book review where the crawdads sing

ADMIN AREA MY BOOKSHELF MY DASHBOARD MY PROFILE SIGN OUT SIGN IN

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

New York Times Bestseller

IndieBound Bestseller

WHERE THE CRAWDADS SING

by Delia Owens ‧ RELEASE DATE: Aug. 14, 2018

Despite some distractions, there’s an irresistible charm to Owens’ first foray into nature-infused romantic fiction.

A wild child’s isolated, dirt-poor upbringing in a Southern coastal wilderness fails to shield her from heartbreak or an accusation of murder.

“The Marsh Girl,” “swamp trash”—Catherine “Kya” Clark is a figure of mystery and prejudice in the remote North Carolina coastal community of Barkley Cove in the 1950s and '60s. Abandoned by a mother no longer able to endure her drunken husband’s beatings and then by her four siblings, Kya grows up in the careless, sometimes-savage company of her father, who eventually disappears, too. Alone, virtually or actually, from age 6, Kya learns both to be self-sufficient and to find solace and company in her fertile natural surroundings. Owens ( Secrets of the Savanna , 2006, etc.), the accomplished co-author of several nonfiction books on wildlife, is at her best reflecting Kya’s fascination with the birds, insects, dappled light, and shifting tides of the marshes. The girl’s collections of shells and feathers, her communion with the gulls, her exploration of the wetlands are evoked in lyrical phrasing which only occasionally tips into excess. But as the child turns teenager and is befriended by local boy Tate Walker, who teaches her to read, the novel settles into a less magical, more predictable pattern. Interspersed with Kya’s coming-of-age is the 1969 murder investigation arising from the discovery of a man’s body in the marsh. The victim is Chase Andrews, “star quarterback and town hot shot,” who was once Kya’s lover. In the eyes of a pair of semicomic local police officers, Kya will eventually become the chief suspect and must stand trial. By now the novel’s weaknesses have become apparent: the monochromatic characterization (good boy Tate, bad boy Chase) and implausibilities (Kya evolves into a polymath—a published writer, artist, and poet), yet the closing twist is perhaps its most memorable oddity.

Pub Date: Aug. 14, 2018

ISBN: 978-0-7352-1909-0

Page Count: 384

Publisher: Putnam

Review Posted Online: May 14, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 1, 2018

LITERARY FICTION

Share your opinion of this book

More by Mark Owens

BOOK REVIEW

by Mark Owens & Delia Owens

More About This Book

Where the Crawdads Sing and Michelle Obama’s Becoming Top Amazon’s Most-Sold List

SEEN & HEARD

Oscar Nominee Lucy Alibar to Adapt Where the Crawdads Sing

BOOK TO SCREEN

Edgar-Jones Goes Where the Crawdads Sing

HOUSE OF LEAVES

by Mark Z. Danielewski ‧ RELEASE DATE: March 6, 2000

The story's very ambiguity steadily feeds its mysteriousness and power, and Danielewski's mastery of postmodernist and...

An amazingly intricate and ambitious first novel - ten years in the making - that puts an engrossing new spin on the traditional haunted-house tale.

Texts within texts, preceded by intriguing introductory material and followed by 150 pages of appendices and related "documents" and photographs, tell the story of a mysterious old house in a Virginia suburb inhabited by esteemed photographer-filmmaker Will Navidson, his companion Karen Green (an ex-fashion model), and their young children Daisy and Chad. The record of their experiences therein is preserved in Will's film The Davidson Record - which is the subject of an unpublished manuscript left behind by a (possibly insane) old man, Frank Zampano - which falls into the possession of Johnny Truant, a drifter who has survived an abusive childhood and the perverse possessiveness of his mad mother (who is institutionalized). As Johnny reads Zampano's manuscript, he adds his own (autobiographical) annotations to the scholarly ones that already adorn and clutter the text (a trick perhaps influenced by David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest ) - and begins experiencing panic attacks and episodes of disorientation that echo with ominous precision the content of Davidson's film (their house's interior proves, "impossibly," to be larger than its exterior; previously unnoticed doors and corridors extend inward inexplicably, and swallow up or traumatize all who dare to "explore" their recesses). Danielewski skillfully manipulates the reader's expectations and fears, employing ingeniously skewed typography, and throwing out hints that the house's apparent malevolence may be related to the history of the Jamestown colony, or to Davidson's Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph of a dying Vietnamese child stalked by a waiting vulture. Or, as "some critics [have suggested,] the house's mutations reflect the psychology of anyone who enters it."

Pub Date: March 6, 2000

ISBN: 0-375-70376-4

Page Count: 704

Publisher: Pantheon

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 1, 2000

More by Mark Z. Danielewski

by Mark Z. Danielewski

Kirkus Reviews' Best Books Of 2019

NORMAL PEOPLE

by Sally Rooney ‧ RELEASE DATE: April 16, 2019

Absolutely enthralling. Read it.

A young Irish couple gets together, splits up, gets together, splits up—sorry, can't tell you how it ends!

Irish writer Rooney has made a trans-Atlantic splash since publishing her first novel, Conversations With Friends , in 2017. Her second has already won the Costa Novel Award, among other honors, since it was published in Ireland and Britain last year. In outline it's a simple story, but Rooney tells it with bravura intelligence, wit, and delicacy. Connell Waldron and Marianne Sheridan are classmates in the small Irish town of Carricklea, where his mother works for her family as a cleaner. It's 2011, after the financial crisis, which hovers around the edges of the book like a ghost. Connell is popular in school, good at soccer, and nice; Marianne is strange and friendless. They're the smartest kids in their class, and they forge an intimacy when Connell picks his mother up from Marianne's house. Soon they're having sex, but Connell doesn't want anyone to know and Marianne doesn't mind; either she really doesn't care, or it's all she thinks she deserves. Or both. Though one time when she's forced into a social situation with some of their classmates, she briefly fantasizes about what would happen if she revealed their connection: "How much terrifying and bewildering status would accrue to her in this one moment, how destabilising it would be, how destructive." When they both move to Dublin for Trinity College, their positions are swapped: Marianne now seems electric and in-demand while Connell feels adrift in this unfamiliar environment. Rooney's genius lies in her ability to track her characters' subtle shifts in power, both within themselves and in relation to each other, and the ways they do and don't know each other; they both feel most like themselves when they're together, but they still have disastrous failures of communication. "Sorry about last night," Marianne says to Connell in February 2012. Then Rooney elaborates: "She tries to pronounce this in a way that communicates several things: apology, painful embarrassment, some additional pained embarrassment that serves to ironise and dilute the painful kind, a sense that she knows she will be forgiven or is already, a desire not to 'make a big deal.' " Then: "Forget about it, he says." Rooney precisely articulates everything that's going on below the surface; there's humor and insight here as well as the pleasure of getting to know two prickly, complicated people as they try to figure out who they are and who they want to become.

Pub Date: April 16, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-984-82217-8

Page Count: 288

Publisher: Hogarth

Review Posted Online: Feb. 17, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2019

More by Sally Rooney

by Sally Rooney

PERSPECTIVES

Here Are Barack Obama’s Favorite Books From His 2019 Reading

Discover Books Fiction Thriller & Suspense Mystery & Detective Romance Science Fiction & Fantasy Nonfiction Biography & Memoir Teens & Young Adult Children's
News & Features Bestsellers Book Lists Profiles Perspectives Awards Seen & Heard Book to Screen Kirkus TV videos In the News
Kirkus Prize Winners & Finalists About the Kirkus Prize Kirkus Prize Judges
Magazine Current Issue All Issues Manage My Subscription Subscribe
Writers’ Center Hire a Professional Book Editor Get Your Book Reviewed Advertise Your Book Launch a Pro Connect Author Page Learn About The Book Industry
More Kirkus Diversity Collections Kirkus Pro Connect My Account/Login
About Kirkus History Our Team Contest FAQ Press Center Info For Publishers
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Reprints, Permission & Excerpting Policy

Popular in this Genre

Hey there, book lover.

We’re glad you found a book that interests you!

Please select an existing bookshelf

Create a new bookshelf.

We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!

Please sign up to continue.

It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!

Already have an account? Log in.

Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.

Almost there!

Industry Professional

Welcome Back!

Sign in using your Kirkus account

Don’t fret. We’ll find you.

Magazine Subscribers ( How to Find Your Reader Number )

If You’ve Purchased Author Services

Don’t have an account yet? Sign Up.

Advertise Contact Privacy

Browse All Reviews

New Releases

List Reviews by Rating

List Reviews by Author

List Reviews by Title

Where the Crawdads Sing

By delia owens.

Book review and synopsis for Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens, a coming-of-age crime drama about a girl growing up alone in the marshes of North Carolina.

In Where the Crawdads Sing , Kya is known in her town as the "Marsh Girl." She grows up in a shack out in the marshes bordering a small village on the coast of North Carolina. Her mother and her four older siblings all leave to get away from their abusive father, leaving her behind to fend for herself. Eventually, her father disappears as well.

Where the Crawdads Sing is part bildungsroman and part crime drama, centered around Kya, a wild and unkempt girl. The book follows the ups and downs of her life. She lives a lonely life, but her story is a hopeful one as well. With a little help, she's able to survive and even learn to read.

Despite her status as an outcast, her natural beauty catches the eye of two men in town. However, when the body of Chase Andrews, the local hotshot, is discovered in the marshes, she quickly becomes a prime suspect. The fragile life she has struggled and fought so hard to build is at risk.

(The Full Plot Summary is also available, below)

Full Plot Summary

The Prologue opens with the discovery of the body of Chase Andrews in a swamp in 1969.

In Part I , Kya Clark grows up with her abusive father in a shack in the swampy outskirts of town in the 1950's (her mother and siblings all leave due because of Pa's abuse). Kya meets Tate, a boy from town that befriends her. When Kya is 10, Pa disappears (a couple nearby, Jumpin' and Mabel, help Kya to survive). As she grows up, Kya develops a keen knowledge of the outdoors. Kya and Tate reconnect, he teaches her to read, and it grows into a romance. When Tate leaves for college, he promises to come back, but later Tate worries that Kya (wild and unkempt) can't fit into his world. He doesn't return, and Kya gives up on him.

(Flash forward) Many years later, the body of Chase Andrews, the town hotshot and ladies' man, is found in the swamp at the bottom of the fire tower. An investigation starts up.

In Part II , Kya is now 19. Chase Andrews has been pursuing Kya aggressively, and she finally gives in to his advances. One day, Chase takes her to the fire tower, and she gives him a shell necklace as a gift. He promises to marry her, but Kya soon discovers that Chase is actually engaged to someone else. She dumps him. Meanwhile, Tate comes back and apologizes for what happened. He also wants to help Kya turn her nature diagrams into a book. Eventually, Kya's book is published in 1968.

In 1969, Kya is identified as a suspect in the Chase Andrews murder. Notably, Chase's shell necklace that he always wore was not found on his body. Eventually, Kya is arrested for Chase's death. The trial proceeds (reviewing evidence such as the missing necklace, fibers found on Chase's body, Kya's whereabouts, plus Chase had attacked Kya after being rebuffed two months before his death). But Kya is found not guilty, and she and Tate profess their love for each other.

Time passes, and Kya and Tate turn her shack into a nice cottage and remain there. Kya passes away at 64. Tate goes through her things and discovers evidence (in the form of a poem Kya wrote under a pseudonym and notably Chase's shell necklace) that Kya killed Chase. The book ends with Tate destroying the poems and tossing the necklace into the ocean.

For more detail, see the full Section-by-Section Summary .

If this summary was useful to you, please consider supporting this site by leaving a tip ( $2 , $3 , or $5 ) or joining the Patreon !

Book Review

Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens opens with a picture of a map and the discovery of a dead body in the marshes of North Carolina.

I was intrigued immediately when I saw it in the bookstore, though I put off reading it for a while. Ultimately, though, my curiosity won out as it hung in the bestseller lists, and I’m very glad it did.

where the crawdads sing reeses book club

Where the Crawdads Sing is about resiliency and survival, but also alienation. I loved the part about Kya’s childhood; it made for a unique story line as Kya learns to navigate the world on her own. The story focuses thematically a lot on her status as an outcast and sense of abandonment, as she is forced to fend for herself. In terms of pacing, it is eventful and mostly fast-moving.

Kya’s story has elements of romance, mystery and even a courtroom thriller interlude. Nature enthusiasts will also enjoy this book, as Kya’s love of the nature around her is conveyed through detailed descriptions of the flora and fauna, a reflection of the author’s background as a former wildlife scientist.

The compelling imagery is descriptive in the right places and sparse when it serves the story better instead. The book has a strong sense of place, transporting you to a different life where you can smell the salty air and sink your feet into the muddy grounds outside the seaside village.

Meanwhile, the discovery of a dead body leads to the Chase Andrews investigation that provides the suspense in the story. Kya’s story is also interspersed with flash-forwards detailing the progress of the investigation. I found this worked well, adding an element of mystery, since it’s not clear how it will play out for Kya or what exactly happened that night. There’s compelling evidence on both sides and the pacing of the investigation is spot-on, making for pleasurable and suspenseful reading.

Some Criticisms

As she heads into her teenage years, the romantic storylines start kicking in, and the melodrama starts ramping up as well. My enthusiasm waned a little bit at this point. The book is increasingly divorced from reality (the idea that a teenage boy would teach her not only to read but about her period seemed far-fetched, and it goes on from there) and plot events get a bit contrived.

Additionally, Kya’s internal journey, her mentally processing the events of her life, felt a little surface level. She struggles with being abandoned by her mother, and the book brings in interesting parallels to nature, but beyond that, events simply happen without much reflection. It felt like there were a number of missed opportunity for it to be a more insightful book.

But, for whatever criticisms I had while reading, the story easily won me over. As it approaches the date of the crime and the investigation ramps up, I was totally engrossed.

Read it or Skip It?

I read this book quickly and found myself delighted by it by the end. The book is more melodrama than a serious literary novel, but is such an engaging story that it’s easy to accept. It’s part romance, mystery, courtroom drama and ode to nature, all of which make for an appealing tale about the town outcast.

The setting is a distinctive “slice-of-life” that’s commonplace, yet not often portrayed clearly in books or movies. It is vividly drawn in a way that infuses the story with energy, a credit to Owen’s genuine love and respect for nature.

Where the Crawdads Sing has been very popular among book clubs, and deservedly so. It’s eventful and accessible, but thoughtfully written, all of which make it a good choice for readers of varying tastes. See it on Amazon or Book Depository .

Where the Crawdads Sing, Explained!

See Questions and Explanations for Where the Crawdads Sing .

Book Excerpt

Read the first pages of Where the Crawdads Sing

Movie / TV Show Adaptation

See Everything We Know About the 'Where the Crawdads Sing' Adaptation

Share this post

Bookshelf -- A literary set collection game

The Heiress

Fourth Wing

Funny Story

2024’s Best Book Club Books (New & Anticipated)

Best Cozy Mystery Books of 2024

Bookshelf: Development Diary

Best Rom-Com, Beach Reads & Contemporary Romance Books

2024’s Best Rom Com & Romance Books (New & Anticipated)

65 comments

Share your thoughts cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

well crafted review

Fantastic review! I’ve been wondering about this one and I think I’ll check it out :)

Thank you! Glad to hear it, and I hope you like it if you end up getting a chance to read it! :)

This sounds like a book I might enjoy, tossing another one on the TBR!

That’s awesome to hear, thanks for letting me know and thanks for reading!

What a beautifully written, helpfully compartmentalised review! Feeling very inspired. Sounds like an engaging read too x

Thank you so much and thanks for reading!

Wonderful, thorough review. You don’t see a lot of coming-of-age murder mysteries. I’m putting this on my TBR list. Thanks for the post.

Hey Rosi! Yes, I liked that it felt like a unique book and story, both in terms of the setting and the plot. Definitely not cookie cutter. Hope you love it if you get a chance to read it — it goes by quickly! Nice to hear from you as always, and cheers! :)

Jennifer, you are one of the best writers I have seen. I read your reviews because I love the way you talk about books. Your honesty is much appreciated and gives me insight into titles I may otherwise never pick up.

Hey Jen, that’s such a kind thing for you to say. I really appreciate your feedback and that you take the time to read my reviews! My goal in writing this blog has always been to help books find the right readers, so thank you for saying that. I genuinely value your encouragement, thanks again! :)

Nicely done review.

Hi Martie! Thank you very much and nice to hear from you again! :)

Melodrama irritates me, but the synopsis sounds so good that I need to read it. This book is high on my priority list. I’m happy it’s good. Great review!

Honestly, it bothered me a little at first, but I think there’s a lot of wonderful but unrealistic stories out there. If it didn’t all add up to something solid and interesting it would have bothered me more, but I think it came together in a way that made me feel like it was worth overlooking. Thank you for reading, and I hope you enjoy it as much as I did if you get a chance to read it! :)

You’ve motivated me to put this book on my TBR!

Thank you for reading and visiting! Hope you enjoy it if you get a chance to read it!

I’ve been interested in this one but a bit wary since I really didn’t like the other Reese’s Book Club pick I’ve read. Glad you enjoyed it. Your review definitely makes it likely I’ll give it a go after all.

Hey, that’s great to hear — yeah I mean I guess she picks out one new-ish book a month which is actually kind of a lot so I suppose they can’t all be winners. I think this one is definitely one of her better recs though, hope you like it!

Beautiful review of a beautiful book! I enjoyed this, too. It took some patience with all that description, but in the end, it worked to create that sense of place you described.

Thank you for reading! I usually don’t have a ton of patience for unnecessary description (I’m always a little wary of books that are described by reviewers as “lyrical” since sometimes that translates into lots of lengthy descriptive passages) but I thought Owens did a good job of balancing out creating atmosphere and moving the plot forward — thanks for dropping by! :)

Sounds like an interesting book – even with the negative parts.

I really enjoyed it, thanks for reading! :)

wow, you give thorough reviews…

haha what can I say, I love talking about books! :)

too bad, my genre doesn’t fit… have a wonderful weekend

Good to know that this is more melodrama than a serious literary novel. I do like the sound of this slice of life book. Great review!

