film review 6 days

London, England, April 1980. Six terrorists assault the Embassy of Iran and take hostages. For six days, tense negotiations are held while the authorities decide whether a military squad should intervene.

Jamie Bell Abbie Cornish Mark Strong Martin Shaw Emun Elliott Ben Turner Aymen Hamdouchi Tim Pigott-Smith Robert Portal Colin Garlick Andrew Grainger Martin Hancock Colin Moy Toby Leach Xavier Horan Te Kohe Tuhaka William Chubb Ronan Vibert John Henshaw Tim Downie Sam Snedden Mia Blake Matthew Sunderland Emma Campbell-Jones Jared Turner Calum Gittins Ryan O'Kane Fayssal Bazzi Kenneth Collard Show All… Nicholas Boulton Scarlett Featherstone Venice Harris Marjan Gorgani Jeff Szusterman Phil Peleton Kip Chapman Ajayshri Scott Michael Wagstaff Brady Powell Jay Sutherland Joel Beckett Alan McElroy Dominic Hughes David Rumney Eric Colvin Sara Stone Margaret Thatcher Simon Elrahi Glen Levy Ghazaleh Golbakhsh Andrew Lawrence John Ramm Taylor Murphy Michael Denkha Robert Hartley

Director Director

Additional directing add. directing.

Glenn Standring Hamish Gough

Producers Producers

Norman Merry Matthew Metcalfe

Writer Writer

Glenn Standring

Casting Casting

Daniel Hubbard

Editors Editors

John Gilbert Dan Kircher

Cinematography Cinematography

Aaron Morton

Production Design Production Design

Philip Ivey

Art Direction Art Direction

Jon Bunker Jill Cormack

Set Decoration Set Decoration

Daniel Birt

Visual Effects Visual Effects

George Zwier

Composers Composers

Lachlan Anderson David Long

Sound Sound

James Hayday Paul Paragon Adam Martin

Costume Design Costume Design

Liz McGregor

Makeup Makeup

Gabrielle Jones

XYZ Films New Zealand Film Commission Ingenious Media GFC Films Lipsync Productions Fightertown Imagezone Dog with a Dog Productions

New Zealand UK

Alternative Titles

Six Days, 6 데이즈, 6 dager, 6日間：2017, 6 ايام, 6 дни, 6 Ημέρες, 6 días, 6 jours, שישה ימים, 6 nap, 6日間, 6 დღე, 대테러 님로드 작전, Šešios dienos, 6 dni, 6 Dias, 6 дней, 6 Dagar, 6 วันล่าสุดขีด, 6 Gün, 6 днів, 六天

history action thriller drama

High speed and special ops War and historical adventure Politics and human rights action, explosives, exciting, action-packed or villain political, democracy, documentary, president or propaganda war, wwii, combat, military or duty spy, agent, intrigue, thriller or suspense terrorism, thriller, gripping, intense or political Show All…

95 mins More at IMDb TMDb Report this film

Popular reviews

Review by cal 🥪 ★★★ 1

the title is misleading: the film is actually 95 minutes

Review by Ivica_Pusticki ★★½ 6

You know those movies that you start watching, and then halfway trough the movie you "catch yourself" scrolling trough Facebook or something...but you still kind of want to see the whole movie, so you don't turn it off after all!? Well...6 DAYS is one of those movies. Lost my attention halfway trough, but I still finished the damn thing. The ending was decent. OK movie for a lazy Sunday afternoon, I guess...

Review by Andy Summers ★★½

When your career starts off with a BAFTA Award win, it's usually downhill from there unless the right mix of blockbuster and indie roles present themselves. Jamie Bell came to prominence with his starring turn in Billy Elliott, before a variety of roles in the likes of King Kong, Defiance, and my own personal favourite, Hallam Foe, cast him as just another jobbing British actor dipping in and out of Hollywood with varying degrees of success. He also managed to bag a couple of fine fillies while forging that career across the water, Evan Rachel Wood for a couple of years, and new wife Kate Mara, have been Bell's other prizes in a somewhat stop/start career that brings us up…

Review by Jerome1994 ★★½ 3

How does one go into great detail about this movie? At one point reviewing these action thrillers is going to be extremely hard because they are almost all the same darn thing. This one just happens to put a little drama into it and that's it, this basically felt like an extended TV episode of some generic cop show. The acting and writing were bland and the story is very predictable, you have seen this movie 20 times before but done much better no need to see this one.

