sleep deprivation effects essay

Problem of Sleep Deprivation Cause and Effect Essay

Introduction.

• What is Sleep Deprivation?

Causes of Sleep Deprivation

• Effects of Sleep Deprivation

Managing Sleep Deprivation

Works cited.

The functioning of the human body is influenced by a number of factors, which are mainly determined by the health status of an individual. Oftentimes, people seek medication when the body deviates from its normal and usual functioning mechanisms. Through different activities and processes, the body is able to use energy and replenish itself. Sleeping is one of the activities that has a direct effect on the functioning of the body.

This sleep deprivation essay explores how the functioning of the human body is influenced by various factors, primarily determined by an individual’s health status. While most people do not understand the implications of sleep, human effectiveness solely depends on the amount of time dedicated to sleeping. However, for various reasons, people fail to get enough sleep daily, weekly, or on a regular basis.

What Is Sleep Deprivation?

This cause and effect of sleep deprivation essay defines sleep deprivation as a condition occurring among human beings when they fail to get enough sleep. Sleep deprivation is defined as a condition that occurs when human beings fail to get enough sleep. Many experts argue that sleep deficiency is widespread even though most people do not consider it to be a serious issue, which affects their (Gaine et al.). Sleep deprivation has become a major problem in the United States, with almost 47 million suffering from the condition (Wang and Xiaomin). This lack of sleep can lead to a variety of physical and mental health issues, impacting daily functioning and quality of life.

The present essay about sleep deprivation defines sleep deprivation as a condition that occurs among human beings when they fail to get enough sleep. Many experts argue that sleep deficiency is widespread even though most people do not consider it to be a serious issue that affects their lives. Sleep deprivation has become a major problem in the United States, with almost forty-seven million suffering from the condition (Wang and Xiaomin). Among other reasons, one may get insufficient sleep in a day as a result of various factors. Some people sleep at the wrong time due to busy daily schedules, while others have sleep disorders, which affect their sleeping patterns. The following segment of the paper discusses the causes of deprivation.

Sleep deprivation may occur as a result of factors that are not known to the patients. This is based on the fact that sleep deprivation may go beyond the number of hours one spends in bed. In some cases, the quality of sleep matters in determining the level of deprivation.

In this context, it is possible for one to be in bed for more than eight hours but suffer from the negative effects of sleep deprivation. Whilst this is the case, there are people who wake every morning feeling tired despite having spent a recommended number of hours in bed (Griggs et al.14367).

Sleep deprivation can be caused by medical conditions, which may include but are not limited to asthma, arthritis, muscle cramps, allergies, and muscular pain. These conditions have been classified by researchers as common medical conditions that largely contribute to most of the cases of sleep deprivation being witnessed in the United States.

Similarly, these medical conditions have a direct impact on not only the quality but also the time one takes in bed sleeping. It is worth noting that sometimes people are usually unconscious to realize that their sleep is not deep enough (Wang and Xiaomin). This also explains the reason why it is not easy for a person to recall any moment in life when he or she moved closer to waking up.

Treatment of cases like sleep apnea is important because it affects the quality of sleep without necessarily awakening the victim. This is because medical surveys have revealed fatal effects of sleep apnea, especially on the cardiovascular system. Besides these, one is likely to experience breathing difficulties caused by insufficient oxygen.

Even though the treatment of sleep deprivation is important, it has been found that some drugs used to treat patients may worsen the case or lead to poor quality of sleep. It is, therefore, necessary for the doctor to determine the best drugs to use. Discussions between doctors and victims are imperative in order to understand patients’ responses (Conroy et al. 185).

Sleep deprivation is also caused by sleep cycle disruptions, which interfere with the fourth stage of sleep. Oftentimes, these disruptions are described as night terrors, sleepwalking, and nightmares.

Though these disorders are known not to awaken a person completely, it is vital to note that they may disrupt the order of sleep cycles, forcing a person to move from the fourth stage to the first one. Victims of these disruptions require attention in order to take corrective measures.

In addition, there are known environmental factors which contribute to several cases of sleep deprivation. However, doctors argue that the impact on the environment is sometimes too minimal to be recognized by people who are affected by sleep deficiency (Gaine et al.). In other words, these factors affect the quality of sleep without necessarily arousing a person from sleep.

Common examples include extreme weather conditions, like high temperatures, noise, and poor quality of the mattress. As a result, they may contribute to a person’s awakening, depending on the intensity when one is sleeping.

Moreover, the impact of these factors may develop with time, thus affecting one’s quality of sleep. In addition, most of the environmental factors that contribute to sleep deprivation can be fixed easily without medical or professional skills. Nevertheless, the challenge is usually how to become aware of their existence.

Lastly, sleep deprivation is caused by stress and depression, which have been linked to other health disorders and complications. Together with some lifestyles in America, these factors are heavily contributing to sleep deficiency in most parts of the world. Even though they might not be acute enough to awaken an individual, their cumulative effects usually become significant.

There are countless stressors in the world that affect youths and adults. While young people could be concerned with passing exams, adults are normally preoccupied with pressure to attain certain goals in life. These conditions create a disturbed mind, which may affect a person’s ability to enjoy quality sleep.

Sleep deprivation has a host of negative effects which affect people of all ages. The commonest effect is stress. Most people who suffer from sleep deficiency are likely to experience depression frequently as compared to their counterparts who enjoy quality sleep (Conroy et al. 188). As a result, stress may lead to poor performance among students at school.

Research has revealed that students who spend very few hours in bed or experience disruptions during sleep are likely to register poor performance in their class assignments and final exams. Additionally, sleep deprivation causes inefficiency among employees.

For instance, drivers who experience this disorder are more likely to cause accidents as compared to those who are free from it (Griggs et al.14367). This is based on the fact that un-refreshed people have poor concentration and low mastery of their skills.

Besides stress and anxiety, sleep deprivation has a wide-range of health-related effects. For instance, medical experts argue that people who spend less than six hours in bed are likely to suffer from high blood pressure. Quality sleep gives the body an opportunity to rest by slowing down the rate at which it pumps blood to the rest of the body (Wang and Xiaomin).

Inadequate sleep implies that the heart has to work without its normal and recommended rest. Additionally, sleep deprivation is known to affect the immune system. People who experience this disorder end up with a weakened immune system, leaving the body prone to most illnesses. This reduced immune response accumulates and may become fatal with time.

Sleep paralysis is also a common effect of inadequate sleep. This is due to disruption of the sleep cycle. It primarily occurs when the body is aroused during the fourth stage of the sleep cycle. In this case, the body is left immobile as the mind regains consciousness. Due to this conflict, one may experience pain and hallucinations.

Based on the negative effects of sleep deprivation, there is a need to manage this disorder among Americans. Firstly, it is necessary for people to seek medical advice concerning certain factors which could be contributing to this condition, like stress and infections (Wang and Xiaomin).

Proper counseling is also vital in stabilizing a person’s mental capacity. Physical exercises are also known to relieve a person from stressful conditions, contributing to sleep deficiency. Lastly, it is essential to ensure that the environment is free from noise and has regulated weather conditions.

Sleep deprivation remains a major problem in America, affecting millions of people. As discussed above, sleep deprivation is caused by a host of factors, ranging from environmental to health-related issues. Moreover, sleep deficiency has countless effects, most of which may become fatal in cases where the disorder is chronic.

Conroy, Deirdre A., et al. “ The Effects of COVID-19 Stay-at-home Order on Sleep, Health, and Working Patterns: A Survey Study of US Health Care Workers. ” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine , vol. 17, no. 2, Feb. 2021, pp. 185–91.

Gaine, Marie E., et al. “ Altered Hippocampal Transcriptome Dynamics Following Sleep Deprivation. ” Molecular Brain, vol. 14, no. 1, Aug. 2021.

Griggs, Stephanie, et al. “ Socioeconomic Deprivation, Sleep Duration, and Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. ” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 21, Nov. 2022, p. 14367.

Wang, Jun, and Xiaomin Ren. “ Association Between Sleep Duration and Sleep Disorder Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Stroke Among Adults in the United States .” Medical Science Monitor , vol. 28, June 2022.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, February 3). Problem of Sleep Deprivation. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sleep-deprivation/

"Problem of Sleep Deprivation." IvyPanda , 3 Feb. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/sleep-deprivation/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'Problem of Sleep Deprivation'. 3 February.

IvyPanda . 2024. "Problem of Sleep Deprivation." February 3, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sleep-deprivation/.

1. IvyPanda . "Problem of Sleep Deprivation." February 3, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sleep-deprivation/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Problem of Sleep Deprivation." February 3, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/sleep-deprivation/.

• The Influence of Sleep Deprivation on Human Body
• Sleep Deprivation and Specific Emotions
• How Sleep Deprivation Affects College Students’ Academic Performance
• Sleep Deprivation and Learning at University
• Effects of Sleeping Disorders on Human
• Sleep Deprivation and Insomnia: Study Sources
• Sleep Deprivation: Biopsychology and Health Psychology
• The Issue of Chronic Sleep Deprivation
• Sleep Deprivation: Research Methods
• How the Brain Learns: Neuro-Scientific Research and Recent Discoveries
• Parkinson's Disease Treatment Approaches
• Concepts of Batten Disease
• Dyslexia: Definition, Causes, Characteristics
• How Dysphagia Disorder (Swallowing Disorder) is Caused in Parkinson’s Disease

• Human Editing
• Free AI Essay Writer
• AI Outline Generator
• AI Paragraph Generator
• Paragraph Expander
• Essay Expander
• Literature Review Generator
• Research Paper Generator
• Thesis Generator
• Paraphrasing tool
• AI Rewording Tool
• AI Sentence Rewriter
• AI Rephraser
• AI Paragraph Rewriter
• Summarizing Tool
• AI Content Shortener
• Plagiarism Checker
• AI Detector
• AI Essay Checker
• Citation Generator
• Reference Finder
• Book Citation Generator
• Legal Citation Generator
• Journal Citation Generator
• Reference Citation Generator
• Scientific Citation Generator
• Source Citation Generator
• Website Citation Generator
• URL Citation Generator
• Proofreading Service
• Editing Service
• AI Writing Guides
• AI Detection Guides
• Citation Guides
• Grammar Guides
• Paraphrasing Guides
• Plagiarism Guides
• Summary Writing Guides
• STEM Guides
• Humanities Guides
• Language Learning Guides
• Coding Guides
• Top Lists and Recommendations
• AI Detectors
• AI Writing Services
• Coding Homework Help
• Citation Generators
• Editing Websites
• Essay Writing Websites
• Language Learning Websites
• Math Solvers
• Paraphrasers
• Plagiarism Checkers
• Reference Finders
• Spell Checkers
• Summarizers
• Tutoring Websites

Most Popular

Ai or not ai a student suspects one of their peer reviewer was a bot, how to summarize a research article, loose vs lose, how to cite a blog, apa paraphrasing, what a lack of sleep does to you essay sample, example.

Everyone has at least once in their lives stayed awake throughout an entire night. Usually, being up all night is a choice of high school or college students—commonly for partying; excessively responsible workers and workaholics also tend to spend sleepless nights working on their tasks. It is widely believed that, unlike insomnia (which means a regular lack of sleep), a couple of sleepless nights now and then cannot do much harm. Unfortunately, this is not true— being awake for 24 hours even once for a long period of time has unpleasant effects on health.

Everyone knows a night spent without sleep (or having little sleep) can result in fatigue and a bad mood in the morning; many would consider this a small price for a night of fun or productive labor. However, several sleepless nights can cause more serious mental effects. In particular, your ability to focus and to make decisions will decrease significantly; having a foggy brain and unclear thinking, as well as falling asleep mid-day are also among the possible negative effects. However, in a long-term perspective, the health effects are much worse: proneness to obesity, high blood pressure, heart diseases, diabetes, and so on (NHS).

Fatigue and sleepiness are just the tip of the iceberg. Specifically, experts from Sweden compared the effects of one-night sleep deprivation to a mild concussion. They conducted a study in which a group of healthy young men slept 8 hours one night, and then abstained from sleep another night. The blood samples taken from the men after the sleepless night revealed a 20% increase of neurochemical markers associated with brain cells damage (compared to the samples taken after the full rest night). “Dysfunctional sleep has been linked with a range of health problems, and it looks like that’s because we’re injuring our brain by not getting enough sleep,” says W. Chris Winter, M.D., medical director of the Martha Jefferson Sleep Medicine Center in Charlottesville, Virginia (Men’s Health).