Thank you and thanks for reading! :)

Thanks for the balanced review! Will consider picking this up.

Glad to hear that, and thanks for reading!

I thought the book was wonderful. I loved all of it. It had a perfect ending.

glad to hear it — yeah I was really impressed by the ending as well! thanks for dropping by!

I will definitely have to pick this one up. You make it sound compelling. Thanks for the post.

Very interesting review. I’ve been split on a lot of her book club picks but I have noticed that almost all of them she has the movie rights for which makes me a little cynical about her choices in some cases :)

yeah, I can understand that. On one hand, I’m glad that the adaptations are giving authors a way to make some big dollars. On the other hand, it is kind of annoying when I read books that seem to be written in a way that feels like the’re prepackaged for hollywood though. So I have mixed feelings.

Fabulous review

Please read my first post

I subscribed to your blog just now because you had such a thorough review of this book. I am about halfway through the book at this point, and while I have enjoyed it, I have found, as you, there were missed opportunities for more development in some areas, and some events which seemed unreasonable. Overall, I am enjoying the book. Great job! I look forward to reading more of your reviews!

Hi Sandra, thank you so much for the thoughtful comment! Much appreciated. Thanks for reading! Even with those criticisms, I’m glad I read it. I hope you enjoy the rest of it as well!

I’ve read 33 novels so far in 2019 and this is my favorite. Loved it!

NIcely written review.

Terrific. Will help at my book club. Ty.

Thanks for the review. I am yet to read this one!

Thanks so much. I appreciate you time to share.

The focus on nature was refreshing in contrast to the sadness of Kya literally raising herself. Changing back and forth with the time frame was a bit distracting as was the poetry inserted here and there ( not especially good poetry) but as you near the end that is explained. I was more impressed with how Kya, in school just a day, could educate herself enough to write books about the plants and critters living in the marsh and become a well respected author. Then the trial about who killed the jerk Chase Andrews with a surprising end when she is found not guilty. Kya goes on to live a happy life with her original friend and first love Tate, but in the end he discovers she really did kill Chase. There were some positive things in her life but such a disfunctional family and so much hatred from most of the townspeople offset the real beauty of the marsh .

Consider listening to it. The reader’s soft. N. Carolina accent lends an authenticity to the flora and fauna descriptions.

This is the most balanced review I’ve read yet of this book. It sounds like it goes a bit off the rails but is overall worth the read. Thanks for the post!

Not great literature at all. Just a story. Delia needs to read more of the best HEMINGWAY, STEINBECK, CATHER and the other great authors to learn symbolism, conflict and the art of not telling but showing.

My feelings about the character Kya are that she really could be cast as a Native American. She has the instincts and abilities of a Native American woman. Reese Witherspoon and Delia Owens, maybe you can consider this as a facet of the character.

I am looking for some good solid books for my avid pre teen reader. Do think the scope of details would be ok for someone that young?

Hmmm, I think it’s a little iffy. There’s definitely talk about sex, sexual desires and at one point one of the characters gets kind of aggressive about it.

Great start but then descended into a melodrama with an eye on the prize of a television or film adaptation. It was so obvious and disappointing. Unconvincing after the very promising first chapters onwards. The premise was unlikely and my interest waned when the story turned into a murder mystery. It was obvious that Kya killed Chase. Who else would bother?

Thank you for an excellent review. Loved the book but also felt it dragged at points. The Ode to Nature and the child that nature nourished when people failed was spell-binding.

I think it was proven that there was no time for Kya to kill Chase

Did Kaya have her own children with Tate or were they just a flashback of her childhood

I hope the movie stands up. I remember waiting with great anticipation for “the Prince of tides” movie to come out and feared it would digress from the book. I was delighted to be wrong.

I loved this book but have struggled to understand the absence of Chase’s wife in the courtroom. Why isn’t she there to support justice for her husband, staring down Kya and acting bereaved?And why did she allow her husband to wear a necklace every day of his life, fashioned for him by another woman? Why wasn’t she a suspect in her husband’s murder, given that jealousy and vengeance could have been her motive? She had as much reason as Kya to hate Chase and to remove the all-significant necklace. Anyone else agree?

I believe author wants reader to know who killed chase from early on. The phrase where the crawdads sings , essentially speaks to how nature will always try to ensure continuation of species. She was raised by nature.the references to female fire flies and praying mantis who kill males to continue survival of future generations. The mother fox who is injured who leaves her kits to die,so she can come day have future litters. Biggest disappointment in story line was that ” Tate” was not aware kya killed chase. She only received red hat after he attempted to rape her. It could only have been Tate or kya.

I found the book to be a quick read, and suspenseful until the last page. The characters were realistic and each one was well developed.

Thank you so much for your thoughtful review!!! this helps me to determine whether or not to read the book :) the movie was fantastic!

Notice: All forms on this website are temporarily down for maintenance. You will not be able to complete a form to request information or a resource. We apologize for any inconvenience and will reactivate the forms as soon as possible.

Book Review

Where the crawdads sing.

Delia Owens
Drama , Suspense/Thriller

Readability Age Range

18 years old and up
Penguin Random House
#1 New York Times Bestseller; Reese’s Book Club; British Book Award; Business Insider Defining Book of the Decade; #1 Bestselling Book of the Year; #1 International Bestseller; Edgar Award Nominee; Macavity Award Nominee

Year Published

For years, rumors about Kya Clark swirled around the quiet fishing village of Barkley Cove. Barefoot and wild, they called her the “Marsh Girl.” And when something unthinkable happens and a young man is found dead, it’s Kya the Marsh Girl they blame.

Plot Summary

Kya Clark, known by some locals as the “Marsh Girl,” grew up in a swamp. And that makes her, well, “swamp trash” as far as most folks in the North Carolina coastal community of Barkley Cove are concerned.

One by one, starting with her mother, Kya’s family members all ran off to escape Kya’s intolerable father. And then he ran off, too.

Though she’s been virtually alone from the time she was 6, Kya can never quite stifle her need for human connection. Of course, connecting with people is not easy for a girl living by her lonesome in a swamp. But the one thing she can embrace is the wild, natural world around her. And she tries to understand every relationship through her experience with nature, which causes her to have an unsettling effect on almost all the people she interacts with.

The main exception is Tate Walker, a local boy who befriends her as she turns from child to teenager. Kya’s wildness is beautiful to him, and he compassionately teaches her to read. The pair understand each other because of their mutual appreciation for the marsh, but Kya’s upbringing has put her on a collision course with polite society.

That collision effectively blows up when a former star quarterback and town hot shot named Chase Andrews turns up dead in the marsh. Inconclusive evidence and a romantic run-in are all the townspeople need to start pointing fingers.

And the Marsh Girl is everyone’s top suspect.

Christian Beliefs

It’s said that the town “serves its religion hard-boiled and deep fried.” Kya knows about three white churches and two black churches in the area. One of these black churches helps provide her with clothes, but a white preacher’s wife tells her daughter that Kya is dirty and to stay away.

Several scenes show that Kya feels she is not presentable enough for God, and that Christianity tends to be about religious rituals and posturing.

Other Belief Systems

The evolution of people from animals is implied, and animalistic instincts are a major part of Kya’s worldview. In fact, Kya’s connection with the Earth and mother nature is akin to worship.

Authority Roles

The glaring lack of authority in Kaya’s life during most of her development as a child, teenager, and young adult is integral to the plot of Where the Crawdads Sing . Arguably, nature itself is her most positive authority figure.

Kya’s dad is abusive and an alcoholic. He relies on a 7-year-old girl to do his cleaning and to cook for herself when her mother, and then older siblings, leave. Throughout the story, Kya’s father is unreliable and he teaches her to deeply mistrust others.

Her mother is shown as a loving figure, but she failed Kya by leaving. Kya’s memories of her fade, and someone later explains that the woman was mentally ill.

Kya’s older brother, Jodie, teaches her a few things about how to survive in the marsh and how to deal with their violent dad, until he leaves in fear of their father.

Kya eventually considers a man named “Jumpin” to be her closest authority figure. He is a kind, protective and consistent presence who gives her basic supplies.

Profanity & Violence

The dialogue includes scattered foul language, especially while Kya’s dad is around, including several occurrences of the s-word and “b–—ch” in various forms. A few strong racial slurs are directed at African American characters. The f-word is used a few times in reference to an article on animals.

The novel addresses physical abuse. Kya’s family suffers at the hands of her dad in varying levels of detail throughout. Kya remembers being struck by a belt and a paddle. Her brother is stabbed in the face with a fire poker. Police officers discover that Chase died because he was pushed from a fire tower. A man assaults Kya, and she beats him badly in self-defense.

Kya’s dad drinks heavily. Chase’s drinking is mentioned.

Two police officers speculate that Chase may have been involved with drugs, which led to his death.

Sexual Content

The sexual content in this book is intense, adult and problematic. Kya’s sexually charged encounters with her first love are described in detail, and it includes nudity. The pair’s longing for one another is clear, and the sexually explicit content is comparable to that of an R-rated movie.

Throughout the book, Kya contemplates the mating rituals of various animals and, sometimes, the resulting violence between mates. Later, Kya has sex with another man after his repeated advances, and he treats her roughly. After their consensual relationship ends, he assaults her and attempts to rape her.

Discussion Topics

Get free discussion question for books at focusonthefamily.com/magazine/thriving-family-book-discussion-questions .

Additional Comments

Where the Crawdads Sing will draw the attention of young readers because of the public praise for the novel as well as the fact that it’s been made into a major motion picture. And this book does explore some deep themes, including the longing that all people, especially women, have for sustaining connection with others, platonically and romantically.

That said, the heavy sexual content, violence, and language here make this an ill-advised read for young people. Even adults should approach this novel with caution and be aware of its content.

You can request a review of a title you can’t find at [email protected] .

Book reviews cover the content, themes and worldviews of fiction books, not necessarily their literary merit, and equip parents to decide whether a book is appropriate for their children. The inclusion of a book’s review does not constitute an endorsement by Focus on the Family.

Review by Marsella Evans

Latest Book Reviews

Castle Reef 2: Bloodlines

Compass and Blade

Nothing Else But Miracles

Waverider (Amulet #9)

The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue

Dune Messiah

Weekly reviews straight to your inbox.

Member Login
Library Patron Login

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR

FREE NEWSLETTERS

Search: Title Author Article Search String:

BookBrowse Reviews Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens

Where the Crawdads Sing

by Delia Owens

Critics' Opinion:

Readers' Opinion:

Literary Fiction
Romance/Love Stories
N & S Carolina
1960s & '70s
Adult-YA Crossover Fiction
Nature & Environment
Top 20 Best Books of 2018

Rate this book

About this Book

Reading Guide

Book Awards

Media Reviews
Reader Reviews

In Delia Owens's debut novel, a young woman who's survived a solitary childhood in a shack in North Carolina's marsh country looks for love and builds a career in science.

Voted 2018 Best Debut Award Winner by BookBrowse Subscribers Where the Crawdads Sing was a hit even before being chosen for Reese Witherspoon's Hello Sunshine Book Club – and it's easy to see why so many have taken this debut novel into their hearts. It's a gripping mystery but also a tender coming-of-age story about one woman's desperately lonely upbringing and her rocky route to finding love and a vocation. Not only that, but its North Carolina marsh setting is described in lyrical language that evinces Delia Owens's background in nature writing (see Beyond the Book ). We first meet Kya Clark in 1952. The marshland surrounding the Clarks' shack has been a haven for fugitives and runaway slaves; though it's not far from Barkley Cove, it seems to have its own rules based on instinct and survival. Six-year-old Kya watches Ma leave with a blue suitcase in hand, and before long Pa's drunken violence has also driven off the last of her four older siblings, her brother Jodie. Pa disappears for weeks at a time, leaving Kya to subsist on grits and soda crackers. The thought of a hot lunch lures her into attending second grade for a day, but after the kids call her "swamp trash" and make fun of her for not knowing how to spell, she vows to never set foot in school again. For years she survives by picking mussels and trading them for dry goods and kerosene at the general store run by Jumpin' and Mabel. As African Americans in the South, they know what it's like to be ostracized, and become like family to white Kya. Kya's other source of support is Jodie's friend Tate, who shares her love of nature and teaches her to read when she's 14. Tate brings her rare feathers, science books and paint for her sketches. Their budding romance is cut short when Tate leaves for college. Although he promises to come back for Kya, the years pass and she's still alone, writing and illustrating field guides to the region's shells and birds. When she's 19, star quarterback Chase Andrews catches her eye and starts wooing her over picnics. Soon he's talking marriage, though he still hasn't introduced Kya to his parents or friends. Does he really love her, or is he just making a trophy out of "the Marsh Girl"? Early on in the novel we learn that Chase Andrews will be found dead in 1969, having fallen from the fire tower into the swamp. No fingerprints or footprints are found; it doesn't seem like suicide or an accident. Soon rumor points to "the crazy lady on the marsh" because of her clandestine relationship with Chase. In between sections about Kya's childhood and adolescence, there are short updates on the 1969 investigation. As the two story lines converge, the chapters become more rapid-fire. Owens ramps up the tension, culminating in top-notch courtroom scenes as Kya stands trial for murder. The novel's third-person narration is coy, omitting certain scenes to allow readers to speculate right along with the prosecution. Although the novel focuses on the years between 1965 and 1970, it encompasses the whole span of Kya's life. At times I found it hard to believe that the plucky urchin living off of grits and evading truant officers is the same character as the willowy nature writer wondering who will love her and never leave. Also, the chronology becomes slightly difficult to follow as it approaches 1969, and there are perhaps a few too many Amanda Hamilton poems. (You'll have to read the novel to find out more about who this fictional poet is!) The use of animal behavior metaphors works very well, though. Kya understands her fellow humans by analogy, asking why a mother animal might leave her cubs or why males compete for female attention. The title refers to places where wild creatures do what comes naturally, and throughout the book we are invited to ponder how instinct and altruism interact and what impact human actions can have in the grand scheme of things, as in this passage about the marsh swallowing Chase's body: "the swamp is quiet because decomposition is cellular work. Life decays and reeks and returns to the rotted duff. … A swamp knows all about death, and doesn't necessarily define it as tragedy, certainly not a sin." In Kya, Owens has created a truly outstanding character. The extremity of her loneliness makes her a sympathetic figure in spite of her oddities. If you like the idea of a literary novel flavored with elements of mystery and romance, and of a poetic writing style tempered with folksy Southern dialect, Crawdads is a real treat.

"Beyond the Book" articles
Free books to read and review (US only)
Find books by time period, setting & theme
Read-alike suggestions by book and author
Book club discussions
and much more!
Just $45 for 12 months or $15 for 3 months.
More about membership!

Beyond the Book: Nature Writers Who Also Write Fiction

Read-alikes.

Genres & Themes

If you liked Where the Crawdads Sing, try these:

by Margaret Verble

Published 2024

About this book

More by this author

A gripping, gut-punch of a novel about a Cherokee child removed from her family and sent to a Christian boarding school in the 1950s—an ambitious, eye-opening reckoning of history and small-town prejudices from Pulitzer Prize finalist Margaret Verble.

Carolina Moonset

by Matt Goldman

Published 2022

Both suspenseful and deeply moving, Carolina Moonset is an engrossing novel about family, memories both golden and terrible, and secrets too dangerous to stay hidden forever, from New York Times bestselling and Emmy Award–winning author, Matt Goldman.

Support BookBrowse

Join our inner reading circle, go ad-free and get way more!

Find out more

Book Jacket: A Love Song for Ricki Wilde

BookBrowse Book Club

Members Recommend

The Mystery Writer by Sulari Gentill

There's nothing easier to dismiss than a conspiracy theory—until it turns out to be true.

The Divorcees by Rowan Beaird

A "delicious" debut novel set at a 1950s Reno divorce ranch about the complex friendships between women who dare to imagine a different future.

Bad Animals by Sarah Braunstein

A sexy, propulsive novel that confronts the limits of empathy and the perils of appropriation through the eyes of a disgraced small-town librarian.

Who Said...

We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare...

Click Here to find out who said this, as well as discovering other famous literary quotes!

Solve this clue:

and be entered to win..

Your guide to exceptional books

BookBrowse seeks out and recommends the best in contemporary fiction and nonfiction—books that not only engage and entertain but also deepen our understanding of ourselves and the world around us.

Subscribe to receive some of our best reviews, "beyond the book" articles, book club info and giveaways by email.

Advertising
Write For Us
Book Reviews
Uncategorized

Book Review: Where the Crawdads Sing // Delia Owens

The first novel of retired wildlife biologist, Delia Owens had rather low expectations by publishers. Within a year and a half, Where the Crawdads Sing had topped the Sunday Times bestsellers list, sold over four million copies, and earned Reese Witherspoon’s stamp of approval, as she added it to her acclaimed book club and with her production company, won the film rights to it.

Atmospheric and tumultuous, Owens’ writing is dreamy. She creates a sublime narrative which tells the story of an isolated girl surviving on the fringes of society in North Carolina during the 1950s and 1960s. Against the backdrop of racial and social strife, the narrative follows Kya, viciously pegged the “Marsh girl” by the narrow minds of townsfolk.

Owens switches between two timelines: 1952-69, beginning from the moment Kya’s Ma leaves the family, and 1969-onwards, when town star, Chase Andrews is found dead and Kya is accused of his murder.

The first timeline describes how Kya grapples with being abandoned by her family, soon becoming self-sufficient with the help of an old family friend. Exploring the Marsh leads Kya to Tate, a local boy a few years her senior, who becomes intrigued by the “Marsh girl”. Her existence becomes legend in Berkeley Cove, the fictionalised local North Carolina town.

The second timeline describes the discovery of Andrews’ body and how the townsfolk implicate and accuse Kya. Owens speaks to the consequences of this rural small-mindedness and tendency to scapegoat those deemed socially or racially inferior. Owens does not let the readers forget the reality of what life was like in North Carolina in the 1950s and 1960s.

Jumping back and forth between the two timelines until they finally intersect creates a sense of hopelessness for Kya. There is an inevitable sense of dread, as we anticipate heartache and loss. Every happy moment she shares with Tate or around the Marsh is fleeting. We know it will not last.