Review by Zig ★★★ 2

On a Wednesday in April 1980, six Iranian terrorists storm the Iranian embassy in London. Twenty-six people are taken hostage. The crisis escalates into a six-day siege.

Toa Fraser's Six Days is a compact dramatization of the week when middle eastern politics was placed front-and-center of an already embattled British government. But Six Days doesn't step back to give us the bigger, geo-political picture. It keeps its head to the ground and hyper-focused on the plot, which begins and ends with the siege of 16 Prince’s Gate, South Kensington, London.

It’s a humming ninety-minute thriller that’s perfectly built for the age of streaming. Small enough to not feel insecure with its lack of frivolous action, but it’s also taut dry…

Review by Chris Hormann ★★★½

A dramatisation of the Iranian Embassy siege in London in 1980, this plays things pretty straight, albeit the lion's share POV is from the Western perspective, where it would have been great to have had additional focus on the gunmen who stormed the Embassy. There are some brief moments between Mark Strong (the chief negotiator) and Aymen Hamdouchi as the lead gunman but we hear little of his or his cohorts' background. The final assault is tense and well choreographed so that the final outcome (while it may exist in history) is still in doubt right until the end.

Review by Michael Jones ★★★

Manages to overall be rather serviceable despite often being dull and containing the worst English accent I've ever heard from Abbie Cornish.

Review by Yo_Roboto ★★★½

This is my Argo .

Sorry, everybody, sorry. Fuck the police and fuck military propaganda and all that but (sorry) I just think all this tactical SWAT/SAS shit is just the goddamned coolest. Sorry. Breaching charges and flashbangs and checking your corners are just really cool to me. Sorry.

What we got here is a trim, competent thriller. For better or for worse, it's completely frill-less, opting for lean action and a straightforward dramatization of the real-life hostage situation, avoiding any perspective of the politics at play.

Margaret Thatcher seems like a total psycho.

Review by Daniel Shillito ★★★ 1

Despite Abbie Cornish's performance and English accent threatening to self-destruct the rest of the movie, 6 Days is a tight, albeit unambitious thriller retelling a significant chapter in the history of international terrorism. Fantastic performances from Mark Strong and Jamie Bell elevate this otherwise poorly paced and cast film. The final siege of the embassy is well worth the slow burn however and the use of old archival news footage does actually quite well given the three-pronged narrative.

It's a film that could have definitely benefitted from being a bit longer and more fleshed out, giving the terrorists their actual motivations as opposed to the stereotypical and narrow-minded view we are presented with here, but that's hard to do when you have a charisma sponge-like Abbie Cornish.

Review by Luis_989 ★★★ 2

Entertaining for most of its duration, but you will forget it as soon as you finish it.

Review by Imm0rtalVJ ★★★½

Brilliant film. Excellent film with a great cast! Had me gripped till the end. Mark's Strong performance is outstanding. Must watch the film.

Review by Film_Sammlung ★★★

Aufarbeitung der Geiselnahme in der iranischen Botschaft in London, welche am 30. April 1980 begann und 6 Tage dauerte.

Sechs Bewaffnete stürmen die Botschaft in South Kensington im Zentrum Londons. Die Forderung besteht darin, 91 Häftlinge aus iranischen Gefängnissen zu entlassen, doch die Verhandlungen stellen sich als extrem schwer heraus. Um das Blatt zu wenden, wird die Anti-Terroreinheit SAS hinzugezogen.

Jamie Bell gibt den knallharten SAS Anführer, während Abbie Cornish die Berichterstatterin vor Ort geben darf. Am meisten glänzt aber wie so oft Mark Strong.

