essay on the kindness of strangers

Schneier on Security

Home Essays

The Kindness of Strangers

• Bruce Schneier
• The Wall Street Journal
• March 12, 2009

When I was growing up, children were commonly taught: “don’t talk to strangers.” Strangers might be bad, we were told, so it’s prudent to steer clear of them.

And yet most people are honest, kind, and generous, especially when someone asks them for help. If a small child is in trouble, the smartest thing he can do is find a nice-looking stranger and talk to him.

These two pieces of advice may seem to contradict each other, but they don’t. The difference is that in the second instance, the child is choosing which stranger to talk to. Given that the overwhelming majority of people will help, the child is likely to get help if he chooses a random stranger. But if a stranger comes up to a child and talks to him or her, it’s not a random choice. It’s more likely, although still unlikely, that the stranger is up to no good.

As a species, we tend help each other, and a surprising amount of our security and safety comes from the kindness of strangers. During disasters: floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, bridge collapses. In times of personal tragedy. And even in normal times.

If you’re sitting in a cafe working on your laptop and need to get up for a minute, ask the person sitting next to you to watch your stuff. He’s very unlikely to steal anything. Or, if you’re nervous about that, ask the three people sitting around you. Those three people don’t know each other, and will not only watch your stuff, but they’ll also watch each other to make sure no one steals anything.

Again, this works because you’re selecting the people. If three people walk up to you in the café and offer to watch your computer while you go to the bathroom, don’t take them up on that offer. Your odds of getting three honest people are much lower.

Some computer systems rely on the kindness of strangers, too. The Internet works because nodes benevolently forward packets to each other without any recompense from either the sender or receiver of those packets. Wikipedia works because strangers are willing to write for, and edit, an encyclopedia – with no recompense.

Collaborative spam filtering is another example. Basically, once someone notices a particular e-mail is spam, he marks it, and everyone else in the network is alerted that it’s spam. Marking the e-mail is a completely altruistic task; the person doing it gets no benefit from the action. But he receives benefit from everyone else doing it for other e-mails.

Tor is a system for anonymous Web browsing. The details are complicated, but basically, a network of Tor servers passes Web traffic among each other in such a way as to anonymize where it came from. Think of it as a giant shell game. As a Web surfer, I put my Web query inside a shell and send it to a random Tor server. That server knows who I am but not what I am doing. It passes that shell to another Tor server, which passes it to a third. That third server—which knows what I am doing but not who I am—processes the Web query. When the Web page comes back to that third server, the process reverses itself and I get my Web page. Assuming enough Web surfers are sending enough shells through the system, even someone eavesdropping on the entire network can’t figure out what I’m doing.

It’s a very clever system, and it protects a lot of people , including journalists, human rights activists, whistleblowers, and ordinary people living in repressive regimes around the world. But it only works because of the kindness of strangers. No one gets any benefit from being a Tor server; it uses up bandwidth to forward other people’s packets around. It’s more efficient to be a Tor client and use the forwarding capabilities of others. But if there are no Tor servers, then there’s no Tor. Tor works because people are willing to set themselves up as servers, at no benefit to them.

Alibi clubs work along similar lines. You can find them on the Internet, and they’re loose collections of people willing to help each other out with alibis. Sign up, and you’re in. You can ask someone to pretend to be your doctor and call your boss. Or someone to pretend to be your boss and call your spouse. Or maybe someone to pretend to be your spouse and call your boss. Whatever you want, just ask and some anonymous stranger will come to your rescue. And because your accomplice is an anonymous stranger, it’s safer than asking a friend to participate in your ruse.

There are risks in these sorts of systems. Regularly, marketers and other people with agendas try to manipulate Wikipedia entries to suit their interests. Intelligence agencies can, and almost certainly have, set themselves up as Tor servers to better eavesdrop on traffic. And a do-gooder could join an alibi club just to expose other members. But for the most part, strangers are willing to help each other, and systems that harvest this kindness work very well on the Internet.

Categories: Psychology of Security

Tags: Wall Street Journal

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.

Powered by WordPress Hosted by Pressable

Movie Reviews

Tv/streaming, collections, great movies, chaz's journal, contributors, the kindness of strangers.

Now streaming on:

Just when we thought movies that assert we are all circumstantially connected via cosmic powers went out of fashion for good, comes along yet another story of intertwined destinies. Outdated from the offset—think Fernando Meirelles ’ “360,” Garry Marshall ’s “New Year’s Eve” and a certain brand of early Alejandro González Iñárritu films without the miserablism —the frustratingly unrealistic “The Kindness of Strangers” from Danish writer/director Lone Scherfig exploits the aforesaid subgenre’s most testing traits, yielding a syrupy brew thick with twee and an abundance of cringe-inducing moments pulling at heartstrings. Fanciful to a fault and yet carried by an ensemble of committed performers—so purely dedicated that you end up feeling embarrassed on their behalf—Scherfig’s latest effort pursues something naively magical, only to end up with a mélange of miscalculated, cheap sentiments.

The wondrous emporium that sets the stage for our tangled souls is New York City; the town where this critic is from and therefore can confirm: we don’t quite chip in to the flow of things with an unlimited amount of selfless acts on a daily basis. But in the writer/director’s fantasy edition of the Big Apple, generosity floods through the town’s gridded bowels as amply as the East River. The main benefactor—the one that whisks us into this imaginary version of the city—is Clara ( Zoe Kazan ), a horribly mistreated young mother with two sons, running away from her abusive husband who lives somewhere around Upstate, works as a cop and seems thirsty for violence. After their car gets towed—the fugitive family’s temporary accommodation till then—Clara and her good-natured pre-teen boys Jude ( Finlay Wojtak-Hissong ) and Anthony ( Jack Fulton ) brave it out in the cold streets of downtown Manhattan, trying out homeless shelters or wherever would accept them for the night. Thanks to her implausibly polished looks—slick dresses, freshly touched-up waves (who knows how) and elegant shoes—Clara occasionally manages to sneak into hotels and cocktail parties undetected to scavenge for scraps and crosses paths with a number of helpful yet victimized humans who also seem lost in their own ways.

Among them are Andrea Riseborough ’s resolute Alice, juggling an impossible schedule both as a tireless nurse of 12-hour shifts and also as a volunteer somehow, working in support groups and soup kitchens. There is also Tahar Rahim ’s ex-convict Marc, Caleb Landry Jones ’ down-on-his-luck, hapless small-timer Jeff, and the past-his-prime Russian restaurateur Timofey ( Bill Nighy ), who runs the once-upon-time-popular joint Winter Palace, an old-worldly spot where Marc works as a manager. A fantastical hub for everyone that the story touches, Winter Palace looks like the kind of place where there is an endless supply of caviar and vodka and a side of thick Russian accent 24/7. Except (and here’s the film’s biggest twist): Timofey is not even Russian. His real name is Tim and his fake accent, he believes, is supposed to create a certain intrigue to better his business.

Of course, that never happens. Not that it matters in “The Kindness of Strangers,” as Scherfig—who had previously found exceptional emotional and historical detail within the romantic and deeply feminist beats of “ An Education ” and “ Their Finest ”—doesn’t linger on anyone or anything long enough for them to grow into substantial entities. Instead, her film moves along with barely there, heartbreakingly lonesome characters spreading some good deeds while getting lost in the shuffle. We wait—and wait—to learn, for instance, why Jeff fails at everything, how Clara found herself in the midst of a nightmarish marriage and what lies beneath her husband’s (slowly revealed) psychopathic acts. Those answers never get delivered. Similarly underdeveloped elsewhere is the vague romance between Marc and Clara—the one thing that could have helped save the aimless movie that fizzles before it reaches anything halfway rewarding. While Sebastian Blenkov ’s picture-book cinematography, aided by Andrew Lockington ’s overly sentimental score, insists on a whimsical idea of human unity in New York, it’s too bad that Scherfig’s untidy narrative never connects the dots.

Tomris Laffly

Tomris Laffly is a freelance film writer and critic based in New York. A member of the New York Film Critics Circle (NYFCC), she regularly contributes to  RogerEbert.com , Variety and Time Out New York, with bylines in Filmmaker Magazine, Film Journal International, Vulture, The Playlist and The Wrap, among other outlets.

Now playing

State of Consciousness

Simon abrams.

Drive-Away Dolls

Glitter & Doom

Sheila o'malley.

Brian Tallerico

Red Right Hand

Marya e. gates.

Film Credits

The Kindness of Strangers (2020)

112 minutes

Zoe Kazan as Clara

Andrea Riseborough as Alice

Tahar Rahim as Marc

Caleb Landry Jones as Jeff

Jay Baruchel as John Peter

Bill Nighy as Timofey

David Dencik as Lars

• Lone Scherfig

Cinematographer

• Sebastian Blenkov
• Cam McLauchlin
• Andrew Lockington

Latest blog posts

Steve Martin Is an Auteur Without Having Directed a Thing

The Unloved, Part 124: Play Dirty

Beyoncé and My Daughter Love Country Music

A Poet of an Actor: Louis Gossett, Jr. (1936-2024)

THE KINDNESS OF STRANGERS

Writers share their experiences of kindness while travelling.

By The Boar Travel

Credit: Pexels.

Image: Unsplash.

Zofia Swiatek

It is quite peculiar that when a stranger is kind to us while travelling, it’s immediately obvious to both parties that the favour cannot be returned — soon, we will be again physically distant, and lost to each other forever. We pass each other for only a moment in our lives, a chance encounter with no past and likely no future.

I think that the unique circumstances make even the smallest act of kindness so touching and memorable. I still remember how three years ago I was traveling through Georgia with my family and we left the car to visit a viewpoint outlooking a mountain pass. Several other people were there, taking pictures of the beautiful scenery, and I saw that one woman was posing with a large bouquet of beautiful purple wild flowers. I truly liked them, and went up to her to say how lovely they were.

It was all she needed to hear — immediately, she offered to give me the flowers, so that I could take a picture with them myself. Her gesture was extremely kind, and I smiled happily as my mom took our her camera. Yet this stranger’s kindness did not end there: the woman insisted that I keep the flowers with me, and refused to take them back. She saw that they brought me joy, and wanted to contribute to my happiness. People usually receive flowers from loved ones, and it’s so amazingly precious to receive them from a stranger!

The flowers withered away by the end of the day, but the memory will stay with me forever. This simple, ephemeral gift became a powerful reminder of the goodness people can show towards others.