At the same time, some results of the studies were surprising. According to new research, one night without sleep can increase the levels of dopamine in the brain—a substance responsible, in particular, for wakefulness. Scientists believe that by producing more dopamine, the brain tries to compensate for the negative effects of a sleepless night; still, according to the study, cognitive deficits caused by sleep deprivation remain significant. “[…] Dopamine may increase after sleep deprivation as a compensatory response to the effects of increased sleep drive in the brain,” says David Dinges, PhD, at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (ScienceDaily).

Abstaining from sleep has no positive effects on the human body. One-night deprivation of sleep results in fatigue and irritability; several sleepless nights affect one’s ability to concentrate and make decisions. Swedish experts compared the negative effects of the lack of sleep to a mild concussion, and although studies show that the brain tries to compensate the lack of sleep by producing more dopamine, it is still not enough to compensate the harm dealt. So, no matter what your reasons are to stay awake for a prolonged time, make sure to have a normal 8 hours sleep.

Girdwain, Jessica. “The Scary Side Effect of One Sleepless Night.” Men’s Health. N.p., 12 Jan. 2014. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.

“Why Lack of Sleep is Bad for Your Health.” NHS. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.

“One Sleepless Night Increases Dopamine in the Human Brain.”ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 21 Aug. 2008. Web. 11 Jan. 2016.

Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.

Comments (0)

Welcome to A*Help comments!

We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.

We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

More from Cause and Effect Essay Examples and Samples 2024

Jul 18 2023

How Your Childhood Affects Your Love Style Essay Sample Example

Apr 15 2019

How the Harry Potter Series Became So Popular Essay Sample, Example

Apr 05 2019

Why Our Ancestors Started to Walk on Two Feet Essay Sample, Example

Related writing guides, writing a cause and effect essay.

Remember Me

What is your profession ? Student Teacher Writer Other

Forgotten Password?

Username or Email

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Heart-Healthy Living
• High Blood Pressure
• Sickle Cell Disease
• Sleep Apnea
• Information & Resources on COVID-19
• The Heart Truth®
• Learn More Breathe Better®
• Blood Diseases and Disorders Education Program
• Publications and Resources
• Blood Disorders and Blood Safety
• Sleep Science and Sleep Disorders
• Lung Diseases
• Health Disparities and Inequities
• Heart and Vascular Diseases
• Precision Medicine Activities
• Obesity, Nutrition, and Physical Activity
• Population and Epidemiology Studies
• Women’s Health
• Research Topics
• Clinical Trials
• All Science A-Z
• Grants and Training Home
• Policies and Guidelines
• Funding Opportunities and Contacts
• Training and Career Development
• Email Alerts
• NHLBI in the Press
• Research Features
• Past Events
• Upcoming Events
• Mission and Strategic Vision
• Divisions, Offices and Centers
• Advisory Committees
• Budget and Legislative Information
• Jobs and Working at the NHLBI
• Contact and FAQs
• NIH Sleep Research Plan
• < Back To Sleep Deprivation and Deficiency
• How Sleep Affects Your Health
• What Are Sleep Deprivation and Deficiency?
• What Makes You Sleep?
• How Much Sleep Is Enough
• Healthy Sleep Habits

MORE INFORMATION

Sleep Deprivation and Deficiency How Sleep Affects Your Health

Language switcher.

Getting enough quality sleep at the right times can help protect your mental health, physical health, quality of life, and safety.

How do I know if I’m not getting enough sleep?

Sleep deficiency can cause you to feel very tired during the day. You may not feel refreshed and alert when you wake up. Sleep deficiency also can interfere with work, school, driving, and social functioning.

How sleepy you feel during the day can help you figure out whether you're having symptoms of problem sleepiness.

You might be sleep deficient if you often feel like you could doze off while:

• Sitting and reading or watching TV
• Sitting still in a public place, such as a movie theater, meeting, or classroom
• Riding in a car for an hour without stopping
• Sitting and talking to someone
• Sitting quietly after lunch
• Sitting in traffic for a few minutes

Sleep deficiency can cause problems with learning, focusing, and reacting. You may have trouble making decisions, solving problems, remembering things, managing your emotions and behavior, and coping with change. You may take longer to finish tasks, have a slower reaction time, and make more mistakes.

Symptoms in children

The symptoms of sleep deficiency may differ between children and adults. Children who are sleep deficient might be overly active and have problems paying attention. They also might misbehave, and their school performance can suffer.

Sleep-deficient children may feel angry and impulsive, have mood swings, feel sad or depressed, or lack motivation.

Sleep and your health

The way you feel while you're awake depends in part on what happens while you're sleeping. During sleep, your body is working to support healthy brain function and support your physical health. In children and teens, sleep also helps support growth and development.

The damage from sleep deficiency can happen in an instant (such as a car crash), or it can harm you over time. For example, ongoing sleep deficiency can raise your risk of some chronic health problems. It also can affect how well you think, react, work, learn, and get along with others.

Mental health benefits

Sleep helps your brain work properly. While you're sleeping, your brain is getting ready for the next day. It's forming new pathways to help you learn and remember information.

Studies show that a good night's sleep improves learning and problem-solving skills. Sleep also helps you pay attention, make decisions, and be creative.

Studies also show that sleep deficiency changes activity in some parts of the brain. If you're sleep deficient, you may have trouble making decisions, solving problems, controlling your emotions and behavior, and coping with change. Sleep deficiency has also been linked to depression, suicide, and risk-taking behavior.

Children and teens who are sleep deficient may have problems getting along with others. They may feel angry and impulsive, have mood swings, feel sad or depressed, or lack motivation. They also may have problems paying attention, and they may get lower grades and feel stressed.

Physical health benefits

Sleep plays an important role in your physical health.

Good-quality sleep:

• Heals and repairs your heart and blood vessels.
• Helps support a healthy balance of the hormones that make you feel hungry (ghrelin) or full (leptin): When you don't get enough sleep, your level of ghrelin goes up and your level of leptin goes down. This makes you feel hungrier than when you're well-rested.
• Affects how your body reacts to insulin: Insulin is the hormone that controls your blood glucose (sugar) level. Sleep deficiency results in a higher-than-normal blood sugar level, which may raise your risk of diabetes.
• Supports healthy growth and development: Deep sleep triggers the body to release the hormone that promotes normal growth in children and teens. This hormone also boosts muscle mass and helps repair cells and tissues in children, teens, and adults. Sleep also plays a role in puberty and fertility.
• Affects your body’s ability to fight germs and sickness: Ongoing sleep deficiency can change the way your body’s natural defense against germs and sickness responds. For example, if you're sleep deficient, you may have trouble fighting common infections.
• Decreases   your risk of health problems, including heart disease, high blood pressure, obesity, and stroke.

Research for Your Health

NHLBI-funded research found that adults who regularly get 7-8 hours of sleep a night have a lower risk of obesity and high blood pressure. Other NHLBI-funded research found that untreated sleep disorders rase the risk for heart problems and problems during pregnancy, including high blood pressure and diabetes.

Daytime performance and safety

Getting enough quality sleep at the right times helps you function well throughout the day. People who are sleep deficient are less productive at work and school. They take longer to finish tasks, have a slower reaction time, and make more mistakes.

After several nights of losing sleep — even a loss of just 1 to 2 hours per night — your ability to function suffers as if you haven't slept at all for a day or two.

Lack of sleep also may lead to microsleep. Microsleep refers to brief moments of sleep that happen when you're normally awake.

You can't control microsleep, and you might not be aware of it. For example, have you ever driven somewhere and then not remembered part of the trip? If so, you may have experienced microsleep.

Even if you're not driving, microsleep can affect how you function. If you're listening to a lecture, for example, you might miss some of the information or feel like you don't understand the point. You may have slept through part of the lecture and not realized it.

Some people aren't aware of the risks of sleep deficiency. In fact, they may not even realize that they're sleep deficient. Even with limited or poor-quality sleep, they may still think they can function well.

For example, sleepy drivers may feel able to drive. Yet studies show that sleep deficiency harms your driving ability as much or more than being drunk. It's estimated that driver sleepiness is a factor in about 100,000 car accidents each year, resulting in about 1,500 deaths.

Drivers aren't the only ones affected by sleep deficiency. It can affect people in all lines of work, including healthcare workers, pilots, students, lawyers, mechanics, and assembly line workers.

Lung Health Basics: Sleep

People with lung disease often have  trouble sleeping. Sleep is critical to overall health, so take the first step to sleeping better: learn these sleep terms, and find out about treatments that can help with sleep apnea.

The Effects of Sleep Deprivation

For this assignment, I have watched a TED Talk video in which Wendy Troxel explains the impact of the lack of sleep on teenagers. The author argues that the role of sleep is significantly underrated, which leads to many issues with health, both physical and mental (Troxel, 2016). I agree with this fact, as I have experienced the adverse effects caused by the lack of sleep myself. I regularly observe these effects in my classmates, which leaves me no doubt that this is indeed an epidemic, as Troxel stated in her TED Talk.

The effects of sleep deprivation are well-studied, however, they are often ignored by the majority during schedule planning. Shattuck et al. (2019) state that the lack of sleep leads to “adverse health outcomes, including weight gain and obesity, diabetes, hypertension, heart disease and stroke, depression, and increased risk of death” (p. 205). Chronic sleep deprivation increases the chances for severe mental issues, including dementia and Alzheimer’s’s disease (Bobić et al., 2016). and During the exams, sleep is always hard to come by for me. Due to the stress, I often find myself studying past my regular bedtime, sleeping for about 5 hours a day. While the effects of this behavior harmed my performance, I was unable to prevent myself from doing so.

If I had to define sleep without referencing other sources, I would say that it is a state of unconsciousness during which an organism restores its energy reserves over time. For humans, a complete sleep cycle improves cognitive abilities, decreases chances to develop conditions that plague modern society, lowers the occurrence of mental health disorders, and alleviates logistical issues. A full night’s sleep plays a crucial role in human development, and it is necessary for educational facilities to review their approach to schedule planning.

Bobić, T., Šečić, A., Zavoreo, I., Matijević, V., Filipović, B., Kolak, Z., Kes, V., Ciliga, D., & Sajković, D. (2016). The impact of sleep deprivation on the brain. Acta Clinica Croatica , 55 , 469-473. Web.

Shattuck, N. L., Matsangas, P., Mysliwiec, V., & Creamer, J. L. (2019). The role of sleep in human performance and well-being. Human Performance Optimization , 200-233. Web.

Troxel, W. (2016). Transcript of “Why school should start later for teens” . TED: Ideas worth spreading. Web.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2022, February 25). The Effects of Sleep Deprivation. https://studycorgi.com/the-effects-of-sleep-deprivation/

"The Effects of Sleep Deprivation." StudyCorgi , 25 Feb. 2022, studycorgi.com/the-effects-of-sleep-deprivation/.

StudyCorgi . (2022) 'The Effects of Sleep Deprivation'. 25 February.

1. StudyCorgi . "The Effects of Sleep Deprivation." February 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-effects-of-sleep-deprivation/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "The Effects of Sleep Deprivation." February 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-effects-of-sleep-deprivation/.

StudyCorgi . 2022. "The Effects of Sleep Deprivation." February 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-effects-of-sleep-deprivation/.

This paper, “The Effects of Sleep Deprivation”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: February 25, 2022 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
• v.3(5); 2007 Oct

Sleep deprivation: Impact on cognitive performance

Paula alhola.

1 Department of Psychology

Päivi Polo-Kantola

2 Sleep Research Unit (Department of Physiology), University of Turku, Turku, Finland

Today, prolonged wakefulness is a widespread phenomenon. Nevertheless, in the field of sleep and wakefulness, several unanswered questions remain. Prolonged wakefulness can be due to acute total sleep deprivation (SD) or to chronic partial sleep restriction. Although the latter is more common in everyday life, the effects of total SD have been examined more thoroughly. Both total and partial SD induce adverse changes in cognitive performance. First and foremost, total SD impairs attention and working memory, but it also affects other functions, such as long-term memory and decision-making. Partial SD is found to influence attention, especially vigilance. Studies on its effects on more demanding cognitive functions are lacking. Coping with SD depends on several factors, especially aging and gender. Also interindividual differences in responses are substantial. In addition to coping with SD, recovering from it also deserves attention. Cognitive recovery processes, although insufficiently studied, seem to be more demanding in partial sleep restriction than in total SD.