Wenn man so im Internet recherchiert, dann scheint der Film sich ja ziemlich an die Ereignisse zu halten. Die werden quasi über die vollen 6 Tage erzählt vom Anfang bis zum Finale, und am ende…

Similar Films

Upgrade to remove ads

Letterboxd is an independent service created by a small team, and we rely mostly on the support of our members to maintain our site and apps. Please consider upgrading to a Pro account —for less than a couple bucks a month, you’ll get cool additional features like all-time and annual stats pages ( example ), the ability to select (and filter by) your favorite streaming services, and no ads!

Select your preferred poster

Posters are sourced from TMDb and Posteritati , and appear for you and visitors to your profile and content, depending on settings. Learn more.

The Definitive Voice of Entertainment News

Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter

site categories

Cannes: ‘how to have sex’ wins best film in 2023 un certain regard.

'Omen,' 'Goodbye Julia,' 'Hounds' and 'Mother of All Lies' also took home awards in the Cannes sidebar.

By Scott Roxborough

Scott Roxborough

Europe Bureau Chief

Share this article on Facebook
Share this article on Twitter
Share this article on Flipboard
Share this article on Email
Show additional share options
Share this article on Linkedin
Share this article on Pinit
Share this article on Reddit
Share this article on Tumblr
Share this article on Whatsapp
Share this article on Print
Share this article on Comment

CANNES - Une Certain Regard - HOW TO HAVE SEX

Molly Manning Walker’s Cannes festival breakout How to Have Sex has won the prize for best film in the 2023 Un Certain Regard sidebar. The astounding debut, which follows three British teens out for a summer holiday in Greece that turns dark, was The Hollywood Reporter ‘s hidden gem pick this Cannes and was among the most talked-about movies on the Croisette this year.

THR Newsletters

More from The Hollywood Reporter

Arnold schwarzenegger on bruce willis’ retirement: action stars “never really retire … they reload”, china box office: ‘fast x’ roars past $100m, ‘the little mermaid’ struggles to stay afloat, ‘the wiz’ star stephanie mills relates her own experience to racist backlash toward ‘little mermaid”s halle bailey, box office: ‘the little mermaid’ swimming to $118m-plus memorial day debut, jon favreau says robert downey jr. was in talks for another marvel character before becoming iron man.

This controversial sci-fi blockbuster about climate change still polarizes scientists today

Did "the day after tomorrow" accurately depict our climatic future not quite. but some appreciate a deeper message, by matthew rozsa.

At the start of the third act of the 2004 sci-fi disaster flick " The Day After Tomorrow ," teenager and academic decathlon participant Laura Chapman shares her deep feelings of despair with her boyfriend Sam Hall.

"Everything I've ever cared about, everything I've worked for... has all been preparation for a future that no longer exists," Laura (Emmy Rossum) tells Sam (Jake Gyllenhaal) as she shivers due to a combo of a recent blood infection and an apocalyptic snowstorm. "I know you always thought I took the competition too seriously. You were right. It was all for nothing."

"We passed out fliers at screenings, and brought images of real-world climate disasters to ExxonMobil's annual shareholder meeting."

Despite largely being remembered as a special effects-fueled extravaganza, this quiet dramatic moment may best epitomize the complex legacy of "The Day After Tomorrow," directed and co-written (along with Jeffrey Nachmanoff) by Roland Emmerich of "Independence Day" fame. It was the first Hollywood blockbuster to use its premise to focus on climate change and make bank while doing so.

A semi-adaptation of the 1999 book "The Coming Global Superstorm" by Art Bell and Whitley Strieber on a budget of $125 million (or nearly 200 million in today's dollars), "The Day After Tomorrow" grossed a whopping $552 million (in 2023, that's more than $883 million). It primarily tells the story of Jack Hall (Dennis Quaid), a paleoclimatologist who unsuccessfully tries to warn America's political leaders — most notably Vice President Raymond Becker (Kenneth Welsh), an obvious satire on real-life Vice President Dick Cheney — that climate change is about to rapidly cause a new ice age.

Like many Emmerich blockbusters (such as "Godzilla" and "2012"), "The Day After Tomorrow" includes spectacular scenes of mass destruction, with apocalyptic ice storms smothering landmarks in New York City and ultimately covering the entire northern hemisphere. Yet in addition to being entertaining, "The Day After Tomorrow" also attempted to make an important political point by raising awareness about how greenhouse gas emissions are destroying our planet. As the film reaches its 19-year anniversary this week, it should in theory be celebrated as ahead of its time — particularly in scenes like the one with Rossum, who articulated views later expressed by Greta Thunberg and countless other future climate protesters.