Throughout, Owens never fails to pay homage to the natural world in which she sets Where the Crawdads Sing . She crafts an ethereal setting that comes to life, becoming a central character in its own right. You can visualise a brewing love affair between Kya and Tate, all while the autumn leaves “swirled and sailed and fluttered” around them, a “flash of golden leaves across the slate-grey skies”. The story and its characters grip you, but the filmic scenery allows the tale to fill up in your head, creating vivid images that stay with you after the final page.

Over the lockdown period, it was moving to read a novel of raw loneliness where the protagonist finds solace and comfort in the natural world, having been rejected by the bustling world of people. Bereft of a loving family, but in abundance of the beauty of nature, Kya gives herself a purpose and something to strive for in life when she begins publishing reference books on the living creatures in the Marsh. Cut off from the outside world, Kya had to look inward.

Where the Crawdads Sing will transport you, move you and stay with you. Owens creates complex characters and an original storyline that feels like it is from another time, yet it deeply resonates today. With its appreciation of nature and celebration of humanity, Where The Crawdads Sing is a rare gem of a novel that will truly remain a timeless piece of storytelling.

Words by Kim Singh-Sall

Want more Books content from us? Click here!

Support The Indiependent

We’re trying to raise £200 a month to help cover our operational costs. This includes our ‘Writer of the Month’ awards, where we recognise the amazing work produced by our contributor team. If you’ve enjoyed reading our site, we’d really appreciate it if you could donate to The Indiependent. Whether you can give £1 or £10, you’d be making a huge difference to our small team

Content Guide

Violence/Scary Images: Some boys discover a corpse, and the investigating police describe it, but the description is not explicit. A person commits murder. The main character’s father is abusive. Boys throws rocks at an African American man. Kya fights off an attempted rapist.

Language: Frequent use of language throughout, including a**, h***, d***, s*** (and variations). Less frequent use of f***, f*****s, and n*****.

Drug/Alcohol References: Kya’s father is an alcoholic and abusive to his family when drunk. The town deputy mentions drug dealing as a possible motive for murder. A young man gets drunk and tries to rape Kya.

Sexual Content: Kya gets her menstrual cycle and must learn about it through friends. She and her love interest engage in detailed sexual exploration, which nearly leads to intercourse. Premarital intercourse occurs and is described simply as “lovemaking.” A young man tries to rape Kya, and the author vividly describes the scene. Some of the townspeople bet on who will be the first to “take the cherry” of the wild girl. Kya takes note of the various mating habits of marsh animals.

Other Negative Content: One of the main characters makes a morally questionable choice, and it is neither praised nor condemned. The town is prejudiced against Kya and her family because of their status as marsh dwellers. African Americans are segregated to “Colored Town,” called inappropriate names, and sometimes physically harassed. Women, children, and African Americans are not allowed to enter the bar in town; and African Americans cannot go into the shops, even in the rain.

Spiritual Content: An African American church donates clothing and food to Kya when no one else in town will.

Positive Content: The townspeople discover their underlying hatred of the Marsh Girl and attempt to change. A couple takes care of Kya, even though they face hardships because of their race. Kya starts to believe love exists, even after a lifetime of abandonment.

From the first line of the prologue, Owens throws the reader into the setting:

Marsh is not swamp. Marsh is a space of light, where grass grows in water, and water flows into the sky. … Then within the marsh, here and there, true swamp crawls into low-lying bogs, hidden in clammy forests. Swamp water is still and dark, having swallowed the light in its muddy throat (3).

The image of marsh versus swamp is present throughout Where the Crawdads Sing , linking Owens’ background in science to her literary genius. Kya lives in the marsh. She is comfortable and confident in her little shack with her gull family. She can survive with minimal human interaction, and knows the name of every shell and bird feather she collects. The swamp, though, is another beast entirely.

The swamp is where they find the body of someone who pretends to love Kya Clark, but only wants the Marsh Girl. He tries to rape her in the swamp, and she is forced to run for her life. The swamp is where the people of the town gather, hoping to see her executed. It is the marsh, not the swamp, which Kya loves.

This love is evident to readers through the tender way Kya interacts with her surroundings: Painting her collection, whispering in the grasses, and feeding the gulls daily. She understands the marsh like no other, and this brings the author’s own vast knowledge of nature to light. Owens brilliantly weaves Kya’s story with a story about North Carolina wildlife. Poetry and metaphor scattered throughout the book force readers to learn more about the area without realizing they are doing so.

When someone reads this story, they step into that marsh and commit to a journey through the prejudices of the US South in the 1960’s. They will watch Kya struggle against bullies of all ages and realize even though she has proved her worth, the bullies still refuse to leave her alone. It forces readers to look at US history, and themselves, and question decisions they may take for granted.

At first glance, Where the Crawdads Sing is just another coming-of-age story with hints of a murder mystery. In reality, it is a study in intimacy. Kya never understands love. She watches her loving mother, abusive father, and five siblings walk down the dirt path out of her life forever. One couple helps her the best they can: Taking donations from their church to keep her clothed, advising her about female anatomy when she comes of age, and employing her for jobs they do not need. However, their help is limited. As African Americans, they are relegated to the “Colored Town” outside the town limits and face similar prejudices to Kya.

The most positive relationship comes in the form of Tate Walker, a childhood friend. As Kya and Tate grow closer through the years, she starts to reflect on love, or the absence of it, in the animal kingdom:

Kya watched other [fireflies]. The females got what they wanted – first a mate, then a meal – just by changing their signals. Kya knew judgment had no place here. Evil was not in play, just life pulsing on, even at the expense of some of the players (142-143).

When Tate makes a bad decision, Kya is even more convinced love is only a reproductive instinct: Mate and move on. It will take the love of a town, not just one man, to repair her fractured heart.

The murder mystery in Where the Crawdads Sing is not the true plot, which is a refreshing difference from most genre mysteries. In fact, if a reader tried to pinpoint the plot by its events alone, they would fall short. This story is sometimes painfully slow. There is little to no action. Time jumps are signaled only by a year printed at the beginning of each chapter, which can be confusing since the entire story (Kya’s past and present) is set in the reader’s past. However, this story is not about murder or the passage of time; it is about the Marsh Girl.

While the story may creep along, the characters’ lives are rich and developed, full of love and mistakes. Some of the main characters make bad decisions when faced with nearly impossible odds, and readers will find themselves wondering what they would do in such a situation. It may be Delia Owens’ debut novel, but it reads like a masterpiece. This coming-of-age story is perfect for anyone who wants to fully immerse themselves in the life of another, for better or worse.

+ Complex, believable characters + Complete immersion into setting + Nonfiction inserts fit perfectly in story + Knowledgeable author

- Slow moving plot - Sometimes wondering if there is a plot - Time jumps can be confusing

The Bottom Line

Where the Crawdads Sing is a haunting, beautiful tale about a North Carolina Marsh Girl who learns to move past prejudice and discovers the nature of love and relationships. While it may be the most slow moving murder mystery ever, the characters are fully developed and readers will fall in love with their complexity.

Courtney Floyd

I may be too old, weaned on classics, but I expected a mystery thriller, not a wooden romance novel. The back-and-forth time structure was forced, with no real purpose, and the inconsistencies in an autodidactic savant, who yet acted nearly developmentally disabled, then transformed without explanation or process, stretched my patience. No reveal, of how she mastered the complexities without tripping up, left us to accept it as fact. Worse, the morality play left gaps that could have been dealt with as an act of true self defense, rather than coolly calculated revenge, where we have to weigh one certainly cruel crime against a capital one. Stereotypes are even cringe-worthy, in the dated dialects of the white trash and the noble, but poor Blacks. In my 70 years, I’ve lost several acquaintances to murder, and also experienced truly bizarre coincidences, which had they aligned in time and place with those crimes, might have fingered me as a suspect, in the finest Perry Mason/Hitchcock manner. Life can be stranger than fiction, but it is the author’s task to weave a convincing tale that feels natural, without convenient gaps in time or exposition. If the third person narrative enters the thoughts of a character, it should obligate the full disclosure, of all going on in there, not just snippets edited to conceal the largest secret of the whole book. I read this while sick, and at least won’t have to see the film.

I agree the book was not something I would recommend to everyone, as it was a very slow burn with a morally gray protagonist. I personally am interested to see how they adapt such a book into a thriller. Your comment, while a thoughtful analysis of the material, does imply that people who are developmentally disabled (you used a more offensive term we felt was appropriate to change) are either slow or stupid. Please remember that Geeks Under Grace is a place for everyone–regardless of race, gender, and ability–to engage with pop culture. That said, please keep your comments respectful.

Where the Crawdads Sing Review (Author Delia Owens)

Before starting this Where the Crawdads Sing review and in all my years of book blogging, I’ve learnt that, on the whole, books are divisive. Much like many things in life – such as, for example, whether north or south of the Thames is the better part of London, or which city – Melbourne or Sydney – is the more liveable one (I’m a south London and Sydney-sider for anyone who’s remotely interested) opinions are, more often than not, split. There will be those that adore a book, those that don’t, and those that fall somewhere in between. This was until I read – and posted about my reading – Delia Owens’ Where the Crawdads Sing, on both my Facebook and Instagram account, to entirely unanimous praise of Owens debut.

And no sooner had I started to read Where the Crawdads Sing than I began to see why it was so consistently adored by all who had already read it.

Where the Crawdads Sing Review

A story of resilience, survival and hope, Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens tells the story of Kya – known locally in the North Carolina town in which she resides as the Marsh Girl – who is abandoned at a young age by her parents, siblings and finally the school system; and left to fend for herself.

As Kya grows and learns more about life through her interactions with the creatures of the Marsh, two young men enter her life. One is her brother’s older friend, Tate, who teaches her to read and shows her acceptance and happiness. But when he, too, leaves the Marsh behind for a learned life at university, she learned not to trust nor depend on anyone but herself, and resigns herself to a life spent along on the marsh, until Chase Andrews comes along.

And so when Chase is later found dead, rumours are rife as to Kya’s possible involvement in his murder. Over the years there’s been much hearsay as to the nature of Kya and Chase’s relationship, and with no other suspects so-to-speak, the finger is swiftly pointed at Kya.

Rich with poetic prose, lyrical depictions of the marshlands and atmosphere, Where the Crawdads Sing is a beautiful and compelling read steeped in nature. A fusion of murder, mystery, coming-of-age and love-story, Where the Crawdads Sing is a poignant and powerful tale that will stay with its readers long after its gripping finale and I couldn’t wait to review Where the Crawdads Sing.

Where the Crawdads Sing Summary

For years, rumors of the “Marsh Girl” have haunted Barkley Cove, a quiet town on the North Carolina coast. So in late 1969, when handsome Chase Andrews is found dead, the locals immediately suspect Kya Clark, the so-called Marsh Girl. But Kya is not what they say. Sensitive and intelligent, she has survived for years alone in the marsh that she calls home, finding friends in the gulls and lessons in the sand. Then the time comes when she yearns to be touched and loved. When two young men from town become intrigued by her wild beauty, Kya opens herself to a new life–until the unthinkable happens.

Perfect for fans of Barbara Kingsolver and Karen Russell, Where the Crawdads Sing is at once an exquisite ode to the natural world, a heartbreaking coming-of-age story, and a surprising tale of possible murder. Owens reminds us that we are forever shaped by the children we once were and that we are all subject to the beautiful and violent secrets that nature keeps.

About Delia Owens

Delia Owens is the co-author of three internationally bestselling nonfiction books about her life as a wildlife scientist in Africa— Cry of the Kalahari, The Eye of the Elephant , and Secrets of the Savanna . She has won the John Burroughs Award for Nature Writing and has been published in Nature, The African Journal of Ecology , and International Wildlife , among many others. She currently lives in Idaho, where she continues her support for the people and wildlife of Zambia. Where the Crawdads Sing is her first novel. Check out her website for a detailed biography .

Need more reading inspiration? Take a look at more of my book reviews here .

Love my Where the Crawdads Sing book review? Click here to subscribe.

5 comments on “Where the Crawdads Sing Review (Author Delia Owens)”

I somehow missed this book. Adding this to my summer reading list. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Lucy!

Thanks for stopping by Crystal! I hope you love it as much as I did xo

I finished reading this book only few days ago, and I can say it’s one of the most “unputdownable” books I’ve ever read! And when I think that I hadn’t heard about it before I received it as a gift from a dear friend 🙂

Hi Georgiana, I’m so glad you enjoyed it too – it really is a wonderful book! xo

Pingback: Thirteen of the Best Book Blogs to Follow - The Literary Edit

Review: ‘Where the Crawdads Sing’ is the latest literary sensation turned ho-hum movie

Daisy Edgar-Jones and Taylor John Smith in "Where the Crawdads Sing."

Show more sharing options
Copy Link URL Copied!

In 2018, retired zoologist Delia Owens, the author of the bestselling 1984 memoir “Cry of the Kalahari,” published her first novel at the age of 69. “Where the Crawdads Sing” is set on the North Carolina coast in the 1950s and ’60s, threading romance and murder mystery through the life story of a young, isolated woman, Kya, who grows up abandoned in the marsh. The story is a bit far-fetched, the characterizations broad, but there’s a beauty in Owens’ description of Kya’s relationship to the natural world. Her derisive nickname, “the Marsh Girl,” ultimately becomes her strength.

“Where the Crawdads Sing” has become a legitimate publishing phenomenon, one of the bestselling books of all time, despite a controversy bubbling in Owens’ past — a connection to the killing of a suspected animal poacher in Zambia. Reese Witherspoon bestowed the book with her book club blessing, and as she has done with other titles from her club, like “Big Little Lies,” Witherspoon has produced the film adaptation of “Where the Crawdads Sing,” written by Lucy Alibar, directed by Olivia Newman, and starring Daisy Edgar-Jones as the heroine, Kya.

For your safety

The Times is committed to reviewing theatrical film releases during the COVID-19 pandemic . Because moviegoing carries risks during this time, we remind readers to follow health and safety guidelines as outlined by the CDC and local health officials .

The film is easily slotted into the Southern gothic courtroom drama sub-genre — it’s like “A Time to Kill” with a feminine touch. While the nature of adaptation requires compression and elision, the film dutifully tells the story that fans of the book will turn out to see brought to life on the big screen. But in checking off all the plot points, the movie version loses what makes the book work, which is the time we spend with Kya.

Kya is a tricky protagonist whose life story requires a certain suspension of disbelief. Abandoned by her mother (Ahna O’Reilly) and siblings escaping the drunken abuse of her father (Garret Dillahunt), who later disappears, young Kya (Jojo Regina) survives on her own, selling mussels to the proprietor of the local bait and tackle shop, Jumpin’ (Sterling Macer Jr.). His wife, Mabel (Michael Hyatt), takes pity on Kya and offers her some clothes and food donations, but it’s an exceedingly tough existence, something that the film does not manage to fully convey.

As a teen, Kya forms a friendship with a local boy, Tate (Taylor John Smith), who teaches her to read, and though their relationship turns romantic, he ultimately leaves her for college. Abandoned once again, she seeks companionship with popular local cad Chase Andrews (Harris Dickinson). It’s his death, from a fall at the rickety fire tower, that sees Kya on trial in the town of Barkley Cove, which ultimately becomes a referendum on how she’s been harshly judged over the years by the townspeople.

The only reason Kya works in the book is the amount of time the reader spends with her in the marsh, understanding the tactics she uses to get by, and getting to know the natural world in the way that she does, observing the patterns and life cycles of animals, insects, and plants. The deep knowledge of her environment and ad-hoc education from Tate helps Kya overcome poverty, as she publishes illustrated books of local shells, plants, and birds. But in the film, which sacrifices getting to know her in order to prioritize the more scandal-driven twists and turns, Kya comes off as somewhat silly, a bit easy to laugh at in her naiveté and guilelessness.

There’s also the matter of plausibility, and the shininess with which this rough, wild world has been rendered by Newman and cinematographer Polly Morgan. The marsh (shot on location in Louisiana) is captured with a crisp, if perfunctory beauty, but it’s hard to buy English rose Edgar-Jones in her crisp blouses and clean jeans as the near-feral naturalist who has been brutally cast out by society. Everything’s just too pretty, a Disneyland version of the marsh.

The whole world feels sanded-down and spit-shined within an inch of its life, lacking any grime or grit that might make this feel authentic, and that extends to the storytelling as well. It feels exceedingly rushed, as the actors hit their marks and deliver their monologues with a sense of obligation to moving the plot along rather than developing character. Hyatt, as Mabel, and David Strathairn, who plays Kya’s lawyer, Tom Milton, are the only actors who deliver grounded performances that feel like real people — everyone else feels like a two-dimensional version of an archetype spouting the necessary backstory or subtext to keep the plot churning forward.

Though it is faithful, “Where the Crawdads Sing” is lacking the essential character and storytelling connective tissue that makes a story like this work — an adaptation such as this cannot survive on plot alone.

Katie Walsh is a Tribune News Service film critic.

'Where the Crawdads Sing'

Rating: PG-13, for sexual content and some violence including a sexual assault Running time: 2 hours, 5 minutes Playing: In general release July 15

Review: History haunts the characters of ‘Black Cypress Bayou’ at the Geffen Playhouse

Feb. 20, 2024

Resisting sentimentality, Laird Hunt’s latest book is an elegy for a lost generation

Feb. 7, 2024

A father goes missing. Then a brother too. In this ‘Great Forest,’ a fraught return home

Jan. 31, 2024

Only good movies

Get the Indie Focus newsletter, Mark Olsen's weekly guide to the world of cinema.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

More From the Los Angeles Times

Julia Stiles in pink blouse and hoop earrings at the Christian Siriano Fall/Winter 2023 fashion show in New York

Julia Stiles privately welcomed third child while directing her first movie

A video store is crammed with discs for sale.