Introduction

A person’s quality of life can be disrupted due to many different reasons. One important yet underestimated cause for that is sleep loss ( National Sleep Foundation 2007 ). Working hours are constantly increasing along with an emphasis on active leisure. In certain jobs, people face sleep restriction. Some professions such as health care, security and transportation require working at night. In such fields, the effect of acute total sleep deprivation (SD) on performance is crucial. Furthermore, people tend to stretch their capacity and compromise their nightly sleep, thus becoming chronically sleep deprived.

When considering the effects of sleep loss, the distinction between total and partial SD is important. Although both conditions induce several negative effects including impairments in cognitive performance, the underlying mechanisms seem to be somewhat different. Particularly, results on the recovery from SD have suggested different physiological processes. In this review, we separately consider the effects of acute total and chronic partial SD and describe the effects on cognitive performance. The emphasis on acute total SD reflects the quantity of studies carried out compared with partial SD. The effects of aging and gender, as well as interindividual differences are discussed. We concentrate on the studies that have been published since 1990.

Sleep and sleep loss

The need for sleep varies considerably between individuals ( Shneerson 2000 ). The average sleep length is between 7 and 8.5 h per day ( Kripke et al 2002 ; Carskadon and Dement 2005 ; Kronholm et al 2006 ). Sleep is regulated by two processes: a homeostatic process S and circadian process C (eg, Achermann 2004 ). The homeostatic process S depends on sleep and wakefulness; the need for sleep increases as wakefulness continues. The theory for circadian process C suggests a control of an endogenous circadian pacemaker, which affects thresholds for the onset and offset of a sleep episode. The interaction of these two processes determines the sleep/wake cycle and can be used to describe fluctuations in alertness and vigilance. Although revised “three-process models” (eg, Akerstedt and Folkard 1995 ; Van Dongen et al 2003b ; Achermann 2004 ) have been suggested, this classical model is the principal one used for study designs in SD research.

There are many unanswered questions regarding both the functions of sleep and the effects of sleep loss. Sleep is considered to be important to body restitution, like energy conservation, thermoregulation, and tissue recovery ( Maquet 2001 ). In addition, sleep is essential for cognitive performance, especially memory consolidation ( Maquet 2001 ; Stickgold 2005 ). Sleep loss, instead, seems to activate the sympathetic nervous system, which can lead to a rise of blood pressure ( Ogawa et al 2003 ) and an increase in cortisol secretion ( Spiegel et al 1999 ; Lac and Chamoux 2003 ). Immune response may be impaired and metabolic changes such as insulin resistance may occur (for review, see Spiegel et al 2005 ). People who are exposed to sleep loss usually experience a decline in cognitive performance and changes in mood (for meta-analyses, see Pilcher and Huffcutt 1996 ; Philibert 2005 ).

Sleep deprivation is a study design to assess the effects of sleep loss. In acute total SD protocols, the subjects are kept awake continuously, generally for 24–72 hours. In chronic partial SD, subjects are allowed restricted sleep time during several consecutive nights. Although chronic sleep restriction is more common in the normal population and thus offers a more accurate depiction of real life conditions, total SD has been more thoroughly explored.

Cognitive performances measured in SD studies have included several domains. The most thoroughly evaluated performances include different attentional functions, working memory, and long-term memory. Visuomotor and verbal functions as well as decision-making have also been assessed. Sleep deprivation effects on cognitive performance depend on the type of task or the modality it occupies (eg, verbal, visual, or auditory). In addition, task demands and time on task may play a role. The task characteristics are discussed in more detail in following sections where the existing literature on the cognitive effects of SD is reviewed.

Mechanisms behind sleep loss effects

Some hypotheses are proposed to explain why cognitive performance is vulnerable to prolonged wakefulness. The theories can be divided roughly in two main approaches, in which SD is assumed to have (1) general effects on alertness and attention, or (2) selective effects on certain brain structures and functions. In addition, individual differences in the effects have been reported.

The general explanation relies on the two-process model of sleep regulation. Cognitive impairments would be mediated through decreased alertness and attention through lapses, slowed responses, and wake-state instability. Attentional lapses, brief moments of inattentiveness, have been considered the main reason for the decrease in cognitive performance during sleep deprivation (on lapse hypothesis, eg, Williams et al 1959, see Dorrian et al 2005 ; Kjellberg 1977 ). The lapses are caused by microsleeps characterized by very short periods of sleep-like electro-encephalography (EEG) activity ( Priest et al 2001 ). Originally, it was thought that in between the lapses, cognitive performance almost remained intact, but the slowing of cognitive processing has also been observed independent of lapsing ( Kjellberg 1977 ; Dorrian et al 2005 ). According to these hypotheses, performance during SD would most likely deteriorate in long, simple, and monotonous tasks requiring reaction speed or vigilance. In addition to the lapses and response slowing, considerable fluctuations in alertness and effort have been observed during SD. According to the wake-state instability hypothesis, those fluctuations lead to variation in performance ( Doran et al 2001 ).

According to explanations on selective impact, SD interferes with the functioning of certain brain areas and thus impairs cognitive performance. This approach is also referred to as the ‘sleep-based neuropsychological perspective’ ( Babkoff et al 2005 ). Perhaps the most famous theory in this category is the prefrontal vulnerability hypothesis, first proposed by Horne (1993) . It suggests that SD especially impairs cognitive performances that depend on the prefrontal cortex. These include higher functions, such as language, executive functions, divergent thinking, and creativity. In order to show the SD effect, the tests should be complex, new, and interesting. A good performance would require cognitive flexibility and spontaneity. This theory also assumes that the deterioration of subjects’ performance in simple and long tasks is merely due to boredom ( Harrison and Horne 1998 ; Harrison and Horne 1999 ; Harrison and Horne 2000 ). The specific brain areas that are vulnerable to sleep loss have been explored using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Those studies, however, have mainly measured working memory or other attentional functions with the type of tasks that are not traditionally emphasized in the prefrontal vulnerability hypothesis (for summary, see Chee et al 2006 ).

Individuals differ in terms of the length, timing, and structure of sleep. Therefore, it is logical to hypothesize that interindividual differences are also important in reaction to SD. Studies have consistently found that some people are more vulnerable to sleep loss than others (for review, see Van Dongen et al 2005 ). In reference to trait differential vulnerability to SD, Van Dongen et al (2005) have proposed the concept of the “trototype”, as compared to the terms “chronotype” and “somnotype”, which define interindividual differences in the timing of circadian rhythmicity and sleep duration. Since a comprehensive review of the interindividual differences in sleep and performance has been published recently ( Van Dongen et al 2005 ), we will focus here on the studies with group comparisons and just briefly address the trait-like vulnerability.

Acute total sleep deprivation

Attention and working memory.

The two most widely studied cognitive domains in SD research are attention and working memory, which in fact are interrelated. Working memory can be divided into four subsystems: phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, episodic buffer and central executive ( Baddeley and Hitch 1974 ; Baddeley 2000 ). The phonological loop is assumed to temporarily store verbal and acoustic information (echo memory); the sketchpad, to hold visuospatial information (iconic memory), and the episodic buffer to integrate information from several different sources. The central executive controls them all. Executive processes of working memory play a role in certain attentional functions, such as sustained attention ( Baddeley et al 1999 ), which is referred to here as vigilance. Both attention and working memory are linked to the functioning of frontal lobes (for a review, see Naghavi and Nyberg 2005 ). Since the frontal brain areas are vulnerable to SD ( Harrison et al 2000 ; Thomas et al 2000 ), it can be hypothesized that both attention and working memory are impaired during prolonged wakefulness.

The decrease in attention and working memory due to SD is well established. Vigilance is especially impaired, but a decline is also observed in several other attentional tasks ( Table 1 ). These include measures of auditory and visuo-spatial attention, serial addition and subtraction tasks, and different reaction time tasks ( Table 1 ). The most frequently used task is the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT, lasts usually 10 min) ( Dinges and Powell 1985 ), which is sensitive to sleep loss effects and provides information about both reaction speed and lapses. In working memory, the tests have varied from n-back style tasks with different demand levels to choice-reaction time tasks with a working memory component ( Table 1 ). However, some studies have also failed to find any effect. After one night of SD, no difference was observed between deprived and non-deprived subjects in simple reaction time, vigilance, or selective attention tasks in one study ( Forest and Godbout 2000 ). Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, a measure of frontal lobe function, also remained even ( Binks et al 1999 ; Forest and Godbout 2000 ). These results may be partly biased because of small sample sizes, inadequate control of the subjects’ sleep history or the use of stimulants before the study.

Cognitive tests in which deterioration of performance has been reported during acute total sleep deprivation

Abbreviations: SD, sleep deprivation; WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; WAIS-R, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised.

Outcomes are inconsistent in various dual tasks used for measuring divided attention. Sleep deprivation of 24 h impaired performance in one study ( Wright and Badia 1999 ), whereas in two others, performance was maintained after 25–35 h of SD ( Drummond et al 2001 ; Alhola et al 2005 ). The divergent findings in these studies may be explained by the uneven loads between different subtests as well as by uncontrolled practice effect. Although dividing attention between different tasks puts high demands on cognitive capacity, subjects often attempt to reduce the load by automating some easier procedures of a dual or multitask. In the study by Wright and Badia (1999) , the test was not described; in the study by Alhola et al (2005) , subjects had to count backwards and carry out a visual search task simultaneously, and in the study by Drummond et al (2001) subjects had to memorize words and complete a serial subtraction task sequentially. In addition, differences in essential study elements, like the age and gender of participants, as well as the duration of SD, further complicate comparison of the results.

In the tasks measuring attention or working memory, two aspects of performance are important: speed and accuracy. In practice, people can switch their emphasis between the two with attentional focusing ( Rinkenauer et al 2004 ). Oftentimes, concentrating on improving one aspect leads to the deterioration of the other. This is called the speed/accuracy trade-off phenomenon. Some SD studies have found impairment only in performance speed, whereas accuracy has remained intact ( De Gennaro et al 2001 ; Chee and Choo 2004 ). In others, the results are the opposite ( Kim et al 2001 ; Gosselin et al 2005 ). De Gennaro et al (2001) proposed that in self-paced tasks, there is likely to be a stronger negative impact on speed, while accuracy remains intact. In experimenter-paced tasks, the effect would be the opposite. However, many studies show detrimental effect on both speed and accuracy (eg, Smith et al 2002 ; Jennings et al 2003 ; Chee and Choo 2004 ; Habeck et al 2004 ; Choo et al 2005 ). The speed/accuracy trade-off phenomenon is moderately affected by gender, age, and individual differences in response style ( Blatter et al 2006 ; Karakorpi et al 2006 ), which could be a reason for inconsistencies in the SD results. It has been argued that low signal rates increase fatigue during performance in SD studies and that subjects may even fall asleep during the test ( Dorrian et al 2005 ). Therefore, tasks with different signal loads may produce different results in terms of performance speed and accuracy.

Long-term memory

Long-term memory can be divided between declarative and non-declarative (procedural) memory. Declarative memory is explicit and limited, whereas non-declarative memory is implicit and has a practically unlimited capacity. Declarative memory includes semantic memory, which consists of knowledge about the world, and episodic memory, which holds autobiographical information. The contents of declarative memory can be stored in visual or verbal forms and they can be voluntarily recalled. Non-declarative or procedural memory includes the information needed in everyday functioning and behavior, eg, motor and perceptual skills, conditioned functions and priming. In previous studies, long-term memory has been measured with a variety of tasks, and the results are somewhat inconsistent.

In verbal episodic memory, SD of 35 h impaired free recall, but not recognition ( Drummond et al 2000 ). The opposite results were obtained with one night of SD ( Forest and Godbout 2000 ). The groups in both studies were quite small (in Drummond’s study, N = 13; in Forest and Godbout’s study, experimental group = 9, control group = 9), which offers a possible explanation for the variation in results. In addition, Drummond et al (2000) used a within-subject design, whereas Forest and Godbout (2000) had a between-subject design. In visual memory, recognition was similar in the experimental and control groups when the measurement was taken once after 36 h SD ( Harrison and Horne 2000 ), whereas the practice effect in visual recall was postponed by SD in a study with three measurements (baseline, 25 h SD, recovery; Alhola et al 2005 ). Performance was impaired in probed forced memory recall ( Wright and Badia 1999 ), and memory search ( McCarthy and Waters 1997 ), but no effect was found in episodic memory ( Nilsson et al 2005 ), implicit memory, prose recall, crystallized semantic memory, procedural memory, or face memory ( Quigley et al 2000 ). In the studies failing to find an effect, however, the subjects spent only the SD night under controlled conditions ( Quigley et al 2000 ; Nilsson et al 2005 ).