If that's so, then why do so many scientists view the film with contempt? Simply put: It's a movie about listening to science — but it also butchers most of it in the process.

"I don't recall a lot except that the whole science was incredibly wrong," Dr. Kevin E. Trenberth , distinguished scholar at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, told Salon by email. His views echoed each scientist who spoke to Salon for this article, criticizing the movie's central premise of a rapid ice age and observing that "one does not get an ice age out of global warming." Although Trenberth acknowledged that science fiction " can be helpful in setting the stage for people relationships and politics," he scoffed when Salon referred to "The Day After Tomorrow" as a "work of art."

"You are kidding? " he sarcastically replied.

Trenberth has good company among prominent scientists in disliking Emmerich's arguable magnum opus. Dr. Michael E. Mann is a professor of Earth and Environmental Science at the University of Pennsylvania and, like Trenberth, one of the world's most prominent climatologists. Prior to the film's release, a climate advocacy group contacted Mann with an early copy of the script. They wanted to know if the movie should be used to raise awareness. Mann warned them against it.

" In some ways, it trivializes concern about the climate crisis because it presents such a caricature of the science," Mann wrote to Salon. This is not to say that Mann believes the movie to be totally devoid of scientific merit: For example, there is an opening scene about a chunk of ice the size of Rhode Island breaking off, which Jack Hall describes as "sensational."

"In fact that first scene was based on an actual event (the collapse of Larsen Ice Shelf B) that had already occurred in 2002," Mann wrote to Salon. "There have been some similar-sized ice shelf collapses since. These are of concern because they potentially destabilize the inland ice (which, unlike an ice shelf which is already floating on water, contribute to sea level rise)."

These pluses, though, are outweighed by the minuses, at least in Mann's view. Indeed, for many years he would watch "The Day After Tomorrow" with first-year seminar students to deconstruct exactly what it gets right and what it gets wrong — and they regularly found that "i t gets a lot wrong."

"The animation of the 'ocean conveyor' that Dennis Quaid shows to the rapt audience at the international climate conference is actually going in the wrong direction," Mann pointed out. "A collapse of the conveyor wouldn't cause another ice age, it would just slow the warming in some regions surrounding the North Atlantic. And it would play out over decades not days. You don't drill an ice core on the ice shelf as he and his crew were doing in the opening science, but inland where you get a much longer record back in time. And an ice core record is just a series of measurements. There's no physics in it. So you couldn't use it to build a 'forecasting model' as he does in the film."

Mann's students also criticized Emmerich's decision to cast Gyllenhaal as a nerd: "But the thing my students were most skeptical about in the film was Jake Gyllenhaal participating in an academic decathlon. They just couldn't suspend disbelief on that one!"

Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist .

"The thing my students were most skeptical about in the film was Jake Gyllenhaal participating in an academic decathlon. They just couldn't suspend disbelief on that one!"

Despite this harsh view from some scientists, there are others who applaud the movie's existence. One of them is E mory University Physics Professor Sidney Perkowitz, who was so critical of the 2003 sci-fi flick "The Core" that his words helped catalyze the creation of t he Science & Entertainment Exchange . As its name indicates, the mission of the Science & Entertainment Exchange is to promote positive impressions of science for the general public. While Perkowitz derided "The Core" for taking excessive liberties with scientific accuracy, he did not have the same perspective about "The Day After Tomorrow."

"Despite scientific flaws, [The Day After Tomorrow] carried a message to millions that was important then and is more important now," Perkowitz wrote to Salon. He quoted his 2007 book "Hollywood Science," where he covers the movie in depth. In particular he noted that it had actually changed people's minds about the reality of global warming, prompting Perkowitz to give the movie a Special Award. After acknowledging criticisms of the plot and dialogue as trite, Perkowitz wrote that " the film has redeeming features. Though presented in clichéd style, the story illustrates scientific commitment through the conflict between Jack Hall's work and his relations with his wife and son."

