whole community to support gay marriage and it should be made legal to enforce the people’s right to choose. As for all the mentioned benefits above, I strongly admit that gay marriage can be considered to put in legal for all the good.

• Log in or register to post comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors: Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3] Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider accepting'. Suggestion: consider accepting ...d beneficial to the society, they could consider to accept and live up to. In conclusion, it woul... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used: if, moreover, so, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech: To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words: No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK Chars per words: 4.89913544669 5.12529762239 96% => OK Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK Word Length SD: 2.64311166044 2.80592935109 94% => OK Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK Unique words percentage: 0.553314121037 0.561755894193 98% => OK syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by: Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted. Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences: How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK Sentence length SD: 38.4004809706 49.4020404114 78% => OK Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 106.682146367 114% => OK Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted. Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted. What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion: Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348778423101 0.244688304435 143% => OK Sentence topic coherence: 0.121693408119 0.084324248473 144% => OK Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104695574448 0.0667982634062 157% => OK Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229214517963 0.151304729494 151% => OK Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130772590551 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability: automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK What are above readability scores?

--------------------- Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100 Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9 --------------------- Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.