Review: ‘Kim’s Video’ is a meandering shrine to a shuttered media palace with an afterlife

Rebel Wilson at the amfAR Cinema Against AIDS benefit during the 76th Cannes international film festival

Rebel Wilson’s memoir suffers delays amid Sacha Baron Cohen harassment allegations

April 4, 2024

Review: In ‘Farewell, Mr. Haffmann,’ survival chafes against an erotic thriller’s contrivances

Books and other leisurely pursuits

Book Review :: Where the Crawdads Sing

The longer I have my book blog, the more reticent I am to write negative reviews. For one, I have not done the very hard work of finishing a novel, much less have had one published. Second, in my deep appreciation of the written word, I’ll extend grace to most anything that encourages reading. Often it is books with the popularity of Where the Crawdads Sing that encourages someone to return to reading – and that’s a good thing.

That said, this is one of those times when I feel the world of opinions needs some balance. I did not like Where the Crawdads Sing.

I have written before about the disservice some editors do for their authors by not fixing blatant errors and problems, and Where the Crawdads Sing falls into that category as well. Here are just a few examples that irked me:

When Kya packs a picnic for Tate early in their relationship, among other things, she packs French bread & cheese, saying it is her favorite picnic snack. Really? A girl who has lived off of grits and mussels – just when and where did she experience French bread? I can promise you Jumpin’ wasn’t selling French bread in the tackle shop. A loaf of Sunbeam – for sure – but no French bread.
When Kya gives Chase the necklace with the unique shell, she says: “There are many of that genius here, but this particular species usually inhabits regions south of this latitude because these waters are too cool for them.” This is simply not how Kya talks. And before you offer, “Well, she’s been reading text books…” remember that Owens is depicting her as someone who really knows her stuff, and we all know that the better you know a subject, the better your ability to talk about it in your own language.
When Jodie shows up, Kya tells the story of how he got the scar on his cheek. A good editor would have placed that event earlier in the narrative when Kya talks about her abusive father and then let the scar itself identify the stranger.

It is examples like this last one that are most pervasive in the novel, and are the most egregious. Owens lacks the art of subtle revelation in her narrative. She repeats things over and over as if she needs to remind the reader about the clues she’s leaving.

Similarly, Owens’ nature prose is too heavy handed. I love a beautiful description with a metaphor as much as the next reader, but I also get the parallels between wildlife and human nature – you don’t have to beat me over the head with them. Again, subtly can go a long way. By the way, this is the author’s fault, not that of the editor.

And, I don’t know if that’s she been gone from South Georgia for too long, but I thought her Southern dialect was horrible. As one fellow (Southern) reader said, “It’s insulting.” Well said.

***SPOILER ALERT: If you haven’t read Where the Crawdads Sing and plan to, you may not want to read any further. ****

The death of Tate’s father had no purpose. Why introduce a character just to kill him off in the last two chapters? If his relationship with Tate was necessary, make it a part of the story when Tate and Kya were first together. It seems this was included solely for the moment when the sheriff comes for him – to make the reader wonder if Tate is being arrested for the murder. When that doesn’t happen but you have what is supposed to be a poignant graveside scene, it falls flat. About the only thing that it does do is cheapen the death of Jumpin’, which really should be tender.

While I didn’t hate the fact that it turns out Kya did murder Chase, I do think the way it was revealed was low-rate and demonstrated the author’s inability to (again) artfully craft a narrative where this bears the weight that it should. As it is, Tate and Kya live happily ever after – her knowing she killed Chase – and Tate finds out after she dies? What’s the point? This feels like an elementary solution.

This review is long enough without me getting into all that is wrong with “Amanda Hamilton” but suffice it to say, I wanted to scream every time one of her poems was dropped into the story and finding out that Kya was the poet didn’t make it any better. (A better “ah-ha” for Amanda Hamilton would have been that she was Kya’s mother – and Kya to have discovered she had this link and shared language with a woman she longed to know.)

With all of this said, here is my one concession: I hold books that have gotten the type of praise that Where the Crawdads Sing to a higher standard than other books. If I had read this without seeing it on every summer reading list I would have likely given it a middle-of-the-road three star rating and moved on. But when I see people falling all over themselves over what is at best fair-to-middling writing, I have to speak up. Where the Crawdads Sing isn’t worthy of the hype.

Tate , by the way, was one of the sweetest characters I’ve read about in a long time when he was 14 to 18 years old. The man deserved better He was a very interesting young man and broke my heart in a few of the scenes where he was helping Kya when she was a little girl and he was a young teenager. Loved those interactions!!

I just do have to say that are we to believe that Reese Witherspoon is thinking of playing Kya in the film version?

Ummm. Cute as she is… She’s 40 years old.

Tiramasu…LOL! But you’re right…

uh yeah i liked tate, till he started dating Kya when he was 18/19 and she was 14??? and then abandoned her?

Thank you, Sally, for sayin’ …

In all her lunches with Tate, and in two readings of the novel, I could find no reference to French bread. Your observation also enabled me to affirm that the picnic was not meant for Tate, but for Chase—until she discovered he was engaged.

This book has really shown me how easy it is to skip over details. I was making myself a little dizzy trying to find French bread “early” in her relationship with Tate, who, I was sure, had brought all the goodies to their get-togethers. Your tip led me to the right chapter and right relationship, where, on that particular page, beyond midpoint of the novel (not early), I underlined many things, but not “cheese, French bread, and cake ingredients.”

If Elisabeth ever publishes her novel, she must give it more care than she gave this review. She has made some serious errors in her three-point dislike of “Crawdads.” One, she got the picnic scene all wrong; two, she mistyped “genius” for “genus,” not proofreading her hypos over a trifling detail in dialogue (no novel is perfect); and three, she failed to see that Kya was having a long-suppressed flashback to the violence that scarred Jodie—Kya wasn’t “telling” the story.

As I say, Sally, you helped me through a dizzy spell. I really appreciate your diligence.

I thought it a fabulous book and this review facile, needless and non contributory

Funny, that’s exactly what i think of all of the positive reviews of this book, “facile, needless and non contributory”. A book review should contain more words than just, “Delightful”, or, “I laughed out loud!” We’re not at the movies.

I almost wondered if Chase’s betrayal had caused Kya’s personality to splinter and it was the morose Amanda Hamilton, rather than the gentle “Marsh Girl” that killed Him. Surprise ending? Anyone who didn’t catch on after the firefly/praying mantis passages was just not paying attention. It was a proper beach read but not the next Mockingbird as one breathless reviewer gushed.

Split personality – that would have been interesting!

Actually, I was thinking Mockingbird… but the much touted and equally disappointing second effort by Harper Lee (or “Harper Lee,” depending upon your opinion), Go Set a Watchman. Everything about Crawdads made me nauseous. I hope this is not where American literature is going, because it would be a sad thing.

Fortunately, there are writers like Amor Towles that give me hope!

Go Set A Watchman was finally published in 2015, I believe.

Amen to that. ” A Gentleman in Moscow” is a wonderful book with charm and depth. Also “Home in the Sky” by Ivan Doig is another great read. Just to name two books that are deserving.

Go Set A Watchman was actually Lee’s first novel that was never published. He editor suggested she expand the story in the book (that was very brief) about Atticus defending Tom Robinson. In addition, she told her to tell the story from a child’s point of view. That is how TKAM came to be.

As I browsed through reviews of this novel, I wondered if I would ever find anyone who found it as flawed as I did – thank you for articulating many of the elements that I found jarring and too much in the style of Nicholas Sparks. A better title would have been “Cinderella of the Swamp” with all the magical transformation of that fairy tale as well the clichéd romances, and the heavy-handed biology lessons. Now I have to spend 2 hours with my book group who I am sure will gush enthusiastically. As others have commented, this is a good beach read but certainly does not deserve the glowing reviews and comparisons to great novels such as To Kill a Mockingbird. Literary fiction – it is not! Thank you so much for making feel that I am not alone in disliking this book.

I’d love to hear how your book club discussion went!

Cinderella of the Swamp! Thanks for my laugh of the day!

I was disappointed by the lack of any detail about Kya’s research. The list or mention of flora or fauna was sad, no bitterness or terms or woodpeckers. No orchids or ferns. Why travel to Asheville instead of Realeigh or cities close to the coast? Too many characters follow a set cliche lacking much character at all.

That’s the first thing I thought, too. I don’t even live in NC, no one would drive across the whole state when they could go to Jacksonville or Greenville. The basic premise of the story is so good, but many details could be improved upon to make it a classic.

This! And, I’m from Greenville, NC. I did enjoy the book, but I know too much about the layout of my home state and my home town to let the details slide. The Trailways bus station was downtown. Walking distance from my great-grandma’s house. Not highway 258 (I’m not quite sure where Highway 258 is,). And right, why Asheville–clear across to Western NC when Eastern NC is right there? That is all–had to express this somewhere, so thanks! The French Bread was for Chase, not Tate, much later in the book as another reader pointed out. But still….!

Kya didn’t go to Asheville, she went to Greenville which is considerably closer to the coast.

Sparks! Great comparison. I began one of his. Rare for me to read any fiction bestseller, but this was a gift. I began liking the author’s flowery use of her zoology expertise, but the errors so well pointed out in this blog, especially those directed at the editor, made me wonder what has become of America’s taste. I swear that either someone other than the author wrote the entire courtroom drama chapters or the editor gave up on that section and it reflects the writer’s real voice. Two very distinct voices in this book. I don’t recall ever seeing that anywhere, ever in English literature, but there is a reason I read classics and nonfiction.

May I borrow ‘Cinderella of the Swamp’? Spot on.

8th grade story like island of the blue dolphin would have enjoyed it at14yrs old sorry Delia

Thank you for this. The book finally came up in my library queue after half my friends have gushed about it all year long. Now I’ve read it – and didn’t like it at all. I’m just hoping they don’t ask, because I hate having to tell someone who loves something that I thought it was bad.

We had a very engaging discussion at our book club with some who loved and some who did not. It actually made for a pretty interesting discussion.

I thought that flawed it was still a great read. Far from perfect and not a great book. Many flaws but many great and beautiful parts. You get the feeling the author pulled out all the stops and probably doesnt have anything left in the tank we will see. Still i love it.

Well put Guy!!! Exactly!l ‘You get the feeling that the author pulled out all the stops and doesn’t have anything left in the tank”…ha ha!

I kept thinking, “Hey lady, why don’t you save something and not use everything in your head in this one book?”

That being said, there were some moments of pure beauty throughout. To say the book was utter crap seems to be unnecessarily mean-spirited, overly critical and perhaps even jealous. Especially if those being so viciously critical have never written a novel themselves.

I agree, it was a sad, sweet, exciting story that’s all. It is what it is. I enjoyed it and would recommend it to most of my friends.

I was enjoying the story up to a point, but then I just couldn’t suspend my belief anymore. The author is a nature writer and those parts came off well, but come on, no other part of this book was researched or thought out. If you think about any of it, it falls apart. The setting, the language, everything. I understand people read for enjoyment and whatnot and sometimes it doesn’t matter, but to see this 5 star praise from people just saying it’s great and that’s the end of it makes me feel like Larry David standing there in the middle scratching my head while everyone pretends that nothing is going on. No, you can like a book and still be critical of it, this all or nothing praise is just a no for me. I can’t. I’m seeing this trend with most Reese Witherspoon book club picks, “delightful”, “fabulous”. That’s the book review. I want more for myself.

Don’t Tell them and tell them why It is a book discussion Not a monologues

i couldn’t make thru it at all..ugh. Sometimes when celebrities recommend things people think it’s the end all be all. I haven’t cared much for Reece’s suggestions or Oprah’s…

Thanks for this – I hated the novel and now you’ve provided me ammunition for my next book club meeting!

Refreshing and a relief to read this review. While I did not hate it, I agree that it is overrated and flawed. I cannot get over the red herringstl and tied up loose ends in the last chapters. Kya is Amanda Hamilton? — wait, how does the real Amanda Hamilton feel about that?

YES! The dialect and dialogue were both awful. Kya is a Boo Radley who is socially savvy whenever the author finds it convenient. Half-baked love story. At one point Jumpin threatens to get a posse after the most high-profile white guy in the white town – all to protect this white girl. REALLY? As if he doesn’t know what would happen to his own family and town and life if he does so? Bad.

The author of WHERE THE CRAWDADS SING should stick to non-fiction biology because her eagerness to describe (what seemed to be) every molecule of the marsh became as boring as an 8th grade microbiology textbook. In addition- her incessant descriptive details came off more like indulgent observations as opposed to moving the story along.

Speaking of having a story – there was such a low threshold to reach in the 1st part of the book that Kya and Tate’s 1st kiss – not an earth shattering event, mind you – at least made me put my coffee cup down as it jolted me awake.

I also found the conversation of ALL the characters so cliche. “Jumpin” sounded like a character in a Shirley Temple movie – not a real, complicated man. Both Tate and Chase were cardboard Good and Bad Boys.

Kya, however, was the most problematic. Goddess of the Marsh – I could see her on the cover of a cheap steamy romance novel. But then she also had this Howard the Hermit Hughes side. Don’t get me started on the Published Author career turn. The main problem with Kya is that the writer didn’t make her real (irregardless of plot turns). Kya was the author’s heroine- for sure. Unfortunately, the author saw her through rose-colored glasses because….in my opinion…Kya came off as a (albeit muddy) Disney Princess.

I did enjoy Sunday Justice the Cat, however.

I liked Sunday Justice, too. One of the few bright spots.

Idk if I can take your literary critique seriously after you used the word irregardless.

I absolutely agree.

Person, get educated before you dis on literature: “irregardless” is not even a word.

Whether or not irregardless is a word is a whole other area for discussion…under the heading: when a commonly used word is considered a real word: some schools think that if it means something to the listener, and is in common use, it can be considered legit like “gonna”. However, that aside, I have to say that I am enjoying this whole discussion as much as (or even more than) reading the book. I agree with all the skeptic-y types that felt there were too many inaccuracies and that it was too fairy-tale-ish (which is OK, as fairy tales have their place), but I would place it in the “Cinderella Porn” genre. We are doing it in our upcoming book club, and I fear expressing my real feelings as saying you didn’t like Crawdads is almost akin to say you kill kittens as a pastime.. But having said all that ,it was good read…with lovely descriptions of the marsh.

Thank you. I also had a big quibble with the geography. They keep running off to Ashville, which would have been a 8-12 hour drive from the coast in the 50’s. Baltimore, Maryland would have been more accessible! I also find it hard to believe that a truant officer would never follow up or a social worker never go looking for a child they knew was alone out there. Sure, she was looked at as swamp trash, but some people did feel a responsibility to do their job and see that kids were educated and cared for (at least the white ones). And what about hurricanes?

I’I’m glad someone pointed out the Asheville nonsense. Too, crawdads live in fresh water, not salt or even brackish. So, in addition to the character of Kya being utterly implausible and the dialogue being all wrong, the author is writing about an area, a culture, an ecology with which she is unfamiliar. Why? She spent very interesting time in Africa and in the Pacific Northwest. Why not write about something she knows?

THIS. SO THIS. I’ve lived in the southeast for 5 years now and hardly know anything about the area but even I knew this. Thank you!!!!

The geography was the very first thing that put off this NC native. First of all, most of the NC coast comprises a series of barrier islands, so you don’t see much marshy land going right up to the Atlantic Ocean. The “Graveyard of the Atlantic” is off the Outer Banks, far from any marshy land. NC doesn’t have everglades. Pa says: “They had land, rich land, raised tobaccy and cott’n and such. Over near Asheville.” Cotton would not have been grown in the mountains around Asheville, and the only tobacco might be small patches of burley, not the vast fields of brightleaf that you (used to) see in eastern NC.

The “Graveyard of the Atlantic” museum is at the south end of NC Hwy 12, south of Buxton (by the ferry to Ocracoke) … mile-wide barrier islands … 5,280-feet at the most. FWIW, I live on a barrier island salt march at zip 31410. Never heared no crawdaddys singin’, tho.

Thanks for this review. It ‘s helped me articulate lots if things I disliked about the book. (The comments helped too) i feel better about attending my Sept book club where some members have already heaped the praise

Thanks for leaving a comment! I’m happy to have been helpful! Good luck.

I was thinking about dropping out of a book club and decided to do it now so I won’t have to face those who loved Where the Crawdads Sing. The plot seemed like a poorly done young adult romance. I couldn’t quibble about the setting as I live on the California coast. However, feeding seagulls? Here we would be attacked and have to fight them off. Not a nice picture.

A close recommended this book and I had to tell her that I loved it, then my book group picked it and I reread it or rather I listened to the audio version. The parts that I couldn’t reconcile were that no one human came to check on her; her mother, her mother’s family, the school teachers, her siblings, her father, Tate’s father, anyone who saw her at Jumpin’s. How do you go from illiterate to college speaker when you seldom speak to anyone? I found the reference to the mosquito scooping out the previous mosquito’s sperm ridiculous and unbelievable. And finally, when Kya’s attorney describes how the timing of going to kill Chase while needing a boat and a bus ride back and forth more than enough the exonerate her, and I began to wonder how Kya could tell time? did she own a watch? How would she know to disguise herself? How did she spend her day besides making salted fish? Thanks for letting me vent as well.

LOL! Happy to provide free therapy.

I think kya killed her father too….I did not like the book…I found it very slow.

I agree. The details of planning and executing such a murder did not seem to fit with Kya’s personality/character. The planning of arranging for an alibi, timing the bus rides back and forth (even though she only got a bus schedule when she first bought her ticket and boarded the bus the first time) , getting Chase to be on the fire tower at the right time that night ……. I can imagine Kya getting desperate if Chase kept trying to hunt her down, maybe murdering him in self defense when he came back , and maybe hiding/burying the body in a way consistent with her knowledge of the marsh. But the whole thing with timing bus trips, two different disguises for the extra bus trips to keep her alibit etc. etc., was very far fetched and not believable to me. Also. the ending was not satisfactory. I don’t believe that Kya would have kept that shell necklace, or that Tate would only discover it and put the pieces together after she died. Just not believable in so many ways. This type of premeditated murder and evil scheming does not seem consistent with Kya’s character.

Karin, I found the revelation that Kya was the murderer very disappointing. Simply, there was not enough time for her to commit the crime nor was it fitting with her character. It would have made more sense had Jumpin’ and Tate planned it out knowing she had the perfect alibi and could not be blamed. Also, how and when did she prearrange a meeting with Chase. I do not find it plausible that she hated him to the point of killing him in this extensively premeditated way.