Perkowitz also enjoyed the special effects, visual and audio alike, and observed "Jack's speeches to the UN delegates and to the President include true scientific nuggets about global warming. In this way, 'The Day After Tomorrow' draws attention to a real and current problem, with greater odds of doing serious harm than any asteroid strike or alien invasion."

As proof of this beneficial impact, Perkowitz points in his book to a survey by environmental science and policy expert Anthony Leiserowitz taken among 529 US adults before and after they saw the movie. It was viewed by roughly 21 million American adults in theaters upon being released, and millions more through DVD sales and streaming.

" [Leiserowitz] asked about concerns over global warming and the possibility of changing one's own behavior as a result, and about political preferences," Perkowitz explained. "For those who had seen the film, he concluded that it had a 'significant impact' on climate change risk perceptions, conceptual models, behavioral intentions, policy priorities… The film led moviegoers to have higher levels of concern and worry about global warming [and] encouraged watchers to engage in personal, political, and social action to address climate change and to elevate global warming as a national priority… The movie even appears to have influenced voter preferences."

This is not to say that "The Day After Tomorrow" changed the public conversation on a massive scale. At the end of the day a movie is, after all, just a movie — meaning it has limited reach.

"The film caused no change in overall public attitudes toward global warming because its audience, though huge, is only a fraction of the US adult population," Perkowitz observed. "Even enormously successful movies aren't seen by a majority of Americans and so can't immediately swing popular opinion."

Yet this does not mean that "The Day After Tomorrow" only had a negligible impact. "According to Leiserowitz's analysis, media coverage of the film and its science was ten times greater than was accorded the report of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the scientific report that solidified worries about global warming in 2001," Perkowitz writes in his book.

"Despite scientific flaws, [The Day After Tomorrow] carried a message to millions that was important then and is more important now."

"The Day After Tomorrow" also tackled partisan politics with a boldness not normally seen in mainstream Hollywood fare. Emmerich's movie has an undeniable "liberal tilt," as Perkowitz put it, such as clearly basing its fictional vice president on Cheney and having Americans illegally cross the Mexican border to escape the apocalyptic storms. Additionally, the movie raises provocative questions about how our species will preserve its culture if we are unable to prevent the climate change crisis from reaching a tipping point — a question that humanity has yet to convincingly answer . The impetus for these conversations in the film is that a group of survivors need to burn books to stay warm (a plight that on one occasions leads to the movie's most memorable laugh-out-loud line).

"Besides the book-burning discussion, [The Day After Tomorrow] even shows symbolically that all our stored knowledge, at least for Western civilization, is threatened when the tsunami due to climate change reaches NY's 42nd Street Library," Perkowitz observed to Salon. "But in the real world, most people and institutions haven't yet emotionally accepted that climate change is a real global threat. With a few exceptions, we haven't even begun preparing to help millions of people survive, let alone try to save the culture that defines civilization."

Although there have been efforts to preserve business and banking records, as well as the basis of the world's food supply (such as at Norway's Svalbard Global Seed Vault ), "I expect that if serious action to survive the effects of climate change ever comes, it will be by the skin of our teeth at the last possible minute, with saving print and digital books, art treasures and so on at the bottom of the list."

One group that hopes things don't get that bad is Greenpeace, an international nonprofit 501(c)(3) that focuses on environmental issues. After it was released in 2004, Greenpeace tried to use "The Day After Tomorrow" as a call to action.

"We passed out fliers at screenings, and brought images of real-world climate disasters to ExxonMobil's annual shareholder meeting," John Hocevar , a marine biologist and director of Greenpeace's oceans campaign, wrote to Salon. He feels that the movie " got the big story right. If we don't stop extracting and burning oil, coal and gas, we are in serious trouble in ways that may be difficult to predict precisely but will nonetheless cost trillions of dollars and many, many lives."

While he concedes that the movie "didn't try too hard to get the specifics right," he added that "it's hard to get too upset about that because everyone knows that whether it is a disaster movie or real life, no one listens to the scientists until it is too late. Hopefully this is the time we decide to break that pattern."