I passed a lot of people on that trip years ago, but the fact that I still remember this woman and the flowers shows that a simple gesture can truly go a long way. Back then, the flowers made my day, and every time I think back to it, the world seems a bit more bright.

Rosie Williams

This week I was reminded of someone who played a very minor role in my year abroad in Germany, yet whose regular kindness and positive attitude never failed to put a smile on my face.

I took the train to work every day and I soon realised there was a ticket inspector, who also worked on this route regularly. He was the most friendly man, with dark curly hair and a thin moustache- which also curled outwards in a spiral at the sides just like in a cartoon. In fact, he did look rather Super Mario-esque, but that’s beside the point.

Every time he entered the carriage to check the tickets, he would announce his arrival with a jovial greeting. On one occasion, I overheard him talking to some people in front of me. He’d sat down beside them as he often did, telling them that he used to be an artist before realising that the real art in life was interacting with other people, which is why he became a train conductor.

You really couldn’t make this stuff up! He certainly used this opportunity, which the profession apparently afforded him, to its full extent! I liked to eavesdrop into the friendly conversations like this, which he had with passengers, (it was hard not to overhear because he was so animated), but one day it was my turn.

Getting out my ticket for him to check, he spotted the British driving license in my card wallet, which prompted him to sit next to me and tell me about the time when his sports team, (to my memory it was something like trampolining), went to competitions in the UK and then Japan. Listening to what he had to say always felt slightly surreal, as this man seemed to have such a rich life behind him. I embraced the opportunity, listening eagerly and feeling privileged to share in his storytelling.

Even though my journey was only eight minutes, his friendliness and mad adventures combined had the ability to put my little worries into perspective and send me off feeling inspired.

Lauren Nicholson

Last year I visited Paris with a few friends and we spent a day looking at art galleries. The last one on our list was ‘Musee De L’Orangerie', a dreaded 40 minute trek from the previous one. We weren’t too familiar with the public transport so we were travelling between everything on foot.

We ended up arriving about five minutes before the museum closed and the guard told us they actually stopped letting in people fifteen minutes before anyway. I was pretty gutted – the gallery features a beautiful set of waterlily paintings by Monet and the room is circular so the painting bends around. Sort of like a panorama view.

The security guard caught on to our mood and asked us “Brexit or no Brexit?” My friend replied “no Brexit” and the guard grinned and told us we could go in for the last few minutes.

They let us straight through the security checks and passport checks (if you’re an EU resident you get in free, otherwise you have to pay). I did feel like a bit of a celebrity.

Although we didn’t get to spend long inside, it was definitely worth it and certainly my favourite of all the museums. Pictures of the Monet paintings really don’t do it justice: there’s just something really beautiful about being surrounded by the paintings in real life. It’s really immersive.

You can also get quite close to them too and the vast size means you can see so many details of his work – every brush stroke. I definitely recommend visiting, but maybe before its closing time at 6pm, because I doubt the guard is always that nice!

Hannah Drew

My fondest memory of a kind stranger comes from my year abroad. I was travelling back to the UK for the Christmas holidays, a journey which involved travelling a couple of hours from my small town to Paris, where I would catch the Eurostar to London.

The day had already been made extremely difficult, due to the transport strikes and my trains to Paris being cancelled, followed by a Flixbus that turned up over an hour late. In Paris, I needed to catch RER B to Gare du Nord, a service which was significantly reduced due to the strikes.

The station was completely rammed with people and I knew that if I missed the next metro, I would miss my Eurostar due to my late Flixbus earlier in the day. Enter my kind stranger. Seeing that I was visibly upset after my stressful morning and the panic of the crowd, he helped me onto the train with my huge suitcase as we were pushed and shoved by other passengers. He then proceeded to form a human barricade around me, so nobody was shoving into me and I was able to calm myself down.

As I arrived at Gare du Nord, he yet again helped me lug my suitcase off and pointed me in the direction of my Eurostar train. Although he did not know of my difficult day and desire to get back to the UK, for the first time in three months, a stranger took the time to help someone who was visibly struggling and get me on my way.

It’s a shame he wasn’t there to help me when my phone was stolen about ten minutes later in Gare du Nord. Thanks, Paris.

Reece Goodall

Way back in my first year, I decided to take part in one of the many ‘travel abroad’ opportunities you’re bombarded with.

The idea of the journey was to hitchhike from London to Morocco. In all honesty, I had little faith that the trip would be a success– although hitchhiking seems an adventure in films, I simply didn’t believe that it would in real life. The charity trip involved groups of three, and who would have the space and the patience for three random kids they’d found on the road?

It transpired that Europe was full of wonderful people, and they went above and beyond giving us lifts. One French lady found us wandering and, when she learned we’d scarcely eaten for two days, she took us back to her house and invited us to share a stuffed chicken meal with her family.

When it poured with rain and we attempted to rest under some trees, a lady took us to a nearby hostel and paid for our board. Sitting in a train station, again because of weather, one of our party was sad and struggling with homesickness – an old French man saw her crying, asked what music she liked and then started playing it on the station piano.

In the most exciting moment of the trip, the American member of our party left her passport in a service station toilet. A Spanish man picked up there and, when she realised, he took her back several miles to look. It wasn’t there, so he called the local police and then he took us to the US embassy in Spain. It was out of his way by a magnitude of several hours, but he said that he couldn’t abandon someone in need.

I wasn’t expecting the trip to be a success and, for me, it wasn’t – I bailed out before Morocco. But the journey was wonderful, in no small part because of the kindness of the people we encountered on the way.

Have you benefitted from the kindness of strangers?

Michael McCullough joins the podcast to discuss the difficult questions around the evolution and development of human kindness and morality.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

The Kindness of Strangers with Michael McCullough

Overview & Shownotes

How did humans turn from animals who were only inclined to help their offspring to the creatures we are today–who regularly send precious resources to total strangers? With me on the show today is Michael McCullough , who explores this difficult question in his book, The Kindness of Strangers: How a Selfish Ape Invented a New Moral Code .

For the episode transcript,  download a copy  or read it below.

Contact us at [email protected]

Links to people and ideas mentioned in the show

• Michael McCullough,   The Kindness of Strangers: How a Selfish Ape Invented a New Moral Code
• W.D. Hamilton  and the gene for altruism
• Robert Trivers and  reciprocal altruism
• Ancient  Mesopotamia
• Humanity’s turn to agriculture (the  Neolithic Revolution )
• The  Code of Hammurabi
• The  Axial Age
• The  Golden Rule
• Peter Singer

Thanks to Evelyn Brosius for our logo. Music featured in the show:

“ The Zeppelin ” by Blue Dot Sessions from sessions.blue (CC BY-NC 4.0)

“ Silk and Silver ” by Blue Dot Sessions from sessions.blue (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Christiane Wisehart, host and producer: I’m Christiane Wisehart. And this is Examining Ethics, brought to you by The Janet Prindle Institute for Ethics at DePauw University.

[music: Blue Dot Sessions, The Zeppelin]

Christiane: How did humans turn from animals who were only inclined to help their offspring and mates to the creatures we are today–who regularly send precious resources to total strangers? With me on the show today is Michael McCullough, who explores this difficult question in his book, The Kindness of Strangers: How a Selfish Ape Invented a New Moral Code.

Michael McCullough: I was really trying to understand how we got from a world in which we limited our concern for others’ welfare to family, friends, and members of our own small societies, to the world we’re in now, which is a world in which we don’t really think anything is strange, about wondering what we can do to help people in the developing world or the concern we should have ethically about future generations and their wellbeing, or even people on the other side of our countries or the other side of our cities that we’ll never meet, but we nevertheless have some impulse to try to take an interest in them to help them to ease their suffering.}

Christiane: Stay tuned for my interview with Michael McCullough on today’s episode of Examining Ethics.

[music fades out]

Christiane: I went to a religious private high school, which meant that evolution was not a big part of any of my biology classes. It was there in a kind of negative sense–we were taught that Darwin’s theory of evolution did not mesh with the Biblical account of human history, which was the “true” account of human history. In spite of that, and thanks to my scientist father, from a pretty young age I’ve appreciated the beauty of Darwin’s theory and developed an interest in the ways in which human bodies have changed over the course of millions of years.

I was fascinated, then, by Michael McCullough’s account of our psychological evolution and how our minds–not just our bodies–have morphed over hundreds of thousands of years. His book, The Kindness of Strangers: How a Selfish Ape Invented a New Moral Code stretches from hunters and gatherers who wandered across the earth in nomadic bands to the present day. He focuses on the question of how humans went from a fairly limited sense of morality to developing sophisticated moral codes that help us answer the complicated ethical questions we’ve faced as societies get bigger and more complex.

I spoke with Michael in December of 2020. [interview begins] Christiane: Most of the listeners will understand that we’re a social animal, that we’re biologically programmed to be social, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that we’re biologically programmed to be kind to one another, right? Michael McCullough: We most surely are programmed for certain kinds of altruism toward others, but I actually don’t think the mechanisms that those evolutionary dynamics give rise to can really explain the thing I want to explain, which is, you know, why is there an effective altruism movement? Why is there a UNICEF? Um, and I don’t think the evolutionary explanations that evolutionary biologists and evolutionary psychologists trade in, I don’t think those theoretical tools are up to the job of explaining that kind of cool stuff.

Going back to Darwin actually, evolutionary biologists have been interested in what they call the problem of cooperation. And the problem of cooperation is that it shouldn’t exist and yet it does. And the reason it shouldn’t exist is because when I render help to some other individual, it comes at a cost to me, and it comes as a benefit to the other individual. And those are the currencies that natural selection operates on. It operates on costs and benefits. So we do a sort of short- uh, sort of a shorthand thing and we talk about sort of costs and benefits as a matter of economics, but natural selection is an economist too. So anything that I’m doing, any energy I’m expending, any resources I’m expending to your benefit, are resources I couldn’t convert into reproductive success. So the question is why, why do we invest in others?

And so this problem sat around actually in, in evolutionary biology for a hundred years, um, with people kind of knowing sort of what an answer was, which is, well, we take care of our family, you know, um, that’s sort of how we get our interests into the future. So there was a recognition that our genetic interests live on through our offspring, but no one really knew how to formalize that. But in the 1960s, uh, an evolutionary biologist named William Hamilton worked out the math on this.

