short answer questions lord of the flies

Lord Of The Flies Quiz Test Questions And Answers

Have you read the novel Lord of the Flies? How much do you remember? This Lord of the Flies quiz provides a comprehension test for this novel by William Golding. Choose the answers that best complete the statements or answer the question. Make sure that you attempt all of the questions, as that will be of paramount importance in helping us assess your results accurately. Don't forget to share this Lord of the Flies test with your fellow fans of the book!

Lord Of The Flies Questions and Answers

At the beginning of the novel, jack appears to be the leader/ruler of _____..

A flock of birds

A ring of snakes

A group of girls

A choir of boys

Rate this question:

What was the first meal that the boys had on the island?

Fruit from the trees.

A pig was roasting on a fire.

Strange mulberries were found in an overgrown bush.

Lettuce leaves.

Which of the following is one of the rules that Ralph established at the beginning of the novel? Why was this rule made?

The only way someone may speak as if they are holding the conch; is to establish order.

The only people who may start fires are Jack and Simon; to keep from harming the littluns.

The fire is to be kept on the beach and made with Piggy's glasses; The fire should be close by and made orderly so as not to get out of control.

No littluns may leave the campfire after 7:00; to protect the littluns and make them feel safe.

Roger kicks over several sand castles and throws rocks at _______.

When jack and ralph go to the mountaintop to see the beast, jack _______.

Is petrified with fear

Slays the beast

Hides behind a bush until the beast flies into the air and makes a horrible cry

Realizes that the beast is nothing more than a casualty of war

Which character is the first to be introduced in the novel?

_____ tries to speak by grabbing the conch shell right before the conch shell is destroyed., why was the severed sow's head (and the title of the book) called the lord of the flies.

The pig was called by this name because flies literally swarmed around its head. However, symbolically, it was used to symbolize Satan, whose nickname is Lord of the Flies.

Simon was smelly and attracted flies to himself and to the pig's head, thus garnering the name.

The term refers theologically to the angels, who represent the humanity and beauty of the island.

The pig represented two of Jack's desires: to murder and to play with bugs. This shows the fulfillment of Jack's longing and, thus, his happiness.

Who is Samneric?

A set of twins who speak in nearly perfect unison.

A littlun who ends up betraying Jack at the end of the novel.

A friend of Simon who is eventually killed by a fire that gets out of control

A child who has been on the island for over twenty-two days without food.

Which of the following is a tactic employed by Jack in order to try to kill Ralph?

The use of spies told Jack everything that Ralph had planned.

The use of camouflage prevented Ralph from seeing Jack.

Jack stalked Ralph during the night when it was hard to see.

Jack used fire to try to smoke Ralph out of his hiding place.

How does Piggy die?

Ralph kills him with a vine.

Roger kills him with a stone.

Jack kills him with a knife.

He dies when he and Ralph both try to use the conch shell at once.

At the beginning of the book, a ______ was found that was later used to summon the littluns.

Conch shell

Ceramic bottle

Model ship with a noisy sail

_____ says that shelters, not fires, are the most important things that need to be made.

All the boys except Jack.

In the novel, Ralph most frequently shows _____.

The most intelligent of any of the boys on the island.

Moral responsibility, common sense, and kindness.

The violent, sociopathic tendencies of murderers.

A hatred of the world for its horrible condition.

In the novel, Piggy most frequently shows _____.

Knowledge, wisdom, and physical vulnerability.

Poor planning, cruelty, and impulsive actions.

Anger and short-tempered behavior.

Elitist mentality and pompous behavior.

What event triggers the destruction of the conch and the death of Piggy in the novel?

An air battle near the island

Ralph confronting Jack about the smoke signal

Simon's mistaken identity as the beast

Roger triggering a trap

Near the end of the novel, Ralph decides not to sleep by himself in an empty shelter. When he makes this decision, where does he go to sleep?

Castle Rock

One of the huts that were made.

The underwater shelter is made from rocks and seaweed.

How many shelters are made in total?

Ralph and jack both want to fire for different reasons. ralph wants fire because _______..

It will signal for help, and it symbolizes hope.

Fire causes smoke, which causes less fumigation of the island.

Fire is one of Ralph's secret obsessions.

Ralph desires the ability to cook food via the use of fire.

What is Simon's nickname for the plants of the forest?

Relic weeds

Candle buds

Violet sprouts

Still lives

Which of the following was not killed by (or as a result of) Jack's actions?