"The film led moviegoers to have higher levels of concern and worry about global warming [and] encouraged watchers to engage in personal, political, and social action to address climate change and to elevate global warming as a national priority."

Victoria Scrimer, Ph.D. , a lecturer in theater and performance studies at the University of Maryland who used to work for Greenpeace, has written an essay with her thoughts on "The Day After Tomorrow" . Scrimer argues that people need compelling stories to understand their reality, and that "The Day After Tomorrow" is significant for that reason.

"A lot of environmental disaster is what we might call boring (it takes place over a long period of time, with several different, sometimes unidentified causes, largely unspectacular until it's too late, etc.), and some research suggests humans are ill equipped to perceive and respond to long term phenomenon like climate change," Scrimer explained. "For instance, a 1994 study of risk perception suggests that we fail to recognize climate change risk because it does not fit into a conventional dramatic framework. The study suggests that 'climatic change' belongs to a class of 'hidden hazards' or problems which could pass 'unnoticed or unattended' to until their effects reach such a scale that can no longer be ignored."

This doesn't mean that Scrimer believes "The Day After Tomorrow" is a great movie. "I think it's valuable for how it highlights some problems with how we as a species prioritize information and concern and see movies like 'The Day After Tomorrow' as one way to do that." That is why "despite the inaccuracy of the film's anthropocentric, hyper-rapid depiction of climate disaster which troubled some scientists, many others were happy to grant poetic license to filmmakers for the sake of pushing climate change into the media spotlight. And it is true that this film did help bring awareness to the issue."

Perkowitz, for his part, also said that "The Day After Tomorrow" is "not a great film." Yet w hile "greatness" from a quality standpoint is purely subjective, there is an objective definition of "greatness" that applies to "The Day After Tomorrow." It is most apparent during the Rossum-Gyllenhaal dialogue, when Laura Chapman talks about preparing for a future that no longer exists, as well as during scenes when library patrons argue over whether to preserve The Gutenberg Bible and the works of philosopher Frederich Nietzsche for future generations.

If nothing else, "The Day After Tomorrow" is a historically significant film. While earlier movies like "Waterworld" and " Soylent Green " also depicted cataclysmic climate change, the topic in those films was more set dressing than anything central to the plot — and "Waterworld" famously flopped at the box office. By contrast, "The Day After Tomorrow" was the first Hollywood blockbuster to focus primarily on climate change and succeed, and was clearly distinctive enough that nearly 20 years after its release people still remember it and harbor strong opinions. Good, bad or indifferent, "The Day After Tomorrow" deserves to be seen — and, if humanity fails to thwart climate change, preserved like that Gutenberg Bible, as a relic from the earliest days when artists and scientists alike tried to pull humanity from the edge of the climate change cliff.

about science and entertainment

How this laughable sci-fi flick embarrassed Hollywood into doing better science
"The Last of Us" is an almost-perfect metaphor for climate change, but it gets one thing wrong
"Soylent Green" scarred me with its disgusting twist ending – but scientists love its prescience

Matthew Rozsa is a staff writer at Salon. He received a Master's Degree in History from Rutgers-Newark in 2012 and was awarded a science journalism fellowship from the Metcalf Institute in 2022.

The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry

Harold is an ordinary man who has passed through life, living on the side lines, until he goes to post a letter one day...and just keeps walking. Harold is an ordinary man who has passed through life, living on the side lines, until he goes to post a letter one day...and just keeps walking. Harold is an ordinary man who has passed through life, living on the side lines, until he goes to post a letter one day...and just keeps walking.

Hettie Macdonald
Rachel Joyce
Jim Broadbent
Penelope Wilton
19 User reviews
14 Critic reviews
See more at IMDbPro

Rich the T-Shirt Pilgrim

Sister Philomena

Farmer's Wife

Jim the Oncologist

Pizza Delivery Man

Young Maureen

Press Photographer

All cast & crew
Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

More like this

Did you know

Trivia Jim Broadbent also narrated the audiobook of the story.
Goofs Maureen's first phone call is on brown phone in hallway; Second phone call it has changed to a business phone, then close up on handset is brown, then long shot is back to brown phone.
Connections Referenced in OWV Updates: Cinema Ticket Update (27/04/2023) (2023)

User reviews 19

ethanbresnett
May 6, 2023
April 28, 2023 (United Kingdom)
United Kingdom
Harold Frys oväntade vandring
Alfreton, Derbyshire, England, UK (location)
Essential Cinema
Free Range Films
Ingenious Media
See more company credits at IMDbPro

Technical specs

Runtime 1 hour 48 minutes

More to explore

IMAGES

6 Days (Film, 2017)
Film Review: 6 Days
6 Days (2017)
6 Days DVD Release Date
6 Days |Teaser Trailer
6 Days

VIDEO

Pokémon Scarlet and Violet Are a Wonderful Mess
pathan vs kgf2
ALL IN ONE l TRẬN CHIẾN GIỮA TỨ HOÀNG LUFFY VS KẺ MẠNH NGANG VUA HẢI TẶC ROGER l REVIEW ONE PIECE
Nhặt được 5000 Tỷ nhưng không ai Tin
Saya udah putus asa sama HP Nokia
Đoạn Băng Kinh Hoàng, Ghi Lại Những Sự Việc Ngoài Sức Tưởng Tượng Của Bạn |Quạc Review Phim|

COMMENTS

6 Days
Movie Info. In April 1980, gunmen storm the Iranian Embassy in London. Highly trained SAS operatives prepare a counterattack, hoping to end the hostage situation in one swift blow. Rating: R ...
6 Days review
T 's real-life hostage thriller about the 1980 siege of the Iranian embassy in London (it skipped a cinema release and arrives on Netflix on 3 November) is thoughtful, well-made, with a couple ...
6 Days
6 Days is a mostly well-made film based on true events, but its similarity to our current political climate makes it an uncomfortable watch. Full Review | Aug 29, 2017. Prev Next .
Review: A Hostage Standoff Unfolds in '6 Days'
Action, Drama, History, Thriller. R. 1h 34m. By Ben Kenigsberg. Aug. 17, 2017. "6 Days" is drawn from a real event in 1980 when gunmen who identified themselves as members of Iran's Arabic ...
6 Days (2017 film)
6 Days is a 2017 action thriller film directed by Toa Fraser and written by Glenn Standring. A British-New Zealand production, it is based on the 1980 Iranian Embassy siege in London and stars Jamie Bell, Abbie Cornish, Mark Strong and Martin Shaw.. The siege situation is presented from three perspectives: that of negotiator Max Vernon (Mark Strong), SAS leader Rusty Firmin (Jamie Bell) and ...
Film Review: '6 Days'
Film Review: '6 Days'. Covering the 1980 terrorist invasion of London's Iranian Embassy, Toa Fraser's true-life thriller is technically adept but dramatically muted. "A renaissance for ...
6 Days Movie Review
Our review: Parents say Not yet rated Add your rating. Kids say ( 4 ): This movie is a workmanlike, if fairly flat, depiction of the kind of story that often makes the news these days. Mark Strong plays the real-life Max Vernon, the chief police negotiator who does his best to buy time, keep the terrorists calm, and keep the hostages safe while ...
6 Days Reviews
Jun 8, 2020. 6 Days is without question a flawed film. For a film that barely reaches 90 minutes, there did feel like a significant amount of filler. The constant use of subtitles and character title cards was unnecessary. The SAS soldiers weren't particularly likeable as characters, the female BBC….
Review: 6 Days
By the end, Toa Fraser's film tellingly leaves the root causes of the militant group's malcontent entirely unexplored. We never see Margaret Thatcher or even hear her voice until the final minutes of 6 Days, yet the British prime minister's cold, implacable presence pervades nearly every frame of director Toa Fraser's film.
6 DAYS: A Tense Hostage Drama That Makes For ...
6 Days is a big, boldly waving Union Jack of a film, an awestruck ode to the firepower of the British Special Air Service (SAS), and the stubbornness of a government unwilling to give in to the demands of terrorists. Written by Glenn Standring and directed by Toa Fraser - who previously collaborated on the 2014 Maori revenge drama The Dead ...
Movie Review
There is no way of missing anything. 6 Days obsesses with the attributes of each location, name and role. For most of the film, it throws the text up on the screen. Director Toa Fraser is markedly systematic in the way he approaches his filmmaking. In principle, this is Christopher Nolan's nightmare; it almost feels too straightforward.
6 Days (2017)