Free recall and recognition are both episodic memory functions which seem to be affected differently by SD. Temporal memory for faces (recall) deteriorated during 36 h of SD, although in the same study, face recognition remained intact ( Harrison and Horne 2000 ). In verbal memory, the same pattern was observed ( Drummond et al 2000 ). One explanation may be different neural bases, which supports the prefrontal vulnerability hypothesis. Episodic memory is strongly associated with the functioning of the medial temporal lobes ( Scoville and Milner 2000 ), but during free recall in a rested state, even stronger brain activation is found in the prefrontal cortex ( Hwang and Golby 2006 ). It is unclear whether this prefrontal activation reflects episodic memory function, the organization of information in working memory, or the executive control of attention and memory. Recognition, instead, presumably relies on the thalamus in addition to medial temporal lobes ( Hwang and Golby 2006 ). Since SD especially disturbs the functioning of frontal brain areas ( Drummond et al 1999 ; Thomas et al 2000 ), it is not surprising that free recall is more affected than recognition.

Although the prefrontal cortex vulnerability hypothesis has received wide support in the field of SD research, other brain areas are also involved. For instance, the exact role of the thalamus remains unknown. Some studies measuring attention or working memory have noted an increase in thalamic activation during SD (eg, Portas et al 1998 ; Chee and Choo 2004 ; Habeck et al 2004 ; Choo et al 2005 ). This may reflect an increase in phasic arousal or an attempt to compensate attentional performance during a demanding condition of low arousal caused by SD ( Coull et al 2004 ). In other cognitive tasks such as verbal memory ( Drummond and Brown 2001 ) or logical reasoning ( Drummond et al 2004 ), no increase in thalamic activation was found despite the fact that behavioral deterioration occurred. This implies that thalamic activation during SD is mainly related to some attentional function or compensation, providing further support for the hypothesis that “prefrontal dependent” recall is more affected by SD than “thalamus dependent” recognition. However, it is possible that the brain activation patterns during SD reflect something more than merely different cognitive domains. Harrison and Horne (2000) stated that their results may also reflect the difficulty of the task assigned to subjects.

Other cognitive functions

Sleep deprivation impairs visuomotor performance, which is measured with tasks of digit symbol substitution, letter cancellation, trail-making or maze tracing ( Table 1 ). It is believed that visual tasks would be especially vulnerable to sleep loss because iconic memory has short duration and limited capacity ( Raidy and Scharff 2005 ). Another suggestion is that SD impedes engagement of spatial attention, which can be observed as impairments in saccadic eye movements ( Bocca and Denise 2006 ). Decreased oculomotor functioning is associated with impaired visual performance ( De Gennaro et al 2001 ) and sleepiness (eg, De Gennaro et al 2001 ; Zils et al 2005 ). However, further research is needed to confirm this explanation, since not all studies have found oculomotor impairment with cognitive performance decrements ( Quigley et al 2000 ).

Reasoning ability during SD has for the most part been measured with Baddeley’s logical reasoning task or its modified versions. Again the results are inconsistent (deteriorated performance was reported by Blagrove et al 1995 ; McCarthy and Waters 1997 ; Monk and Carrier 1997 , and Harrison and Horne 1999 ; no effects were noted by Linde and Bergstrom 1992 ; Quigley et al 2000 , or Drummond et al 2004 ). The studies reporting no effect have mainly used SD of ca. 24 h ( Linde and Bergström 1992 ; Quigley et al 2000 ), whereas in the studies showing an adverse effect, the SD period has been longer (36 h). Thus reasoning ability seems to be maintained during short-term SD. However, choosing divergent study designs may result in different outcomes. Monk and Carrier (1997) repeated the cognitive test every 2 h and found deterioration after as little as 16 h of SD. In the studies with zero-results, cognitive tests were carried out in the morning ( Linde and Bergström 1992 ; Quigley et al 2000 ) or the practice effect was not adequately controlled ( Drummond et al 2004 ). In the studies with longer SD, the tests have been conducted either in the late afternoon ( McCarthy and Waters 1997 ; Harrison and Horne 1999 ) or have been repeated several times ( Blagrove et al 1995 ; Monk and Carrier 1997 ). Therefore, the different results may reflect the effect of circadian rhythm on alertness and cognitive performance. In the morning or before noon, the circadian process reaches its peak, inducing greater alertness, whereas the timing of the circadian nadir coincides with the late afternoon testing (see Achermann 2004 ).

In addition to the cognitive domains already introduced, total SD affects several other cognitive processes as well. It increases rigid thinking, perseveration errors, and difficulties in utilizing new information in complex tasks requiring innovative decision-making ( Harrison and Horne 1999 ). Deterioration in decision-making also appears as more variable performance and applied strategies ( Linde et al 1999 ), as well as more risky behavior ( Killgore et al 2006 ). Several other tasks have been used in the sleep deprivation studies ( Table 1 ). For example, motor function, rhythm, receptive and expressive speech, and memory measured with the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery deteriorated after one night of SD, whereas tactile function, reading, writing, arithmetic and intellectual processes remain intact ( Kim et al 2001 ).

The adverse effects of total SD shown in experimental designs have also been confirmed in real-life settings, mainly among health care workers, professional drivers and military personnel ( Samkoff and Jacques 1991 ; Otmani et al 2005 ; Philibert 2005 ; Russo et al 2005 ). Performance of residents in routine practice and repetitive tasks requiring vigilance becomes more error-prone when wakefulness is prolonged (for a review, see Samkoff and Jacques 1991 ). However, in new situations or emergencies, the residents seem to be able to mobilize additional energy sources to compensate for the effects of tiredness. More recent meta-analysis shows that SD of less than 30 h causes a significant decrease in both the clinical and overall performance of both residents and non-physicians ( Philibert 2005 ).

What role does motivation play in cognitive performance? Can high motivation reverse the adverse effect of SD? Does poor motivation further deteriorate performance? According to a commonly held opinion, high motivation compensates for a decrease in performance, but only a few attempts have been made to confirm this theory. Estimating the compensatory effect of motivation in performance during SD is generally difficult, because persons participating in research protocols, especially in SD studies, usually have high initial motivation. The concept of motivation is closely linked to the “attentional effort” that is considered a cognitive incentive (for a review, see Sarter et al 2006 ). According to Sarter et al (2006) , “increases in attentional effort do not represent primarily a function of task demands but of subjects’ motivation to perform.” Furthermore, attentional effort is a function of explicit and implicit motivational forces and may be increased especially when the subjects are motivated or when they detect signals of performance decrements ( Sarter et al 2006 ).

Harrison and Horne (1998 , 1999) suggest that the deterioration of cognitive performance during SD could be due to boredom and lack of motivation caused by repeated tasks, especially if the tests are simple and monotonous. They used short, novel, and interesting tasks to abolish this motivational gap, yet still noted that SD impaired performance. In contrast, other researchers suggest that sleep-deprived subjects could maintain performance in short tasks by being able to temporarily increase their attentional effort. When a task is longer, performance deteriorates as a function of time. A meta-analysis by Pilcher and Huffcutt (1996) provides support for that: total SD of less than 45 h deteriorated performance more severely in complex tasks with a long duration than in simple and short tasks. Based on this, it is probably necessary to make a distinction between mere attentional effort and more general motivation. Although attentional effort reflects motivational aspects in performance, motivation in a broader sense can be considered a long-term process such as achieving a previously set goal, eg, completing a study protocol. If one has already invested a great deal of time and effort in the participation, motivation to follow through may be increased.

Different aspects of motivation were investigated in a study with 72 h SD, where the subjects evaluated both motivation to perform the tasks and motivation to carry out leisure activities ( Mikulincer et al 1989 ). Cognitive tasks were repeated every two hours. Performance motivation decreased only during the second night of SD, whereas leisure motivation decreased from the second day until the end of the study on the third day. The authors concluded that the subjects were more motivated to complete experimental testing than to enjoy leisure activities because by performing the tasks, they could advance the completion of the study. The researchers suggested that the increased motivation towards the tasks on the third day reflected the “end spurt effect” caused by the anticipation of sleep.

Providing the subjects with feedback on their performance or rewarding them for effort or good performance is shown to help maintain performance both in normal, non-deprived conditions ( Tomporowski and Tinsley 1996 ) and during SD ( Horne and Pettitt 1985 ; Steyvers 1987 ; Steyvers and Gaillard 1993 ). In a large study with 61 subjects (experimental group = 29), with SD of 34–36 h, and with a comprehensive test battery, the subjects were continuously encouraged and provided with 2–3 minute breaks between the tests ( Binks et al 1999 ). Furthermore, they were told they would receive a monetary award for completing all tests with “honest effort”. As result, no deteriorating effect on cognitive performance was found. Unfortunately, a non-motivated control group was not included and thus the effect of motivation remained uncertain. In general, since this issue has not been addressed sufficiently, it is difficult to specify the role of motivation in performance. It seems that motivation affects performance, but it also appears that SD can lead to a loss of motivation.

Self-evaluation of cognitive performance

It has been suggested that the self-evaluation of cognitive performance is impaired by SD. During 36 h SD, the subjects became more confident that their answers were correct as the wakefulness continued ( Harrison and Horne 2000 ). Confidence was even stronger when the answer was actually wrong. In another study, performance was similar between sleep-deprived and control groups in several attentional assessments, but the deprived subjects evaluated their performance as moderately impaired ( Binks et al 1999 ). The controls considered that their performance was high.

The ability to evaluate one’s own cognitive performance depends on age and on the study design. Young people seem to underestimate the effect of SD, whereas older people seem to overestimate it. In a simple reaction time task, both young (aged 20–25 years) and aging (aged 52–63 years) subjects considered that their performance had deteriorated after 24 h SD, although performance was actually impaired only in young subjects ( Philip et al 2004 ). When it comes to the study design and methodology, the way in which the self-evaluation is done may affect the outcome. The answers possibly reflect presuppositions of the subjects or their desire to please the researcher. The repetition of tasks is also essential. Evaluation ability is poor in studies with one measurement only ( Binks et al 1999 ; Harrison and Horne 2000 ; Philip et al 2004 ), whereas in repeated measures, the subjects are shown to be able to assess their performance quite reliably during 60–64 h SD and recovery ( Baranski et al 1994 ; Baranski and Pigeau 1997 ). Thus, self-evaluation is likely to be more accurate when subjects can compare their performance with baseline.

Chronic partial sleep restriction

Although chronic partial sleep restriction is common in everyday life and even more prevalent than total SD, surprisingly few studies have evaluated its effects on cognitive performance. Even fewer studies have compared the effects of acute total sleep deprivation and chronic partial sleep restriction. Belenky and co-workers (2003) evaluated the effect of partial sleep restriction in a laboratory setting in groups which were allowed to spend 3, 5 or 7 h in bed daily for seven consecutive days. The control group spent 9 h in bed. In the 3 h group, both speed and accuracy in the PVT deteriorated almost linearly as the sleep restriction continued. In this group, performance was clearly the worst. In the 5- and 7 h groups, performance speed deteriorated after the first two restriction nights, but then remained stable (though impaired) during the rest of the sleep restriction from the third night onwards. Impairment was greater in the 5- than 7 h group. Accuracy followed the same pattern in the 7 h group, but further declined in the 5 h group as the study went on. The control group’s performance did not change during the study. Intriguingly, a highly similar pattern was observed in another study with the same task when sleep was restricted by 33% of the subject’s habitual nightly sleep, which resulted in 5 h of sleep per night on average ( Dinges et al 1997 ). Both speed and accuracy were impaired at the beginning of the sleep restriction period followed by a plateau and finally, another drop after the seventh night of deprivation. However, no change was found in probed recall memory or serial addition tests, probably because of the practice effect and short duration of the tests (serial addition test: 1 min).