A sow that was nursing her piglets

The Lord of the Flies

The conch was destroyed with a _________.

How was the simon killed.

It was roasted.

He was beaten to death by the other boys on the island.

It died in the fire.

It was crushed by a rock.

Who is Merridew?

Which of the following characters frequently shows brute force and wavering loyalty.

Quiz Review Timeline +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

Current Version
Mar 14, 2024 Quiz Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team
Nov 20, 2009 Quiz Created by Testmaker

'Lord of the Flies' Questions for Study and Discussion

How to Understand William Golding's Famous Novel

Study Guides
Authors & Texts
Top Picks Lists
Best Sellers
Plays & Drama
Shakespeare
Short Stories
Children's Books
M.A., English Literature, California State University - Sacramento
B.A., English, California State University - Sacramento

"Lord of the Flies" is a famous and highly controversial novel by William Golding. An unusually violent version of a coming-of-age story , the novel is viewed as an allegory , exploring the aspects of human nature that lead us to turn on each other and resort to violence.

Golding was a war veteran, and much of his literary career was spent exploring these themes central to an understanding of humanity. His other works include "Free Fall," about a prisoner in a German camp during World War II; "The Inheritors" which depicts a race of gentle people being overrun by a more violent race and "Pincher Martin," a story told from the point of view of a drowning soldier

Here are a few questions about " Lord of the Flies " for study and discussion, to help improve your understanding of its themes and characters.

Why Is the Novel Called 'Lord of the Flies'?

What is important about the title? Is there a reference in the novel that explains the title? Hint: Simon is the one who names the pig's staked head.
Central to the plot of "Lord of the Flies" is the idea of order and society being crucial to survival. Does Golding seem to be advocating for a structured society, or against it? Explain your answer using one of the characters as your evidence.

Plot and Character in 'Lord of the Flies'

Which of the boys on the island is the most well-developed character? Which is the most poorly developed? Could Golding have done more to explore the boys' backstories, or would that have slowed the plot?
Could "Lord of the Flies" have taken place at another point in history? Explore this possibility by choosing a time period and determining how the plot would have played out there.
How important is the setting in "Lord of the Flies?" Would it have been as effective to the plot if Golding had stranded the boys on another planet, for instance? Explain your answer.
The ending of "Lord of the Flies" is not unexpected; it seemed likely throughout the novel that the boys eventually would be "rescued." But does the ending satisfy you? What do you think Golding was trying to say by letting us hear the Navy officer's inner thoughts?

Putting 'Lord of the Flies' in Larger Context

If you were going to recommend "Lord of the Flies" to a friend, how would you describe it? Would you warn them of the novel's violence?
Understanding that the central plot is highly controversial, do you think "Lord of the Flies" should be censored or banned? Does it make sense that it has been banned in the past?
Do you agree that "Lord of the Flies" is a companion piece of sorts to J.D. Salinger's " The Catcher in the Rye ?" How do you think Holden Caulfield would have fared on Golding's island with the rest of the boys?
Controversial and Banned Books
50 General Book Club Questions for Study and Discussion
Why Is 'Lord of the Flies' Challenged and Banned?
The Most Commonly Read Books in High School
Memorable Quotes From 'Lord of the Flies'
Lord of the Flies: A Critical History
The Catcher in the Rye: Questions for Study and Discussion
Lord of the Flies Book Profile
'Lord of the Flies' Overview
10 Classic Novels for Teens
January Writing Prompts
'Lord of the Flies' Themes, Symbols, and Literary Devices
How to Find the Theme of a Book or Short Story
'A Passage to India' Questions for Study and Discussion
9 Must-Read Books If You Like 'Lord of the Flies'
'Brave New World:' Questions for Study and Discussion

Lord of the Flies Questions and Answers

The Question and Answer sections of our study guides are a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss literature.

Ask a question and get answers from your fellow students and educators.