Suppose you have an adaptation that causes you to do something nice for other individuals, and this is beneficial to them. What Hamilton showed was, that’s a gene that could evolve by natural selection.

So if you think about this, it’s like, uh, let’s say I’m doing something that’s harmful to me, but it creates three times that amount of benefit to another individual and the class of individuals I’m helping are 50% likely to share that gene as well. Who is the class of individuals in my world who are 50% likely to have a gene that I possess? Well, my offspring will have a 50% likelihood. So I can reach out into that class of individuals called my offspring. And if I’m doing something that costs me a unit, but it makes them three units better off, and we multiply that cost benefit ratio by the likelihood that they have that gene, that satisfies the requirements for that gene to evolve. You get three times the benefit I do, and there’s a 50% likelihood you’ve got that gene.

So in a sense, um, I produce one fewer copy of that gene, but you’re producing another copy and a half of it on average, that gene is going to increase in frequency. So the population will become more altruistic because of relatedness and because we’ve got this cost benefit ratio that is favorable given, given the degree of relatedness. So what does this all mean? It means we evolve to take an interest in the welfare of our families, and that’s a kind of altruism. Um, so that’s the first way we explain the evolution of altruism. There’s other models we can get to, uh, if you feel like it, but a lot of them have to do with reciprocity and friendship.

Christiane: I actually, yeah, I do want you to talk about reciprocity just a little bit. I’d like you to explain why humans have this idea of reciprocity and how that works in our bodies? Michael McCullough: So another mechanism in addition to kin altruism, as we often call it is a dynamic called reciprocal altruism. And here, we’re just trying to explain how it could come to be that you end up helping individuals who are not close genetic relatives. For what reason might we have a motivation to help individuals who are non-relatives? Um, so who don’t share that gene for helping in common. An evolutionary biologist named Robert Trivers, uh, in 1971 figured this one out. And, and what he was able to show is that if you have a gene that causes you to provide a benefit, uh, at a suitable cost benefit ratio, again, like, like with Hamilton, it’s cheap, cheap for you to give, but really beneficial to receive. And in that giving process, you create some kind of motivation in the recipient that then motivates that recipient to repay you in the future to provide that same kind of benefit to you in the future. Then that’s a gene that’s also on the move.

And, you know, you can think about this as buying low and selling high. I’m going to buy your friendship in a sense, I’m going to buy it low, you know, by providing a benefit to you that’s, you know, it’s cheap for me to provide, but it’s really valuable to you. So what have I bought? I’ve sort of bought your gratitude and as a result of how I’ve helped you, if that, if that kind of caused you to make a memory that I helped you, and that it also motivates you in the future to help me, then even though I’m sort of in the immediate term, I’ve paid a cost in order to provide a benefit to you, which makes it look like I’m disadvantaged in the eyes of natural selection.

If that favor I’ve given you repays itself over the life course, then over the life course I’m better off for having paid that small initial cost. It’s really like investing in a stock, actually, reciprocal altruism works very much that way. I’m going to sort of buy your friendship or your faithfulness so that when I need three units of benefit, you’re willing to pay that one unit cost in order to make me better off. And so through the course of a lifetime, we establish this sort of partnership. And each, each, at each, with each exchange of benefits and costs, we’re better off, you know, on average, we end up better off over the lifetime. Christiane: I think this is where the problem of your book comes in, right? Because then how do you explain a one time $500 donation to Live Aid or me sending bottled water down to New Orleans during hurricane Katrina? Right? I don’t know anybody in New Orleans, I’m from Indiana. When does that shift start? Or, or have we always been programmed to want to help even people that we’ll never ever see? Michael McCullough: We have to do a little bit of projection backwards and work with, uh, you know, a fairly sparse anthropological record, archeological record to try to figure out how we did think about complete strangers prior to moving into cities and chiefdoms and stuff like that. Before we got into big collectives. My read of the existing data is that we lived in small societies. Uh, you know, if you think about the organizational units that we evolve to live in, there’s the nuclear family. Then there’s this kind of band of, you know, a couple of family groups, maybe three or four family groups that lived together for a season. And you can think of them as sort of a temporary neighborhood or something like that. So it’s this sort of temporary nomadic band.

And then above that, you’ve got the cultural group, you know, you can think of, this as people who speak your language. And that could be a thousand people. Maybe several thousands of people. That is your social universe. That is the entire world of people that you could in principle care about. And the reason you could in principle care about them is because the whole Kevin Bacon thing, the whole six degrees of separation thing. I know your brother’s wife, who you also know or something like that. So we have just a couple of degrees of separation.

Then I have some incentive to be nice to you, even if we’ve never met. And, you know, perhaps we’ll, we never will see each other again, but we exist in this dense network of friends, of friends, of friends. So you can think of that as the mating pool, the marriage pool, you know, this is the class of people you couldn’t in practice interact with. So what do we know about how people interact with people from other ethnolinguistic groups? This is where the data are contested. But my read is that we tend to, uh, regard those people with suspicion and hostility. We don’t speak together. We don’t eat together. Our customs are different. Uh, and in general, um, our relationships are either regulated by just keeping apart, uh, and avoiding conflict, or when we come in to, if we bump up against each other too closely, to engage in conflict.

So I think we evolved not only to not treat that distant other kindly, but in fact, to regard them with suspicion and possibly hostility. So I think that’s the psychology we come into the modern world with where we are, we’re really indifferent to people whom we can only imagine are out there. And that’s the psychology we bring with us to the first city-states, to the first chiefdoms, to, uh, Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilization, where societies start to get really big. And that’s where we start to have, I think, the first tangible problems of suffering strangers and us not being equipped with kind of evolved psychological hardware that would motivate us to care for, for their wellbeing. Christiane: We come into the modern age with this psychology, but you’re talking about what era? BCE?

Michael McCullough: We’re probably talking about 13,000 years ago, when that transition started, then we’re in the first cities, you know, maybe 8,000 BCE. People move from a really communal way of life to when they start farming and cultivating grains, primarily. You see that they start to privatize their resources. We’re starting to move from a communal understanding of how to make a living out of the world, to one that’s really more organized around immediate family or extended family. The way you make a living as a farmer is you can do it all yourself. You can do it with you and your family, so you don’t need to coordinate the sharing.

So life begins, begins to get private and lineage based. Then you project that forward into these first, these big city States, and that whole thing just explodes. It becomes about home and hearth and your immediate trading partners, and maybe your neighbors. You don’t know the people, you know, in your city of 10,000 people. You’re not going to interact with the people on, you know, clear on the other side of the city. This is the first, I think, the first real challenge for our evolved mechanisms for caring that they’re just not built for worlds of 10,000 strangers. Christiane: And maybe even worse than that, this is when, this is when you start to see what we would call poverty. Michael McCullough: Yeah. Christiane: So then how do you explain what you call the age of compassion? Michael McCullough: The solution in those early societies of the ancient near East is legal codes. It becomes offensive enough to see the amount of inequality in society that these God Kings of Sumeria and Mesopotamia began to issue these grand legal codes. Code of Hammurabi, of course, is, is, is the example that, that we, you know, that comes to mind, you know, immediately, but it wasn’t the first, there were others. What they all seem to include are regulations against exploiting the very, very poor. Life in those ancient city-states–as is increasingly the case in the United States, for example–success and failure becomes so much a matter of luck, good luck and bad luck that is heritable.

So the first land, your, your family is able to acquire and enclose and privatized, it’s going vary in quality from, and, location, from irrigation and so forth from, um, your neighbors. This is just random luck. Some land will be more productive than other lands. We’re privatizing this stuff, so it’s no longer communal, so we’re not pooling risk among large collectives, that’s a kind of bad luck just as a starting initial condition. But then there’s just sort of random bad luck that, I mean, this is all about the small numbers, right? The breadwinner of a family dies, a son dies, who was, you know, critical for helping the farm to run and so on and so forth.

This, this kind of bad luck just in, you know, or good luck multiplies across society. So you have, you have widows and orphans who have no one to take care of them out of bonds of friendship or family: easy to exploit. And, uh, it becomes so outrageous, and I think so demoralizing that these ancient despots realize like we have to do something to limit how they’re being exploited. So you get these legal codes that say, we can’t charge exorbitant interest rates. If somebody becomes your indentured servant, it can’t be for a lifetime. If you take someone’s property as sort of, if you pawn it, you have to give them the chance to buy it back in the future.

So you see all of these sort of tender mercies developing that are designed to limit the ability of the very fortunate and wealthy for, to just grinding the very unfortunate poor into the dirt. So from this age of these first large cities, we move into an era that, um, social scientists and many philosophers and historians called the axial age. And this is a period probably, you know, between 800 and 200 BC. When you see this flowering of the world’s religions, the religions that are still practiced today, you know, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, and then classical Greek thought. In each of these societies, you see the development of a golden rule for the first time, a notion that everyone around you, no matter their identity is entitled to the same kind of consideration that you would claim that they give to you.

You become morally obligated during this so-called axial age to practice what’s, you know, what we now recognize as the golden rule. So what you see is that in each of these societies, spirituality becomes really deeply tied up with sympathy, with compassion, in some sense to be spiritually right, or right with God means you have to extend your compassion to the entire world. So we get the golden rule and we get all kinds of institutions during this era that are responses to this new ethical insight. So you see in ancient classical Greece, you see kind of the first, um, veterans affairs, the department of veterans affairs. You see the first large work programs, the first disability insurance programs in Israel at the time after the Israelites returned from the Babylonian captivity. You see them bringing with them and innovating ideas like the need for institutions within the society that helped to meet the needs of the poor, of the orphans and the widows. Christiane: The golden rule, these, these ideas around compassion, helping, helping others, it is new, right? Um, in terms of humans as animals, it’s a thing that we have created, right? No matter, it might be 2000 years ago, but it’s, it’s never the last something that might not necessarily have been with us since the beginning of our evolutionary journey. Right? Michael McCullough: That’s right.