It is difficult to compare the effects of total and partial SD based on existing literature due to large variation in methodologies, including the length of SD or the type of cognitive measures. The only study that has compared total and partial SD found that after controlling learning effects, cognitive performance declined almost linearly in the course of the study in all four experimental groups ( Van Dongen et al 2003a ): one group was exposed to 3 nights total SD, and in other experimental groups, time in bed was restricted to 4 or 6 h for 14 consecutive days. The control group was allowed 8 h in bed for 14 days. Impairment in psychomotor vigilance test and digit symbol substitution task for the 4 h group after 14 days was equal to that of the total SD group after 2 nights. Deterioration in the serial addition/subtraction task for the 4 h group was similar to that of the total SD group after 1 night. The effect of 6 h restricted sleep corresponded to 1 night of total SD in psychomotor vigilance and digit symbol. Performance remained unaffected in the control group.

According to the well-controlled studies ( Dinges et al 1997 ; Belenky et al 2003 ; Van Dongen et al 2003a ), the less sleep obtained due to sleep restriction, the more cognitive performance is impaired. Otherwise, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the effects of chronic sleep restriction because of methodological problems in the previous studies. Blagrove et al (1995) compared subjects that slept at home either 5 h or 8 h per night for 4 weeks and found no effect in a short task of logical reasoning (duration 5 min). The statistical analyses were compromised by the small sample size (6 subjects in the experimental group and only 4 subjects in the control group). In another protocol, they also carried out auditory vigilance test, two column addition, finding embedded figures, and logical reasoning (10 min) tasks, and again no effect was observed with groups of 6–8 subjects having 4, 5 or 8 h sleep per night for 7, 19 or 40 weeks respectively ( Blagrove et al 1995 ). Casement et al (2006) reported no change in working memory and motor speed in the group whose sleep was restricted to 4 h per night for 9 nights. In the control group, performance improved. The study was carried out in a controlled clinical environment, but only one short test session per day was included, which means that subjects may have been able to temporarily increase their effort and thus maintain their performance. Furthermore, the results were confounded by the practice effect. In other sleep restriction studies, SD cannot be considered chronic, since the length of the restriction has been 1–3 nights ( Stenuit and Kerkhofs 2005 ; Swann et al 2006 ; Versace et al 2006 ).

Since chronic partial SD mimics every day life situations more than acute total SD, additional studies on how it affects cognitive performance are warranted. In addition, the tasks used in previous studies have been quite short and simple, and trials with more demanding cognitive tasks are required. The effects of sleep restriction have also been addressed by drive simulation studies, which are interesting and practical designs. Just one night of restricted sleep (4 h) increased right edge-line crossings in a motorway drive simulation of 90 minutes ( Otmani et al 2005 ). However, neither the drivers’ position in the lane nor the amplitude and frequency of steering wheel movements were affected. One sleep-restricted night did not increase the probability of a crash, but after five nights of partial SD, the quantity of accidents increased ( Thorne et al 1999 ).

Cognitive recovering from sleep deprivation

The recovery processes of cognitive performance after sleep loss are still obscure. In many SD studies, the recovery period has either not been included in the protocol or was not reported. Recovery sleep is distinct from normal sleep. Sleep latency is shorter, sleep efficiency is higher, the amounts of SWS and REM-sleep are increased and percentages of stage 1 sleep and awake are decreased ( Armitage et al 2001 ; Kilduff et al 2005 ). The characteristics of recovery sleep may also depend on circumstances and some differences seem to come with eg, aging ( Kalleinen et al 2006 ). Evidence suggests that one sleep period (at least eight hours) can reverse the adverse effects of total SD on cognition ( Brendel et al 1990 ; Corsi-Cabrera et al 2003 ; Adam et al 2006 ; Drummond et al 2006 ; Kendall et al 2006 ). The tasks have been mainly simple attentional tasks; for example, the PVT used by Adam et al (2006) has been proven to have practically no learning curve and little if any correlation with aptitude ( Durmer and Dinges 2005 ). Thus, it is likely that the improvement was mostly caused by the recovery process and not just the practice effect.

After chronic partial sleep restriction, the recovery process of cognitive functioning seems to take longer than after acute total SD. Performance in the PVT was not restored after one 10 h recovery night, but approached the baseline level after two 10 h nights in a study with seven consecutive sleep restriction nights with 5 h sleep/night ( Dinges et al 1997 ). Using the same test, three 8 h recovery nights were not enough to restore performance after one week of sleep restriction even in the group that spent 7 h time in bed (the study is explained in greater detail in paragraph 1 of “Partial sleep restriction”, Belenky et al 2003 ). The group that spent 3 h in bed showed the greatest decline as well as the greatest recovery, although it did not reach baseline level again. In the 5 h group, a similar deterioration-recovery curve was observed, although it was not as steep. Those authors concluded that during mild and moderate chronic partial SD, the brain adapted to a stressful condition to maintain performance, yet at a reduced level. This adaptation process was obviously so demanding that it postponed the restoration of normal functioning. According to their results, it could be further interpreted that when sleep restriction was severe, no such adaptation occurred, which in turn allowed for greater recovery. However, these results may be biased because of poor statistical sensitivity in multiple comparisons. They have also been criticized by eg, Van Dongen et al (2004) , who pointed out that another confounding factor may have been considerable interindividual differences in recovery rates. Since interindividual differences have been observed in response to SD, it is likely – although not yet adequately verified – that those individual traits also affect the recuperation.

Sleep deprivation in different populations

Sleep structure changes with aging. Slow wave sleep and sleep efficiency decrease, and alterations in the circadian rhythm occur (for reviews, see Dzaja et al 2005 ; Gaudreau et al 2005 ). Sleep complaints also become more frequent ( Leger et al 2000 ). Yet, during prolonged wakefulness, cognitive performance seems to be maintained better in aging people than in younger ones ( Bonnet and Rosa 1987 ; Smulders et al 1997 ; Philip et al 2004 ; Stenuit and Kerkhofs 2005 ). Total SD of 24 h deteriorated vigilance in young subjects (20–25 years), whereas performance in aging subjects (52–63 years) remained unaffected ( Philip et al 2004 ). Similarly, during three consecutive nights of partial SD (4 h in bed) performance in psychomotor vigilance task declined more in young subjects (20–30 years) than in aging ones (55–65 years, Stenuit and Kerkhofs 2005 ). In visual episodic memory, visuomotor performance and divided attention, aging subjects (58–72 years) were able to maintain their performance after 25 h of SD and showed improvement only after a recovery night ( Alhola et al 2005 ). However, no comparison with young subjects was made in that study.

Sleep deprivation deteriorates accuracy of performance, especially in young subjects ( Brendel et al 1990 ; Smulders et al 1997 ; Adam et al 2006 ; Karakorpi et al 2006 ). Regarding performance speed, however, results have been inconsistent and the performance of aging subjects has declined more, less, or equally compared to that of younger people. In simple and two-choice reaction time tasks as well as in a vigilance task, reaction speed was impaired in aging subjects (59–72 years) during 40 h SD, whereas young subjects (20–26 years) kept up their speed ( Karakorpi et al 2006 ). These results followed the speed/accuracy trade-off phenomenon so that aging subjects maintained accuracy at the expense of speed and the younger ones did the opposite. In contrast, two other studies found that young subjects were slower than aging subjects ( Brendel et al 1990 ; Adam et al 2006 ). During 24 h wakefulness, performance speed in a vigilance task was impaired in both 20- and 80-year-olds, but more so in the young subjects ( Brendel et al 1990 ). This was confirmed in another study with 40 h SD ( Adam et al 2006 ). When measuring reaction speed in three different choice-reaction time tasks, performance deteriorated similarly in young (18–24 years) and aging (62–73 years) subjects after 28 h total SD ( Smulders et al 1997 ).

Even though there is some evidence that older subjects tolerate SD better than young subjects, it is difficult to determine the age effect during SD with precision. However, because of age-related changes in many aspects of sleep and wakefulness, it is plausible that aging influences reactions to SD. As suggested previously, the weaker SD effect in aging may be due to attenuation of the circadian amplitude, which is reflected in the performance curve in vigilance tasks ( Blatter et al 2006 ). Also, changes in the homeostatic process may play a role. During wakefulness, the accumulation of sleep pressure seems to be reduced in aging ( Murillo-Rodriguez et al 2004 ), which could leave older subjects more alert. There is also evidence that aging subjects recover faster from SD than young subjects in terms of physiological sleep ( Bonnet and Rosa 1987 ; Brendel et al 1990 ). This faster recovery in sleep state may also mean better restoration of cognitive performance ( Bonnet and Rosa 1987 ; Brendel et al 1990 ). However, more research is necessary to confirm these hypotheses.

The age effect found in previous studies could also be explained by methodological factors, such as inadequate control of the baseline conditions. Younger subjects are usually more chronically sleep deprived ( National Sleep Foundation 2002 ) due to several reasons, such as studying, career building or raising children. Chronic sleep restriction may cause long-term changes in brain functions that are not reversible during short adaptation and baseline periods in sleep laboratory studies. Even though subjects of certain studies were instructed to maintain a regular 8 h sleep schedule for 3–5 days, this may not be enough to erase the previous “sleep debt” ( Brendel et al 1990 ; Philip et al 2004 ; Adam et al 2006 ). Furthermore, in the long run, people tend to get used to experiencing sleepiness ( Van Dongen et al 2003a ) and thus may not even recognize being chronically sleep deprived. Perhaps aging people also have more experience that helps them to cope with the challenges posed by SD. Nevertheless, based on the available studies, it is impossible to distinguish the factors behind the age effect.

There are dissimilarities between genders in sleep structure measured with polysomnography (for a review, see Manber and Armitage 1999 ). Furthermore, women of all ages report more sleeping problems than men ( Leger et al 2000 ). Sex hormones affect sleep through several mechanisms, both genomic and nongenomic, including neurochemical and vascular mechanisms (for a review, see Dzaja et al 2005 ). This ensures instant and short-term effects as well as long-term ones.

It is possible that physiological responses to SD are not equal among men and women. During SD of 38 h, EEG showed more sleep activity in men than in women during waking rest and cognitive performance ( Corsi-Cabrera et al 2003 ). Presumably, therefore, one recovery night of nine hours would be enough to restore waking EEG activity in men, but not in women. Only a few studies have examined gender differences in cognitive performance during SD. In a vigilance task, performance was more impaired in men but returned to the baseline level in both men and women after recovery sleep ( Corsi-Cabrera et al 2003 ). In another study, women performed better than men in verbal and in visuo-constructive tasks during 35 h SD ( Binks et al 1999 ). No gender differences were observed in word fluency, maintenance or suppression of attention, auditory attention or cognitive flexibility. In that study, however, only one point of measurement was included, and so the difference in performance could be caused by SD or initial distinctions between the gender groups.

Few attempts have been made to evaluate the effect of sex hormones on coping with SD. It has been suggested that hormone therapy, which is widely used for women during their menopausal transition to help alleviate climacteric symptoms, attenuates physiological stress response ( Lindheim et al 1992 ). However, after 25 h of total SD, no difference was observed between hormone therapy users and nonusers in visual episodic memory, visuomotor performance, verbal attention and shared attention ( Alhola et al 2005 ). In addition, during 40 h of SD, hormone therapy did not produce any advantage in reaction time or vigilance tasks ( Karakorpi et al 2006 ).

The previous studies suggest that women cope with continuous wakefulness better than men. According to evolution, the demands of child nurturing and rearing in women would support this hypothesis ( Corsi-Cabrera et al 2003 ), but that certainly does not constitute a comprehensive explanation today. Gender differences during SD could be due to either physiological or social factors. There are differences in the brain structure and functioning of men and women ( Ragland et al 2000 ; Cowell et al 2007 ). These can be seen in cognitive performance in normal, non-deprived conditions: men typically have better spatial abilities and mental rotation, and higher visuo-constructive performance, whereas women perform better in visuomotor speed and some verbal functions, especially verbal fluency (for a review, see Kimura 1996 ). Men and women also exhibit behavioral and lifestyle differences, which are mainly due to socialization and gender roles ( Eagly and Wood 1999 ). Current literature, however, provides only minimal evidence of differential effects during SD, and does not resolve the issue of sexual dimorphism in coping with SD.

Interindividual differences

Several studies provide evidence that during total SD, performance becomes more variable as assessed from the within-subject point of view (eg, Smith et al 2002 ; Habeck et al 2004 ; Choo et al 2005 ). This is considered to reflect the wake-state instability caused by prolonged wakefulness. However, Doran et al (2001) were probably the first to also examine between-subjects variability, which they found to increase in PVT as wakefulness was extended to 88 hours. They suggested that some people are more vulnerable to the effects of sleep loss than others, which could probably explain the lack of significant results in some group comparisons. These differences between subjects could have arguably been caused by differences in sleep history, but the sleep patterns for the preceding week were controlled with sleep diaries, actigraph, and calls to the time-stamped voice recorder.