Also, blaming the murder on her is a missed opportunity to develop the other characters such as Chase or his wife. And why does Chase go to dinner at his parents’ house but not take his wife? It makes no sense and there is not an attempt to explain it. Maybe their marriage was rocky since he was in love with Kya, a woman he believed he could not marry because of society’s expectations. At times he was a two dimensional player and others a deep person playing his harmonica and being happy getting away from the pressures of his life. The fact that he spent so many hours with Kya, always wore the necklace and kept the beautiful “relationship journal” shows he loved her deeply. And, why was that journal only brought up during the trial? I feel like it would have been something that was discussed while she was making it or even on the occasion she gifted it. He must have struggled with the decision not to own up to his love. When it was convenient for the story line to fall into stereotypes it would.

The whole geography of NC also was confusing. I live in NC and very little of it added up. Although, I will say, I enjoyed the story itself. I loved reading it because I was entertained and had to know if she would get convicted. I liked the descriptions and found the poems relevant and thought provoking.

The fact that I liked the story and Amanda Hamilton’s poems enjoyable was how I found this review thread. I thought there might be a book of Amanda Hamilton poems out there. It was odd at the end how the poet turned out to be Kya, somewhat unnecessary to the plot.

thank you for writing this! I felt duped by it….I was engaged initially by the nature narrative and the concept of nature as “mother”….but the romance and plot really fell flat for me. All of the things you’ve said and your commenters have said rang true for me. And I’m feeling kinda angry that so many think this is well written literature!

I agree with you. Initially, tho it was slow, I enjoyed much of the concept of nature. But then it became implausible. How did she firstly lure Chase to the tower? How did she plan the bus trips, when she only got the schedule when she purchased her ticket? And then the bus was late. She just wouldn’t have had the time to clear the evidence before catching the bus back. Where did she get the disguises from?

How did she know that the motel she chose to stay at was closest to the bus stop.? There are many more anomaly’s I could go on and on. NOOOO. It just wasn’t her character to plan all this. And the final stupidity was to keep the shell necklace. One would think this was the last thing she would want to keep

Thanks for writing an honest review. No 6 year old calls a marsh an estuary. Nor would a 6 year old be able to start a boat engine and then run it that well. I agree that someone would have taken food out to her house and tried to help. Going to Asheville from the NC coast to do business was absurd. Where was the coastal dialect of the 1950’s? I could go on and on.

OK guys, all very interesting, and in my opinion accurate. But what?…..Walter? What is IRREGARDLESS, aargh, that non-word is a pet peeve, not in the dictionary, and an unfortunate double negative becoming horribly common. Oh dear, my rant for the day! A great blog by the way 🙂

“Irregardless” is a pet peeve of mine, too. If she used it, I totally missed it! I guess everything else was already too distracting.

I wrote my response at 3am. Sorry to offend.

Well, perhaps the interweb gods were looking out for you because an earlier post from you didn’t come through.

The thing I found truly unbelievable was that she was able to take the bus all the way from Greenville back to the fire tower, do all the things she had to do to avoid detection and cover up the crime, and then BACK to Greenville in plenty of time to meet again with her publisher. Did I miss something or did the cops just neglect to subpoena the bus records that would’ve clearly showed something was aloof? The D.A. talked about people in disguise on the bus, but really didn’t give any buildup. But this isn’t John Grisham. I found the dialect also suspect: she goes from this hick accent to–viola!–speaking in Ph.D. language. Maybe the author assumed that readers felt that given her self- and Tate-education, that she would progress to that kind of banter. Still, I empathized with Kya, living the gawd-awful life she led in abject loneliness, being shunned by the townsfolk. Now, I’m going back to my “swamp.”

My thoughts exactly! How many folks could there be on that bus at that hour? Why not track them down to identify/eliminate the nervous and possibly disguised passenger!? On point as always L&L and thank you for an honest review of a book clearly written to appeal to Hollywood. Maybe a good screenwriter will make her mother the poet and clean up other loose ends to create more suspense. I predicted the ending when I saw the name of the final chapter.

Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment, Ginna! 🙂

I’m so happy to “meet” all of you! I’ve been wondering if I had missed something in this book, all friends and family have been praising it and I thought it was mediocre at best. What a relief!

Yes, welcome to the support group for those who are baffled by its popularity!

Hello, I am half way through the book and struggling to finish. I’m glad to know that there are so many others who see it as I do. I was beginning to think perhaps I’ve turned “uppity” from reading too many literary novels and could no longer enjoy a well-written mainstream novel. I don’t think that’s the case, however, This book is beyond redemption in my view. I won’t rehash all that’s been said, but would like to add a bit about characterization. One of the biggest problems with this book, for me, is that the characters don’t ring true. For example, Kya has fond memories of her mother’s nurturing and gentle acts of kindness. Clearly, she is a woman of sensitivity who cares for her children, yet she leaves a man who abuses her when she knows full well that he also abuses the children. Really? And then, not only does she leave (all dressed up and ready to find a new life for herself, to hell with the kids), she never checks back on them? Never sends anyone after them? The character of Kya’s father is also problematic. Here’s a guy who turns into a jerk when he drinks. But why make the distinction if he’s supposedly a total jerk when he is sober too? The thing is, the author lets us see the father have some moments of bonding with his daughter; he teaches her to fish, gives her money, takes her out to eat. He even calls her “Hon.” And yet, after having established a connection, he can leave without a backward glance. He doesn’t seem to care if she’s easy prey or starves to death. Most people wouldn’t treat a pet that way, much less a kid. That is, unless the person is some kind of monster. And that’s the point; the father isn’t really so much a monster as a rage-aholic and an alcoholic. Or IS he a monster? The author can’t seem to make up her mind. Then we have the character of Tate. Wow. Teenage perfection in the form of a young male. A young male who so completely understands how lonely and rejected Kya feels after all the abandonment she has been subjected to, nonetheless turns around and does the same thing. He totally abandons her after carefully taming her wild spirit and spending months getting her to completely trust him. And all without so much as an explanation or a note… Other characters operate in the story as stock characters without dimension, the preoccupied social worker, the black store owner with a heart of gold and his heart-of-gold wife. And by the way, is there really no one in the entire town with a modicum of sympathy for a dirty, skinny child with no social skills and no parent in sight? Then there’s Kya herself. As some of you have noted, her natural beauty and allure is an imaginative stretch. I could, for the sake of the story, get past that. But her remarkable ability to unpack dense biology texts after a few reading lessons and no formal education is rather ludicrous. I know some have countered the criticism of this novel by saying it should be read as an allegory. My understanding of allegory is that you are typically dealing with a simple story that symbolizes a much more complicated issue. The ideas of “connection-to-nature vs. disconnection,” “rural folk vs. town folk,” “respect for nature vs. exploitation” all operate as themes, not allegory.

Yes, yes, and yes. Thank you for stopping by and adding to the discussion!

So true. Also it was a stretch that Tate taught her to read using the book Sand County Almanac (a brilliant book which I happen to have read.)That is a real book by a naturalist with sophisticated writing. It could never be used to teach a totally illiterate person. You’d be more likely to start with easy children’s books. Yet she learned to read it easily.

Maybe you all should try the audio book Reads like a movie and most of your Criticisms are overshadowed by hearing Only point I make is there really is a poet named Amanda Hamilton

I think this proves my point. If you have to listen to it by audio book to not be annoyed by the errors, it isn’t quality fiction.

Hi, I just finished this book. 10 pages before the ending I noted to myself, Kya did it, I didn’t want that to be the case, but it makes sense. I kept thinking about that shell necklace.

It was quite a sad book. That’s okay but it seemed like 2 authors. The courtroom to the end was very different than the beginning. Maybe, I thought, because Kya changed, was shut down after the murder.

Anyway, it was fast forwarding , vacant and though Kya’s killing Chase was probable and predictable to me , her sneaking back on the bus is not realistic. I wish we had her inside story, like the entire book before the murder. I felt the author was just plowing through to the ending to answer The Who did it?

Thanks for letting me share my honest thoughts.

Interesting your point about two authors. I agree the courtroom scene was stronger than other parts – like maybe that section was more closely edited or workshopped than other sections.

I hate being critical too. But in this case, I think you missed some genuine literary devices and got stuck in the swamp with details. In University, I studied Annie Dillard ‘s Pilgrim at Tinker Creek . I studied it in the context of science communication. In Dillard’s case, as the title suggests, this is religion versus science or the combination of them. In this way, this book is similar. Her words on shells, or other treasures, are not her own but those of the biology textbooks she’s been reading. That device shows us how disassociated she is from human feelings and attitudes – all her emotions are bound in her scientific look at human interactions. That is really where the book has strength for me. I don’t worry so much about the french bread or butter. I don’t remember her saying it was her favourite. But it’s just not important because literature doesn’t have to be a science 🙂 I see your points but the book speaks to Lady of Shallott, the pilgrims, and how some struggle to bond their spiritual side with the scientific.

I have only three words….Hallmark Channel Movie

I had an issue with Tate talking about studying DNA and the double helix in 1960 in a small town in the south. My small town in the south did not cover this until later. (I have more details on this but my sister and I discussed this about 15 years ago when my son had to make a DNA double helix as a class project and we talked why this wasn’t covered in school when we attended.) It’s these kind of disconnects (like parroting scientific details rather than assimilating in her own voice to explain to Chase) that caused me to jump out of the story and I had to convince myself to jump back in. I would recommend you read Cross Creek by Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings. She did extensive writings on growing up in rural swamp areas in Florida and you are pulled into her stories. She won a Pulitzer Prize for The Yearling, written in 1939.

Rawlings is on my TBR list – so thank you for the additional push. Thanks for stopping by and leaving your thoughts.

Helen, I just got Cross Creek based on your recommendation. Thank you!

Thanks for an interesting discussion. I agree that the novel is filled with all these outrageous flaws that should have consigned this book to the remainder bin after a couple of months. But that’s culture and taste in America. The movie will make a fortune, I’m sure. What is more amazing to me is that I have not read one comment in the numerous reviews I’ve read that even mentions the fact (much less analyzes it) that the novelist has created a very “sympathetic” female heroine who is nearly destroyed by violence, racism, cultural bias, ignorance, abandonment, etc., but who pulls herself out of the mud to become this wonderful artist/scientist, yet, who, in the last couple of pages, turns out to be a gigantic fraud. For god’s sake: SHE’S A MURDERER! Yes, she’s portrayed (endlessly) as a victim, but the fact is that being a lonely “wronged woman,” including an attempted rape, does not justify MURDER. This is not just a “twist” at the end! It blows up the main character! Thus the values extolled by the author throughout the book (love of nature, etc., etc.) are dwarfed by the overriding fact of her crime and her silence, including hiding her true character from the husband she supposedly loves. Even a decent author coming out of college with a creative writing major would have seen this massive problem—and would have either explored the possibilities of dealing with such human complexities, or perhaps just dumped this ridiculous novel and started a new one.

Agree. There’s a way that a more skilled writer could have crafted a scene of self-defense but in this case, it would have been premeditated & she lured him there for the purpose of killing him. She’s mixing her genres for sure to have the noble heroine turn into the guilty party.

Gosh, I have combed through the reviews here and on another site and you are the only one mentioning what troubled me so much about the book. If Kya murdered Chace, then I have no respect for her. If she never told Tate about it, I have even less. So what was the point of that whole story which was tugging at my sympathies to respect and value her? So I feel like the author tricked my sympathies and jerked me around which means I cannot really respect the author for that either. Secondly, do people really have so little moral center that they’re okay with Kya murdering Chace just for being an every-day-super-jerk that so many guys are? I’m not. Towards the end, Kaya says plaintively, “I never asked anybody for anything.” Well, killing somebody is asking them for the ultimate: their life. Now, no one seems to be mentioning this but there is huge chance that Kya is not the murderer (if there even was one), but somehow came upon that necklace anyway. 1) If Chace wore it “every day”, in reality people stop noticing whether someone is actually wearing a small item or not, so they could be wrong about him wearing it that day. 2) the murderer, if there was one, had about 40 years to give this to Kya (she died at 64 and Chace died when she was 24. She could have been come by it, and put it under the floorboards as recently as the last time the wood supply was low.) Insect analogies aside, there’s actually no proof provided by the author that Kya murdered him, and lots of reasons to think she didn’t. Most of the evidence points to there not having been a murder. How about a suicide? And about Amanda, I thought this would turn out to be her sister, who was named Amanda (according to the Bible records) and called Many for short. I think that would have been better than having the poet be the mother, which would be a little too “neatly wrapped up” for my tastes. Truly, the author should have mentioned suicide as a possibility somewhere along the lines, if for no other reason than to confound the reader. The guy was a jerk, and jerks have no self-esteem.

Never mind, Dan B, it turns out you were the first of many which appeared “below” (later in time) than yours, and I hadn’t seen them before I replied to you, Maybe yours helped people feel they had permission to say murder is not okay when the “motive” is having been jilted or even attempted rape. Though I understand the ourtrage that would emerge from an attempted rape, no one is above the law and self-defense 2 months later could not be claimed.

THANK YOU! I finished the book last night and have been reading reviews for the past hour and NO ONE has reflected this obvious fact! She’s a murderer for crying out loud.

The way Tate discovered her secret made me feel bad for him. It felt creepy and unfulfilling. He thought her to be this pure and innocent girl, different from all those other women…well yeah, doubt any of those other women KILLED a man! Not by accident, mind you, but actually PLANNED it!!!!

During the court scene I guess Owens didn’t want us in Kya’s mind much so her true thoughts can be hidden but when she was in the cell or staring out the window, detached from the hearing…with the knowledge later that she murdered Chase, Kya was scary. No remorse, no regret, no guilt. Completely ruined the character for me. Chase was a jerk but he didn’t deserve to be murdered.

I loved the first half of the book before the hearing, I actually loved the prose and nature writing but the court scenes and the ending completely ruined what could have been a beautiful book. I don’t think the murder was needed. This book would have been amazing as a coming of age story drawing parallels between nature and civilization as this girl grows up in isolation and loneliness only to come into her own as a successful artist and writer…Chase didn’t have to die..ugh wasted opportunity.

Person, ever heard of a run-on sentence?! Take a breath!

This is exactly it. I just finished this book earlier today and felt totally duped. I couldn’t believe how the main character was completely untrustworthy to the reader and everyone around her who supported and stood by her – her husband, brother, father-in-law, Jumpin and his wife, her attorney. She lied to all of these people for years. And she committed premeditated murder, which was completely detached from the character we read about. I have read some posit the possibility that Kya had a personality disorder. Perhaps, but that wasn’t set up and neither was it clear why chase would wear a necklace for four years or turn into a raging sociopath

Never (IIRC) was the subject of toilet paper mentioned … or soap … or tooth brushing or … the nail in the sole (“soul”?) made me wince. MASSIVE infection … never mind tetanus (which I haven ever known or heard of, other than in old wife’s (wives’) tails/tales.

So grateful for this thread. Tossed and turned all night after finishing the book. Among all the ridiculous trite romance novel qualities the fact that she ends up a murderer and a liar truly destroyed it for me.

I am so glad to hear that others found this much overrated book to be totally implausible, and not particularly well written.

I just finished reading this book after slipping and falling, hurting several body parts which put me in quite a bit of pain. My sister gave me the book days before as a gift. I had not read a novel in quite some time and needed to rest, so into my bed I went with this book to take my mind off of my own painful place. I thoroughly enjoyed the many metaphors and similes while figuring out the ending long before I was told by the author. Having been raped, I can understand the fear of Kya. As a writer, editor and proofreader, I also understand the role of a good editor. Many of the flaws you have related I also found, but as a person in pain looking for a story to take my mind off that, it served its purpose. Any reader would know that loose end shell necklace was bound to turn up among Kya’s hidden treasures. I appreciate your comments as I also enjoyed my mind being taken off into the marshes with the birds, sand and wildlife. I look out on the Rappahannock River where birds of many kinds swoop and dance, perch and search for prey. Bald eagles, and porpoises all play here from time to time. Raccoons and deer, wild turkeys and skunks, all meander by at their own pace. Life goes on. Love is always somewhere to be shared and celebrated in the heart. Murder, however, is not a part of love.

thank you everyone for your wonderful comments. You have written by book club presentation for me. By the way, hated the book.

THANKS GUYS..ditto your thoughts..googled thoughts on this book because I needed some feedback…The fact that she murdered Chase..ruined her whole character..and made me wonder why I wasted so much of my time reading this book ..oh it was a gift ..and i would be asked my thoughts..

Thanks for the courageous review.

It’s a plotless story, with an evil view of human nature, mindless and overwrought descriptions of nature, peppered with non-poetry. Perhaps worst of all, the novel lacks a key element of good mysteries: human motivation.

Agatha Christie is turning in her grave.

I think you hit on something with your comment. She hasn’t figured out what genre she’s writing & thus fails at them all.

And notice the horrible (and completely nondramatic) message: Don’t blame Kya (or — wink, wink — the author) for murder. Either nurture made her do it (abusive and neglectful parents) or nature did (the praying mantis). There’s no free will, no choice, no personal values animating the character.

Compare that to the gripping and unsparing portrayal of a murderer in Dostoyevsky’s “Crime and Punishment.”

I’m always suspicious of books on The NY Times’ bestseller list as 70% of the people in any given society have average IQs. That being said, all the previous comments ring true. I decided to search for critiques of this book because, though I found many passages to be lyrical, the whole story just didn’t gel.

As a retired reading teacher with a master’s degree in special education, I’ve spent years working with children in the area of literacy. In order to learn to read, learning to decode the abstract symbols of the alphabet takes about 500 repetitions per letter. Our brains have only been reading for about 5,000 years ~ which isn’t a long time in human development. Thus, Kya’s astonishing metamorphoses after 14 years of illiteracy from ignorance of the printed word to scientific genius was impossible to believe. The author might have been able to rectify this glaring error had she simply added a paragraph or two discussing the passage of time ~ years, for example ~ during which we could see Kya’s struggle toward literacy. But that was not done and, so, the reader is jolted out of the “vivid and continuous dream” (John Gardner) that great fiction achieves. We should never be removed from our reverie in fiction and slapped across the face with slips in technique. But, in “Crawdads,” we *are* and that’s just too bad.