You could have a rule that works in your small scale society that’s like, you better pay those people back because you know you’re going to need help from them in the future. Like if you are lazy today and you decide to not go out and work, well, you’re setting yourself up for being abandoned or being, being shunned, not getting their help in the future. So in this society where there’s, you know, what comes around, goes around, it’s really easy to see the logic of helping other people. But when you get to this world where you just, you just know you’re never going to see these people again, but you know they’re out there, you know they’re hurting, that takes a different kind of psychological raw materials to get the conviction that you ought to be caring about complete nameless, faceless strangers. Christiane: The golden rule is, is, is one of the most revolutionary insights into ethics that we have as humans, right? Michael McCullough: Right. Christiane: And we’re just fine tuning it and making it better and fixing the problems that, that come up with this. By the last half of the, the 20th century, we’ve evolved pretty far from those, those early years in the age of compassion, right? Those early years in, in our big, in our first big cities. And we get, we get a guy named Peter Singer, right? Who, who, as you say writes one of the most important works in terms of kindness of the 20th century. So, so what are his ideas and what kind of new, what kind of new era does he spark? Michael McCullough: Right. Uh, so Singer, uh, is an ethicist and, uh, has spent his life trying to, his, his career trying to trace out what the implications of utilitarianism are for the world of ethics. One of his major contributions was an essay in which he made a very, very subversive, but very simple argument. And, uh, in this essay, he basically just presents the idea that if, you know, you passed by a child who was drowning in a little pond, you know, a little city pond, and you were on your way to work and you were busy and you had your best clothes on, you would think nothing about going into that pond to save this little drowning child, even if it meant you had to send your clothes to the dry cleaners and maybe replace your leather shoes or something like that.

You, you would, you know, most people would say it would be monstrous to, you know, to prioritize your, you know, your work schedule, uh, and you need to punch, your need to punch the clock and your dry cleaning bill, um, to prioritize that over saving a life. You see this child, um, flailing around and all of the cues there are to tell you that there’s this, uh, helpless, blameless little creature with a real problem. It’s completely uncontroversial to imagine we run into that pond to save the drowning kid. What Singer does in this essay, uh, Poverty, Affluence and Morality is to say fine, okay, if that’s your intuition, then what’s your intuition with regard to sending money to an organization and a cost-effective organization, that’s going to make meals available in Sub-Saharan Africa?

It’s the identical ethical structure as the, the, the kid in the pond, um, except at this point, you don’t know anybody involved, you don’t, you don’t know the people who would be helped by your $50 a month. So when I teach this in, in my classes with my undergraduates, they start to come up with reasons why they’re not blameworthy if they were to do that. You know, they all say they would be morally blameworthy if they don’t pull the drowning kid out of the pond. But I ask, would you be morally blameworthy if you didn’t, you know, write that check once a month or, um, you know, set up that recurring credit card payment once a month? They come up with all sorts of reasons why they would not be morally blameworthy.

They say things like, I’m not sure the organization is going to be cost-effective. And then you can say, well, assume, assume it is, assume it’s really cost-effective. Or there’s so many other positive things I could be doing with it here at home, you know, in the United States, or I, I’ve, you know, I’m all budgeted out. I’m, I’m using, I’m taking care of my grandmother, you know, or something like that. They can come up with a lot of reasons where suddenly, even though it’s ethically equivalent, for some reason, there are these outside considerations that make them, make excuses seem defensible.

If you follow this argument out, though, what Singer concludes and it’s kind of Singer’s principle, I guess, is if you can create a good in the world that reduces suffering without inordinately increasing suffering for yourself, then morally you ought to do it. So, because he’s this, he is a utilitarian, for him the ethical coin of the realm is suffering. So I don’t know how many times this essay has been cited among scholars. I mean, I would assume it’s like 10,000 times or something like that. I mean, it’s just, it’s so influential. Uh, and this is really just one of several essays and books that are coming out at this point, um, that are about global poverty.

So in the 1970s, we see kind of culture-wide, and in fact, through most of the developed world, an intensification of interest in global poverty. The developed world starts to get very serious about global poverty, in part through arguments like Singer’s, in part, um, through simply the recognition that it’s, it’s good realpolitik to be concerned about making the world a more stable place. Um, we strengthen the United Nations with all kinds of capacities for stimulating development and, um, making more effective humanitarian interventions in the developed world. I think this is the beginning of a real renaissance or a real kind of new high watermark in our concern for strangers. We’re getting, we begin to get really good at helping the nameless, faceless others in, you know, literally on the other side of the planet.

Christiane: So then how do you explain the kindness of strangers? Michael McCullough: You know, I’m an evolutionary psychologist, so I’m always trying to figure out, well, we thought it through somehow, you know, everything we do is generated by cognitive mechanisms, so like what’s the nature of the cognition that we’ve brought to bear on these problems? And I actually think this is a set of general-purpose kind of cognitive tools that we use. One is simply that we have a capacity for reasoning. And the second is we have a capacity for tracing our incentives and figuring out what’s good for us. I actually think the long arc of the history of human generosity is one about us encountering problems, large-scale, society-wide problems that involve mass suffering, looking at these as things that need to be explained, they need explanations. They kind of are offensive to how, to our worldviews.

So then we say, well, what are the, what are the problems? Why is this a problem? And then we can identify, well, it’s bad for business. It’s demoralizing, it’s offensive to God. So then people, what do people do? Well, they do the same kinds of argumentation and reasoning that they’ve always brought to solving corporate problems. And I think we do have evolved psychological mechanisms to promote argument.

So we argue about, you know, why do we not want vast swaths of humanity showing up sick and starving at the city gates? Well, we have all of these reasons why it’s, you know, it’s, it’s a bad idea. And then we say, well, what can we do? You know, what are the best approaches? So we get more and more sophisticated through history. Um, we can know more about what works. We can know more about the problems, we can know more about what works.

We get ethically smarter. We get ethically cleverer, I think smarter, I would say. Um, we have ethical tools that we didn’t have, um, 2,500 years ago. We have trade, technology, science, social science, the kind of science that can give us vaccines and pesticides and, um, high yield, um, cereals. We have wonderful intellectual and material resources at our disposal to make people better off in a way that we just couldn’t have done 2000 years ago, because we didn’t know how to do it. We didn’t necessarily have the ethical apparatus that convinced us that we should do it. And, um, we didn’t have the material resources that made it possible to do it.

Christiane: Um, so why do you care about this? Michael McCullough: Um, I, I … (laughs) Why do I care about it? Um, I began caring about it merely as a sort of, um, insider social science matter because I thought we were not doing ourselves any favors as a, as a science by sort of very neatly saying like, oh, this is about reciprocal altruism, or this is about, you know, uh, kin altruism. Those were kind of some of the tools that evolutionary scientists wanted to use to explain this. And this just to me, did not look right. It did not seem to fit the facts of history. So as a kind of insider, inside baseball shop talk kind of thing, I wanted to present a different view, but the more I read and the more I wrote and the more I thought about it, the more I realized like this is, this is good news.

You know, it’s, uh, you know, I wanted to be, uh, a cheerleader for ethical progress in a time when we tend to be quite gloomy about progress and science, and we’re sort of disaffected and seemed to be going through some kind of malaise about, you know, whether we are better off as a society than we used to be. The more I read, the more convinced I became that we are doing better. You know, we are a better civilization, morally, technologically, et cetera. We are better than we were 2000 years ago. So I think I wanted to kind of tell a story of good news that I’d hoped would not only give people some hope, but also show them what are the raw materials at our disposal for pushing this forward into the future.

[music: Blue Dot Sessions, Silk and Silver]

Christiane: If you want to know more about The Kindness of Strangers or Michael McCullough’s other work, check out our show notes page at examiningethics.org.

The Prindle Institute for Ethics also produces a podcast called Getting Ethics to Work. You can find it at prindleinstitute.org/getethicstowork or wherever you find your podcasts.

Examining Ethics is hosted by The Janet Prindle Institute for Ethics at DePauw University. Christiane Wisehart wrote and produced the show, with editorial assistance from Hilary Koch. Our logo was created by Evie Brosius. Our music is by Blue Dot Sessions and can be found online at sessions.blue. Examining Ethics is made possible by the generous support of DePauw Alumni, friends of the Prindle Institute, and you the listeners. Thank you for your support.

The views expressed here are the opinions of the individual speakers alone. They do not represent the position of DePauw University or the Prindle Institute for Ethics.

[music fades]

Moral Grandstanding with Brandon Warmke

Meena Krishnamurthy and Political Emotions

Related Episodes

Morality scaled up with joshua greene.

2961 W County Road 225 S Greencastle, IN 46135 P: (765) 658-4075

BUILDING HOURS

Monday - Friday: 8:00AM - 5:00PM Saturday-Sunday: closed

• Free Samples
• Premium Essays
• Editing Services Editing Proofreading Rewriting
• Extra Tools Essay Topic Generator Thesis Generator Citation Generator GPA Calculator Study Guides Donate Paper
• Essay Writing Help
• About Us About Us Testimonials FAQ
• Studentshare
• The Kindness of Strangers

The Kindness of Strangers - Essay Example

• Subject: Sociology
• Type: Essay
• Level: High School
• Pages: 1 (250 words)
• Downloads: 32
• Author: pinkie51

Extract of sample "The Kindness of Strangers"

While playing a game of Frisbee in my front yard with Har Lan, she darted out in front of a car and was hit. The car sped away, not showing the courtesy to stop. My Har Lan suffered a serious injury to her front leg and was unable to walk. I cried as I carried her into the house. As I tended to Har Lan's broken leg, I could hear the echo of my mother saying, "She will be your responsibility." So as I called veterinarians, all sympathetic, my despair deepened as I found the estimated cost of several hundred dollars to be far beyond my reach.

After hearing "I'm sorry we couldn't help" several times, I persisted through one more call. The receptionist must have heard the tears in my eyes as she said hold for just a moment. She soon came back to the phone and told me that the veterinarian had agreed to do the necessary treatment at no charge. My mother rushed us to the office where the doctor placed a splint on Har Lan's leg.Har Lan is a good as new now and an even better friend, but it was Dr. Rebecca Cox, the veterinarian, who instilled in me the lasting meaning of the kindness of strangers.

Thanks to her, I fully appreciate what it means to give. She inspired me to work hard to succeed in everything I do so I'll have something to offer a stranger in need. She showed me that our friendships may be our most treasured possession, but the kindness of strangers is priceless.

• Reggae Music
• Weary Blues
• Cited: 1 times
• Copy Citation Citation is copied Copy Citation Citation is copied Copy Citation Citation is copied

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Kindness of Strangers

Symbolism, poetic realism and poetic tragedy in 'a streetcar named desire', daniel defoe of mans salvation, a streetcar named desire, a honduran immigrant, transnational immigrants in a global society, lead character in streetcar named desire, virtual tours vs. written word.