The interindividual variability has been further examined with a thorough protocol where a three night study (baseline, 36 h SD and recovery) was carried out three times ( Van Dongen et al 2004 ). Sleep history was manipulated by instructing subjects to stay in bed for either 6 or 12 h per night for one week before the study. The 12 h procedure was repeated and the order of the conditions was counterbalanced. The cognitive test selection included serial addition/subtraction task, digit symbol, critical tracking, word detection, repeated acquisition of response sequences, and PVT. The authors concluded that interindividual differences were systematic and independent from sleep history. The trait-like differential vulnerability to sleep loss has received support from an fMRI study attempting to reveal the neural basis for the interindividual differences ( Chuah et al 2006 ). They used a go/no-go task to measure response inhibition after 24 h of sleep deprivation. The results indicated that the subjects less vulnerable to SD had lower prefrontal cortex activation at the rested wakefulness than the more vulnerable subjects. During SD, activation increased temporarily in the prefrontal cortex and in some other areas only in the less vulnerable subjects. Since interindividual differences have also been found in other sleep-related variables, such as duration, timing, and quality of sleep, sleepiness, and circadian phase ( Van Dongen 1998 ; Van Dongen et al 2005 ), it is plausible that the tolerance to SD may also vary. Nevertheless, more studies are needed for further support.

Methodological issues and common biases

Although the adverse effects of SD on cognitive performance are quite well established, some studies have failed to detect any deterioration. Inadequate descriptions of study protocols or subject characteristics in some studies make it difficult to interpret the neutral results. However, it is likely that such results are due to methodological shortcomings, such as insensitive cognitive measures, failure to control the practice effect or other confounding factors, like individual sleep history or napping during the study. Also, if the task is carried out only once during the SD period, the results may be influenced by circadian rhythm.

Sleep deprivation studies are laborious and expensive to carry out, which may lead to compromises in the study design: for example, a small sample size can reduce the statistical power of the study, but a larger population may come at the expense of other methodological issues, such as a reduction in the cognitive test selection or in the number of nights spent in the sleep laboratory. Comparison of the results is also complicated because the length of sleep restriction varies and the studies are designed either within- or between-subjects.

Sleeping in unfamiliar surroundings may impair sleep quality. An adaptation night at the sleep laboratory is used to minimize this first night effect. However, in several studies, this has been neglected and the SD period has been preceded by a “normal” night at home (eg, Harrison and Horne 2000 ; Jennings et al 2003 ; Choo et al 2005 ). Although sleeping at home certainly reflects a subject’s reality more accurately, it does not allow for precise control and information of sleeping conditions. Adding a portable recording, such as an actigraph, provides objective information about eg, bedtime and resting periods. In some studies, the first night in the sleep laboratory has been the baseline (eg, Drummond et al 2000 ; Forest and Godbout 2000 ; De Gennaro et al 2001 ; Drummond et al 2001 ), whereas others have included one adaptation night (eg, Casagrande et al 1997 ; Alhola et al 2005 ). Yet, it may be questionable to use data from the second night as the baseline because sleep quality can be better than normal due to the rebound from the first night. Accordingly, only data from the third night should be accepted, which has been the case in a few studies ( Thomas et al 2000 ; Van Dongen et al 2003a ). This, however, makes the procedure very hard. Furthermore, study protocols can be improved by adding an ambulatory EEG recording to confirm the wakefulness of the subjects during the study.

In sleep studies, a common pitfall is recruitment methods. Enrolment via advertisements or from sleep clinics favors the selection of subjects with sleeping problems or concerns about their cognitive performance. Thus, strict exclusion criteria regarding physical or mental diseases or sleeping problems are essential. Further, sleeping habits should be controlled to make sure that the subjects are not initially sleep deprived. For this, use of a sleep diary for eg, 1–3 weeks before the experiment (eg, De Gennaro et al 2001 ; Habeck et al 2004 ; Alhola et al 2005 ) or an actigraph is applicable ( Harrison and Horne 1999 ; Thomas et al 2000 ).

The use of medication or stimulants, such as caffeine, alcohol or tobacco, is often prohibited before the experiment (eg, Thomas et al 2000 ; Van Dongen et al 2003a ; Habeck et al 2004 ; Alhola et al 2005 ; Choo et al 2005 ). In some studies, the subjects have been required to refrain from these substances only 24 h before the study ( Habeck et al 2004 ; Choo et al 2005 ), which may increase withdrawal symptoms and dropping out of the study. Thus a longer abstinence, eg, 1–2 weeks, is more appropriate ( Van Dongen et al 2003a ; Alhola et al 2005 ).

A variety of cognitive tests, from simple reaction time measures to complex decision-making tasks requiring creativity and reasoning, have been used to evaluate the effect of SD on cognition. The greatest problem in repeated cognitive testing is the practice effect, which easily conceals any adverse effects of SD. Therefore, careful control over learning is essential. Cognitive processes are also intertwined in several ways, which makes it difficult to specify exactly which cognitive functions are utilized in certain performances. Because attention is involved in performing any cognitive task, a decrease in other cognitive domains during SD may be mediated through impaired attention. In complex tasks, however, applying previous knowledge and use of strategies or creativity may be more essential. Some studies have concentrated on neural correlates of cognitive functioning during continuous wakefulness. Both fMRI ( Portas et al 1998 ; Drummond et al 2000 ; Drummond et al 2001 ; Chee and Choo 2004 ; Habeck et al 2004 ; Choo et al 2005 ) and PET have been used ( Thomas et al 2000 ). Although these trials yield interesting information about brain functioning, the use of imaging techniques limits the selection of cognitive tests that could be carried out at the same time.

Dorrian et al (2005) have compiled a list of criteria for neurocognitive tests that would be suitable for investigating sleep deprivation effects. The criteria include psychometric quality, ie, reliability and validity, but the tests should also reflect a fundamental aspect of waking neurocognitive functions and it should be possible to interpret them in a meaningful way. The tasks should be repeatable, independent of aptitude, and they should be short with a high signal load. These criteria are not met in some studies. Dorrian et al (2005) also argued that vigilance is the underlying factor through which the sleep deprivation effects are mediated in all other tasks. However, although attention is needed to perform any task to some extent, the hypothesis that sleep deprivation can have an independent effect on other cognitive functions such as memory cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, when measuring other cognitive functions, the characteristics of the task should be considered carefully and, eg, for repeated measures of memory, parallel test versions should be used.

The negative effect of both acute total and chronic partial SD on attention and working memory is supported by existing literature. Total SD impairs a range of other cognitive functions as well. In partial SD, a more thorough evaluation of higher cognitive functions is needed. Furthermore, the effects of SD have not been thoroughly compared among some essential subpopulations.

Aging influences a person’s ability to cope with SD. Although in general the cognitive performance of aging people is often poorer than that of younger individuals, during SD performance in older subjects seems to deteriorate less. Based on the scarce evidence, it seems that in terms of cognitive performance, women may endure prolonged wakefulness better than men, whereas physiologically they recover slower. Tolerating SD can also depend on individual traits. However, mechanisms inducing differences between the young and aging and between men and women or different individuals are mostly unclear. Several reasons such as physiological mechanisms as well as social or environmental factors may be involved. In conclusion, there is great variation in SD studies in terms of both subject selections and methods, and this makes it difficult to compare the different studies. In the future, methodological issues should be considered more thoroughly.