In kindergarten, if we can get our students to master 52 letters and sounds within 9 months of school before we send them to 1st grade, as teachers we’re delighted. But reading is *not* just about decoding sounds! Basic sight words, of which I teach about 1,000 by the end of 3rd grade, must simply be memorized. They *cannot* be sounded out! Words like “the, do, is, from, enough” ~ to name just five ~ are examples of my point. Sight words make up approximately 80% of all the words we read ~ even in advanced texts. As we progress into print at higher levels, the percentage of sight words drops a bit but, still, they remain the *glue* in text. Tate may have taught Kya basic sound/symbol correspondence but her meteoric rise into Greek roots and scientific jargon is simply unbelievable ~ as many of you have mentioned. Kya has no mentor with whom she can go over the complexities of our English tongue; her accomplishments, then, seem contrived and unrealistic.

As an aside, I’m wondering, now that I’ve read this book, how in the *world* Kya would have been able to acquire all the props necessary for her disguise as she made her mad dash on the bus? Where would she have purchased the wigs and costumes needed to hide her identity? That would have taken some elaborate planning. Surely a shopkeeper would have remembered her buying those things locally. There are just too many loose ends in this book!

Someone recommended this book to me and though I’d clicked over it as I pondered titles during the last year or so, I agreed to read it to please a friend. As an avid reader, I can readily absorb a weak book and be none the worse for wear. Many of you have made excellent points regarding flaws ~ and, on the whole, I agree with your assessments. Despite those flaws, though, I did love learning about the details of life in marshes and swamps, areas foreign to me, and I reveled in the solitude of those places. I’m a thoughtful, quiet person and could not live without nature in my life. I’m always thrilled to add another bit of knowledge about our natural world to my body of understanding. “Crawdads” appealed to me in that way. I’ll let Hollywood sort out the rest since, surely, as many have stated, this is a Hollywood novel that will make millions of dollars at the box office. It is not, however, literary fiction. Remember, the majority of readers who catapult books to the top of The NY Times’ bestseller list don’t seek excellence but, rather, escape. I like my fiction to offer more than that. I like it to move me. This book falls short. While “Crawdads” can offer us a way to spend a few spare hours, it’s most definitely not a book that will rock our literary world.

When I’m not enamored with wildly-popular books, I always wonder what I’m missing, why I’m not following the crowd. As a writer and editor, I respect the craft of writing, but have a rule: if my my editor self kicks in while reading, something’s wrong with the writing, And from the prologue on, “Crawdads” — while easy enough to buzz through — opened up numerous questions and problems that many readers point out here on this blog.

I can suspend disbelief enough to acknowledge that maybe Marsh Girl had innate, almost primitive, survival techniques; that Tate had a higher-than-average intelligence and relatability to teach Kya to read and that she would have had no other way to spend her time but to dedicate herself to learning. But: -With her extreme malnutrition, she would have been sick. A lot. She also would have had other problems with her hair, nails, teeth – she simply couldn’t be as beautiful as the author claimed. -She wouldn’t have had any authentic social or conversational skills – simply saying she’s shy doesn’t even begin to cover how inept her interactions with Chase would be, no matter how much Tate talked to her before he left. So Chase was obviously a convenient plot device for the murder and a weak attempt at forcing class issues. I believe this was also the case with the movie “Nell.” -Using the overwrought “Magical Negro” trope of Jumpin’ and Mabel, combined with the dialect, was incredibly racist. I lived in the South and Deep South, including Coastal Carolina. Most people out in the Outer Banks have a unique Southern-New England dialect, and it’s hard to replicate verbally, much less with the written word. Further, everyone would speak that way because of the isolation of location, not just Jumpin’ and Mable. Most writing professors tell students not to use dialectical language unless you’re certain you’ll get it right. -Amanda Hamilton’s poetry inserts were simply unnecessary, so this part of the ending was forced for no reason. -The prologue, if there has to be one, (I hate prologues!) should always tell the truth. I think this is what disappointed me the most: the blatant sellout of the main character. If she believed her survival depended on killing someone, Kya the Marsh Girl wouldn’t have wrangled bus schedules, disguised herself, raced against time, and lured Chase to the fire tower. The prologue proclaimed the marsh is life, while the swamp is death. Kya the Marsh Girl would have lured Chase to the edge of the swamp, made love to him, and while he napped briefly, smacked him with a branch to knock him unconscious. Before she ripped off the necklace, she would drag him into the murky waters and let nature take its course. Maybe Chase’s boat was found adrift near her shack, and Kya is called into questioning, but the mystery of his disappearance—never solved—adds to the Legend of the Marsh Girl. Perhaps years later, Tate would find a worn shell necklace strung on rawhide in a drawer after her death, and wonder what it was. He wouldn’t know… …but the reader would. And that’s the point.

That’s a much better ending! Great points all around. Thanks for dropping in and contributing to the conversation.

Great site! And thanks. I’m sure every reader imagines a story going a different way. But if I were Owens’ editor, I would have reminded her of the integrity of her character. She still probably would have gone her own way, as she should, but at least there would have been a discussion. 🙂

I agree with so many of your points. This novel romanticises neglect and loneliness, both of which I’ve experienced and neither of which are remotely romantic. Neglect makes it extremely hard to form social relationships, it doesn’t just make you shy and neglected kids are usually bad at taking care of their physical appearance.

For goodness sake everyone, it is a fiction, a story. I take on board the inaccuracies and implausible happenings but I was so wrapped up in Kya and her life that I turned pages way into the wee hours. I was so upset when the book was finished. A person I had “lived with” was dead and the book ended.

I’m another reader who missed the promised “gorgeous, lyrical prose.” At heart, this is a manipulative story, with the puppeteer’s moving strings visible. The phoniness is, more than anything, caused by the distance from the main character (for, after all, if we were close to her, the ending “surprises” would have had to be disclosed at the time). Instead, the writer attempts to make us feel close to Kya by having her speak aloud to herself about her loneliness, etc., and having her recite bad poetry (without even acknowledging to herself its origin!). Grrrrrrrr.

I waited and waited for this to become available at my local library, and when it did I eagerly started to read I knew nothing of reviews, which is the way I like to dive into a new book and decide how it moves me. While I love descriptive phrases and metaphors, this was way over the top and not in a good way. So far at page 58, I WILL finish but am finding so many things cringeworthy that I am afraid that’s what I will remember rather than the characters or story line. Not a writer. Not a wannabee writer. Just a reader who loves good books that worm their way into my brain and get me to think. Thank you for writing this commentary…it fits my reactions so far even though I am only 58 pages in.

I can have a willing suspension of disbelief that her isolation, her feeing under threat, and her living again in fear in her own home of a violent man might drive Kya to kill the tormentor—under certain circumstances. But I cannot buy for a second that Kyra is racing around catching buses in disguises, motor boating up the coast, climbing fire towers, luring/manipulating/murdering a man—all between being dropped off at 10 pm after a lovely dinner and first meeting with her editor and being picked up at 7:30 am for breakfast with said editor. Unbelievable. Completely out of character. Don’t get me started on the going to Asheville from the coast to buy supplies or a bike.

I am having trouble with the red wool fibers found on Chase’s body. Why didn’t Tate suspect her guilt after that evidence was presented?

I thought that Chase ended up with the red hat when they were batting it back and forth.

I’ve just read this book in Catalan, my mother tongue. I agree with the most repeated issues here written. I’ve found several translation mistakes, attributable to editor in my language. Despite it’s a book that is agreeable in the most of the chapters, lacks of coherence. Writing about mother cells in 1961 when first hypothesis was proposed by Canadian scientist in early 1960 is, at least, a temerity. Also putting in Kya’s voice Einstein Theories is not realistic. I’m not able to talk about idioms or words used by people in New Carolina in those years, either the bus availability. In the other hand; in my opinion, too much paragraphs are self-dedicated to the writer. TX

Thank you for sharing your thoughts – an interesting perspective given you read it in a different language.

I have scanned comments and replies, and like many of the contributors, I have written and edited fiction, so we read differently than many readers. I was put off by the use of dialect, and then found it inconsistent. I would think an editor would have cleaned that up. This stuck out for me (and probably many Tarheels): there has never been a Raleigh Herald newspaper in Raleigh, NC. There is a Raleigh, West Virginia, that has or had a Raleigh Herald. It’s a small point, but puts the author’s research in other areas in question.

If I could get past the absurd storyline, the poor use of dialect, and the uneven (at best) writing then I would give this more than 2.5 out of 5 stars. I would have given it fewer stars but there were times when it was so bad it was good. Listening to the audiobook I found myself laughing out loud. When the author described this marsh child who had lived on her own exposed daily to the sun the bugs the mud without adequate food, clothing, medical care and grooming opportunities as nothing short of the most beautiful woman to ever live I nearly spit my coffee across the room. Then there was the passage where the teen boy mansplained to the most observant “nature genius” on earth that she was getting her period for the first time. And I can’t stop chortling thinking of the numerous “almost sex” scenes. The trial never quite made sense to me either. How could they charge her with first degree murder when they themselves admitted that it could have been an accident.

I must stop because there are so many things in this book that either make no sense or are completely ridiculous. I could go on and on. That said I can see why Reese Witherspoon claims to love it. It will make a decent movie and if she can encourage enough people to read the book and be invested in the story it will be a guaranteed money maker.

“. . . the most observant ‘nature genius’ on earth . . .”

Exactly! She’s supposed to be the “noble savage” (a tired, discredited story) who’s capable of miracles, and who’s justified in doing anything (e.g., murder) because society’s corrupt and has corrupted her. (I.e., it’s a thinly veiled auto-biography.)

THANK YOU so much for this review. After reading the book, I kept thinking, “Reese, stick to acting”, I’ve seen on a few talk shows that she reads constantly, and since she loved this book and added it to her book club, I wonder what books she’s reading. By the end, I was groaning every time I saw another poem by ol’ Amanda on the page. The whole book was implausible, from a 6 year old surviving on her own, to her beauty and intelligence. I used to work with a woman who taught herself Organic Chemistry. She was very intelligent but couldn’t pronounce anything correctly. I think Kya would have the same problem. I also couldn’t imagine how Kya “lured” Chase to the fire tower, although maybe that was covered as I skimmed the last few chapter. I wonder if she also killed her father.

I’m here for you. 🙂

As a male child of the 60s, I couldn’t help but wonder why Chase and his pals – football players without college deferments – did not end up drafted and in Vietnam, which, trust me, was the overriding concern for 18-year old males in the 60s. Amanda’s “poetry” was awful. And the whole rigmarole about assembling multiple disguises by this character was ridiculous. I did appreciate the “close to nature” vibe, but this was not a book to move one’s heart.

It was heartening to see that other people have a problem with this murder when they believe Kya did it….. On the other hand, the number of people who assume Kya did do it is bewildering to me. “Oh, because she had the necklace. That’s proves it.” It proves nothing. She could have found it or it could have been given to her in the 40 years between Chace’s death and her own. After spending all that “time” as a reader with Kya, to me the more likely thing is that she did not murder him, which explains her blank traumatized mind that didn’t get shared with us during the trial, and it explains why she never “told Tate” about it. There was nothing to tell. Why is suicide never mentioned in the book or in the reviews? Is the myth that “rich people are happy” so entrenched? Maybe Tate was not in fact wearing the necklace that night, or maybe he tore it off and threw it in the swamp before he stepped into the grate hole. There is no evidence of a murder, anywhere. Only numerous theories crafted to support the hypothesis that Kya “must have” done it. To me, that means this is a book about how prejudice works in a community (and everywhere) and it’s especially effective and educational because most people think white people aren’t discriminated against. The book should be judged on how well it explores this problem, and I would say it does that superbly. It’s quite possible that people simply don’t mind bad accents and Asheville’s location because this book has a vision, even a mission, to educate people about the insidiousness and stupidity of prejudice. If white people see that they too can be victims, maybe they’ll wake up more to what’s going on far worse for people of color. But if you rush into the conclusion that Kya killed Chace (and the author might be extremely upset that people are doing that) then you won’t see that visionary message at all, but quite the opposite: that knee-jerk prejudice is justified.

“. . . she did not murder him . . .”

To arrive at that conclusion, one has to ignore tons of evidence that’s actually in the book, e.g., the confession poem, the insect-mating metaphor, the fact that she hid the necklace for all those years. (Your “maybes” are pure fantasy.)

“. . . this is a book about how prejudice works . . .”

And to arrive at that conclusion, one has to make up tons of evidence that’s not in the book.

One evaluates a novel based on what the writer included in the story — not on what a reader wishes for. The story is a paean to the (hideous) concept of the “noble savage.”

Ditto to so many of the comments here. I just thought it was me in many cases, since I am not much of a recent fiction reader and am a biology teacher who also lived in eastern North Carolina for 20+ years. I will not be repetitive here about the travel to Asheville, Raleigh paper name, and over the top selection of the praying mantis eating her mate vignette, but do want to add that I never met anyone from eastern NC who called a knit cap a ski cap – always, always, always they say toboggan.

The author lost all credibility for me when Kya’s mother’s old, well-worn volume of poetry contains poems by Galway Kinnell and James Wright— Having once lived in Greenville, I was also flummoxed by everyone traveling to Ashville. Authors shouldn’t make mistakes like this, and good editors shouldn’t let them.

Thank you thank you for the Galway Kinnell point. His first book of verse was published in 1960 – not possible for her mother to have a Kinnell poem at that time. I, too, hated the book for all the reasons stated above: horrible dialect, far too many “ I’m so sure that couldn’t happen” moments, cheap sex scenes, teaser “hint hints” and overall bad writing. Who was her editor???

Thank you for writing this review. I hated the book too, and the comments have helped me process a lot of the thoughts I had, particularly the horrible noble savage and magical negro tropes.

As a psychologist and traumatised person, I felt that, at times, the treatment of psychological trauma was somewhat realistic (e.g. aspects of the father’s PTSD), but I found it simplistic and cliched overall. Part of that was the idea that romantic love is a psychic panacea. At the end of the novel, the ‘nice guy’ that she was obviously going to end up with asks her to love him without fear. Dude, you know that this woman is severely traumatised. Way to minimise her lifetime of abandonment and neglect.

I won’t rehash what others said about her magical ability to learn following her early life, but it was so unrealistic that I could not suspend my disbelief. Ditto her unearthly beauty and allure. Blech.

Like with Tate’s father, the death of Kya’s mother was handled horribly. And the way Kya talked about forgiveness of her mother etc- so heavy-handed. A real example of why you should show, not tell.

This is the first book I’ve read for my work book club and I’m a little apprehensive to find out what my new colleagues thought. I already know that my boss loved it.

I’m glad the post helped! Know you’re not alone in the universe & you can always point the club back here for proof if it seems you’re the lone voice in discussion. (But I bet you’re not.)

Can we just talk about the lack of emotion in every conversation? Aside from the hideous dialects, unbelievable childhood, textbook coming of age and the effing seagulls which are easily the most irritating birds on the planet, could the author have maybe just eeked out some emotion? Your long lost brother shows up at the door and you don’t throw him to the ground and beat the krap out of him for leaving you? You find mysterious feathers from a stalker, I mean adorable intelligent boy, and you just take them inside? You’ve grown up on your own in a marsh but yet you just open your somehow mature heart to this stranger? Holy cream puff Batman give me some real life grit. Nobody said writing a novel is easy! But as the author you have to remember that we as the reader are not in your head, seeing it the way you do. This book made me so angry because what could have been a beautiful, funny, poignant account of an abandoned girl was stripped bare and left to those stupid, noisy seagulls.

As a social worker, one of the things that really irritates me is when the developmental characteristics of children are ignored. A child of six with so much trauma in her life would be very lucky to survive, but I can’t imagine how she could survive without the love of another human being until she was fifteen. So much had happened to her that she would have needed a lot of intervention to thrive and become the person she did. She may have been extremely intelligent but that doesn’t take the place of socialization.

I know it was set in an earlier time but social workers don’t go after children and make them come to school. It’s the parent’s responsibility to get a child to school and Kya’s father could have easily been found by the social worker or truant officer. I would be surprised that her shame at being barefoot would overcome her feelings of hunger for real food after eating nothing but turnip greens and grits. Certainly child protective services would have been called to see about her not having any food, and being left alone for days at a time. That constitutes child neglect and causes major harm to a child. That kind of harm would usually cause a failure to thrive and psychological damage. What sense does it make that Kya’s mother (who supposedly loved her children) writes to a violent alcoholic and asks him to send her child back to her? It’s preposterous. It seems like once she healed she would have come back with others to protect her and took her child.

And really after Tate teaches Kya basic math, gives her a few books, she checks out an Organic Chemistry book? I know honor students who needed tutors for that course. Kya goes to another town and checks out an interlibrary loan textbook with no identification?

For her to have taken the time to travel to a new city on a bus, something she’s never done, stay in a hotel by self, stayed up all night and convinced Tate to get to the tower at a particular time at night would have been quite difficult for someone as skittish as Kya. She hides when she see’s people in he r own marsh but she’s okay traveling on a bus. And figuring out a disguise? Lying when she has very little experience in even talking with people? She must have had significant rage in planning Chase’s murder to do all this. And I don’t believe she was psychologically sophisticated enough to hide her feelings. Plus, there are all the other concerns people have already cited. There are so many other books that are worth our time!

Oh for heavens sake! You sound like the townspeople during Kya’s trial!!!! Wonderful nature descriptions. Fantastic survival of a strong girl character.

everyone, please relax and enjoy this sweet and unique novel.

I completed the novel just now, and then I scooted around the web to find reviews. This was because Crawdads left me feeling very unsatisfied and even manipulated. I know from experience that when young children are neglected, abused, and abandoned that the consequences are always disastrous. The way the writer depicted Kya’s development was pure fantasy. I wish that children of trauma could develop as well as Kya did. Unrealistic!

Straight to the point, I read the first two pages, front and back and stopped immediately. Fin. Several of my friends whom are avid readers of many genres and value and appreciate the written word in reading as well as their own writing, strongly and I mean strongly suggested this book as, “it will be on your top ten list and illicit and evoke emotions that will run deep” kind of read.

I bought it with a very open mind of excitement and within the first page of reading the author’s attempt for us to discern swamp and marsh repeatedly…and was trying in my opinion too is hard to appear…poetically insightful, where we’d be “wowed” by her ebb and flow of taking much too long to get to the point without redundancy, allowed me to get a glimpse of her writing style.

I thought, “oh no”, but kept reading the next page and saw a pattern. There was no hook, just a lot of unnecessary descriptions that didn’t pull me in as I wanted to drawn to her fictional characters.

I fanned through the book and randomly landed on a page, much like spinning a globe and stopping it on some random country to see where you are going to live next type of game as a kid….anyhow, the fanned page I landed on wasn’t Bora Bora, it read exactly with the same stylistic approach as the beginning, meaning I could have started the book 3/4 toward the end and would have been able to dipict all I needed to know.

I returned the uncreased fiction and bought how the Philadelphia Eagles won the Super Bowl in 2018 for my son.

À polite ending to my opinion, kudos to her for writing a book, the time, her passion for it and happy for those who did enjoy it.

I know better than to fall for the fawning over an NYT BS. But… my best friend just gushed over it. Now how to tell her I found it remedial? Parts anyway, like the story, the plot. The whole thing seemed forced, contrived. As if it were only there to interact with the setting. Which was the part that kept me reading. Owens is a nature writer and at that she excels! She’s not a people person (having been reclusive in her research settings for years) and that shows. I’m not done and will have to finish it, but all in all, not surprisingly disappointed. I couldn’t even just use it for escapism, the story kep jarring me back to mental criticism. I hate that I’m a book snob. I wonder what Jane Smiley is working on? Or Marilyn Robinson? Anthony Doerr maybe?

I have to agree with these criticisms – farfetched Wuthering Heights without the grits

I find the above comments perplexing. That all of you find some deep need to trash the praises of other readers is disturbing. Some of you appear to be bent on vendetta over some offense. It’s as if you have been personally attacked by readers who find the book praiseworthy, intriguing, insightful. On reading praise for Where The Crawdads Sing I found no attacks on those who did not it might not enjoy the book. While there were times I grew impatient with the book I never felt insulted by those who did not. There are many things that explain away some of the criticisms. Kya us no ordinary child and cannot be seen as such. She lives in a natural world and everything that firms her us outside society. The mastery of Owens is in her ability to draw for us a wild child who is a genius, Tate notes this early as she almost instantly grasps the power of language, reads and rereads advanced textbooks learning more each time as what the books either collide with or fail to realize about their topics. She has no one to help her translate emotion so she looks at her feelings through the lens of scientific, in the field, observation. Key to the death of Chase are her observations of lightening bugs. She didn’t murder him. She only observed and then did what was natural. She is a genius apart from culture and a precious example of what we all might be should we grow from childhood to adult apart from society. I think the s as vice criticism are seated in a misunderstanding about what Owens is writing about and the book can’t be judged juxtaposed against similar stories of growing up in society. Mixed in heavily is of course all the makings of myth and fantasy, story and tale. Kya is not real on some level and cannot be judged so. She’s a wraith who hides and appears, runs and emerges. She comes out of the marsh as she longs to be human, but she’s not. Kya is not of us and that’s what makes her intriguing.

Also no prosecutor would have laid charges against her with the scant evidence he had. This made the courtroom section not credible to me.

Once again I’m so disappointed by a “best seller”. I have to finish a book once I’ve started reading it, but this story became more and more difficult to read as it progressed. Her mother’s story after leaving her children was ridiculous. She wrote a letter and made beautiful oil paintings but couldn’t find a way to rescue her children? She had family to help her, but couldn’t speak? Again, ridiculous.

Where the Crawdads Sing review – hit novel crashes on the big screen

The Reese Witherspoon-produced adaptation of the best-seller remains faithful to the fantasies of the book, for better and mostly for worse

W here The Crawdads Sing, the bestselling book of 2019, presents a fantasy of grit and purity: a young white girl, abandoned by her family in the 1950s, learns to fend for herself in a North Carolina marsh, goes from illiterate to acclaimed scientific author without ever abandoning her communion with the land, and finds love as an outcast so suspicious the town assumes she killed her former lover. The debut novel by Delia Owens, a former scientist in her mid-70s known for years of controversial (and possibly violent) conservation work in Africa , offered a seductive blend of romance, murder mystery and feral coming-of-age that, along with a nod from Reese Witherspoon’s book club, helped sell over 12m copies to date.

The Witherspoon-produced film version, directed by Olivia Newman from a script by Lucy Alibar (Beasts of the Southern Wild), faithfully preserves that fantasy for the big screen. Which is to say, a lot of this gutless, often silly, film’s issues are the book’s, beautifully realized and thus reified by trying to make what is essentially a mud-splattered, civil rights-era fairy tale into a lifelike story.

The film, like the book, proceeds on two timelines, the latter being a swampy mystery in 1969: who, if anyone, killed Chase Anderson, the (relatively) rich kid of Barkley Cove, North Carolina, found dead at the base of an old fire tower. Small-town gossip points to “the Marsh Girl”, 24-year-old Kya Clark (Daisy Edgar-Jones), a mysterious object of confusion and scorn who lives alone out in the dense, mostly uninhabited wetlands. Arrested and awaiting trial, a kindly lawyer (David Strathairn), sympathetic to her isolation, draws out Kya’s tale of growing up in the wild, like a folkloric wolf-child.

As a six or seven-year-old, young Kya (Jojo Regina) is abandoned by her mother (Ahna O’Reilly) and older siblings in quick succession – we’re given only a few minutes in an idyllic flashback to know them, so it’s difficult to care about who they are or sympathize with why they left the youngest child alone with an alcoholic, physically abusive father (a menacing Garrett Dillahunt). Skittish, reasonably skeptical of people, and most comfortable alone in the marsh, Kya only lasts a day in school; the other kids tease her as a swamp rat. The film’s portrayal of her poverty is more aesthetic than acute, lest it be actually uncomfortable to watch or she become less sympathetic. Kya is covered in dirt as a child but never remarked upon as smelly, barefoot in an untamed way. We never see her truly starving, and the “shack” in which she lives bears the hallmarks of a genteel existence – books, sofa and pillows, an old radio, boxes of her mother’s fine dresses.

As a lissome, isolated teenager played by Daisy Edgar-Jones, Kya finds connection (and supplies) through Jumpin’ (Sterling Macer, Jr), a general store owner, and his wife Mabel (Michael Hyatt) – kindly black folks who, true to the novel’s sentimentalist roots, do little more than be concerned and kindly to a fellow outsider. With the help of handsome childhood friend Tate (Taylor John Smith), Kya learns to read, to translate her love of the marsh into scientific language, and in the film’s strongest section, to fall in love.

Yet at almost every turn, she is betrayed: by Tate, when he leaves for college without saying goodbye; years later by Chase, when his talk of love and marriage culminates in one disappointing (and accurately rendered) night at a motel and devolves into horrific violation. By the townspeople of Barkley Cove, who are so reluctant to see the intelligent, sensitive young woman beneath the Marsh Girl myth that they suspect her of murder. The final quarter of the two-hour film depicts her brisk, ludicrously simple trial, which only underscores Kya’s pristine innocence and her lifelong commitment to the marsh.

That marsh, filmed in coastal Louisiana, is indeed beautiful – cinematography by Polly Morgan captures vivid sunsets, gliding herons, a maze of waterways transparently worthy of devotion and care. So, too, is Normal People’s Edgar-Jones, who has found somewhat of a niche in supposedly off-putting characters that become, in her hands, doe-like, fragile and magnetic. With her searching, pooled brown eyes, Edgar-Jones can capably play a shy young woman of few words. She breathes life into Kya, particularly in intimate scenes, but struggles to ground the character’s (admittedly confusing) ruggedness; it never makes sense that the town’s No 1 outcast is a thin, conventionally beautiful, quiet and polite white woman.

A braver film would have aimed for actual grit more than the allusion to it, looked to the scabbier (and thus interesting) parts of Kya’s personality, captured a fundamental awkwardness to life outside of human interaction along with an idealized naiveté. Most of all, drawn out darker aspects of Kya’s story that could justify an implausible twist ending that undercuts almost everything that comes before, if you think about it for more than two seconds (this is also a book problem). But Where the Crawdads Sing never really had an interest in complications, or hardship, or racism as anything beyond wallpaper for its central nature girl fantasy of self-reliance. It would rather stay above the fray, gliding prettily along the marsh without actually getting dirty.

Where the Crawdads Sing is out in US cinemas on 15 July and in the UK on 22 July

Drama films
Reese Witherspoon
Romance books
Romance films

Where the Crawdads Sing

Embed our reviews widget for this book

Get the Book Marks Bulletin

Email address:

Categories Fiction Fantasy Graphic Novels Historical Horror Literary Literature in Translation Mystery, Crime, & Thriller Poetry Romance Speculative Story Collections Non-Fiction Art Biography Criticism Culture Essays Film & TV Graphic Nonfiction Health History Investigative Journalism Memoir Music Nature Politics Religion Science Social Sciences Sports Technology Travel True Crime

April 4, 2024

Sheila Heti interviews Lauren Oyler
In conversation with poet Samer Abu Hawwash
A poetics of living rebellion

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

Upcoming Movies and TV shows
Trivia & Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

Movies / TV

No results found.

What's the Tomatometer®?
Login/signup

Movies in theaters

Opening this week
Top box office
Coming soon to theaters
Certified fresh movies

Movies at home

Netflix streaming
Prime Video
Most popular streaming movies
What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

Monkey Man Link to Monkey Man
The Beast Link to The Beast
The Old Oak Link to The Old Oak

New TV Tonight

Mary & George: Season 1
Ripley: Season 1
Star Trek: Discovery: Season 5
Sugar: Season 1
American Horror Story: Season 12
Loot: Season 2
Parish: Season 1
Lopez vs Lopez: Season 2
The Magic Prank Show With Justin Willman: Season 1

Where the Crawdads Sing

2022, Drama/Mystery & thriller, 2h 5m

What to know

Critics Consensus

Daisy Edgar-Jones gives it her all, but Where the Crawdads Sing is ultimately unable to distill its source material into a tonally coherent drama. Read critic reviews

Audience Says

A particular treat for viewers who love the book, Where the Crawdads Sing offers a faithfully told, well-acted story in a rich, beautifully filmed setting. Read audience reviews

Where to watch where the crawdads sing.

Watch Where the Crawdads Sing with a subscription on Netflix, rent on Vudu, Prime Video, Apple TV, or buy on Vudu, Prime Video, Apple TV.

Rate And Review

Super Reviewer

Rate this movie

Oof, that was Rotten.

Meh, it passed the time.

It’s good – I’d recommend it.

So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

What did you think of the movie? (optional)

You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Step 2 of 2

How did you buy your ticket?

Let's get your review verified..

AMCTheatres.com or AMC App New

Cinemark Coming Soon

We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

Regal Coming Soon

Theater box office or somewhere else

By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Where the crawdads sing videos, where the crawdads sing photos.

From the best-selling novel comes a captivating mystery. Where the Crawdads Sing tells the story of Kya, an abandoned girl who raised herself to adulthood in the dangerous marshlands of North Carolina. For years, rumors of the "Marsh Girl" haunted Barkley Cove, isolating the sharp and resilient Kya from her community. Drawn to two young men from town, Kya opens herself to a new and startling world; but when one of them is found dead, she is immediately cast by the community as the main suspect. As the case unfolds, the verdict as to what actually happened becomes increasingly unclear, threatening to reveal the many secrets that lay within the marsh.

Rating: PG-13 (Sexual Content|A Sexual Assault|Some Violence)

Genre: Drama, Mystery & thriller

Original Language: English

Director: Olivia Newman

Producer: Aislinn Dunster , Elizabeth Gabler , Reese Witherspoon , Erin Siminoff , Lauren Levy Neustadter

Writer: Lucy Alibar

Release Date (Theaters): Jul 15, 2022 wide

Release Date (Streaming): Sep 13, 2022

Box Office (Gross USA): $90.0M

Runtime: 2h 5m

Distributor: Sony Pictures Entertainment

Production Co: 3000 Pictures, Hello Sunshine

Aspect Ratio: Scope (2.35:1)

Cast & Crew

Daisy Edgar-Jones

Taylor John Smith

Tate Walker

Harris Dickinson

Chase Andrews

Garret Dillahunt

Michael Hyatt

Ahna O'Reilly

Sterling Macer Jr.

Jojo Regina

David Strathairn

Sheriff Jackson

Olivia Newman

Lucy Alibar

Screenwriter

Aislinn Dunster

Elizabeth Gabler

Reese Witherspoon

Erin Siminoff

Lauren Levy Neustadter

Betsy Danbury

Executive Producer

Rhonda Fehr

Polly Morgan

Cinematographer

Alan Edward Bell

Film Editor

Mychael Danna

Original Music

Production Design

Kirby Feagan

Art Director

Mirren Gordon-Crozier

Costume Designer

David Rubin

News & Interviews for Where the Crawdads Sing

Weekend Box Office Results: Thor: Love and Thunder Stays on Top Despite Big Drop

The 5 Most Anticipated Movies of July 2022

Critic Reviews for Where the Crawdads Sing

Audience reviews for where the crawdads sing.

There are no featured audience reviews for Where the Crawdads Sing at this time.

Movie & TV guides

Play Daily Tomato Movie Trivia

Discover What to Watch

Rotten Tomatoes Podcasts

Supported by

‘Where the Crawdads Sing’ Review: A Wild Heroine, a Soothing Tale

Daisy Edgar-Jones stars as an orphaned girl in the marshes of North Carolina in this tame adaptation of Delia Owens’s popular novel.

Share full article

By A.O. Scott

“Where the Crawdads Sing,” Delia Owens’s first novel, is one of the best-selling fiction books in recent years , and if nothing else the new movie version can help you understand why.

Streamlining Owens’s elaborate narrative while remaining faithful to its tone and themes, the director, Olivia Newman, and the screenwriter, Lucy Alibar ( “Beasts of the Southern Wild” ), weave a courtroom drama around a romance that is also a hymn to individual resilience and the wonder of the natural world. Though it celebrates a wild, independent heroine, the film — like the book — is as decorous and soothing as a country-club luncheon.

Set in coastal North Carolina (though filmed in Louisiana), “Where the Crawdads Sing” spends a lot of time in the vast, sun-dappled wetlands its heroine calls home. The disapproving residents of the nearby hamlet of Barkley Cove refer to her as “the marsh girl.” In court, she’s addressed as Catherine Danielle Clark. We know her as Kya.

Played in childhood by Jojo Regina and then by Daisy Edgar-Jones (known for her role in “Normal People” ), Kya is an irresistible if not quite coherent assemblage of familiar literary tropes and traits. Abused and abandoned, she is like the orphan princess in a fairy-tale, stoic in the face of adversity and skilled in the ways of survival. She is brilliant and beautiful, tough and innocent, a natural-born artist and an intuitive naturalist, a scapegoat and something close to a superhero.

That’s a lot. Edgar-Jones has the good sense — or perhaps the brazen audacity — to play Kya as a fairly normal person who finds herself in circumstances that it would be an understatement to describe as improbable. Kya lives most of her life outside of human society, amid the flora and fauna of the marsh, and sometimes she resembles the feral creature the townspeople imagine her to be. Mostly, though, she seems like a skeptical, practical-minded young woman who wants to be left alone, except when she doesn’t.

Kya attracts the attention of two young men. One, a dreamy, blue-eyed fisherman’s son named Tate (Taylor John Smith), who shares her love of shells, feathers and the creatures associated with them. Companions in childhood, they become sweethearts as teenagers, until Tate goes off to college, and Kya gets mixed up with Chase (Harris Dickinson), a handsome cad whose dead body is eventually found at the bottom of a fire tower deep in the marshlands.

Eventually but also right at the beginning. The movie begins with Chase’s death, in October, 1969. Kya is charged with murder, and her trial alternates with the story of her life up until that point. Her mother (Ahna O’Reilly) and siblings flee the violence of an abusive, alcoholic father (Garret Dillahunt), who eventually takes off too, leaving Kya on her own in possession of a metal motorboat, a fixer-upper with a screened-in porch and a curious and creative spirit.

“Where the Crawdads Sing” takes place in the ’50s and ’60s, which on the evidence of the film were uneventful decades in America, especially the American South. Kya’s hermit-like existence — she attends school for one day, doesn’t learn to read until Tate teaches her and has no radio or television — feels a bit like an alibi for the film’s detachment from history. The local store where she sells mussels and gases up her boat is run by a Black couple, Jumpin’ (Sterling Macer Jr.) and Mabel (Michael Hyatt), who nurture and protect her and seem to have no problems (or children) of their own.

Kya’s outsider status — bolstered by the presence of David Strathairn as her Atticus Finch-like defense attorney — gives the movie a notion of social concern. Equally faint is the hint of Southern Gothic that sometimes perfumes the swampy air. But for a story about sex, murder, family secrets and class resentments, the temperature is awfully mild, as if a Tennessee Williams play had been sent to Nicholas Sparks for a rewrite.

Where the Crawdads Sing Rated PG-13. Wild but tame. Running time: 2 hours 5 minutes. In theaters.

A.O. Scott is a co-chief film critic. He joined The Times in 2000 and has written for the Book Review and The New York Times Magazine. He is also the author of “Better Living Through Criticism.” More about A.O. Scott

Explore More in TV and Movies

Not sure what to watch next we can help..

Maya Rudolph and Kristen Wiig have wound in and out of each other’s lives and careers for decades. Now they are both headlining an Apple TV+ comedy of wealth and status .

Nicholas Galitzine, known for playing princes and their modern equivalents, hopes his steamy new drama, “Mary & George,” will change how Hollywood sees him .

Ewan McGregor and Mary Elizabeth met while filming “Fargo” in 2017. Now married, they have reunited onscreen in “A Gentleman in Moscow.”

A reboot of “Gladiators,” the musclebound 1990s staple, has attracted millions of viewers in Britain. Is appointment television back ?

If you are overwhelmed by the endless options, don’t despair — we put together the best offerings on Netflix , Max , Disney+ , Amazon Prime and Hulu to make choosing your next binge a little easier.

Sign up for our Watching newsletter to get recommendations on the best films and TV shows to stream and watch, delivered to your inbox.

Movie Reviews

Tv/streaming, collections, great movies, chaz's journal, contributors, where the crawdads sing.

Now streaming on:

The cicadas buzz and the moss drips and the sunset casts a golden shimmer on the water every single evening. But while “Where the Crawdads Sing” is rich in atmosphere, it’s sorely lacking in actual substance or suspense.

Maybe it was an impossible task, taking the best-selling source material and turning it into a cinematic experience that would please both devotees and newbies alike. Delia Owens ’ novel became a phenomenon in part as a Reese Witherspoon book club selection; Witherspoon is a producer on “Where the Crawdads Sing,” and Taylor Swift wrote and performs the theme song, adding to the expectation surrounding the film’s arrival.

But the result of its pulpy premise is a movie that’s surprisingly inert. Director Olivia Newman , working from a script by Lucy Alibar , jumps back and forth without much momentum between a young woman’s murder trial and the recollections of her rough-and-tumble childhood in 1950s and ‘60s North Carolina. (Alibar also wrote “ Beasts of the Southern Wild ,” which “Where the Crawdads Sing” resembles somewhat as a story of a resourceful little girl’s survival within a squalid, swampy setting.)

It is so loaded with plot that it ends up feeling superficial, rendering major revelations as rushed afterthoughts. For a film about a brave woman who’s grown up in the wild, living by her own rules, “Where the Crawdads Sing” is unusually tepid and restrained. And aside from Daisy Edgar-Jones ’ multi-layered performance as its central figure, the characters never evolve beyond a basic trait or two.

We begin in October 1969 in the marshes of fictional Barkley Cove, North Carolina, where a couple of boys stumble upon a dead body lying in the muck. It turns out to be Chase Andrews, a popular big fish in this insular small pond. And Edgar-Jones’ Kya, with whom he’d once had an unlikely romantic entanglement, becomes the prime suspect. She’s an easy target, having long been ostracized and vilified as The Marsh Girl—or when townsfolk are feeling particularly derisive toward her, That Marsh Girl. Flashbacks reveal the abuse she and her family suffered at the hands of her volatile, alcoholic father ( Garret Dillahunt , harrowing in just a few scenes), and the subsequent abandonment she endured as everyone left her, one by one, to fend for herself—starting with her mother. These vivid, early sections are the most emotionally powerful, with Jojo Regina giving an impressive, demanding performance in her first major film role as eight-year-old Kya.

As she grows into her teens and early 20s and Edgar-Jones takes over, two very different young men shape her formative years. There’s the too-good-to-be-true Tate (Taylor John Smith ), a childhood friend who teaches her to read and write and becomes her first love. (“There was something about that boy that eased the tautness in my chest,” Kya narrates, one of many clunky examples of transferring Owens’ words from page to screen.) And later, there’s the arrogant and bullying Chase ( Harris Dickinson ), who’s obviously bad news from the start, something the reclusive Kya is unable to recognize.

But what she lacks in emotional maturity, she makes up for in curiosity about the natural world around her, and she becomes a gifted artist and autodidact. Edgar-Jones embodies Kya’s raw impulses while also subtly registering her apprehension and mistrust. Pretty much everyone lets her down and underestimates her, except for the kindly Black couple who run the local convenience store and serve as makeshift parents (Sterling Macer Jr. and Michael Hyatt , bringing much-needed warmth, even though there’s not much to their characters). David Strathairn gets the least to work with in one of the film’s most crucial roles as Kya’s attorney: a sympathetic, Atticus Finch type who comes out of retirement to represent her.

This becomes especially obvious in the film’s courtroom scenes, which are universally perfunctory and offer only the blandest cliches and expected dramatic beats. Every time “Where the Crawdads Sing” cuts back to Kya’s murder trial—which happens seemingly out of nowhere, with no discernible rhythm or reason—the pacing drags and you’ll wish you were back in the sun-dappled marshes, investigating its many creatures. ( Polly Morgan provides the pleasing cinematography.)

What actually ends up happening here, though, is such a terrible twist—and it all plays out in such dizzyingly speedy fashion—that it’s unintentionally laughable. You get the sensation that everyone involved felt the need to cram it all in, yet still maintain a manageable running time. If you’ve read the book, you know what happened to Chase Andrews; if you haven’t, I wouldn’t dream of spoiling it here. But I will say I had a variety of far more intriguing conclusions swirling around in my head in the car ride home, and you probably will, too.

Now playing in theaters.

Christy Lemire

Christy Lemire is a longtime film critic who has written for RogerEbert.com since 2013. Before that, she was the film critic for The Associated Press for nearly 15 years and co-hosted the public television series "Ebert Presents At the Movies" opposite Ignatiy Vishnevetsky, with Roger Ebert serving as managing editor. Read her answers to our Movie Love Questionnaire here .

Now playing

Brian Tallerico

In Restless Dreams: The Music of Paul Simon

Clint worthington.

The Truth vs. Alex Jones

Outlaw Posse

Peter sobczynski.

Dad & Step-Dad

Carlos aguilar.

Simon Abrams

Film credits.

Where the Crawdads Sing (2022)

Rated PG-13 for sexual content and some violence including a sexual assault.

125 minutes

Daisy Edgar-Jones as Catherine 'Kya' Clark

Taylor John Smith as Tate Walker

Harris Dickinson as Chase Andrews

Michael Hyatt as Mabel

Sterling MacEr Jr. as Jumpin'

David Strathairn as Tom Milton

Garret Dillahunt as Pa

Eric Ladin as Eric Chastain

Ahna O'Reilly as Ma

Jojo Regina as Young Kya

Olivia Newman

Writer (based upon the novel by)

Delia Owens
Lucy Alibar

Cinematographer

Polly Morgan
Alan Edward Bell
Mychael Danna

Latest blog posts

Netflix Reimagines Patricia Highsmith's Timeless Character in the Chilling Ripley

The People’s Joker and Six Other Films That Were Stuck in Legal Limbo

Metrograph Highlights Remarkable Career of Lee Chang-dong

Female Filmmakers in Focus: Alice Rohrwacher on La Chimera

Spotify is currently not available in your country.

Follow us online to find out when we launch., spotify gives you instant access to millions of songs – from old favorites to the latest hits. just hit play to stream anything you like..

Listen everywhere

Spotify works on your computer, mobile, tablet and TV.

Unlimited, ad-free music

No ads. No interruptions. Just music.

Download music & listen offline

Keep playing, even when you don't have a connection.

Premium sounds better

Get ready for incredible sound quality.

IMAGES

Book Review
Where the Crawdads Sing By Delia Owns
Book Review: Where The Crawdads Sing By Delia Owens
Book Review: Where the Crawdads Sing // Delia Owens : The Indiependent
Book Review
Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens Review

COMMENTS

Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens
Drawn to two young men from town, who are each intrigued by her wild beauty, Kya opens herself to a new and startling world—until the unthinkable happens. In Where the Crawdads Sing, Owens juxtaposes an exquisite ode to the natural world against a profound coming of age story and haunting mystery. Thought-provoking, wise, and deeply moving ...
Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens review
Though set in the 1950s and 60s, Where the Crawdads Sing is, in its treatment of racial and social division and the fragile complex-ities of nature, obviously relevant to contemporary politics and ...
The Debut Novel That Rules the Best-Seller List
Shortly after Delia Owens's "Where the Crawdads Sing" was published last Aug. 14, Reese Witherspoon picked it as a selection for her Hello Sunshine book club, telling The Times she "loved ...
WHERE THE CRAWDADS SING
Connell Waldron and Marianne Sheridan are classmates in the small Irish town of Carricklea, where his mother works for her family as a cleaner. It's 2011, after the financial crisis, which hovers around the edges of the book like a ghost. Connell is popular in school, good at soccer, and nice; Marianne is strange and friendless.
From a Marsh to a Mountain, Crime Fiction Heads Outdoors
By Marilyn Stasio. Aug. 17, 2018. The wildlife scientist Delia Owens has found her voice in WHERE THE CRAWDADS SING (Putnam, $26), a painfully beautiful first novel that is at once a murder ...
Review: Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens
Where the Crawdads Sing is part bildungsroman and part crime drama, centered around Kya, a wild and unkempt girl. The book follows the ups and downs of her life. She lives a lonely life, but her story is a hopeful one as well. With a little help, she's able to survive and even learn to read. Despite her status as an outcast, her natural beauty ...
The Long Tail of 'Where the Crawdads Sing'
A year and a half later, the novel, " Where the Crawdads Sing ," an absorbing, atmospheric tale about a lonely girl's coming-of-age in the marshes of North Carolina, has sold more than four ...
Reviews of Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens
Both suspenseful and deeply moving, Carolina Moonset is an engrossing novel about family, memories both golden and terrible, and secrets too dangerous to stay hidden forever, from New York Times bestselling and Emmy Award-winning author, Matt Goldman. We have 14 read-alikes for Where the Crawdads Sing, but non-members are limited to two results.
Where the Crawdads Sing
The glaring lack of authority in Kaya's life during most of her development as a child, teenager, and young adult is integral to the plot of Where the Crawdads Sing. Arguably, nature itself is her most positive authority figure. Kya's dad is abusive and an alcoholic. He relies on a 7-year-old girl to do his cleaning and to cook for herself ...
Review of Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens
Both suspenseful and deeply moving, Carolina Moonset is an engrossing novel about family, memories both golden and terrible, and secrets too dangerous to stay hidden forever, from New York Times bestselling and Emmy Award-winning author, Matt Goldman. We have 14 read-alikes for Where the Crawdads Sing, but non-members are limited to two results.
Book Review: Where the Crawdads Sing // Delia Owens
Where the Crawdads Sing will transport you, move you and stay with you. Owens creates complex characters and an original storyline that feels like it is from another time, yet it deeply resonates today. With its appreciation of nature and celebration of humanity, Where The Crawdads Sing is a rare gem of a novel that will truly remain a timeless ...
Where the Crawdads Sing
Where the Crawdads Sing is a 2018 coming-of-age murder mystery novel by American zoologist Delia Owens. The story follows two timelines that slowly intertwine. The first timeline describes the life and adventures of a young girl named Kya as she grows up isolated in the marshes of North Carolina.The second timeline follows an investigation into the apparent murder of Chase Andrews, a local ...
Review
August 14, 2018. Where the Crawdads Sing is about Kya Clark, known to townspeople as the Marsh Girl, growing up in the marsh of North Carolina in the 1960's. When her family abandons her at age six, Kya must learn to survive on her own with only nature (and a handful of friends) to guide her. During her young adulthood, a tragedy occurs in ...
Where the Crawdads Sing Review (Author Delia Owens ...
When two young men from town become intrigued by her wild beauty, Kya opens herself to a new life-until the unthinkable happens. Perfect for fans of Barbara Kingsolver and Karen Russell, Where the Crawdads Sing is at once an exquisite ode to the natural world, a heartbreaking coming-of-age story, and a surprising tale of possible murder ...
'Where the Crawdads Sing' review: Good book turned bad movie
Review: 'Where the Crawdads Sing' is the latest literary sensation turned ho-hum movie. Daisy Edgar-Jones and Taylor John Smith in "Where the Crawdads Sing.". (Michele K. Short / Sony) By ...
'Where the Crawdads Sing' review:
Placing Daisy Edgar-Jones under the spotlight, "Where the Crawdads Sing" serves up a virtual symphony of chords - adapting a bestselling book that's part wild-child tale, part romance ...
Book Review :: Where the Crawdads Sing
This review of Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens is for the small percentage of readers who didn't like it - to let you know you're not alone.. The longer I have my book blog, the more reticent I am to write negative reviews. For one, I have not done the very hard work of finishing a novel, much less have had one published.
Where the Crawdads Sing review
W here The Crawdads Sing, the bestselling book of 2019, presents a fantasy of grit and purity: a young white girl, abandoned by her family in the 1950s, learns to fend for herself in a North ...
Book Marks reviews of Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens
In 1952, 10-year-old Kya Clark is growing up in the coastal marshes of North Carolina, alone and abandoned. Her Ma walked out of her life. Her brothers and sisters drifted away to their own lives. Finally, her drunken Pa leaves. In 1969, the body of Chase Andrews, the town's golden boy, is discovered in the marsh.
Where the Crawdads Sing
A particular treat for viewers who love the book, Where the Crawdads Sing offers a faithfully told, well-acted story in a rich, beautifully filmed setting. Read audience reviews.
'Where the Crawdads Sing' Review: A Wild Heroine, a Soothing Tale
July 13, 2022. Where the Crawdads Sing. Directed by Olivia Newman. Drama, Mystery, Thriller. PG-13. 2h 5m. Find Tickets. When you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our ...
'Where the Crawdads Sing' review: Adaptation of Delia Owens's novel
Just like in the book, Where the Crawdads Sing juggles multiple timelines to tell the story of its protagonist Kya (Edgar-Jones). Abandoned by her family at a young age, Kya raised herself in the ...
Where the Crawdads Sing movie review (2022)
For a film about a brave woman who's grown up in the wild, living by her own rules, "Where the Crawdads Sing" is unusually tepid and restrained. And aside from Daisy Edgar-Jones ' multi-layered performance as its central figure, the characters never evolve beyond a basic trait or two. We begin in October 1969 in the marshes of fictional ...
Bekah and Jenna review "Where the Crawdads Sing" a book written by an
Listen to this episode from Red Wine Reads on Spotify. This week, we read Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens Bekah joins me on this episode to discuss: The dark past of author, Delia Owens, that may or may not influence the plot/characters of the book. What order you should read the "Where the Crawdads Sing" trifecta including book, movie, and New Yorker article. How this book became a ...
Review : Where the Crawdads Sing Author: Delia ...
sarahs.book.corner on April 26, 2022: " Review : Where the Crawdads Sing Author: Delia Owens ⭐️My Rating: 5/5 Book # 29 of 2022 Read This If: •Read the ..." Review 📖: Where the Crawdads Sing 🏼Author: Delia Owens ⭐️My Rating: 5/5 Book # 29 of 2022 Read This If: •Read the ... | Instagram
Watch Where the Crawdads Sing
Where the Crawdads Sing. Trailer: Where the Crawdads Sing. More Details. Watch offline. Download and watch everywhere you go. Genres. Drama Movies, Romantic Movies, Mystery Movies, Movies Based on Books, Courtroom Movies, Social Issue Dramas. This movie is... Emotional, Romantic. Audio. English - Audio Description, English [Original], Spanish ...
Reese's Book Club
Reese's Book Club is a celebrity book sales club run by Reese Witherspoon under her media company Hello Sunshine.Since its founding in 2017, the club has gained a reputation for boosting the careers of female authors such as Delia Owens, Celeste Ng, and Megan Miranda.. Hello Sunshine has been involved in the adaptation of several Reese's Book Club Picks into films and television series ...
WHERE THE CRAWDADS SING movie review: Read the book instead. The
️S T E P H A N I E ️ (@stepharooskie). 1 Like. WHERE THE CRAWDADS SING movie review: Read the book instead. The characters are far more nuanced than the movie was able to portray.

WHERE THE CRAWDADS SING

HOUSE OF LEAVES

NORMAL PEOPLE

Please select an existing bookshelf

Please sign up to continue.

Almost there!

Sign in using your Kirkus account

Where the Crawdads Sing

Full Plot Summary

Book Review

Some Criticisms

Read it or Skip It?

Where the Crawdads Sing, Explained!

Book Excerpt

Movie / TV Show Adaptation

65 comments

Notice: All forms on this website are temporarily down for maintenance. You will not be able to complete a form to request information or a resource. We apologize for any inconvenience and will reactivate the forms as soon as possible.

Book Review

Readability Age Range

Year Published

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles

Profanity & Violence

Sexual Content

Discussion Topics

Additional Comments

Latest Book Reviews

Castle Reef 2: Bloodlines

Compass and Blade

Nothing Else But Miracles

Waverider (Amulet #9)

The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue

Dune Messiah

BookBrowse Reviews Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens

Where the Crawdads Sing

About this Book

Book Awards

In Delia Owens's debut novel, a young woman who's survived a solitary childhood in a shack in North Carolina's marsh country looks for love and builds a career in science.

Beyond the Book: Nature Writers Who Also Write Fiction

Support BookBrowse

BookBrowse Book Club

Members Recommend

Who Said...

Book Review: Where the Crawdads Sing // Delia Owens

LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

Content Guide

The Bottom Line

Courtney Floyd

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Where the Crawdads Sing Review (Author Delia Owens)

Where the Crawdads Sing Review

About Delia Owens

5 comments on “Where the Crawdads Sing Review (Author Delia Owens)”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Review: ‘Where the Crawdads Sing’ is the latest literary sensation turned ho-hum movie

More to Read

Review: History haunts the characters of ‘Black Cypress Bayou’ at the Geffen Playhouse

Resisting sentimentality, Laird Hunt’s latest book is an elegy for a lost generation

A father goes missing. Then a brother too. In this ‘Great Forest,’ a fraught return home

More From the Los Angeles Times

Julia Stiles privately welcomed third child while directing her first movie

Review: ‘Kim’s Video’ is a meandering shrine to a shuttered media palace with an afterlife

Rebel Wilson’s memoir suffers delays amid Sacha Baron Cohen harassment allegations

Review: In ‘Farewell, Mr. Haffmann,’ survival chafes against an erotic thriller’s contrivances

Book Review :: Where the Crawdads Sing

You may also like:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Where the Crawdads Sing review – hit novel crashes on the big screen

Most viewed

Where the Crawdads Sing

Embed our reviews widget for this book

Get the Book Marks Bulletin

April 4, 2024

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Email not verified

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

Movies / TV

Where the Crawdads Sing