• TERMS & CONDITIONS
• PRIVACY POLICY
• COOKIES POLICY

The kindness of strangers

Sometimes the people who get you through are total strangers who make a difference in your day or life and move on, oblivious..

I’M EXTRAORDINARILY BLESSED IN THE WAY of friends and family. I feel lucky that solace, advice, and a steadying sense of shared history are a mere phone call or digital tap away. Sometimes, though, the people who get you through are total strangers, folks you cross paths with for a few minutes or even less, who make a difference in your day or your life and move on, oblivious.

In my 20s I moved from San Francisco to Manhattan to pursue my (speech-obliterating cough) acting career. The Bay Area is fuzzy and friendly and relatively warm. Manhattan is spiky and cold and exhilarating. I was terrified. And my first few months there were probably the loneliest of my life. I wasn’t sure I was going to stay. One miserable winter morning on the bus, late for the day job I hated, I asked a woman near me what time it was. She looked closely at my face and said with great tenderness, “It’s 9 o’clock, baby.” It was as if she had looked into my soul and saw my self-doubt and fear. And when she smiled at me, it was as if the city itself was opening its arms. I stayed for four years.

Advertisement

More recently, my husband and I realized that our tiny North Shore investment property had some (very bad) problems. In order to tackle one of them, I called in an exterminator. He told me the crawl space below our cottage required not mousetraps but small-animal traps. They were expensive, he said, but he happened to have one in his truck that he’d like to just give us; it was an extra, he said, and no one would miss it. I protested, wanting to pay to rent it. Finally he snapped, “You just don’t know how to accept a gift, do you?” It was true. I loved giving presents, but I’d always felt uncomfortable receiving them. Now when someone is uncommonly generous, I just smile and say thank you, and I think of that rat trap still nestled in the bowels of our (impossible to sell) beach house.

And then there was the guy I bought a bagel from on my way to see Stephanie, one of my dearest friends, dying way too young. I was worried about our visit. It had just begun to dawn on me that though she’d fought it off for the better part of a decade, the cancer was going to win. I wanted to be completely there for her in every way I could, but I worried that my grief would get in the way. I was lost in my own head when the bagel guy said something about the temperature. Yes, I concurred, it was a great day. “It’s a great day every day,” said Bagel Dude. I looked up. The man wasn’t smiling. He was serious, and he was right. Every day we draw breath is a great day.

That morning Stephanie and I had our first honest conversation about what was going to happen to her and how she’d like to spend the time she had left. We’d live for each great day.

My kids sometimes give me a hard time about the opportunistic conversations I have when we’re out and about. It’s certainly not the quickest way to get things done, and as I am unencumbered by the sort of inner timetable most people seem to take for granted, my habit has resulted in some egregiously late arrivals and departures.

My two daughters also think it’s amusing that I enjoy doing exactly what I’ve warned them against their whole lives. Not talking to strangers is a good policy when you’re young. But the older I get, the more I treasure these random exchanges. And sometimes I think maybe they’re not as random as I used to believe.

Carolyn R. Russell is a writer in West Newbury. Send comments to [email protected] .

TELL YOUR STORY . E-mail your 650-word essay on a relationship to [email protected] . Please note: We do not respond to submissions we won’t pursue .

• To subscribe to this site
• Wisdom Tradition - See with New Eyes
• Wisdom or War?
• Wisdom Actors, part 1
• Wisdom Actors, part 2
• Wisdom Words
• Bibliography
• IR & Theory
• Realism & Idealism
• Neoconservatism
• IR Constructivism & the English School
• Wisdom Is Better Than Weapons of War
• 9/11 Essay: The Kindness of Strangers
• Change Agents
• Democracy in Afghanistan?
• Memo to the President
• Obama & McCain
• Smart Power or Wise Power?
• Taliban Neighbors
• Truth about "The Mosque at Ground Zero"
• US Military Intervention in Syria is Wrong, Wrong, Wrong
• Wise Foreign Policy Begins at Home
• A World Needing a Map
• Benazir Bhutto
• Changing Tough Hearts & Minds
• Rambo and Stallone on War
• American Evangelicals
• American Political Witchcraft
• Am I a Liberal
• Electing Not to Vote
• Jesus, Political Wisdom, and Human Flourishing
• Three American Myths
• Pastor Joel Hunter: Conservative Spiritual Advisor to President Obama
• Elaine Storkey - public Christian communication
• John Peck - wisdom & worldview
• Karen Mulder - visual arts
• Lynn Green - Muslims & Christians
• Michael Schluter - international relationships
• Nancy Pearcey - intelligent design
• Pam Mackenzie - education
• Paul Patton - performing arts
• Rami Khouri - Middle East
• Ethical Realism
• New Political Religions
• The Trouble With Islam
• A Gospel in the Stars?
• Christopher Hitchens's faith
• Commanding Nature
• GM Foods: Hard to Swallow
• Go Greenbelt
• Ten Years After 9/11
• The Blast is Back
• The Power of a Good Story
• Wisdom-based Foreign Relations
• Waging Wisdom New Blog
• Other Published Writings
• The Kindness of Strangers

The story of Charles Strohmer’s experience the morning of 9/11 and the days immediately following.

Heaven on earth – at an Air Force base

by Charles Strohmer

Three hours out of London and flying uneventfully through florescent blue sky six miles above the Atlantic, the passengers aboard Delta Flight 59 were digesting their lunches, quietly absorbed in laptops or reading novels. Others fell drowsily captive to that vespertine atmosphere created on planes when the movies are running. Other than departing Gatwick 30 minutes late, at Noon (7 a.m. EDT), so far the only bother could now be heard in hushed buzz of passengers asking why all the video screens had suddenly gone blank. “The movies should be back on in a few minutes,” an air hostess said over the intercom. “A computer needs re-booting. It happens. We apologize for the inconvenience.”

Yawn. Passengers stretched, ordered drinks, queued for toilets. Someone across the aisle from me lifted his porthole shade and broke the spell of counterfeit evening. I was overwhelmed. The bright blue evanescence, which I once heard a pilot call “severe clear,” stretched out into forever. It hurt your eyes to gaze at the boundless brightness. I turned away. Twenty more minutes passed. Still no movies. People fidgeted. The Boeing 777 droned on. Five hours to go before touchdown in Atlanta.

Suddenly everyone’s attention locked on to the Texas drawl coming from the intercom. “Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. May I have your attention. Your serious attention.” The dreaded words. Worst nightmares sprung from the fuselage, the overhead compartment, the unconscious — wherever you had stowed them before boarding. A kind of holy moment spread through cabin. No one spoke. No one dared. We’re going down.

It seemed much longer than the millisecond it took before Captain William’s steady but troubled Texas drawl continued: “There’s been a major incident in the United States and all air space throughout the nation has been closed. All planes in the air in the United States are being directed to land at the nearest airports, and all international flights into the U.S. are being diverted. We are okay. I repeat. We are okay. But we cannot land in the U.S. We will be landing in Halifax, Nova Scotia in about two hours. We can’t give you any more information at this time. Please be patient and bear with us. We will have more details for you when we get on the ground in Halifax. Thank you for your cooperation.”

Like synchronized swimmers on cue, passengers turned to face their seat-neighbors. Whispers arose. What do you think it is? Who knows? Maybe that announcement was just a ploy and we’re really going down? Must have been a huge earthquake? What would they close all the airports for that? A nuclear bomb, then? Maybe the air traffic control system has failed? Does the captain even know what’s going on?

Nothing made any sense to me. Why had the FAA closed all the airports? I had to know. Knowing would help me beat back worst-case-scenario self-talk. I quickly calculated to Eastern Time and realized that my wife would be in class with her first-graders. But how could I even be sure of that? Was she safe? What had happened? And where? Who had been effected? Was I even going to get home?

Someone must know. Ahh. Coming down the aisle toward me was a hostess whom I had spoken with earlier and had made a connection. I was traveling alone and there were no passengers near me. I decided to take advantage of that privacy. Our eyes met but I deliberately remained seated, hoping she would stop when I sought inconspicuously to flag her down. She stopped and crouched to listen. “I know you can’t tell me what happened, even if you know,” I whispered, “and I’m not asking you to. But can you at least tell me, does the crew know what’s happened?” She nodded discreetly, stood, and then continued on her errand. Well, it was something. A kindness. The first of many to come during the next four days.

Delta Flight 59 became the penultimate of 42 planeloads of international air travelers permitted safe harbor at Halifax International before the tarmac ran out of wing space. As we circled before landing, I was surprised to see the asphalt service road filled with on-lookers in cars, vans, and pickups; like bystanders congregating to stare at a blazing house fire, they had queued to watch the emergency landings. Well, more than that. It wasn’t just the striking sight of landing these huge commercial jets that had brought them out of their homes and businesses that sunny day. They knew what had happened. We still did not.

Taxiing to our place at the end of the long queue of planes, far from the terminal, we eased past the staring congregation of on-lookers until Captain Williams brought the 777 to a gentle halt. We heard the mic cue. Williams immediately thanked us for our patient cooperation and then provided what details he had of the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. “Hopefully,” he concluded, “they’ll re-open U.S. airspace to get these international flights to their destinations. So maybe we’ll get out of here in a few hours.”

We now asked a thousand questions of the crew, but they only knew Captain Williams knew. Cell phone service had been turned off as we flew to Halifax, and there were no televisions. The details available to us upon landing were still very sketchy and rumors still ran wild in the media about “more possible attacks.” There was a rumor about “a plane crashing in Pennsylvania.”

It would be nearly 24 hours after the attack before our imaginations would be seared by television images of flying machines, twisted I-beams, and charred bodies crashing, falling, and billowing in the explosive chemistry of terror, dust, and loss.

Two long, perfectly executed lines of 747s, 767s, 777s, Air Buses, and L1011s were now parked side-by-side on the tarmac. None would be flying anything for the foreseeable future except their carriers’ logos on their tails. Ten thousand stranded passengers — a small town, and all the problems that come with it. The scene had been repeated across Canada, from Newfoundland to Vancouver. Many trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific flights had been ordered back to their departure cities. Across America, that the extreme sudden workout demanded of thousands of air traffic controllers went without incident is astonishing. The FAA had ordered some 5,000 civilian planes to be landed immediately so that the military could isolate any rogue planes still in the air. Within four minutes, 700 planes had been landed. Nearly 3,000 within the next hour. All 5,000 had been safely guided to the ground in under two hours. An impressive impromptu performance, never once rehearsed in aviation history. The FAA had safely landed 5,000 civilian planes across the US in two hours, a truly impressive impromptu performance, never once rehearsed in aviation history.