• Achermann P. The two-process model of sleep regulation revisited. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004; 75 :A37–43. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Adam M, Retey JV, Khatami R, et al. Age-related changes in the time course of vigilant attention during 40 hours without sleep in men. Sleep. 2006; 29 :55–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Akerstedt T, Folkard S. Validation of the S and C components of the three-process model of alertness regulation. Sleep. 1995; 18 :1–6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• lhola P, Tallus M, Kylmälä M, et al. Sleep deprivation, cognitive performance, and hormone therapy in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2005; 12 :149–55. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Armitage R, Smith C, Thompson S, et al. Sex differences in slow-wave activity in response to sleep deprivation. Sleep Research Online. 2001; 4 (1):33–41. [ Google Scholar ]
• Babkoff H, Zukerman G, Fostick L, et al. Effect of the diurnal rhythm and 24 h of sleep deprivation on dichotic temporal order judgment. J Sleep Res. 2005; 14 :7–15. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ. Working memory . Academic Press; 1974. pp. 47–89. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4 :417–23. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baddeley A, Cocchini G, Della Sala S, et al. Working memory and vigilance: Evidence from normal aging and alzheimer’s disease. Brain Cogn. 1999; 41 :87–108. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baranski JV, Pigeau RA. Self-monitoring cognitive performance during sleep deprivation: Effects of modafinil, d-amphetamine and placebo. J Sleep Res. 1997; 6 :84–91. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baranski JV, Pigeau RA, Angus RG. On the ability to self-monitor cognitive performance during sleep deprivation: A calibration study. J Sleep Res. 1994; 3 :36–44. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Belenky G, Wesensten NJ, Thorne DR, et al. Patterns of performance degradation and restoration during sleep restriction and subsequent recovery: A sleep dose-response study. J Sleep Res. 2003; 12 :1–12. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Binks PG, Waters WF, Hurry M. Short-term total sleep deprivations does not selectively impair higher cortical functioning. Sleep. 1999; 22 :328–34. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Blagrove M, Alexander C, Horne JA. The effects of chronic sleep reduction on the performance of cognitive tasks sensitive to sleep deprivation. App Cogn Psych. 1995; 9 :21–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Blatter K, Graw P, Munch M, et al. Gender and age differences in psychomotor vigilance performance under differential sleep pressure conditions. Behav Brain Res. 2006; 168 :312–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bocca ML, Denise P. Total sleep deprivation effect on disengagement of spatial attention as assessed by saccadic eye movements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 117 :894–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bonnet MH, Rosa RR. Sleep and performance in young adults and older normals and insomniacs during acute sleep loss and recovery. Biol Psychol. 1987; 25 :153–72. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Brendel DH, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Jennings JR, et al. Sleep stage physiology, mood, and vigilance responses to total sleep deprivation in healthy 80-year-olds and 20-year-olds. Psychophysiology. 1990; 27 :677–85. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Carskadon MA, Dement WC. Normal human sleep: An overview. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. pp. 13–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Casagrande M, Violani C, Curcio G, et al. Assessing vigilance through a brief pencil and paper letter cancellation task (LCT): Effects of one night of sleep deprivation and of the time of day. Ergonomics. 1997; 40 :613–30. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Casement MD, Broussard JL, Mullington JM, et al. The contribution of sleep to improvements in working memory scanning speed: A study of prolonged sleep restriction. Biol Psychol. 2006; 72 :208–12. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chee MW, Choo WC. Functional imaging of working memory after 24 hr of total sleep deprivation. J Neurosci. 2004; 24 :4560–7. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chee MW, Chuah LY, Venkatraman V, et al. Functional imaging of working memory following normal sleep and after 24 and 35 h of sleep deprivation: Correlations of fronto-parietal activation with performance. Neuroimage. 2006; 31 :419–28. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Choo WC, Lee WW, Venkatraman V, et al. Dissociation of cortical regions modulated by both working memory load and sleep deprivation and by sleep deprivation alone. Neuroimage. 2005; 25 :579–87. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chuah YM, Venkatraman V, Dinges DF, et al. The neural basis of interindividual variability in inhibitory efficiency after sleep deprivation. J Neurosci. 2006; 26 :7156–62. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Corsi-Cabrera M, Sanchez AI, del-Rio-Portilla Y, et al. Effect of 38 h of total sleep deprivation on the waking EEG in women: Sex differences. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003; 50 :213–24. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Coull JT, Jones MEP, Egan TD, et al. Attentional effects of nor-adrenaline vary with arousal level: Selective activation of thalamic pulvinar in humans. NeuroImage. 2004/5; 22 :315–22. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cowell PE, Sluming VA, Wilkinson ID, et al. Effects of sex and age on regional prefrontal brain volume in two human cohorts. Eur J Neurosci. 2007; 25 :307–18. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• De Gennaro L, Ferrara M, Curcio G, et al. Visual search performance across 40 h of continuous wakefulness: Measures of speed and accuracy and relation with oculomotor performance. Physiol Behav. 2001; 74 :197–204. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dinges DF, Douglas SD, Zaugg L, et al. Leukocytosis and natural killer cell function parallel neurobehavioral fatigue induced by 64 hours of sleep deprivation. J Clin Invest. 1994; 93 :1930–9. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dinges DF, Pack F, Williams K, et al. Cumulative sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor vigilance performance decrements during a week of sleep restricted to 4–5 hours per night. Sleep. 1997; 20 :267–77. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dinges DF, Powell JW. Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations. Behav Res Meth Instr Comp. 1985; 17 :652–5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Doran SM, Van Dongen HP, Dinges DF. Sustained attention performance during sleep deprivation: Evidence of state instability. Arch Ital Biol. 2001; 139 :253–67. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dorrian J, Rogers NL, Dinges DF. Psychomotor vigilance performance: Neurocognitive assay sensitive to sleep loss. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005. pp. 39–70. [ Google Scholar ]
• Drummond SP, Brown GG. The effects of total sleep deprivation on cerebral responses to cognitive performance. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001; 25 :S68–73. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Drummond SP, Brown GG, Gillin JC, et al. Altered brain response to verbal learning following sleep deprivation. Nature. 2000; 403 :655–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Drummond SP, Brown GG, Salamat JS, et al. Increasing task difficulty facilitates the cerebral compensatory response to total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2004; 27 :445–51. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Drummond SP, Brown GG, Stricker JL, et al. Sleep deprivation-induced reduction in cortical functional response to serial subtraction. Neuroreport. 1999; 10 :3745–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Drummond SP, Gillin JC, Brown GG. Increased cerebral response during a divided attention task following sleep deprivation. J Sleep Res. 2001; 10 :85–92. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Drummond SP, Paulus MP, Tapert SF. Effects of two nights sleep deprivation and two nights recovery sleep on response inhibition. J Sleep Res. 2006; 15 :261–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Durmer JS, Dinges DF. Neurocognitive consequences of sleep deprivation. Semin Neurol. 2005; 25 :117–29. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dzaja A, Arber S, Hislop J, et al. Women’s sleep in health and disease. J Psychiatr Res. 2005; 39 :55–76. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Eagly AH, Wood W. The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles. Am Psychol. 1999; 54 :408–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Forest G, Godbout R. Effects of sleep deprivation on performance and EEG spectral analysis in young adults. Brain Cogn. 2000; 43 :195–200. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Frey DJ, Badia P, Wright KP., Jr Inter- and intra-individual variability in performance near the circadian nadir during sleep deprivation. J Sleep Res. 2004; 13 :305–15. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gaudreau H, Carrier J, Tchiteya B. Age and individual determinants of sleep loss effects. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005. pp. 441–479. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gosselin A, De Koninck J, Campbell KB. Total sleep deprivation and novelty processing: Implications for frontal lobe functioning. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116 :211–22. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Graw P, Krauchi K, Knoblauch V, et al. Circadian and wake-dependent modulation of fastest and slowest reaction times during the psychomotor vigilance task. Physiol Behav. 2004; 80 :695–701. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Habeck C, Rakitin BC, Moeller J, et al. An event-related fMRI study of the neurobehavioral impact of sleep deprivation on performance of a delayed-match-to-sample task. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 18 :306–21. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison Y, Espelid E. Loss of negative priming following sleep deprivation. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004; 57 :437–46. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison Y, Horne JA. Sleep loss and temporal memory. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000; 53 :271–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison Y, Horne JA. One night of sleep loss impairs innovative thinking and flexible decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999; 78 :128–45. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison Y, Horne JA. Sleep loss impairs short and novel language tasks having a prefrontal focus. J Sleep Res. 1998; 7 :95–100. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison Y, Horne JA, Rothwell A. Prefrontal neuropsychological effects of sleep deprivation in young adults–a model for healthy aging? Sleep. 2000; 23 :1067–73. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heuer H, Klein W. One night of total sleep deprivation impairs implicit learning in the serial reaction task, but not the behavioral expression of knowledge. Neuropsychology. 2003; 17 :507–16. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heuer H, Kleinsorge T, Klein W, et al. Total sleep deprivation increases the costs of shifting between simple cognitive tasks. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2004; 117 :29–64. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heuer H, Kohlisch O, Klein W. The effects of total sleep deprivation on the generation of random sequences of key-presses, numbers and nouns. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005; 58 :275–307. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heuer H, Spijkers W, Kiesswetter E, et al. Effects of sleep loss, time of day, and extended mental work on implicit and explicit learning of sequences. J Exp Psychol Appl. 1998; 4 :139–62. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Horne JA. Human sleep, sleep loss and behaviour. implications for the prefrontal cortex and psychiatric disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 1993; 162 :413–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Horne JA, Pettitt AN. High incentive effects on vigilance performance during 72 hours of total sleep deprivation. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1985; 58 :123–39. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hwang DY, Golby AJ. The brain basis for episodic memory: Insights from functional MRI, intracranial EEG, and patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2006; 8 :115–26. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jennings JR, Monk TH, van der Molen MW. Sleep deprivation influences some but not all processes of supervisory attention. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14 :473–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnsen BH, Laberg JC, Eid J, et al. Dichotic listening and sleep deprivation: Vigilance effects. Scand J Psychol. 2002; 43 :413–17. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kalleinen N, Polo O, Himanen SL, et al. Sleep deprivation and hormone therapy in postmenopausal women. Sleep Med. 2006; 7 :436–47. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Karakorpi M, Alhola P, Urrila AS, et al. Hormone treatment gives no benefit against cognitive changes caused by acute sleep deprivation in postmenopausal women. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006; 31 :2079–88. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kendall AP, Kautz MA, Russo MB, et al. Effects of sleep deprivation on lateral visual attention. Int J Neurosci. 2006; 116 :1125–38. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kilduff TS, Kushida CA, Terao A. Recovery from sleep deprivation. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005. pp. 485–502. [ Google Scholar ]
• Killgore WD, Balkin TJ, Wesensten NJ. Impaired decision making following 49 h of sleep deprivation. J Sleep Res. 2006; 15 :7–13. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim DJ, Lee HP, Kim MS, et al. The effect of total sleep deprivation on cognitive functions in normal adult male subjects. Int J Neurosci. 2001; 109 :127–37. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kimura D. Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influence human cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996; 6 :259–63. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kjellberg A. Sleep deprivation and some aspects of performance. II. lapses and other attentional effects. Waking Sleeping. 1977; 1 :145–8. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kripke DF, Garfinkel L, Wingard DL, et al. Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002; 59 :131–6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kronholm E, Harma M, Hublin C, et al. Self-reported sleep duration in finnish general population. J Sleep Res. 2006; 15 :276–90. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lac G, Chamoux A. Elevated salivary cortisol levels as a result of sleep deprivation in a shift worker. Occup Med (Lond) 2003; 53 :143–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee HJ, Kim L, Suh KY. Cognitive deterioration and changes of P300 during total sleep deprivation. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003; 57 :490–6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Leger D, Guilleminault C, Dreyfus JP, et al. Prevalence of insomnia in a survey of 12,778 adults in france. J Sleep Res. 2000; 9 :35–42. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Linde L, Bergstrom M. The effect of one night without sleep on problem-solving and immediate recall. Psychol Res. 1992; 54 :127–36. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Linde L, Edland A, Bergström M. Auditory attention and multi-attribute decision-making during a 33 h sleep-deprivation period: Mean performance and between-subject dispersions. Ergonomics. 1999; 42 :696–713. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lindheim SR, Legro RS, Bernstein L, et al. Behavioral stress responses in premenopausal and postmenopausal women and the effects of estrogen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167 :1831–6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Manber R, Armitage R. Sex, steroids, and sleep: A review. Sleep. 1999; 22 :540–55. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Maquet P. The role of sleep in learning and memory. Science. 2001; 294 :1048–52. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McCarthy ME, Waters WF. Decreased attentional responsivity during sleep deprivation: Orienting response latency, amplitude, and habituation. Sleep. 1997; 20 :115–23. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mikulincer M, Babkoff H, Caspy T, et al. The effects of 72 hours of sleep loss on psychological variables. Br J Psychol. 1989; 80 (Pt 2):145–62. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Monk TH, Carrier J. Speed of mental processing in the middle of the night. Sleep. 1997; 20 :399–401. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mu Q, Nahas Z, Johnson KA, et al. Decreased cortical response to verbal working memory following sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2005; 28 :55–67. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Murillo-Rodriguez E, Blanco-Centurion C, Gerashchenko D, et al. The diurnal rhythm of adenosine levels in the basal forebrain of young and old rats. Neuroscience. 2004; 123 :361–70. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Naghavi HR, Nyberg L. Common fronto-parietal activity in attention, memory, and consciousness: Shared demands on integration? Conscious Cogn. 2005; 14 :390–425. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• National Sleep Foundation. “Sleep in America” poll. 2007. [Accessed 8 March 2007]. pp. 1–52. URL: http://www.sleepfoundation.org .
• National Sleep Foundation. “Sleep in America” poll. 2002. [Accessed 6 September 2006]. pp. 1–44. URL: http://www.sleepfoundation.org .
• Nilsson JP, Soderstrom M, Karlsson AU, et al. Less effective executive functioning after one night’s sleep deprivation. J Sleep Res. 2005; 14 :1–6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ogawa Y, Kanbayashi T, Saito Y, et al. Total sleep deprivation elevates blood pressure through arterial baroreflex resetting: A study with microneurographic technique. Sleep. 2003; 26 :986–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Otmani S, Pebayle T, Roge J, et al. Effect of driving duration and partial sleep deprivation on subsequent alertness and performance of car drivers. Physiol Behav. 2005; 84 :715–24. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Philibert I. Sleep loss and performance in residents and nonphysicians; a meta-analytic examination. Sleep. 2005; 28 :1393–402. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Philip P, Taillard J, Sagaspe P, et al. Age, performance and sleep deprivation. J Sleep Res. 2004; 13 :105–10. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pilcher JJ, Huffcutt AI. Effects of sleep deprivation on performance: A meta-analysis. Sleep. 1996; 19 :318–26. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Portas CM, Rees G, Howseman AM, et al. A specific role for the thalamus in mediating the interaction of attention and arousal in humans. J Neurosci. 1998; 18 :8979–89. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Priest B, Brichard C, Aubert G, et al. Microsleep during a simplified maintenance of wakefulness test. A validation study of the OSLER test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 163 :1619–25. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Quigley N, Green JF, Morgan D, et al. The effect of sleep deprivation on memory and psychomotor function in healthy volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2000; 15 :171–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ragland JD, Coleman AR, Gur RC, et al. Sex differences in brain-behavior relationships between verbal episodic memory and resting regional cerebral blood flow. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38 :451–61. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raidy DJ, Scharff LF. Effects of sleep deprivation on auditory and visual memory tasks. Percept Mot Skills. 2005; 101 :451–67. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rinkenauer G, Osman A, Ulrich R, et al. On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004; 133 :261–82. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Russo MB, Kendall AP, Johnson DE, et al. Visual perception, psychomotor performance, and complex motor performance during an overnight air refueling simulated flight. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005; 76 :C92–103. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sagaspe P, Sanchez-Ortuno M, Charles A, et al. Effects of sleep deprivation on color-word, emotional, and specific stroop interference and on self-reported anxiety. Brain Cogn. 2006; 60 :76–87. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Samkoff JS, Jacques CH. A review of studies concerning effects of sleep deprivation and fatigue on residents’ performance. Acad Med. 1991; 66 :687–93. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sarter M, Gehring WJ, Kozak R. More attention must be paid: The neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2006; 51 :145–60. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Scoville WB, Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. 1957. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000; 12 :103–13. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shneerson JM. Handbook of sleep medicine. Cambridge: Blackwell Science; 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith ME, McEvoy LK, Gevins A. The impact of moderate sleep loss on neurophysiologic signals during working-memory task performance. Sleep. 2002; 25 :784–94. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Smulders FT, Kenemans JL, Jonkman LM, et al. The effects of sleep loss on task performance and the electroencephalogram in young and elderly subjects. Biol Psychol. 1997; 45 :217–39. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Spiegel K, Knutson K, Leproult R, et al. Sleep loss: A novel risk factor for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol. 2005; 99 :2008–19. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet. 1999; 354 :1435–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stenuit P, Kerkhofs M. Age modulates the effects of sleep restriction in women. Sleep. 2005; 28 :1284–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Steyvers FJ. The influence of sleep deprivation and knowledge of results on perceptual encoding. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1987; 66 :173–87. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Steyvers FJ, Gaillard AW. The effects of sleep deprivation and incentives on human performance. Psychol Res. 1993; 55 :64–70. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stickgold R. Sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Nature. 2005; 437 :1272–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Strangman G, Thompson JH, Strauss MM, et al. Functional brain imaging of a complex navigation task following one night of total sleep deprivation: A preliminary study. J Sleep Res. 2005; 14 :369–75. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Swann CE, Yelland GW, Redman JR, et al. Chronic partial sleep loss increases the facilitatory role of a masked prime in a word recognition task. J Sleep Res. 2006; 15 :23–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Taillard J, Moore N, Claustrat B, et al. Nocturnal sustained attention during sleep deprivation can be predicted by specific periods of subjective daytime alertness in normal young humans. J Sleep Res. 2006; 15 :41–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thomas M, Sing H, Belenky G, et al. Neural basis of alertness and cognitive performance impairments during sleepiness. I. effects of 24 h of sleep deprivation on waking human regional brain activity. J Sleep Res. 2000; 9 :335–52. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thorne DR, Thomas ML, Sing HC, et al. Driving-simulator accident rates before, during and after one week of restricted nightly sleep. Sleep. 1999; 21 :S135. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tomporowski PD, Tinsley VF. Effects of memory demand and motivation on sustained attention in young and older adults. Am J Psychol. 1996; 109 :187–204. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tsai LL, Young HY, Hsieh S, et al. Impairment of error monitoring following sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2005; 28 :707–13. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dongen HP, Baynard MD, Maislin G, et al. Systematic interin-dividual differences in neurobehavioral impairment from sleep loss: Evidence of trait-like differential vulnerability. Sleep. 2004; 27 :423–33. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dongen HP, Maislin G, Mullington JM, et al. The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: Dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2003a; 26 :117–26. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dongen HP, Rogers NL, Dinges DF. Sleep debt: Theoretical and empirical issues. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2003b; 1 :5–13. [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dongen HP, Vitellaro KM, Dinges DF. Individual differences in adult human sleep and wakefulness: Leitmotif for a research agenda. Sleep. 2005; 28 :479–96. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dongen HPA. Inter- and intra-individual differences in circadian phase 1998 [ Google Scholar ]
• Versace F, Cavallero C, De Min Tona G, et al. Effects of sleep reduction on spatial attention. Biol Psychol. 2006; 71 :248–55. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilkinson RT. Response-stimulus interval in choice serial reaction time: Interaction with sleep deprivation, choice, and practice. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990; 42 :401–23. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wimmer F, Hoffmann RF, Bonato RA, et al. The effects of sleep deprivation on divergent thinking and attention processes. J Sleep Res. 1992; 1 :223–30. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wright KP, Jr, Badia P. Effects of menstrual cycle phase and oral contraceptives on alertness, cognitive performance, and circadian rhythms during sleep deprivation. Behav Brain Res. 1999; 103 :185–94. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wu JC, Gillin JC, Buchsbaum MS, et al. The effect of sleep deprivation on cerebral glucose metabolic rate in normal humans assessed with positron emission tomography. Sleep. 1991; 14 :155–62. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zils E, Sprenger A, Heide W, et al. Differential effects of sleep deprivation on saccadic eye movements. Sleep. 2005; 28 :1109–15. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]

• The Magazine
• Digital Library

Criminal Justice

Some Texas Prisoners Allowed Only Four Hours of Sleep a Night, Lawsuit Says

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a man incarcerated at the Estelle Unit who has been suing over his sleep schedule for a decade.

by Michelle Pitcher

April 2, 2024, 8:00 AM, CDT

At 10:30 p.m., it’s time to “rack up.” The men at the Estelle Unit in Huntsville retire to their cells and get into bed, hallway lights streaming in through cell windows. Through the walls, they can hear the occasional heavy door or gate shut, while their neighbors—despite the required quiet hours—often chat or call out from their beds, some falling asleep to radios. 

At 1 a.m., the men are roused for a head count, and required to verbally identify themselves to guards. Those who fall back to sleep are woken again around 2 a.m. for breakfast. 

The unit’s schedule—packed with programming, check-ins, and appointments on a 24-hour basis—leaves only three and a half hours for sleep, only two and a half uninterrupted, according to court documents in a long-running lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ). 

And now the conservative U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has sided with prisoner Michael Garrett in his ongoing lawsuit that alleges TDCJ’s schedule leaves too little time for sleep.

“[N]ighttime prison conditions—namely the hallway lighting, heavy doors slamming, and prisoners yelling—further imperil inmates’ sleep prospects during this three-and-a-half-hour window,” the Fifth Circuit wrote in an opinion issued late last month.

Garrett, who has served about 30 years in TDCJ, alleges in a lawsuit he first filed 11 years ago that the schedule violates his Eighth Amendment right, which bars the state from inflicting cruel and unusual punishment. The scheduled sleep deprivation, he argues, poses a serious risk to all incarcerated peoples’ health in Texas. 

“It affects every single part of people’s well-being if they are not getting sufficient sleep.”

Candice A. Alfano, director of the University of Houston’s Sleep and Anxiety Center of Houston , who served as an expert witness in an earlier stage of the case, told the Texas Observer she agrees with Garrett’s argument. “Prolonged sleep deprivation is considered a form of torture by the [United Nations] because it essentially attacks and breaks down a person’s most basic biological functions and processes,” Alfano said. “For someone with one or more underlying health condition, these effects are likely to be more rapid.”

Garrett—who according to court documents suffers from migraines, high blood pressure, and vertigo, among other health issues—began his legal battle in 2013 when he was housed at the McConnell Unit in south Texas. After he had exhausted the prison’s internal grievance process, he sued the department in an attempt to force them to allot six hours of scheduled sleep time each night. 

His case went first to the Southern District of Texas in Corpus Christi. Initially Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington said in 2013 that Garrett had “no constitutional right to a predetermined number of hours of uninterrupted sleep” and that he would have to prove he suffered harm from sleep deprivation. 

In a previous ruling in 2014, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, saying that sleep deprivation “could plausibly constitute a denial of the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities” required by the Eighth Amendment and sent the case back to the district court for further consideration. The second time, Garrett, who was represented pro bono by attorney Naomi Howard, ended up in a bench trial with U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos. Ramos ruled that, because Garrett couldn’t prove that a lack of sleep caused his health concerns and that TDCJ was “wantonly” inflicting pain with its schedule, he couldn’t successfully sue. 

Alfano, a sleep expert and professor at the University of Houston, testified on the dangers of sleep deprivation in that trial. She told the Observer the district court’s position disregarded widely accepted medical evidence. “There is no debate among medical experts as to the wide-ranging detrimental effects of poor sleep,” Alfano said. “So, the idea that the burden of proof falls solely on the individual in legal matters is neither reasonable nor just.”

In 2019, Garrett appealed again to the Fifth Circuit, and attorney Chris Knight took on his case. When Garrett was transferred to the Estelle Unit in 2020, the Fifth Circuit Court returned his case to the district court again to determine whether Estelle Unit’s sleep schedule was just as restrictive.

In 2022, Judge Ramos found that sleep conditions were similar at Estelle, but again said that “nothing in the evidence suggests that TDCJ is engaged in conduct designed to intentionally inflict sleep deprivation on inmates.” Instead, the state argued that it had legitimate reasons for its restrictive schedule, citing the large number of people of different security classifications who must cycle through the morning meal and routines. 

Now the Fifth Circuit has stepped in to say that the lower courts had repeatedly unfairly ruled that Garrett had to prove actual harm caused by the lack of sleep. Instead, the court said, he only had to prove that the prison conditions posed a substantial risk to incarcerated people’s health. 

While his legal drama continues to play out, researchers have already begun to track the risks of poor sleep to prisoners’ health. 

Last October, Michele Deitch and Alycia Welch with the University of Texas Prison and Jail Innovation Lab gave a presentation to the International Corrections and Prisons Association on the harmful sleeping conditions in prisons. There, they previewed findings from a forthcoming report entitled, “The Nightmare of Sleep in Prison.” Among their recommendations: increasing dedicated sleep time. They define a healthy amount as at least four 90-minute cycles of uninterrupted sleep, or at least six hours.

Impaired sleep, they reported, endangers incarcerated people’s health, increasing risks associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and mental illnesses. It also can make prisons more dangerous, as a lack of sleep can reduce impulse control, increase irritability, and impair judgment. 

In an interview, Deitch told the Observer that formerly incarcerated people regularly tell her their sleep patterns have been permanently altered by their prison time. She said poor sleeping conditions like the ones described in Garrett’s suit are “not unusual”. 

“It affects every single part of people’s well-being if they are not getting sufficient sleep,” Deitch said. “That’s true if it happens for a day or two. When you’re in prison, this is every single day for years on end. And that has such a cumulative impact on someone’s health.”

Correction: This article has been updated to reflect past legal representation in Michael Garrett’s case . 

You May Also Like

An Open Letter to Richard Linklater on Our Texas Death Penalty

Capital punishment ensnares us all in a labyrinth of our own making, as your new film poignantly reveals.

by Walter C. Long

Two Executions, Many Questions about Mental Health, Innocence

Texas' deadly spring continues: Two Black men, Gary Green and Arthur Brown Jr. are set to be killed this week by the state.

Invisible Scars

For women inside prison, the fight for survival is less physical than psychological.

by Jennifer Toon

Home — Essay Samples — Nursing & Health — Sleep Deprivation — How Sleep Deprivation Affects Students

How Sleep Deprivation Affects Students

• Categories: Sleep Deprivation Sleep Disorders

About this sample

Words: 766 |

Published: Feb 8, 2022

Words: 766 | Pages: 2 | 4 min read

• Bozzay,M.L.,Karver,M.S.,Verona,E(2016).Linking insomnia and suicide ideation in college females:The role of socio-cognitive variables and depressive symptoms in suicide risk. Journal of affective disorders,199,106-113
• Horowitz, D. (2019). Sleep deprivation. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.langara.ca/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=113928185&site=eds-live&scope=site
• Li, L., Wang, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, L., Li, L., Xu, D., … Xiang, Y. (2018). Prevalence of sleep disturbances in Chinese university students: A comprehensive meta‐analysis. Journal of Sleep Research, 27(3), 1–13. https://doi-org.ezproxy.langara.bc.ca/10.1111/jsr.12648
• Kauffman, B. Y., Bakhshaie, J., Lam, H., Alfano, C., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2018). Insomnia and eating expectancies among college students: The role of emotion dysregulation. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 47(6), 470–481. https://doi-org.ezproxy.langara.bc.ca/10.1080/16506073.2018.1466910
• Oxtoby, J., Sacre, S., & Lurie-Beck, J. (2013). The impact of relaxing music on insomnia-related thoughts and behaviours. Australian Journal of Music Therapy , 24, 67–86. Retrieved from https://login.ezproxy.langara.bc.ca/login?url=https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.langara.bc.ca/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2013-26771-007&site=ehost-live&scope=site    

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

• Expert in: Nursing & Health

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

5 pages / 2474 words

1 pages / 1827 words

3 pages / 1423 words

3 pages / 1438 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Sleep Deprivation

Sleep deprivation is a significant issue that affects millions of people worldwide. It can have profound effects on physical health, mental well-being, and overall quality of life. Understanding the causes, effects, and [...]

Sleep deprivation is becoming an increasing challenge among people today. Most individuals have experienced sleep deprivation at least once, and the occurrence is becoming more widespread—especially among adults. Much like food [...]

Sleeping is a time where a person can get their time of relaxing and repairing both mind and body. It is related to having a healthy, steady life. The quality, duration, and regularity of sleep determines whether a person has [...]

“The Connection Between Weight and Sleep Apnea.” National Sleep Foundation, Retrieved from www.sleepfoundation.org/sleep-disorders-problems-list/the-connection-between-weight-and-sleep-apnea. This article talks about the [...]

Does sleep deprivation deteriorate school and daily performances? Due to a lack of sleep, school and daily performances will be affected in a negative way and start to deteriorate as students are unable to get the sufficient [...]

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon is the story of Christopher John Francis Boone’s adventures as told by him. The protagonist, Christopher, wrote the book as a murder mystery, describing his [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free