Browse Questions

Lord of the Flies

How do the boys respond to jack's call for ralph's removal as chief how does jack react respond with evidence from the text., what does ralph recall hearing from simon and seeing in the sky , wooden huts on or near the beach are not called……, why was jack impressed with the site of the rocky ledge, ralph glances at piggy before saying anything at the meeting what might he need or want from piggy, who turned out to be the "creature", what new substance does jack use to facilitate his hunting, how did william goldings life influence his writing, what does simon see when he looks at the pilot, why does jack insist there is a beast after simon’s death, how would you describe the ending of the book, how does golding change his diction right after the death of simon, what is ralph’s new attitude toward piggy, how is this assembly different from the others, what does ralph use to call the boys together, who said it (indicate page number)., what according to simon is man’s essential illness, what does simon think is really the beast, what does jack say about ralph’s character in chapter 8 and why what does he say to oppose ralph’s position as chief, in chapter 8, what problem do the boys face in their efforts to maintain the signal fire what solution is proposed, and by who, describe the scene in which jack and the hunters kill the sow in chapter 8. how is the hunt particularly brutal respond with evidence from the text., compare and contrast the characteristics of jack and ralph through the end of chapter 4. who do you think would be a more effective leader on the island and why cite evidence from the text to support your point of view., what do the twins see on their night watch how do the other boys react and why, what do the boys dislike about living on the island lord of the flies chapter 3.

What’s So Bad About Asking Where Humans Came From?

Human origin stories have often been used for nefarious purposes. That doesn’t mean they are worthless.

Here is an origin story about origin stories. Once upon a time, we knew where we came from: Adam and Eve, the Garden of Eden, the Fall. Then came modern science, modern doubt. Geology, paleontology: The world grew older very fast. Skulls were discovered, and stone tools. Human origins became a problem and a fascination. Who are we? How did we emerge? And given who we think we may be, how should we live?

Explore the May 2024 Issue

Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.

In The Invention of Prehistory: Empire, Violence, and Our Obsession With Human Origins , the intellectual historian Stefanos Geroulanos, who teaches at NYU, offers a compendium of the ideas—speculative, scientific, and somewhere in between—that have arisen in response to these and other questions. Beginning with Rousseau and his idyllic state of nature, we learn the genealogy of a familiar set of tropes: the “noble savage,” the “lizard brain,” the “killer ape,” the goddess-worshipping matriarchy. Other concepts may be less familiar: the “primitive communism” of Engels and others, which allegedly existed prior to the rise of patriarchy, private property, and class struggle; Freud’s “primal horde,” commanded by a father whose murder (and ingestion) by his sons, the original band of brothers, inaugurated civilization and its discontents.

We learn about “stadial” schema, theories about the stages (usually three) through which humanity has passed: Stone/Bronze/Iron, savage/barbarian/civilized, magic/religion/science. About disputes as to where Homo sapiens emerged (China? Egypt?) and where the Indo-European peoples did (Germany? The Caucasus? Somewhere between Iran and India?). About the impact of the unearthing of the dinosaurs and other fossils, of Darwinian evolution, of geology’s discovery of deep time. About questions that continue to engross us . Who were the Neanderthals? What do the cave paintings mean? Were early humans violent or peaceful?

From the November 2021 issue: William Deresiewicz on a brilliant new history of humanity

All of this is fascinating—or would be, but for major problems. For one thing, Geroulanos is not a congenial companion. Like a professor who’s trying too hard to be cool, he sprinkles his language with clumsily modish locutions. “His prose was straight-up goth.” “Rousseau amped up the device of ‘nature’ to the max.” “Bataille vaporized history so as to teleport back to the very beginning.” Worse is the snark, which is relentless, and mostly aimed at nothing worse than the routine careerism of intellectual life. “Jumped at the chance to take credit”; “did his best to show himself to be a good schoolboy”; “had the bad taste to go over his mentors’ head”; “exudes an ambition worthy of Darwin.” Some of it is aimed at exactly the kind of work that scholars are supposed to do. Darwin used “masses of tedious evidence to establish a position others would find hard to assail.” “Other linguists insisted that thanks to their mind-numbingly dry comparative analysis of phonemes they could explain all these bigger issues.” It’s almost as if these people cared about the truth.

All of this points to deeper problems, ones that typify the drift of the contemporary academy. Geroulanos is the executive director of NYU’s Remarque Institute, a prominent center for research on Europe; an executive editor of the Journal of the History of Ideas ; the author or co-author of four previous books; and the co-editor or co-translator of a dozen—in short, a major figure in the history of thought. Yet instead of coming to his subject with a scholar’s open-mindedness—this, alas, is no surprise these days—he does so with self-righteousness and an agenda. His purpose is to argue that the study of humanity’s beginnings is and always must be evil. “The Euromodern search for origins began in and then contributed to a long, brutal history of conquest and empire,” he writes. “It has been drunk on hierarchy. It is rooted in illusions—often murderous ones … Its beautiful ideas have justified force against those deemed weak, different, ugly.”

This is, of course, to a great extent true. It is also not surprising. We are well aware by now that scientific concepts—or, more often, pseudo- or at best proto-scientific ones—have been used to rationalize violence and domination (so, for that matter, have nonscientific concepts). That doesn’t mean we don’t still need to talk about this fact. To pronounce Indigenous people “savage,” as Geroulanos explains, was to license one’s attempts to “civilize” them. To designate them “fossil men,” vestiges of ancient times, was to declare them fit to be displaced. Germany was the birthplace of Indo-European culture, the Nazis believed, so Germans really were the master race.

From the April 2019 issue: Adam Serwer on white nationalism’s deep American roots

But can we have all this without the attitude, the knowing, smug superiority? This so often seems to be the way now on the left—in academia, in media. We are better than the past. Or the rest of you aren’t better, but we are, my allies and I. But you aren’t better than the past; you’re just lucky enough not to live there. Nor are you better than everyone else; you’re just readier to claim you are. Exposing the sources of Western prosperity does not in itself make you virtuous.

Besides, the picture, on Geroulanos’s own evidence, is much more complicated than his politics will allow him to acknowledge. The study of human origins has not invariably been “rooted in illusions,” nor has it always “served ferocious power,” “justified force,” or “rationalized colonial domination.” Sometimes quite the opposite. Geroulanos shows this himself, yet he tends to downplay it, and in any case conveniently forgets it when making his general claims. Indeed, there is an entire through line in his book of figures who employed prehistory to criticize colonialism, capitalism, modern warfare, and modernity more broadly. Rousseau used his state of nature to attack the inequality and artificiality of 18th-century European society. Engels’s primitive communism “offered a model … for true socialist kinship.” The year after Lord of the Flies , William Golding came out with The Inheritors , a book in which he “asked his reader to identify with Neanderthals” against their aggressive, deceitful rivals, the sapiens .

Concepts developed to promote the idea of Western superiority could be turned in the other direction, and were. It is not “they” who are savages, but we: we who exterminate entire populations, slaughter one another in the trenches, bomb cities from the air. Cultural diffusionism, the idea that civilization spread from a single source, often identified as white—Mesopotamia, Northern Europe—“also contributed to an opposing set of political claims: Pan-Africanism and decolonization.”

Geroulanos presents these counterexamples as exceptions, never pausing to consider that, once you have enough of them, exceptions aren’t exceptions so much as a new rule (the study of prehistory: sometimes good), one whose tension with his old rule (the study of prehistory: evil) needs to be worked through into a broader one (prehistory: It’s complicated). So when he does mention someone who played a more positive role in Western relations with the nonwhite world, he often makes sure to undercut them, typically with little or no evidence.

Lewis Henry Morgan, a lawyer and an early ethnographer, advocated on behalf of Native Americans in the years before the Civil War. “The Seneca had adopted him in thanks for his legal and political activism,” Geroulanos tells us, “though today we would see Morgan’s role as much more problematic.” He doesn’t say why. Claude Lévi-Strauss, the great anthropologist, was relentless in his wholesale condemnation of the Western impact on Indigenous societies. Yet his arguments, Geroulanos insists, “had the peculiar quality of diminishing the effects of specific acts of colonial violence.” No reason is given. Other anthropologists are blamed for having tried to preserve what they could of disappearing cultures, if only in the form of artifacts and records of traditions. For this, Geroulanos refers to them as “drivers of colonial violence,” not bothering to explain what they were supposed to have done to stop the real drivers of colonial violence, the companies and states and armies.

This is the opposite of history, if the discipline of history is meant to help us better understand how people saw the world they lived in and the reasons they acted as they did. Instead of strutting through the past, wagging his finger and clucking his tongue, Geroulanos might have exercised a bit of generosity toward people who were trying to make sense of what they had, with the tools that they had. The theories he so gleefully belittles were responding, many of them, to developments that we’ve become accustomed to but that must have been incredibly destabilizing. What did it feel like to learn that the Earth was thousands of times older than we had ever suspected? That it contained remains of creatures more alien than anything we had ever dreamed? That among those creatures were some who looked remarkably like us, yet were somehow not us? There are flashes of this kind of sympathy, but, like the more progressive attitudes that Geroulanos keeps stumbling over, they are quickly overridden and forgotten.

Again, it’s easy to mock the humanitarian impulses of a supposedly benighted past—the belief, for example, that we are all one human family, sharing similar sorrows and joys, which displaced ideas of racial hierarchy after World War II but which Geroulanos condemns for minimizing “difference” (that postmodern holy word). But not only did this represent a real advance; it was a step toward our more enlightened understanding. Yes, to paraphrase T. S. Eliot , we know more than those who came before us, and what we know is them.

But the worst of The Invention of Prehistory is right there in the title. “Invention,” not investigation. Doesn’t it matter if this or that theory is true: about where human beings first evolved, or our historical and genetic relationship to Neanderthals, or the degree of violence in ancient hunter-gatherer societies, or how patriarchy emerged? Apparently, it doesn’t. “I do not much care if particular theories are true,” Geroulanos writes. “I ask what work they do.” It isn’t clear, in fact, if he thinks that there is such a thing as truth. This is someone who can write about “the invention of deep time” and “the ‘discovery’ of the earth’s past”—the scare quotes meaning not that the past was there all along, but that it isn’t there at all, not in any external, empirically observable way. The nascent science of geology, he writes, “played midwife to the birth … of a whole swarm of ostensibly ancient creatures” (that is, the dinosaurs). Ostensibly? So there’s no reality beneath the theories? Geroulanos ducks the question. “The story of human origins has never really been about the past. It has never really been concerned with an accurate, precise depiction of humanity’s emergence out of nature.”

I wonder what his colleagues—the geneticists and archaeologists, the linguists and the neuroscientists—would say to that. This is social constructionism, the idea that there is no truth outside our agreed interpretations, taken to its logical, inane conclusion. And it points to a crucial distinction that Geroulanos’s project denies: the difference between science and pseudo- or proto-science. We have theories about human origins now, and we had theories about them in the 19th century, but they are not the same kinds of theories. Yes, scientists can still have social biases, but contemporary scientific protocols, such as peer review, are meant to root them out. Is the system perfect? Of course not. But there is a qualitative difference between believing that humanity originated in China because (or in order to argue that) the Chinese are “backwards” and deducing that it originated in Africa because that is what genetics and paleontology suggest.

So if truth is irrelevant, what about that “work,” as Geroulanos puts it, that contemporary theories “do”? Well, that’s just the thing. For all his talk of “the new scientific ideologies,” he doesn’t turn up much, in recent decades, that’s indictable. These hypotheses include the notion that the cave paintings show evidence of shamanism; that tools and human bodies shaped each other in a “feedback loop” akin to those we know from the world of computers; that we all descend from a single genetic ancestor, popularly dubbed “Mitochondrial Eve.” All of this is pretty harmless, and certainly a distant cry from the “empire, violence” of his subtitle. Much of it, indeed, comes down on the progressive side of the ledger: goddesses and matriarchies, relatively peaceful tribes that existed before the invention of war, preagricultural egalitarianism. There are still plenty of ideologies running around that justify racism, militarism, and other evils, but they are not drawn from science, for the most part.

And insofar as they are, whose fault is that? “The archaeologists who dig up old bones and the biologists who study hominid genes,” Geroulanos writes, “are seldom the vectors of violence.” Seldom indeed. They also aren’t responsible, to name some of his targets, for Yuval Noah Harari (the “reigning prophet of prehistory’s future”), or 2001: A Space Odyssey (which popularized the idea of the “killer ape,” our supposedly brutal australopithecine ancestor, a notion that Geroulanos presents as having been designed to create an image of violent Indigenous Africans and thus to serve as an argument against decolonization). Nor should they be blamed for the far right’s appropriation of Neanderthals as the original white Europeans. If scientific findings are sensationalized by journalists, oversimplified by authors, and misused by political actors, what are scientists supposed to do? Stop doing science?

Geroulanos seems to imply that the answer is yes, at least for those who study human origins. The world of early humans, he insists, is “inconceivable,” inaccessible. Almost anything we say about it is “a narcissistic fantasy,” a myth. So he openly promotes the myths he likes, which are the ones that announce themselves as such. “I prefer [Georges] Bataille’s and [Annette] Laming-Emperaire’s myths” about the cave paintings—respectively, that the images reflect the moment at which humans became conscious of themselves as separate from nature (and thus conscious of death) and that they embody a complex symbolic system structured around gender (which Laming-Emperaire actually did not regard as a myth). Geroulanos writes admiringly about feminist imaginings that place the female at the center of human evolution. Elaine Morgan’s popularization, in The Descent of Woman , of the “aquatic ape” hypothesis —the theory that hominins developed not on the savanna but in the shallow sea, where mothers could protect their babies from feline predators—was “proudly speculative.” Susan Brownmiller’s assertion, in Against Our Will , that hominin social organization began in fear of rape , was “a primal fiction” that refused to “be judged by crude verification.” He even puts a word in for Wakanda as the “fluorescent triumph” of the Afrocentric view of human history.

This is what constructionism gets you. Geroulanos’s ultimate targets are “humanism, which has always hidden violence,” and the idea of human nature, along with the associated notion that studying the origin of the species can get us closer to understanding it. “In reality,” he writes (reality?), “humans have almost nothing in common with our paleolithic forefathers.” This is also a belief, an ideology, a myth. Human nature may be too, and so may humanism. But I’ll take them over what Geroulanos is offering.

This article appears in the May 2024 print edition with the headline “What’s So Bad About Asking Where Humans Came From?” When you buy a book using a link on this page, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.

IMAGES

Lord of the Flies Short Response Questions and Task Cards
Lord of the Flies Chapter 4 Questions by Alot of English 2
EDITABLE Lord of the Flies Chapter Quizzes with Answers
Lord of the Flies Final TEST (96 objective questions, 1 short answer)
Lord of the Flies exam answer
Chapter 4 Study Guide Lord Of The Flies

VIDEO

BIOL2203- Lord of the Flies
2nd Year || Lord of the Flies Questions and answers || Lord of the flies question answers
Monologue-Lord of the Flies (William Golding)
Lord of the Flies
19- Lord of the Flies Ch 07- Reading, Translation, Question Answers, Summary English 12th
Important Questions from "Lord of the FLies"

COMMENTS

Lord of the Flies: Questions & Answers
Physically, the Lord of the Flies is the pig head that Jack, Roger, and the hunters mount on a sharpened stick and leave as an offering for the beast. The head is described as dripping blood, eerily grinning, and attracting a swarm of buzzing flies. When The Lord of the Flies "speaks" to Simon, we can assume that his voice is a ...
Lord of the Flies Questions and Answers
Lord Of The Flies Chapter 7 Quotes. Lord of the Flies Questions and Answers - Discover the eNotes.com community of teachers, mentors and students just like you that can answer any question you ...
Lord of the Flies Short-Answer Quizzes
Answers. 1. The first two characters to appear in the story are Ralph and Piggy. 2. Ralph and Piggy find a conch shell. 3. Ralph summons the others by blowing the conch shell. 4.
Lord of the Flies Short Answer Questions Flashcards
Which two boys finds the conch on the island? Piggy and Ralph. Which boy is the leader of the choir? (Last name needed) Jack Merridew. Which boy is voted leader over the entire company of boys? Ralph is voted leader. What rule do the boys make about the one who holds the conch? Whoever hold the conch has the right to speak.
Lord of the Flies "Review Packet" Questions (MASTER LIST)
The full list of answers for the "Review Packet" (not necessarily in order, so if you cannot find something, keep scrolling) ... Lord of the Flies Packet Questions. 112 terms. clairebear2101. Preview. Lord of the Flies (Chapter 1) 18 terms. portal2rapture. Preview. Chapter 13 - Mental Health Definitions. 15 terms. User5130resU.
The Lord of the Flies Chapter 1 Quiz
The Lord of the Flies Chapter 1 Quiz. This quiz covers characters and events that take place in Chapter 1 of the novel Lord of the Flies. Who was the leader of the choir boys? Question Answer ...
Lord of the Flies Study Guide
The Lord of the Flies, that is, the pig's head on a stick, directly challenges the most spiritually motivated character on the island, Simon, who functions as a prophet-martyr for the other boys. Published in 1954 early in the Cold War, Lord of the Flies is firmly rooted in the sociopolitical concerns of its era.
Lord of the Flies- Study Guide Questions & Answers Flashcards
Lord of the Flies- Study Guide Questions & Answers. Why is the chapter entitled "The Sound of the Shells"? Click the card to flip 👆. Piggy and Ralph find a conch. When Ralph blows the conch, the sound attracts the attention of all the boys on the island who group together. Click the card to flip 👆. 1 / 77.
Lord Of The Flies Quiz Test Questions And Answers
C. Anger and short-tempered behavior. D. Elitist mentality and pompous behavior. Correct Answer. A. Knowledge, wisdom, and physical vulnerability. Explanation. In the novel "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding, Piggy most frequently shows vast knowledge, intelligence, and physical vulnerability.
'Lord of the Flies' Questions for Study and Discussion
Updated on March 09, 2019. "Lord of the Flies" is a famous and highly controversial novel by William Golding. An unusually violent version of a coming-of-age story, the novel is viewed as an allegory, exploring the aspects of human nature that lead us to turn on each other and resort to violence. Golding was a war veteran, and much of his ...
Lord of the Flies: Study Guide
Lord of the Flies is a timeless allegory that continues to resonate, offering a stark portrayal of the human condition and the potential for moral decay in the absence of authority. Lord of the Flies was Golding's first novel and best-known work. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1983. Significant adaptations of Lord of the ...
Lord of the Flies Quizzes
Short-Answer Quizzes ... Chapter 1 Questions and Answers ... Test your knowledge of William Golding's Lord of the Flies by taking one of our user-contributed quizzes! Each quiz is multiple choice ...
Lord of the Flies Discussion Questions & Answers
When Ralph and Piggy first meet, the former does not want to be bothered with the latter. Ralph never asks Piggy his name, laughs when he learns his nickname, mocks him about his asthma, and is uninterested in hearing about his aunt or his parents. He tells Piggy to shut up, and reveals his nickname to the other boys despite Piggy's request not to.
Lord of the flies Chapter 1 Short Answer Questions Flashcards
Lord of the flies Chapter 1 Short Answer Questions. Why are we not given the names of the boys at the start of the novel? Click the card to flip 👆. At the beginning, the boys don't know each other's names either, so we as readers identify them though appearance just like the characters would. Click the card to flip 👆.
PDF Chapters 1-4 SHORT ANSWER STUDY GUIDE QUESTIONS
23. Who is your favorite character so far? Chapters 3 - 4. 24. Ralph and _________ are building huts. 25. What is Jack doing as the chapter opens (be specific)? 26. Although Ralph criticizes the boys for their lack of cooperation, does he bear some of the responsibility for the failures of the group to achieve its goals?
Lord of the Flies Essay Questions
Answer: The conch shell represents liberal democracy and order, as endorsed by Ralph and Piggy. The Lord of the Flies tends to represent an autocratic or a primitive order. Note the "exchange" of these objects at the novel's conclusion when the conch is smashed in Jack's camp and Ralph uses part of the Lord of the Flies as a weapon. 5.
Lord of the Flies Questions and Answers
Lord of the Flies Questions and Answers. The Question and Answer sections of our study guides are a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss literature. Home Lord of the Flies Q & A. Ask a question and get answers from your fellow students and educators. Ask a Question.
Lord of the Flies Chapter 3 Questions and Answers
Answers. 1. Jack uses a five-foot sharpened stick. 2. Jack found the pig's fresh droppings. 3. They collect drinking water in coconut shells. 4. Simon helps Ralph build the huts.
Lord of the Flies Chapter 9 Questions and Answers
1. The flies prefer the pig's blood to the blood from Simon's nose. 2. Simon decides to travel to the mountain and look into the face of the beast. 3. Simon frees the parachutist's lines ...
What's So Bad About Asking Where Humans Came From?
April 2, 2024, 7 AM ET. Here is an origin story about origin stories. Once upon a time, we knew where we came from: Adam and Eve, the Garden of Eden, the Fall. Then came modern science, modern ...
Lord of the Flies Chapter 9 Summary & Analysis
Summary: Chapter 9. Simon awakens and finds the air dark and humid with an approaching storm. His nose is bleeding, and he staggers toward the mountain in a daze. He crawls up the hill and, in the failing light, sees the dead pilot with his flapping parachute. Watching the parachute rise and fall with the wind, Simon realizes that the boys have ...
Lord of the Flies Test
Choose matching definition. Ralph. Roger. Sam and Eric. Simon. Don't know? 20 of 20. Quiz yourself with questions and answers for Lord of the Flies Test, so you can be ready for test day. Explore quizzes and practice tests created by teachers and students or create one from your course material.
Lord of the Flies Chapter 2 Questions and Answers
Answers. 1. Ralph's idea for order came from his school back home. 2. Jack is excited at the prospect of enforcing the rules. 3. Roger, the "dark boy," first suggests this pessimistic notion ...