Now free to mill about the entire plane – a gracious gesture itself – I found a spot to stand unobtrusively near the open cockpit door to listen to the scratchy, AM radio signal coming out of Halifax, a source of constant news about the attacks, ninety percent of it still rumor. But there were stories in this cockpit, and I decided to chat up the pilots when they were free. “Why did you make the kind of announcement over the Atlantic?” I asked Captain Williams. “Why not just tell us what had happened?” He didn’t hedge. While the videos were off (there had been no computer hiccup), he and his co-pilot had discussed what language to use. “We’ve got almost sixty years’ experience between us,” he told me. “Personally, we’ve never been in this kind of a situation, but colleagues who have been have told us that, in the air, some passengers may panic when they hear the words ‘terrorist attack’ or ‘hijacking’, so we talked for a long time about the right words to describe the urgency but not panic anyone.”

We had now been on the ground a couple hours and flight attendants had been arriving at the cockpit with reports from the cabin. Snacks and water were running low, it was getting stuffy, a couple infants needed baby formula, some passengers wanted a smoke, others needed fresh air. Still squeezed into my spot near the cockpit, I listened to nearly sixty years of experience quickly process each problem as it arose come to wise decisions. The Halifax ground crew was notified about snacks, bottled water, and infant formula. The rear starboard door would be opened for smokers. “But for those of you who need to smoke,” Captain Williams announced, “please take turns and don’t crowd the area. And try to keep the smoke from filtering into the cabin.” The want of fresh air was solved when the front starboard door was opened to admit supplies. “Let’s leave that door open for a while after the ground crew leaves,” Williams told a hostess. Such gestures, especially access to the pilots, made a world of difference in our social microcosm. They defused building tensions and made the confines bearable. I later learned that crews on some of the other carriers had not been as wise.

There was still the matter of reaching my wife. I gave up my post near the cockpit and looked for someone who might lend me a phone. But it was still pointless. Those with phones were wearing down their fingerprints punching numbers robotically every few minutes gambling against a busy signal. Very few won, those hours. But there were countless other stories, and near my seat I began talking with a friendly couple who, apparently, had no phone. They introduced themselves as Robert and Georgia Matthews, from Memphis. A Christian minister, he explained that he had been in London for the opening ceremonies of a colleague’s church. As I began to explain that I’d been traveling in England on a speaking trip, we heard the mike suddenly cue – everyone had become acute to that sound. Captain Williams announced that the FAA had decided not to reopen U.S. airspace today. “We might be here for another day,” he said.

The Matthews and I were digesting this development when Robert’s trouser pocket suddenly began beeping. His daughter in Memphis had been playing phone robotics herself and had finally beat  the odds. Voilà! A connection. Passengers around us were astounded. After he finished talking to his daughter, she took my wife’s number and promised to get hold of her with news that I was okay and where I was. An hour later she got through to us on the plane to say she had been able to reach my wife.

Blessedly, our flight was half full, which made the seventeen hours we spent on board more tolerable. Well past midnight I copped three empty seats side-by-side at the very rear and tried to sleep. Around 3am, we were quickly deplaned on to the runway, shuttled to the terminal, hustled through customs, and immediately driven ten miles in yellow school buses to Shearwater, a Canadian Air Force Base, where we wo0uld be “guests” of Canada. It was a word used by the animated politician who met the group I was with at the school bus outside the terminal. He didn’t seem like he wished he were home in a warm bed. He gave a warm Canadian welcome to “our good neighbors from the south” and promised with many promises that we would be well-looked-after. We were. But questions about how long we’d be your guests were met with we’re taking it a day at a time.

Legends in their own time, forty-two winged ghost towns now waited on the tarmac, the topic of talk radio, press coverage, and conversations in every Halifax-Dartmouth home. The Shearwater encampment numbered about 750 stranded passengers – two Delta flights besides ours, two British Air, and one partying Air Tours group from Scotland filled with vacationers to Florida. The remaining ten thousand had been housed across the area in schools and homes and in what remained of hotel rooms not occupied by tourists. The families that had queued in their cars and vans along the access road were not there just to gawk. Our time as guests of Canada would become the subject of the PBS documentary “Stranded Yanks,” which aired during the one-year anniversary of 9/11.

« 1 2 View All »

The Kindness of Strangers...

The story of my days as a guest of Canada, which began the morning of 9/11, when I was flying from London to Atlanta. It was originally published in the U.S. and the U.K. on the first anniversary of the attacks.

Comment on the topic here

What others are saying.

"If you're ever with Charles, he has always got a good story to tell. Be sure to ask him." Simon Jones, Editor, Third Way

In this section

• Obama & McCain
• US Military Intervention in Syria is Wrong
• Truth about “The Mosque at Ground Zero”

About Charles

New blog posts.

• Conversation with Conservative Pastor Joel Hunter, Spiritual Advisor to President Obama
• Past, Present, Future: Christian Belief, Life, and Expectation
• Wisdom is Better Than Weapons of War
• Care for the Cradle of Christianity
• The United States & Iran: An Alliance of Convenience
• Center for Public Justice
• Chris Bourne
• Institute for Global Engagement
• Jennifer in Rwanda
• Martin Scott
• Site made by LEGEND

Search Site

This site uses valid HTML and CSS. All content Copyright © 1995-2010 Charles Strohmer. Content requires consent for reproduction.

51 Kindness Essay Topics & Examples

Looking for kindness topic ideas to write about? The concepts of kindness, generosity, and compassion are crucial nowadays.

🏆 Best Kindness Essay Examples

📌 top kindness topics to write about, 🥰 interesting kindness essay topics, 👍 controversial kindness topic ideas, 🙏 catchy kindness essay titles.

Being a debated subject in philosophy, psychology, and religion, kindness is definitely worth writing about. The topic of kindness is one of the key in the Bible. It has become especially important nowadays, in the era of intolerance and instability. In your kindness essay, you might want to focus on the importance of helping others. Another option is to consider the concept of kindness in philosophy, psychology, and religion. Whatever direction you will choose, this article will be helpful. It contains everything necessary to write an A+ paper on generosity & compassion! There are kindness essay examples, topics, and research titles.

• “Selfless Gene” by Olivia Judson and Reasons for Altruism Once people realize that the biology and social life of another race is the same, they tend to be more understanding and kind.
• Does True Altruism Exist? Therefore, in their experiment, Cialdini and his colleagues sought to separate the feelings of sadness from those of empathy among the subjects in order to assess the reliability of the findings of the former experiments […]
• Stories of Random Acts of Kindness Foundation I made a shopping list and after completing it, I went to one of the shelters to hand over the purchases to its representatives. In addition, it is important to understand that the reaction of […]
• Random Acts of Kindness Foundation and Personal Acts of Kindness This exercise enabled me to reflect on my principles and think about the kind of impact I make in my day-to-day life.
• Acts of Kindness in Society Initially, she wrote a report on this topic, in the preparation of which she visited the shelter and was upset to tears about how depressing the life of animals is.
• “The Kindness of Strangers” by Ruben Martinez The USA may promote itself to be the “land of immigrants” with the Statue of Liberty as a shining reminder of what the rhetoric of residency means.
• Acts of Kindness and Happiness in Human Life The research at hand is aimed to prove that, to boost happiness through receiving positive emotions, a person should commit more actions that can be referred to as acts of kindness.
• Altruism and social behavior This shows altruism is not only beneficial to the recipients of the meritorious deeds but also to the doers of the deeds.
• An Anonymous Act of Kindness When speaking about the relation of altruism to psychology, it is necessary to state that altruism is considered to be the issue of social psychology.
• The Role of Compassion While Anne Fadiman’s this book seems to be primarily related to the impact of linguistic and cultural barriers on the experiences of immigrants, Amy Tan’s essay suggests that their difficulties can be explained primarily by […]
• Critical Response “On Compassion” She is a lawyer, a sign that her level of literacy is quite higher and she able to learn and understand, even by seeing, the situation of other people.
• Happy People Become Happier through Kindness: A Counting Kindnesses Intervention
• How Kindness Shapes One’s Destiny in Million Dollar Baby
• How Patience Can Be Considered An Act Of Kindness
• Important to Treat Patients with Kindness and Respect
• Introspection in A Complicated Kindness and The Catcher in the Rye
• Jacqueline Woodson’s Lovely Letter to Children About Kindness, Presence, and How Books Transform Us
• Job’s Suffering Not Befitting His Kindness and Compassion
• Larry and Friends: An Illustrated Ode to Immigration, Diversity, Otherness, and Kindness
• Love, Kindness, and the Song of the Universe: The Night Jack Kerouac Kept a Young Woman from Taking Her Own Life
• Marcus Aurelius on What His Father Taught Him About Humility, Honor, Kindness, and Integrity
• Muslim Muslims And Muslim People With Kindness And Love Essay
• People Can Still Show Kindness Despite all the Evil Out There Essay
• Portrayal Of The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment On Kindness
• Positive Interventions: Happiness Attained from Acts of Kindness and Gratitude
• Revealing of the True Identity in Complicated Kindness by Miriam Toews and Mister Pip by Lloyd Jones
• Revisiting Kindness and Confusion in Public Goods Experiments
• Roland: A Charming Vintage Illustrated Ode to the Imagination and the Animating Power of Kindness
• Secular Views on the Concept of Kindness
• Self-Indulgence or Kindness as the Keys to Happiness and a Better Life
• Self-Scrutiny Applied with Kindness: Epictetus’s Enduring Wisdom on Happiness and How Philosophy Helps Us Answer the Soul’s Cry
• Shakespeare: Portia’s Kindness Out Shines
• The Disabled With The Utmost Kindness And Compassion
• The Effect Of Kindness During The Iranian Revolution
• The Effect Of Random Acts Of Kindness, And Social Responsibility
• The Essence of Life: Kindness
• The Farmer and the Clown: A Warm Wordless Story about an Unlikely Friendship and How We Ennoble Each Other with Kindness
• The Huge Impact of the Small Acts of Kindness in Mawi Asgedom’s Memoir of Beetles
• The Importance of Kindness and Thankfulness in The Rihla Essay
• The Importance of Showing Kindness Through Acts
• The Importance of the Qualities of Shredders, Adaptability and Basic Human Kindness in Mark Twain’s Novel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
• The Injustice of Reality: Social Messages in Gilman’s “Wedded Bliss” and Plath’s “Kindness”
• The Issue Of Identity Change In The Novels “Mister Pip” By Lloyd Jones And “A Complicated Kindness” By Miriam Toews
• The Kindness of Strangers? An Investigation into the Interaction of Funder Motivations in Online Crowdfunding Campaigns
• The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice
• The Lion and the Mouse who Returned a Kindness
• Themes of a Complicated Kindness by Miriam Toews
• The Semblance of Selflessness: The Ingenuity of Kindness in As I Lay Dying
• The Theme of Kindness in The Grapes of Wrath, a Novel by John Steinbeck
• The Toil of Good and Evil: Multi-Faceted Kindness in The Book Thief
• The Value Of Kindness In Bhakti According To Vyasa’s The Bhagavad Gita
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, February 28). 51 Kindness Essay Topics & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/kindness-essay-examples/

"51 Kindness Essay Topics & Examples." IvyPanda , 28 Feb. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/kindness-essay-examples/.

