pro death penalty in the philippines argumentative essay

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay; Topics, Arguments, Outline

Sat Sep 25 2021

By Nickdeda

Are you stranded about that assignment that requires you to write a death penalty argumentative essay? Don’t panic. This article is your ultimate guide. Read how to present your arguments while outlining your essay.

What Is Death Penalty?

Death penalty essays revolve around writing about murder executions. Although this topic's debate is controversial, its proponents argue that the death penalty offers retribution to the grieving family. They also contend that it costs less than life imprisonment. On the other hand, opponents to the death penalty argue that it gives the government the power to take out human life, which shouldn't be the case.

What Is A Pro Argument For Death Penalty?

A pro argument in a death penalty persuasive essay revolves around dissecting the pros of the punishment. For instance, perpetrators of heinous crimes are executed, and the US Supreme Court upholds the death penalty as a constitution. A statement of this nature is considered a pro argument when discussing death penalties in the US.

What Are Some Arguments For The Death Penalty?

When assigned death penalty argumentative essays, it is prudent to research extensively to identify the topic's schools of thought. Note that in an argumentative essay, you need to pick a side. Some of the arguments in a death penalty argumentative essay include:

1.       Legality concerns. Although the US is among 55 countries nationwide to constitute the law, some countries still debate the legitimacy of the death penalty.

2.       Life without parole. Opponents to the death penalty law argue that life imprisonment without parole is a more reasonable alternative to killing.

3.       Pre-emption of criminal activities. Proponents argue that by killing offenders, people become afraid of crime due to the harsh penalty.

4.       Retribution. Arguers of the death penalty law argue that victims' families feel that justice is avenged for their deceased by killing perpetrators.

5.       Morality. The debate on ethics has been posed by both religious, secular and legal arms as to how moral the act of killing is when justifying punishment.

How To Write Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay

Students must understand that the context of this topic is opposition. Therefore your counterarguments should clearly define why you object to the death penalty law. To help you do so, you must read plenty of information sources to help you come up with the best points.

How To Write A Death Penalty Argumentative Essay Introduction

Catchy, concise and memorable. That’s the way to go when writing a death penalty introduction. The opening determines whether readers will continue reading the essay or not. Therefore, you ought to come with a great way to welcome them into reading the paper. For example:

To the law, Bashir was a criminal. But to his mother, a son, and his girlfriend expressed that he was the sweetest boyfriend she ever had. With him executed, his loved ones felt that the law purported to uphold policies couldn't protect its own. Traumatized and even victimized, how would this family ever get consoled?

By reading the above introduction, your audience feels the need to delve deeper into it. Therefore, the transition to your body should connect seamlessly while bringing out your most vital thoughts against the death penalty.

How To Write A Death Penalty Argumentative Essay Thesis

The thesis statement provides a detailed view of what an essay will be discussing. Therefore, your entire essay will be based on expounding on this argument. Since your essay is argumentative, your thesis proclamation should be argumentative too. It should let readers know the side of the argument your paper stands for. For example;

·          Death penalty is a law against humanity.

·          How do you dictate that someone deserves death?

·          Is the death penalty retribution to victims' families?

How to Write a Death Penalty Argumentative Essay Body

The body of an essay should clearly outline your different arguments. Defined by paragraphs, always ensure to sub-divide your viewpoints in the following manner:

·          1 st paragraph- The most crucial reason for objecting death penalty

·          2 nd paragraph- Another vital argument against death penalty

·          3 rd paragraph- The point with the least impact

Although all points are strong, scholars advocate to align thoughts based on impact. This is because, it is easy to lose readers when your paper is poorly structured and formatted.

How To Write A Death Penalty Argumentative Essay Conclusion

The summary of your death penalty argumentative essay should recap your discussions and a stamp for your thesis statement. Ensure you emphasize it, attempting to make readers see your sense. Finally, as you bring the essay to a close, be sure to leave readers with a parting shot or food for thought statement.

We offer an excellent alternative if you still don't feel inspired to tackle the death penalty argumentative essay. Request our professional authors and take advantage of our fantastic deals. You bet you'll submit an impressive assignment worthy of nothing less than an A.

Related Posts

Best Causal Analysis Essay Writing Guide

This guide on writing a ⭐causal analysis essay⭐ highlights the key areas to focus on, the structure,.. Read more

Top 100 Of Mice and Men Essay Topics, Questions, and Ideas

If your instructor asked you to write an ⭐Of Mice and Men essay⭐ and do not know what to write about.. Read more

100+ Interesting and Persuasive Speech Topics About Sports

If you are looking for interesting and ⭐persuasive speech topics about sports⭐, this list has more t.. Read more

Join our community of 20,000+ students on their mission to impove their academics.

One Class Help is a team of talented and dedicated writers who are passionate about helping students achieve their goals.

• Terms & Conditions

2024 © One Class Help | Made with by Nelson_K

Set your own customized style

Color Scheme

Choose the perfect color mode for your app.

Switch your language direction

Fluid Layout

Toggle container layout system

• Top Stories
• Pinoy Abroad
• #ANONGBALITA
• Economy & Trade
• Banking & Finance
• Agri & Mining
• IT & Telecom
• Fightsports
• Sports Plus
• One Championship
• TV & Movies
• Celebrity Profiles
• Music & Concerts
• Digital Media
• Culture & Media
• Health and Home
• Accessories
• Motoring Plus
• Commuter’s Corner
• Residential
• Construction
• Environment and Sustainability
• Agriculture
• Performances
• Malls & Bazaars
• Hobbies & Collections
• Travel Features
• Travel Reels
• Travel Logs

Early this month, the House Committee on Justice approved a draft law reinstating the death penalty for heinous crimes like drug offenses, treason, qualified piracy, qualified bribery, parricide, murder, infanticide, rape, serious illegal detention, robbery with violence against or intimidation of persons, arson, and plunder.

A vocal critic of the death penalty is the Commission on Human Rights, which insists that the Philippines is bound under an international protocol to perpetually abolish the death penalty in order to finally uphold the right to life.  That protocol cited by the CHR is the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which purportedly binds signatory countries to do away with the death penalty.  The protocol was signed in 2006 under the administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

According to the CHR, the restoration of the death penalty will violate constitutional provisions regarding respect for human rights and the dignity of every person.  The CHR also claims that capital punishment by whatever method constitutes cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment, does not accord dignity to human beings, and has no place in a civilized society.  In addition, the CHR says that there are no studies which prove that the death penalty deters crime. 

For the CHR, effective law enforcement and an efficient criminal justice system are the best deterrents against crime.  This proposal is echoed by local Catholic Church leaders.             

 The arguments raised by the CHR sound good, but they are devoid of legal substance.  In fact, there is absolutely nothing in the Constitution which sustains the CHR’s position.  A look at the pertinent provision of the Constitution will set the pace. 

Section 19, Article III of the Charter states: “Excessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment inflicted.  Neither shall the death penalty be imposed, unless, for compelling reasons involving heinous crimes, the Congress hereafter provides for it.  Any death penalty already imposed shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua.

It will be readily gleaned from the text of Section 19 that although the imposition of cruel, degrading, or inhuman punishment is explicitly prohibited, the same section allows Congress to impose the death penalty for heinous crimes.  This clearly means that it was never the intention of the Constitution to consider the death penalty as a cruel, degrading, or inhuman punishment. 

Every freshman law student knows that when a particular act is explicitly allowed by the Constitution, it is impossible for that act to be considered unconstitutional.  Therefore, since the Constitution allows Congress to impose the death penalty for heinous crimes, the death penalty cannot be unconstitutional.  It also means that the death penalty cannot be repugnant to any provision in the Constitution.   

Thus, as far as the Constitution is concerned, the death penalty is not a cruel, degrading, or inhuman form of punishment, and the death penalty is not repugnant to any provision of the Constitution.  

This effectively debunks the arguments of the CHR to the effect that the death penalty is an unconstitutional form of punishment, and that it violates provisions of the Constitution regarding human rights and dignity.

As for the argument that the death penalty has no place in a civilized society, suffice it to say that that’s a matter of opinion.  The military establishment imposes the death penalty on erring soldiers.  Does that make the military establishment uncivilized?  Death sentences were carried out during the administrations of past presidents under the 1935 Constitution.  Does that make those administrations uncivilized?  On many occasions in the past, the Supreme Court upheld the death penalty imposed by lower courts on certain convicts.  Does that make the justices of the high court uncivilized?  Good grief!

Sure, the Philippines signed that protocol on the abolition of the death penalty, and the Constitution itself states that the Philippines adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land.  That notwithstanding, it is a basic principle in constitutional law that an international protocol cannot prevail over a specific provision of the Constitution—like Section 19, Article III which allows the imposition of the death penalty.  Moreover, adopting international law as part of Philippine law does not necessarily mean that international law automatically takes precedence over the Constitution. 

The reason for the supremacy of the Constitution over an international protocol is obvious—the Constitution was ratified by the sovereign Filipino people; an international protocol signed by the Philippine government does have the same approval from the electorate.

While there may be no empirical data to show that the death penalty is an effective deterrent against crime, there is none to suggest that its abolition has reduced crime.

The proposition that effective law enforcement and an efficient criminal justice system are the best deterrents against crime is, at best, wishful thinking.  Effective law enforcement only means that criminals will be caught and charged.  On the other hand, an efficient criminal justice system only means crime will not go unpunished.  Both do not necessarily assure that nobody will commit crime. 

Truth to tell, overpopulation contributes to criminality.  A runaway increase in population translates to more unemployed people and, ultimately, to poverty.  Desperation results, and desperation triggers crime because it is very difficult to be law-abiding when one is hungry and no meals are forthcoming.

Because the Philippines has a very serious population problem, the government is promoting a population control program.  Unfortunately, the Roman Catholic Church is not helping out because it is against contraceptives. 

The Church may not know it but by opposing population control, it tacitly condones criminality.

So much for the opposition to the death penalty. 

• Commission on Human Rights
• death penalty
• House of Representatives
• human rights advocates
• Victor Avecilla

LATEST NEWS

Marcos urges filipinos to be a blessing to others like christ in easter sunday message, a-bomb saga ‘oppenheimer’ finally opens in japan, crucifixions and whippings in the philippines on good friday, china says philippine ‘provocations’ cause of south china sea tensions, milf bats for cha-cha to push for more peace laws, lto alicia holds weekend mobile caravan, popular articles, cemex philippines opens new strategic warehouse in batangas, bayer crop science philippines supports vegetable farmers through climate change conditions, germany’s legal weed sparks calls to protect young people, president of peru’s home raided over undeclared rolex watches: police, filipino-indian group donates 10 computers to region 1 police to mark women’s month, food shortages leave cubans in anguish over next meal, july 17 to be observed as ‘national cpr day,’ marcos proclaims.

• Economy & Trade
• Banking & Finance
• Agri & Mining
• IT & Telecom

On the Road

• Monitoring Plus
• Commuter's Corner
• Malls & Bazaars
• Hobbies & Collections
• Entertainment
• TV & Movies
• Music & Concerts
• Culture & Media

Home & Design

• Environment & Sustainability
• Users Agreement

© All Rights Reserved, Newspaper Theme.

• Special Pages

• Study Guides
• Homework Questions

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay.edited

a place where you can feel enjoyment

Introduction.. ü, sunday, august 24, 2008.

• Argumentative Essay: Pro Death Penalty

4 comments:

The Death Penalty in the US: A Review Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters, contact info below   NOTE: Detailed review of any of the below topics, or others, is available upon request   In this brief format, the reality of the death penalty in the United States, is presented, with the hope that the media, public policy makers and others will make an effort to present a balanced view on this sanction.   Innocence Issues   Death Penalty opponents have proclaimed that 129 inmates have been "released from death row with evidence of their innocence", in the US, since the modern death penalty era began, post Furman v Georgia (1972).   The number is a fraud.   Those opponents have intentionally included both the factually innocent (the "I truly had nothing to do with the murder" cases) and the legally innocent (the "I got off because of legal errors" cases), thereby fraudulently raising the "innocent" numbers. This is easily confirmed by fact checking.   Death penalty opponents claim that 24 such innocence cases are in Florida. The Florida Commission on Capital Cases found that 4 of those 24 MIGHT be innocent -- an 83% error rate in for the claims of death penalty opponents. Other studies show their error rate to be about 70%. The totality of reviews points to an 80% error/fraud rate in these claims, or about 26 cases - a 0.3% actual guilt error rate for the nearly 8000 sentenced to death since 1973.  The actual innocents were all freed.   It is often claimed that 23 innocents have been executed in the US since 1900.  Nonsense.  Even the authors of that "23 innocents executed" study proclaimed "We agree with our critics, we never proved those (23) executed to be innocent; we never claimed that we had."  While no one would claim that an innocent has never been executed, there is no proof of an innocent executed in the US, at least since 1900.   No one disputes that innocents are found guilty, within all countries.  However, when scrutinizing death penalty opponents claims, we find that when reviewing the accuracy of verdicts and the post conviction thoroughness of discovering those actually innocent incarcerated, that the US death penalty process may be one of the most accurate criminal justice sanctions in the world.    Under real world scenarios, not executing murderers will always put many more innocents at risk, than will ever be put at risk of execution.   Deterrence Issues   16 recent US studies, inclusive of their defenses,  find a deterrent effect of the death penalty.   All the studies which have not found a deterrent effect of the death penalty have refused to say that it does not deter some.  The studies finding for deterrence state such.  Confusion arises when people think that a simple comparison of murder rates and executions, or the lack thereof, can tell the tale of deterrence.  It cannot.    Both high and low murder rates are found within death penalty and non death penalty jurisdictions, be it Singapore, South Africa, Sweden or Japan, or the US states of Michigan and Delaware.  Many factors are involved in such evaluations.  Reason and common sense tell us that it would be remarkable to find that the most severe criminal sanction -- execution -- deterred none.  No one is foolish enough to suggest that the potential for negative consequences does not deter the behavior of some.  Therefore, regardless of jurisdiction, having the death penalty will always be an added deterrent to murders, over and above any lesser punishments.   Racial issues   White murderers are twice as likely to be executed in the US as are black murderers and are executed, on average, 12 months more quickly than are black death row inmates.   It is often stated that it is the race of the victim which decides who is prosecuted in death penalty cases.  Although blacks and whites make up about an equal number of murder victims, capital cases are 6 times more likely to involve white victim murders than black victim murders.  This, so the logic goes, is proof that the US only cares about white victims.   Hardly.  Only capital murders, not all murders, are subject to a capital indictment.  Generally, a capital murder is limited to murders plus secondary aggravating factors, such as murders involving burglary, carjacking, rape, and additional murders, such as police murders, serial and multiple murders.  White victims are, overwhelmingly, the victims under those circumstances, in ratios nearly identical to the cases found on death row.   Any other racial combinations of defendants and/or their victims in death penalty cases, is a reflection of the crimes committed and not any racial bias within the system, as confirmed by studies from the Rand Corporation (1991), Smith College (1994), U of Maryland (2002), New Jersey Supreme Court (2003) and by a view of criminal justice statistics, within a framework of the secondary aggravating factors necessary for capital indictments.   Class issues   No one disputes that wealthier defendants can hire better lawyers and, therefore, should have a legal advantage over their poorer counterparts.  The US has executed about 0.15% of all murderers since new death penalty statutes were enacted in 1973.  Is there evidence that wealthier capital murderers are less likely to be executed than their poorer ilk, based upon the proportion of capital murders committed by different those different economic groups? Not to my knowledge.   Arbitrary and capricious   About 10% of all murders within the US might qualify for a death penalty eligible trial.  That would be about 64,000 murders since 1973.  We have sentenced 8000 murderers to death since then, or 13% of those eligible.  I doubt that there is any other crime which receives a higher percentage of maximum sentences, when mandatory sentences are not available.  Based upon that, as well as pre trial, trial, appellate and clemency/commutation realities, the US death penalty is likely the least arbitrary and capricious criminal sanctions in the  US.   Christianity and the death penalty   The two most authoritative New Testament scholars, Saints Augustine and Aquinas, provide substantial biblical and theological support for the death penalty. Even the most well known anti death penalty personality in the US, Sister Helen Prejean, author of Dead Man Walking, states that "It is abundantly clear that the Bible depicts murder as a capital crime for which death is considered the appropriate punishment, and one is hard pressed to find a biblical 'proof text' in either the Hebrew Testament or the New Testament which unequivocally refutes this.  Even Jesus' admonition 'Let him without sin cast the first stone,' when He was asked the appropriate punishment for an adulteress (John 8:7) -- the Mosaic Law prescribed death -- should be read in its proper context.  This passage is an 'entrapment' story, which sought to show Jesus' wisdom in besting His adversaries.  It is not an ethical pronouncement about capital punishment."  A thorough review of Pope John Paul II's position, reflects a reasoning that should be recommending more executions.   Cost Issues   All studies finding the death penalty to be more expensive than life without parole exclude important factors, such as (1) geriatric care costs, recently found to be $69,0000/yr/inmate, (2) the death penalty cost benefit of providing for plea bargains to a maximum life sentence, a huge cost savings to the state, (3) the death penalty cost benefit of both enhanced deterrence and enhanced incapacitation, at $5 million per innocent life spared, and, furthermore, (4) many of the alleged cost comparison studies are highly deceptive.   Polling data   76% of Americans find that we should impose the death penalty more or that we impose it about right (Gallup, May 2006 - 51% that we should impose it more, 25% that we impose it about right)   71%  find capital punishment morally acceptable - that was the highest percentage answer for all questions (Gallup, April 2006, moral values poll). In May, 2007, the percentage dropped to 66%, still the highest percentage answer, with 27% opposed. (Gallup, 5/29/07)   81% of the American people supported the execution of Timothy McVeigh, with only 16% opposed. "(T)his view appears to be the consensus of all major groups in society, including men, women, whites, nonwhites, "liberals" and "conservatives."  (Gallup 5/2/01).   81% of Connecticut citizens supported the execution of serial rapist/murderer Michael Ross (Jan 2005).   While 81% gave specific case support for Timothy McVeigh's execution, Gallup also showed a 65% support AT THE SAME TIME when asked a general "do you support capital punishment for murderers?" question. (Gallup, 6/10/01).   22% of those supporting McVeigh's execution are, generally, against the death penalty (Gallup 5/02/01). That means that about half of those who say they oppose the death penalty, with the general question,  actually support the death penalty under specific circumstances, just as it is imposed, judicially.   Further supporting the higher rates for specific cases, is this, from the French daily Le Monde December 2006 (1): Percentage of respondents in favor of executing Saddam Hussein:USA: 82%; Great Britain: 69%; France: 58%; Germany: 53%; Spain: 51%; Italy: 46%   Death penalty support is much deeper and much wider than we are often led to believe, with 50% of those who say they, generally, oppose the death penalty actually supporting it under specific circumstances, resulting in 80% death penalty support in the US, as recently as December 2006.   --------------------------------   Whatever your feelings are toward the death penalty, a fair accounting of how it is applied should be demanded.   copyright 1998-2008 Dudley Sharp Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part,  is approved with proper attribution.   Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters e-mail  [email protected],  713-622-5491, Houston, Texas   Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.   A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.   Pro death penalty sites  homicidesurvivors(dot)com/categories/Dudley%20Sharp%20-%20Justice%20Matters.aspx www(dot)dpinfo.com www(dot)cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm www(dot)clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm www(dot)coastda.com/archives.html www(dot)lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com www(dot)yesdeathpenalty.com/deathpenalty_co yesdeathpenalty.googlepages.com/home2   (Sweden) www(dot)wesleylowe.com/cp.html

The Death Penalty: More Protection for Innocents Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters, contact info below   Often, the death penalty dialogue gravitates to the subject of innocents at risk of execution. Seldom is a more common problem reviewed. That is, how innocents are more at risk without the death penalty.   To state the blatantly clear, living murderers, in prison, after release or escape, are much more likely to harm and murder, again, than are executed murderers.   Although an obvious truism, it is surprising how often  folks overlook the enhanced incapacitation benefits of the death penalty over incarceration.   No knowledgeable and honest party questions that the death penalty has the most extensive due process protections in US criminal law.   Therefore, actual innocents are more likely to be sentenced to life imprisonment and more likely to die in prison serving under that sentence, that it is that an actual innocent will be executed.   That is. logically, conclusive.   16 recent studies, inclusive of their defenses, find for death penalty deterrence.   A surprise? No.   Life is preferred over death. Death is feared more than life.   Some believe that all studies with contrary findings negate those 16 studies. They don't. Studies which don't find for deterrence don't say no one is deterred, but that they couldn't measure those deterred.   What prospect of a negative outcome doesn't deter some? There isn't one . . . although committed anti death penalty folk may say the death penalty is the only one.   However, the premier anti death penalty scholar accepts it as a given that the death penalty is a deterrent, but does not believe it to be a greater deterrent than a life sentence. Yet, the evidence is compelling and un refuted that death is feared more than life.   Some death penalty opponents argue against death penalty deterrence, stating that it's a harsher penalty to be locked up without any possibility of getting out.   Reality paints a very different picture.   What percentage of capital murderers seek a plea bargain to a death sentence? Zero or close to it. They prefer long term imprisonment.   What percentage of convicted capital murderers argue for execution in the penalty phase of their capital trial? Zero or close to it. They prefer long term imprisonment.   What percentage of death row inmates waive their appeals and speed up the execution process? Nearly zero. They prefer long term imprisonment.   This is not, even remotely, in dispute.   Life is preferred over death. Death is feared more than life.   Furthermore, history tells us that lifers have many ways to get out: Pardon, commutation, escape, clerical error, change in the law, etc.   In choosing to end the death penalty, or in choosing not implement it, some have chosen to spare murderers at the cost of sacrificing more innocent lives.   Furthermore, possibly we have sentenced 20-25 actually innocent people to death since 1973, or 0.3% of those so sentenced. Those have all been released upon post conviction review. The anti death penalty claims, that the numbers are significantly higher, are a fraud, easily discoverable by fact checking.   6 inmates have been released from death row because of DNA evidence. An additional 9 were released from prison, because of DNA exclusion, who had previously been sentenced to death.   The innocents deception of death penalty opponents has been getting exposure for many years. Even the behemoth of anti death penalty newspapers, The New York Times,  has recognized that deception.   To be sure, 30 or 40 categorically innocent people have been released from death row . . . (1) This when death penalty opponents were claiming the release of 119 "innocents" from death row. Death penalty opponents never required actual innocence in order for cases to be added to their "exonerated" or "innocents" list. They simply invented their own definitions for exonerated and innocent and deceptively shoe horned large numbers of inmates into those definitions - something easily discovered with fact checking.   There is no proof of an innocent executed in the US, at least since 1900.   If we accept that the best predictor of future performance is past performance, we can reasonable conclude that the DNA cases will be excluded prior to trial, and that for the next 8000 death sentences, that we will experience a 99.8% accuracy rate in actual guilt convictions. This improved accuracy rate does not include the many additional safeguards that have been added to the system, over and above DNA testing.   Of all the government programs in the world, that put innocents at risk, is there one with a safer record and with greater protections than the US death penalty?   Unlikely.   Full report -All Innocence Issues: The Death Penalty, upon request.   Full report - The Death Penalty as a Deterrent, upon request   (1) The Death of Innocents: A Reasonable Doubt, New York Times Book Review, p 29, 1/23/05, Adam Liptak, national legal correspondent for The NY Times copyright 2007-2008, Dudley Sharp Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part,  is approved with proper attribution.   Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters e-mail [email protected] 713-622-5491, Houston, Texas   Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS, VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.   A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.   Pro death penalty sites  homicidesurvivors(dot)com/categories/Dudley%20Sharp%20-%20Justice%20Matters.aspx www(dot)dpinfo.com www(dot)cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm www(dot)clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm www(dot)coastda.com/archives.html www(dot)lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com www(dot)yesdeathpenalty.com/deathpenalty_com yesdeathpenalty.googlepages.com/home2 (Sweden) www(dot)wesleylowe.com/cp.html

Catholic and other Christian References: Support for the Death Penalty Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters, contact info below   Religious positions in favor of capital punishment are neither necessary not needed to justify that sanction. However, the biblical and theological record is very supportive of the death penalty.   Many of the current religious campaigns against the death penalty reflect a fairly standard anti death penalty message, routed in secular arguments. When they do address  religious issues, they often neglect solid theological foundations, choosing, instead, select biblical sound bites which do not impact the solid basis of death penalty support. The strength of the biblical, theological and traditional support for the death penalty is, partially, revealed, below.   Some references:   (1)"The Death Penalty", Chapter XXVI, 187. The death penalty, from the book Iota Unum, by Romano Amerio,    Thoughtful deconstruction of current Roman Catholic teaching on capital punishment by a faithful Catholic Vatican insider and expert theologian.   http://www.domid.blogspot.com/2007/05/amerio-on-capital-punishment.html titled "Amerio on capital punishment "Friday, May 25, 2007     (2)  "Catholic and other Christian References: Support for the Death Penalty", at http://www.homicidesurvivors.com/2006/10/12/catholic-and-other-christian-references-support-for-the-death-penalty.aspx    (3)  "Capital Punishment: A Catholic Perspective", by Emmanuel Valenza (Br. Augustine) at http://www.sspx.org/against_the_sound_bites/capital_punishment.htm     (4) "The Purpose of Punishment (in the Catholic tradition)", by R. Michael Dunningan, J.D., J.C.L., CHRISTIFIDELIS, Vol.21,No.4, sept 14, 200 http://www.st-joseph-foundation.org/newsletter/lead.php?document=2003/21-4   (5) "MOST CATHOLICS OPPOSE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT?", KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER, Catholic Answers, March 2, 2004 http://www.catholic.com/newsletters/kke_040302.asp     (6) "THOUGHTS ON THE BISHOPS' MEETING: NOWADAYS, VOTERS IGNORE BISHOPS" , KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER, Catholic Answers,, Nov. 22, 2005 http://www.catholic.com/newsletters/kke_051122.asp (7) "God’s Justice and Ours" by Antonin Scalia, First Things, 5/2002 http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2022   (8)  "A Seamless Garment In a Sinful World" by John R. Connery, S. J., America, 7/14/84, p 5-8).   (9) "The Death Penalty", by Solange Strong Hertz at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/HOMEPAGES/REMNANT/death2.htm   (10) "Capital Punishment: What the Bible Says", Dr. Lloyd R. Bailey, Abingdon Press, 1987. The definitive biblical review of the death penalty. --------------------- 70% of Catholics supported the death penalty as of May, 2oo5, Gallup Poll, Moral Values and Beliefs. The May 2-5, 2005 poll also found that 74% of Americans  favor the death penalty for murderers, while 23% oppose. copyright 1999-2008 Dudley Sharp Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part,  is approved with proper attribution. Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters e-mail  [email protected],  713-622-5491, Houston, Texas   Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.   A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.   Pro death penalty sites  homicidesurvivors(dot)com/categories/Dudley%20Sharp%20-%20Justice%20Matters.aspx www(dot)dpinfo.com www(dot)cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm www(dot)clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm www(dot)coastda.com/archives.html www(dot)lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com www(dot)yesdeathpenalty.com/deathpenalty_co yesdeathpenalty.googlepages.com/home2 (Sweden) www(dot)wesleylowe.com/cp.html

A worthy essay title grabs the attention of the readers which makes them to read the whole thing to further find out what you wrote and how you develop an argument within your essay or how much it is stated in an effective manner.. This is why giving a title to an essay is crucial – how effectively you are using words to start an essay and how creatively you are crafting your essay title.

Post a Comment

ENGLCOM last day.

To: Ms. Kathy

Best novel ♥, hey its me ü.

my blog archives.. Ü

• Reflective Essay 2: My experiences and Improvement...
• Cause and Effect Essay : Water Pollution
• Comparison and Contrast Essay : DEATH NOTE
• Definition Essay : Love, Loved
• Descriptive Essay : The Ultimate Chocolate Chip Co...
• ►  July (2)