6 Days: Directed by Toa Fraser. With Jamie Bell, Mark Strong, Abbie Cornish, Martin Shaw. Based on the Iranian Embassy siege of 1980, this action-thriller dramatizes a six-day standoff between armed Iranian Arabs and SAS soldiers ready for a counterattack.
6 Days (2017)
A biographical action film about the 1980 Iranian embassy siege in London, and the heroic SAS soldiers that ended it. The movie was directed by Toa Fraser, and it was written by Glenn Standring. It stars Jamie Bell, Mark Strong, Abbie Cornish and Ben Turner.
Critic Reviews for 6 Days
James Berardinelli Aug 24, 2017. This is as pure a narrative-based film as one is likely to find; the men and women populating 6 Days exist primarily to move the story along. Read full review. Technically smart but dramatically a bit flat. Read full review.
Six Days
Movie Reviews; Six Days. This straightforward, informative, well-balanced history, which recently received its theatrical premiere at New York's Quad Cinema, should have a very long life on the ...
6 Days
A movie review by James Berardinelli. On April 30, 1980, six men invaded the Iranian Embassy in Princes Gate, London. The resulting crisis, in which 26 people were taken hostage, led to a daring rescue by England's special forces after six days' of tense negotiations went nowhere. The events were televised around the world, making this one ...
6 Days (2009)
Synopsis. Pizza maker Michael Moretti's life takes a sharp turn when he and his best friend Nick destroy a car belonging to mob boss Eddy "the Lumberjack". But Nick and Michael's blundering cost ...
Six Days, Seven Nights movie review (1998)
Whenever pirates turn up in a romance set more recently than 1843, you figure the filmmakers ran out of ideas. "Six Days, Seven Nights'' illustrates that principle. It's the kind of movie that provides diversion for the idle channel-surfer but isn't worth a trip to the theater. A lot of it seems cobbled together out of spare parts.
6 Days
6 Days | Film Review. Aaron B. Peterson August 15, 2017. On April 30, 1980, six armed men stormed the Iranian Embassy in Princess Gate, London and took 26 hostages in the process. These terrorists were affiliated with the Democratic Revolutionary Front for the Liberation of Arabistan (DRFLA) and their demands were simple: release their specific ...
'The Mother' review: Jennifer Lopez is a mom on fire
The second half of "The Mother" settles for the usual. But getting there makes for a fairly diverting series of melees in the name of child protection, with services rendered by a tough-love ...
‎6 Days (2017) directed by Toa Fraser • Reviews, film
For six days, tense negotiations are held while the authorities decide whether a military squad should intervene. Six terrorists assault the Embassy of Iran and take hostages. ‎6 Days (2017) directed by Toa Fraser • Reviews, film + cast • Letterboxd
Cannes: 'How to Have Sex' Wins Best Film in 2023 Un Certain Regard
Molly Manning Walker's Cannes festival breakout How to Have Sex has won the prize for best film in the 2023 Un Certain Regard sidebar. The astounding debut, which follows three British teens out ...
The Kerala Story
The Kerala Story is a 2023 Indian Hindi-language drama film directed by Sudipto Sen and produced by Vipul Amrutlal Shah. It stars Adah Sharma, Yogita Bihani, Sonia Balani, and Siddhi Idnani.The plot follows a fictional storyline of a group of women from Kerala who are coerced into converting to Islam and join the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). ...
This controversial sci-fi blockbuster about climate change still
This doesn't mean that Scrimer believes "The Day After Tomorrow" is a great movie. "I think it's valuable for how it highlights some problems with how we as a species prioritize information and ...
The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry (2023)
The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry: Directed by Hettie Macdonald. With Jim Broadbent, Penelope Wilton, Earl Cave, Linda Bassett. Harold is an ordinary man who has passed through life, living on the side lines, until he goes to post a letter one day...and just keeps walking.

Letterboxd — Your life in film

Where to watch

In the face of terror, a nation will show its strength