IvyPanda . (2024) '51 Kindness Essay Topics & Examples'. 28 February.

IvyPanda . 2024. "51 Kindness Essay Topics & Examples." February 28, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/kindness-essay-examples/.

1. IvyPanda . "51 Kindness Essay Topics & Examples." February 28, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/kindness-essay-examples/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "51 Kindness Essay Topics & Examples." February 28, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/kindness-essay-examples/.

• Activist Essay Titles
• Charity Ideas
• Humanism Research Ideas
• Virtue Essay Ideas
• Social Responsibility Topics
• Honesty Essay Ideas
• Consciousness Ideas
• Belief Questions
• Tolerance Essay Ideas
• Personal Ethics Titles
• Happiness Research Ideas
• Self-Concept Questions
• Forgiveness Essay Ideas
• Family Titles
• Personal Values Ideas

The Kindness of Strangers: How a simple greeting can brighten someone’s day

After I drop off my daughter at school in the morning, I make my way out of the car line to the stop sign, and am waved on by the school’s crossing guard.

Every morning, without fail, the crossing guard smiles, waves, and says, “Have a good morning.” As simple a gesture as this is, I have found it to be one of the highlights of my day. Her smile is genuine as is her greeting. And it’s how I start each morning, Monday through Friday.

I don’t know her name and she doesn’t know mine. The only thing I know about her is she is the school crossing guard. She doesn’t know anything about me other than I’m a parent of a student at the school.

But it got me thinking about the kindness of strangers. When I go for a run each day, one of the best parts — apart from the natural stress reduction and physical health benefits running provides — is the non-verbal connection with other runners via the “runner wave,” as I like to call it. The runner wave isn’t a full on hand wave but a quick hello with the hand as you pass a runner headed in the opposite direction. If we’re within 15-20 feet of each other, I add in a “morning” or “afternoon” depending on the time of day.

For me, it’s almost a tethered connection, albeit invisible, taking place between two beings out there on the trail — an unspoken bond, a mutual indication of “hey, I see you out here doing your thing, keep it up.”

Not everyone waves back and that’s okay. It used to bug me a little, but then I read this article which gave me a different perspective. 1

A stranger can become a friend

There’s a retired Fire Marshall a few houses up from me. He’s a good guy. He was once more or less a stranger for the first year we lived in our house and has since become a friend. We speak every time we see each other. Growing up where I did in rural Virginia, saying hello to your neighbors was just something you did. It becomes instinctual from a young age.

Every time I saw the Fire Marshall in his old Tahoe driving down the street, I’d wave. For the longest time, he didn’t wave back. Then one day he did. From there came a few words. Now whenever we see each other, we strike up a conversation. It wasn’t until April 2021 that I knew his first name. I had always referred to him as the Fire Marshall or Mr. W–.

My cousin Gary had died a few days before . I was returning from a run and Mr. W– was in his driveway washing his car. I jokingly said, “Hit me with that water hose.” I was drenched in sweat, red faced, and tired. He obliged. We ended up talking for about five minutes. At the end of the conversation, he said:

“I’m Gary by the way.”

“Jeff,” I replied.

We’d lived near each other for more than ten years and it was only then we learned each other’s first names.

“His name’s Gary,” I said to my wife when I returned home.

Back when I was a student at the University of Virginia, there were two girls that lived in the apartment next to me on campus. They were my neighbors and being neighborly I’d always speak. If I saw them on grounds, I’d say hello. One of the girls — who used to look at me like I had my head screwed on backwards the first month or so when I did this — asked me one day, as we were both putting the keys in our apartment doors at the same time, why I waved and spoke to her.

The question caught me off guard.

“Just something I’ve always done I guess. It’s what you do back where I grew up,” I said. “How come you don’t wave back?”

“Where I’m from, if you don’t know the person, no eye contact. No speaking. You go about your business and keep it moving.”

“Where are you from?” I asked.

“Baltimore. Inner city.”

“The Wire, I love that show” was the first thought that popped into my head. She laughed. “How inaccurate is it portrayed?” I asked.

“Not too far from reality, actually. Everything you see is Baltimore. I’ve never seen Omar whistling down the street but there are people like Avon Barksdale and Stringer Bell.”

From that point on, whenever we crossed paths, I’d wave or speak and she’d return the gesture. One day about three months into the semester, I went down to the dining hall to grab dinner. I held the door open for her as she went in.

“They hold doors where you’re from too?” she asked.

“Yes,” I laughed. “But I’ve come to realize that no one here, and I mean no one, says, ‘thank you.’ They just walk on in.”

“Girls think you’re hitting on them is why,” she said.

“Trust me, I am definitely not hitting on some of these people. It just seems rude to let the door shut in their face.”

“Thank you,” she said.

Don’t let negativity push out kindness

At the end of a long day, it’s commonplace for us all to revisit a negative moment or interaction that took place over the preceding 8-12 hours. There’s a phrase for this: negativity bias . Negativity bias means that our negative interactions outweigh our positive experiences. There’s an evolutionary purpose for this feeling and if we still lived in a land filled with saber toothed tigers, it would make a lot more sense. We don’t have saber toothed tigers to worry about so we harp on erratic drivers who almost ran us off the road, gossipy neighbors who denigrate our children (for what, who knows), overbearing or rude co-workers, and the like.

And even if we didn’t have a negative moment in our day, when we talk about or reflect on our highlights, it’s easy to forget those small acts of kindness sprinkled throughout our waking hours.

The kindness of strangers can have a profound impact on our daily lives. It’s often the small, seemingly insignificant gestures that can make a big difference in our mood, attitude, and overall well-being.

Just like the example of the school crossing guard, a simple smile or greeting can set the tone for the rest of the day . It reminds us that there is good in the world all around us and that we are not alone in our struggles in this vast universe we call home. We are sometimes the lion and sometimes the mouse. 2 We are all interconnected, regardless of whether we know each other’s names or backgrounds — and because of this we all have the capacity to be kind and compassionate to one another.

Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

• I’m a bearded 6’4″, 200 lb. male, and even though I’m a fellow runner, I don’t have the faintest idea of what it’s like to feel scared much less be sexually harassed while running. I can’t say I’ve never felt scared while running because I have — dangerously angry drivers, random weirdos in far out of the way places, etc. — but, outside of someone flashing a gun at me, I don’t feel as if someone could possibly overpower me in a physical altercation. Women, at least 60% of women in the survey at the link above, have that shared experience while running.
• In Aesop’s fable “ The Lion and the Mouse ,” the moral of the story is that kindness is never wasted, no matter how big or small you may feel in the world, no matter how big or small your act of kindness may be.
• Tags aesop , essay , happiness , kindness , life , personal growth

7 replies on “The Kindness of Strangers: How a simple greeting can brighten someone’s day”

So good Jeff! Always behind the scenes here reading your works.

Appreciate the kind words Colleen. Glad you’re still reading. My goal is to up my consistency in 2023. I didn’t write too terribly much last year.

This is a great post. I have wondered why people don’t respond when I wave at them. One thing I have discovered is when cars have tinted windows, you cannot see who is in it nor can you see if they wave at you! Whatever happened to friendly interaction!?

Ha. I don’t know. It’s so odd to me. Wave. Say hello. Smile, not scowl. We can all use a little of all three each day.

Wonderful story and commentary on kindness. It really is the small things in life.

It is for sure. Nothing beats a little bit of kindness each day.

This reminds me of the hiking trails near me, and while I don’t get a lot of greetings while running in the city, I sure do get a lot of good mornings when on the trail. There’s just something about having woken up in the morning and being in nature that probably gets people greeting each other. Of course, there will be one or two who’ll just huff on by, but I choose to believe it’s because they’re tired rather than grumpy, lol.

Comments are closed.

• Share full article

Advertisement

Subscriber-only Newsletter

The Ethicist

A stranger bought my groceries. should i have refused her offer.

The magazine’s Ethicist columnist on random acts of kindness.

By Kwame Anthony Appiah

While checking out groceries at a supermarket, I realized my $120 in cash might not suffice and asked the cashier to stop tallying before $120. When I reached $119, an unknown woman approached the cashier and said she wanted to cover the orphaned groceries. I hesitated but ultimately agreed. After paying, she took off. I retrieved the $120 from my purse, only to be informed by the cashier that the woman had paid the entire $133 bill. I dashed out of the store to inform her of the error, but she insisted she’d intended to pay the entire bill. “Merry Christmas,” she said, before hurrying off. I was shocked and embarrassed.

I’m wondering about the ethics of Random Acts of Kindness. This generous woman had the appearance of someone who needed that money to pay for necessities more than I needed it at checkout. Should I have declined her offer? Is there another, better course of action I might have taken? — Name Withheld

From the Ethicist:

You recall feeling “shocked and embarrassed” — was this because you think you were mistaken for being poor, and you believe there’s something dishonorable about this condition? Or were you simply concerned, more honorably, that someone worse off than you burdened herself on your behalf?

It’s entirely possible that this woman did mistake you for a person in need (most shoppers have a credit card in their wallet); it’s also possible she just felt like being generous. She’s an adult who’s entitled to make her own decisions. You seem highly confident in your ability to size up people’s financial situation from their personal appearance. Are you really so certain that she’s unable to do the same? Sometimes the greatest gift we can give people is to accept their gift graciously.

Readers Respond

The previous question was from a churchgoer who was concerned about whether to tell her former pastor that she knew about his plagiarism. She wrote: “After his retirement several years ago, some of us decided to gather his sermons from the past 10 years or so into a bound volume and present it to him. We would also put one into our library and make the digital version available on the members-only part of our website. We set out to work on proofing the sermons for typos, grammatical errors and missing citations. Then we discovered something egregious: He had ‘borrowed’ great swaths of text from stories, articles and online writing and presented them as his own. … On and on it went, with as many as five or more instances of plagiarism in every single sermon. … His actions make those of us who respected and admired him look like fools, especially because he’s a man of the cloth. But those of us who know what he did are not without compassion. He is elderly and has an ailing spouse. He is very proud of his years as a pastor. Should I tell him I know?”

In his response, the Ethicist noted: “My sense is that worshipers expect plenty of the nifty formulations they hear to have been recycled. Certainly, the basic messages delivered are bound to be familiar ones. But even in the absence of a settled consensus about where to draw the line, it’s clear that your minister went too far. … The parishioners at your church would have expected more from their minister. My question for you is why you want him to know that you’re onto him. When you say that he’s made admirers such as you ‘look like fools,’ it can sound as if you wish to get back at him and recover your own self-respect. But I’m hearing something else too. You’ve decided that publicizing his sin would be too great a punishment, especially as he takes care of his ailing spouse in his last years, and so you’re aiming for a more clement penalty. You don’t want to destroy his reputation; you do want him to feel shame. Your outrage, then, is admirably buffered by compassion. That’s to your credit and, insofar as your errant old minister helped shape the moral sensibility of your church, just possibly to his.” (Reread the full question and answer here .)

In the first few months of a new minister’s tenure, our church found out that he was using other people’s sermons and passing them off as his own. We met as a congregation and voted to dismiss him. Any person, but especially someone who seeks to serve as a moral leader, has only their words and deeds to represent themselves. No wonder the letter writer was hurt. How can a minister be trusted to lead people when he had to be more concerned about hiding his ruse? Yes, all ministers and speakers borrow and enhance the words and ideas of others, but they do it with attribution. There’s no harm in quoting from colleagues, but passing others’ words off as your own means that you’ve chosen to lie. Lying takes energy, and that effort interferes with knowing and serving and leading others. — Janet

The experience of reading the Ethicist’s columns is like what happens to the famous pebble once dropped into the pond. By the time you finish reading, you’ve been exposed to perspectives that far exceed what the question may seem to have warranted. In his response to the query about the plagiarizing preacher, Dr. Appiah points out to the letter writer that the compassion tempering her desire to “out” the preacher may exist in part as a result of the same plagiarized sermons she’s heard from this preacher over the years! Though he acknowledges how this preacher’s plagiarism strayed into more nefarious realms, sad is the reader who won’t benefit from the breadth of what he points out, to see that most black-and-white answers are not only just too narrow but are also often deeply flawed. I recently heard Henry Louis Gates Jr. refer to his old friend Kwame as having one of the most brilliant minds he’d come across. I was frankly delighted to have confirmation of my impression that in general, Dr. Appiah’s columns are a great gift to those willing to keep unwrapping beyond the top layer. In today’s world, we are in terrible need of being reminded of the value of doing that. — Ellen

This is tricky. As a minister myself, I also rely on published anecdotes to amplify and explain doctrine. Typical homily training tells us to have a newspaper in one hand and the Bible in another. While the retired minister may have overreached and paid poor attention to the boundaries of the subjects, I would suggest that his excellent preaching was still good ministry and the borrowing possibly from fatigue at the end of his career. — Anne

It’s a sad day when a pastor’s authenticity is found to be fraudulent, because authenticity is the only coin of the realm for a pastor these days. After more than 30 years as a pastor and preacher, I abhorred the practice of plagiarizing sermons, but it was sadly not uncommon. Then again, those same pastors may have paid twice as many hospital calls as I ever did. Parish ministry is extraordinarily challenging, requiring the skills of a counselor, orator, executive director, fund-raiser, politician, volunteer coordinator, handyman, teacher, hospice chaplain, liturgist and writer — while never losing your temper or falling in love or appearing imperfect. No one is good at all of it. I needed two days to write a decent sermon, while others would devote an hour or so, skimming the internet or using sample sermons they subscribed to. Their priorities were elsewhere. I can understand how the stress of the job — combined with people-pleasing neuroses, unmet narcissistic needs and whatever else — drives someone to rationalize this crime against authenticity. — Matthew

As a pastor, I offer that, in my experience, clergy all too often lack clear guidance about intellectual integrity, never mind training in what that looks like in a homiletic setting (which the Ethicist rightly notes is distinct from an academic one). Absent clear policies and training, pastors are left to their own judgment, which only invites situations such as this no matter their intentions. This presents an opportunity to help develop resources in this area — whether that’s best practices within an individual church, or even volunteering to help establish policies and training at the denominational level. While that may not resolve the immediate question, hopefully such resources could aid future ministers who want to do the right thing but simply lack the resources to know what that looks like. — John

Kwame Anthony Appiah is The New York Times Magazine’s Ethicist columnist and teaches philosophy at N.Y.U. His books include “Cosmopolitanism,” “The Honor Code” and “The Lies That Bind: Rethinking Identity.” To submit a query: Send an email to [email protected]. More about Kwame Anthony Appiah

The Ethicist’s Answers to Your Moral Quandaries

Kwame anthony appiah helps us handle the tricky situations that put our values to the test..

As a Scientist, What Should I Do About My Mother’s Alternative-Medicine Views? When reconciling two very different belief systems between family members, the aim should be not conversion to a single view but mere toleration .

Do I Owe a Boss Who Harassed Me Credit for Past Work? Professional peers won’t know about a private situation, and some may see your failure to mention the collaboration as misleading or even dishonest .

Is It Wrong to Go to a Guys-Only Night? The social significance of gender is such that single-gender gatherings can sometimes offer something that their members  legitimately value.

With Unequal Incomes, How Should We Divvy Assets in the Divorce? : An “equitable distribution” might be to be an agreeable one .

Are People Who Read Magazines at the Bookstore Stealing?: Maybe the real question is: What does the store think ?

Is Shoplifting OK if the Shop Owner Is Awful?: How bad a theft is depends on how it affects the welfare of others .

To submit a question to the Ethicist, send an email to [email protected].  To receive advice directly in your inbox, sign up for the Ethicist newsletter .

Home — Essay Samples — Life — Empathy — Random Act Of Kindness

Random Act of Kindness

• Categories: Community Compassion Empathy

About this sample

Words: 527 |

Published: Mar 19, 2024

Words: 527 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Sociology Life

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 610 words

2 pages / 792 words

6 pages / 2711 words

4.5 pages / 2031 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Empathy

The poem "Any Human to Another" by Countee Cullen is a powerful and thought-provoking piece that explores the themes of empathy, compassion, and the universal human experience. Through the use of vivid imagery, emotional [...]

Raymond Carver's short story "Cathedral" is a poignant and thought-provoking exploration of human connection, perception, and the potential for personal growth. The story revolves around the unnamed narrator, his wife, and a [...]

Humility stands as a cornerstone of our values, guiding us towards empathy, personal growth, and interconnectedness. It is through humility that we transcend the superficial desires for power and recognition, instead embracing [...]

The characteristics of an ideal mother are multifaceted and complex, but they all share a common thread of love, care, and dedication. An ideal mother possesses empathy, allowing her to understand and respond to her children's [...]

When it involves education, reading, writing, and arithmetic, accustomed take center stage and were the quality menu of what was instructed to students beginning in school. In today’s world of education, wherever students area [...]

Americans have a long way to go in many aspects of life. One of the most common things that we as a country/society have to improve on is not just focusing on ourselves. We’re so use to being independent that we actually think [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• Specialty Travel

Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.

If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Learn more about the program.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the authors

The Kindness of Strangers Paperback – January 1, 2003

There is a newer edition of this item:.

• Print length 272 pages
• Language English
• Publisher Lonely Planet
• Publication date January 1, 2003
• Dimensions 5.25 x 0.75 x 8 inches
• ISBN-10 1740595904
• ISBN-13 978-1740595902
• See all details

Popular titles by this author

Product details

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Lonely Planet; First Edition (January 1, 2003)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 272 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1740595904
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1740595902
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 9.3 ounces
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.25 x 0.75 x 8 inches
• #7,992 in Travelogues & Travel Essays
• #11,244 in Adventure Travel (Books)
• #228,730 in Biographies (Books)

About the authors

Laurie McAndish King

Laurie McAndish King writes about 20-foot-long Australian earthworms, being rescued from a kidnapper in Tunisia, and an Ivy League astrophysicist’s explanation of how flying saucers are powered—not your typical travel writing. That’s probably why Kirkus Reviews hails her as “an author with an eye for the quirky.” Her stories—poignant, insightful and often quite funny—are always inspiring and entertaining.

King’s award-winning essays and photography have appeared in Smithsonian magazine, the San Francisco Chronicle, Travelers’ Tales’ The Best Women’s Travel Writing, Lonely Planet’s The Kindness of Strangers, and other magazines and literary anthologies.

Laurie grew up in rural Iowa, studied biology and philosophy at Cornell College, and has traveled in forty countries. She observes with an eye for natural science, and writes with the heart of a philosopher. Her most recent book, “An Elephant Ate My Arm: More True Stories from a Curious Traveler,” will be published in May, 2021.

The second of the three-book “Curious Traveler” series, “Your Crocodile has Arrived: More True Stories from a Curious Traveler,” was called “thoroughly engrossing” by the Midwest Book Review and earned a first-place Independent Press Award.

A story in King’s first book, “Lost, Kidnapped, Eaten Alive, True Stories from a Curious Traveler” won a Lowell Thomas Gold Award—the highest honor in American travel writing. This book also won honors from the North American Book Awards, the San Francisco Book Festival, and others.

Laurie also wrote An Erotic Alphabet (for which she was dubbed “The Shel Silverstein of Erotica”) and co-edited two books in the Hot Flashes Sexy Little Stories and Poems series. She lives in northern California.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Start Selling with Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices