why did texans fight in the civil war essay

• The Journal of the Civil War Era

Why Texans Fought in the Civil War (review)

• Jason Phillips
• The University of North Carolina Press
• Volume 1, Number 2, June 2011
• pp. 287-288
• 10.1353/cwe.2011.0026
• View Citation

Additional Information

• Buy Article for $12.00 (USD)

• Rent from DeepDyve
• Buy Digital Article for $12.00 (USD)
• Buy Complete Digital Issue for $24.00 (USD)

Project MUSE Mission

Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.

2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21218

+1 (410) 516-6989 [email protected]

©2024 Project MUSE. Produced by Johns Hopkins University Press in collaboration with The Sheridan Libraries.

Now and Always, The Trusted Content Your Research Requires

Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.

Reasons Of Why Texans Fought In The Civil War

Texans fought in the Civil War, but why? In this essay, we will discuss the three reasons of why Texans fought in the Civil War. There were three main reasons of why they did fight. They mainly fought to protect states’ rights, for the love of Texas, and to preserve slavery. We will go through all of these reasons so we can understand what these reasons meant to Texans at the time. The first reason is to protect states’ rights. Texans wanted to defend states’ rights so they can have rights of their own. In Document C, it is stated that this is a Union of equal states and no state can force another state either to remain in the Union or withdraw from the Union. At that time, the Union believed that if you joined the Union, you cannot leave

Pros And Cons Of Crittenden Compromise

The first reason is to avoid more secession by reaching a compromise. The second reason is to maintain the Southern slavery. This proposal is inspired by the six amendments to the constitution. The six of them are listed below: -----First, Slavery should not be allowed in the upcoming new territories.

Examples Of Primary Source Analysis For Annexing Texas

The combination of the two amendments formed the Joint Resolution for annexing Texas to the United States. The Resolution was composed in order to address the situation of the annexation of Texas. From the moment of the proclamation of its independence from Mexico, the majority of the population in Texas favored the idea of joining the Union. Due to the slave status and vast territories of Texas, a number of resolutions of Texas government were rejected by the American Congress as the United States wanted to keep the balance between the northern free and southern slave states, and therefore, did not want to add another large slave territory to the Union.

Analysis Of Remember The Alamo: A Symbol Of Texas Independence

The Texans wanted to be part of the United

Why Did Texas Grow In The Civil War

The Civil War is known as the bloodiest war the U.S ever fought in, and many people volunteered, including Texans. Slavery has been splitting the U.S apart for a long time, and everyone knew that war would come eventually. Tension was building between the two sides, but the last straw for the South was when Abraham Lincoln, an anti slavery man, was elected for president. The Southern states then began to secede from the Union, with South Carolina leading. Texas was the 7th state to secede, but Sam Houston was forced to resign due to not taking the Confederate oath.

Why Did Texas Take Part In The Civil War Essay

In 1861, Texas was involved in the fighting of the Civil War. The Civil War was composed of the Confederate States of America, or the Confederacy, and the United States of America, or the Union. So the question is, why did Texas take part in the Civil War? Well, Texas fought in the Civil War for their love for Texas, to protect state’s rights, and to protect slavery in the South. One of the reasons Texas fought in the Civil War was because of their love for Texas.

Mexican American War Dbq Essay

This is because Texas was determined to annex itself to the United States (Doc B). They were determined because land is a big priority especially when the United States thinks that “Mexico never can exert any real governmental authority over such a country” so they feel entitled to take the land (Doc A). The people wanted to take over Texas because they wanted more land for slavery and the newspaper over-hyped the idea of taking it so there was more land for slavery (Doc D).

Privileges And Immunities Clause Analysis

Said clause was meant to keeps the states unified but mainly through commerce and trade so that these traders could visit a state and have the ability to buy and sell without a special grant from the host-state. The writers of the constitution preemptively added this clause to fight the feared possibility of interstate commerce, or any other form of mercantilism, where the members of that state would only trade with members from their home in order to dramatically boost their economy and dampen that of the rival states, and anybody trying to sell from outside of the state would possibly be taxed or even prohibited to

Compare And Contrast The Contributions Of Texas To The Civil War

Texas had many contributions to the Civil War. For example, giving the South money they needed, lots of loyal men ready to fight, trading routes used to transport supplies and so much more. All of these things helped push the South in the right direction to have a better position in the Civil war. The greatest advantage Texas gave to the South in the Civil War was the Economic condition..

Texas War Problems

This gives the congress and senate an equal vote on the issue. Equal amount of people who are for slaves, and an equal amount for those who are not. When Texas was annexed the Mexicans brought slaves into Texas. The American government agreed that Texas would be a slavery free state. You can’t really tell in Mexico was doing this to annoy America, or if they didn’t know it was not allowed.

Westward Expansion 19th Century

In 1836, Texas became independent from Mexico after defeating the Mexican Army. Looking to join the US as a new state, Texas applied for statehood, but this event quickly became a controversy. One reason for controversy was that Texas would add another slave state to the US, giving the South more power. The fact that it took nine years for this issue to be resolved shows the constant controversies the North and South had over Texas. Even after Texas had signed treaties with England and France, which made Texas a republic supported by European powers, the US government continued ignoring the issue due to northern opposition, which highlights how divided the North was against the South.

Similarities Between Us And Texas Constitution

Convention delegates believed it was their duty to direct the transition of Texas from a state in the U.S. to one of the Confederate States of America. Most laws not in conflict with the Confederacy remained valid. A clause permitting

Why Did Texas Fight In The Civil War Essay

Why would anyone want to join? Why did Texans fight in the Civil War? Texans fought the Civil War because they wanted to preserve slavery, they loved their state, and they wanted to protect state’s rights. A reason many Texans joined the war was because they wanted to show their love and support for Texas.

Declaration Of Independence Dbq

The North and South bickered whether it had the right to secede or not, and it is still debated to this day. The Southern states did have the right to leave the union as secession was proved to be legal. Texas felt underpowered in federal government according to this quote in Document I, “ By consolidating their strength, they have placed the slave-holding

Annexation Of Texas Essay

The annexation of Texas occurred in the early 1800’s. American colonists were expanding into the Northern sector of the Rio Grande, which developed the need for Texas to become a part of the United States. In the South, the people supported the drive toward the annexation of Texas, but the Northerners opposed this idea. Texas was another slave state and the nature of their society did not appear appealing to the North.

Texas Slavery Research Paper

Texas has a long history that deals with slavery and the effects it had on the Republic before and after it joined the United States. It is easily identifiable and rational to come about the relationship between slavery and secession. Before Texas won their independence from Mexico in 1836, the Anglos had already been dependent upon slavery. However, the Spanish had not allowed this and thought it to be “inhumane”. The Spanish were willing to adjust for the Anglos’ wellbeing in Texas.

More about Reasons Of Why Texans Fought In The Civil War

Why Did Texans Fight In The Civil War

The civil war divided the u.s..

The Civil War was a conflict between the North and the South, which lasted from 1861-1865. The war was fought over the issue of slavery. The North wanted to abolish slavery, while the South wanted to keep it.

The war started when 11 Southern states seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America (CSA). They joined together because they felt that they were being treated unfairly by the federal government in Washington D.C., especially with regards to taxes and tariffs. They also wanted to maintain their way of life as farmers and plantation owners who relied on slavery for cheap labor for their crops such as cotton plantations or sugar cane fields where there were no machines available back then to replace human workers like we have today with robots or other types of machinery."

Order custom essay Why Did Texans Fight In The Civil War with free plagiarism report

5 reasons Why Did Texans Fight In The Civil War

The Civil War was a time of great turmoil in America. It split families apart, and it caused immense strife between neighbors and friends.

But one thing that can't be denied is that Texans were fighting for what they believed in—and the reasons for their valor are worth remembering today.

Here are five reasons why Texans fought in the Civil War:

1) They wanted to preserve their way of life.

2) They believed that slavery was wrong and needed to end.

3) They felt an obligation to protect their fellow Americans from tyranny and oppression.

4) They wanted to preserve the Union as one nation under God.

5) They believed they had no choice but to fight against secessionists who threatened their way of life, the security of their communities, and the future of America itself.

Texas joined the Confederate States of America

The state's decision to join was met with support from many Texans but also with opposition from a significant number of Unionists. As a result, many Texans who were in favor of joining the Confederacy left for other states, including Arkansas and Louisiana. The Unionists were also forced to leave their homes and businesses as Confederate troops took over.

Cite this Page

Why Did Texans Fight In The Civil War. (2022, Nov 01). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/why-did-texans-fight-in-the-civil-war/

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

More related essays

A Rationale for the War on Terrorism Preface On September 11, 2001, our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate.

A History of How American Culture Lead Us Into Vietnam and Made Us Fight the Way We Did, by Loren Baritz, was published by The Johns Hopkins University Press in.

Was the English Civil War a war of Religion? The English Civil Wars of 1642 to 1651 had religious connections indefinitely, yet to say that they were wars of religion.

According to fundamentalist historians the American Civil War was not just the war of ideology: freedom versus slavery. The more significant reason was the power struggle initiated between free states.

Why did the United States enter World War I in 1917? On June 28th 1914, Franz Ferdinand, the Austrian archduke, and his wife were murdered by a Bosnian revolutionary named Gavrilo.

Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source.

When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 he promised to reverse the Treaty of Versailles, like many Germans Hitler believed that the treaty of Versailles was unjust and.

When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933; he had a lot of frustration against the Treaty which he thought was unfair. For example the enormous amount of reparation,.

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Why Did Texas Fight In The Civil War Essay

Show More Civil War and Texas “Why do men fight who were born to be brothers?” (anonymous). The Civil War between the United States of America and the Confederate States of America was a very terrible moment in History. The North and South had different beliefs on slavery and it led to the Civil War. Texas agreed on slavery with the other southern states. So, why did Texans fight in this devastating war? The reason Texans fought in the Civil War is because they believed in state’s rights, their love for Texas , and to preserve slavery. They fought in the Civil War because they believed in state’s rights. “This is a Union of equal states, and no state can force another state either to remain in it or withdraw from it.” (Document C). This sentence explains that states should be able to make decisions on their own, such as seceding. Texas wanted the right to make their own decisions because they wanted to keep and pursue slavery. This is one of the reasons why they wanted to fight in the civil war. Although, Texans fought for their state’s rights they also fought for their love for the state of Texas. “Tell Lissy not to talk to me about marrying up here, for if I ever marry it will be in Texas.” (Document D). He loves Texas so much to where he will try to only get married in Texas. People were so loyal to the state of Texas to …show more content… “In 1860 the percentage of population in slavery in Texas was 30%.” (Document A). This percent is a high percentage of slavery and helps their economy greatly. “The servitude of the African race is mutually beneficial to both bond slave and free.” (Document B). This shows that Texans think blacks and whites can help each other by practicing slavery. Since they thought this, they would fight in the war to keep slavery on the move. Texans that didn’t even own slaves fought in the war with slave owning Texans because they had a passion for Texas and wanted to help the

Related Documents

Battle of the alamo research paper.

Firstname Lastname Instructor’s Name Course Number 14 September 2015 The Battle of the Alamo The Alamo is the name given to an eighteenth century mission located in modern days San Antonio, Texas. Originally designed as a roman-catholic mission, the Alamo also served as a fortified structure whose original purpose was to withstand attacks by native American tribes.…

What Did Texas Say Dbq Essay

Texans voted for secession and war in the American Civil War because of their loyalty to their state, state’s rights, and slavery. Many Texans felt a strong devotion towards their state, and wished to fight for their pride in Texas. A confirmation of this is seen in…

Compare And Contrast Davy Crockett Vs Texas Pride

If you ever get the chance to meet someone from Texas ask why they love Texas so much. But if you ask a Texan why they have so much pride in their state, they might not know the answer to that question.. That's because it was planted into them from everyday society in the same way that Davy Crockett was used to change the way people looked, acted, and thought, back in the earlier…

Compare And Contrast Texas And Us Constitution

With just these four different departs, you can see that the United States and the Texas Constitution have a lot more differences than some of us actually even thought. The differences between the two can keep going on and on for the fact that they were made for two completely different reasons. It just goes to show that the states can set higher level standards than the national government in certain places. These two constitutions both have their own form of way to get the things they want across to the many people they decide they want to get them across to. Even though one way may be different from the other everything still goes the way it needs to go and how it's supposed to go, of course with a little bump in the road sometimes.…

How Did Texas Fight In The Civil War

Why did Texans fight in the Civil war? They fought in the Civil war because they wanted to preserve slavery, of their love to Texas, and to have their state rights. Texans fought to keep…

Why Did Texas Fight In The Civil War Dbq

Slavery was an important economic boost, if you will, and allowed plantation owners to obtain more income per acre than that of non-slave plantations. In 1860, over thirty percent of the southern population were slaves, (Doc A). Texas feared a drastic downfall in the economy, so, like the six states before them, they seceded from the nation and fought the Union in hope to preserve their economic way of life. Finally, Texans fought for their own pride, glory, and ultimately to preserve Southern honor across the state. “Our army is still going on.…

Is Texas Teerica By Jolly Ivins Analysis

Although, one may disagree with Ivins claim on how the stereotypes represent all Texans, she does seek to highlight specific issues dealing with cultural aspects, racism, and political issues in Texas. No one ever questions the State they live in. Until one begins to tune in on what is really going on. Ivins in this case is the one that everyone is tuning in on. She states that Texas, is Texas because its “ignorant, cantankerous and ridiculously friendly” (341).…

Civil War Slavery Causes

Final Exam Question 1: Slavery The Cause of the Civil War Prior to 1830 Slavery was viewed as a necessary evil among many Americans. As a result of the Constitutional Convention the founders banned the importation of new slaves, put a temporary hold on debates to abolish slavery, and instituted the three-fifths rule for federal representation and taxation. The founding fathers, hoped through providence this regrettable evil would eventually become extinct in time (Stamp pg, 157). Following the American Revolution slavery had been on this path and was on the decline in many states. However, the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased the profitability of cotton.…

Summary Of Sam Houston And The American Southwest By Randolph B. Houston

He promised the people better environmental issues such as railroads, rivers and also promised a better educational system (179). In addition to the environment and education, Houston tried to keep peace with some of the still existing Native American tribes as well as peace between his citizens by watching out for sectionalism in the state (180-181). Houston constantly asked and tried to fight against secession. Despite his efforts, Texas seceded and Houston was no longer in…

To What Extent Was The Civil War Predictable?

Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another,…

Analysis Of Charles B. Dew's Apostles Of Disunion

Not only was this a bold move, but also then the confederates took fire on Fort Sumter shortly after. At this point it was confusing in how this much “controversy [could have] swirled” (pg.5) for the conflict to become to this extreme. It doesn’t seem as if it could all come from one cause, which is why he then goes into depth on his experiences and others to help the audience understand the arguments in what caused of the secession and war. Dew follows many secession commissioners their experience, primary documents and speeches to create the research provided in the book to conclude the many causes of the secession. Since the secession lead quickly to many other conflicts, there was sort a domino effect of conclusions in why the uprising and conflict began.…

Territorial Expansion DBQ

One side felt Texas could “increase the wealth and happiness of all classes in our society” (Doc G) and believed “all this patriotism ¬-all this philanthropy -all this religion- appeals to us in favor of the addition of Texas to our Union” (Doc G). On the other hand, the opponents knew that “we are anxious to force free government on all” (Doc H) but only under “a very high state of moral and intellectual improvement, in a civilized state” (Doc H) is the nation able maintain a free government and form “a constitution capable of endurance” (Doc H).…

Was John Brown A Hero Or Terrorist Essay

Hero or Terrorist? A Case for John Brown A hero is admired for an act or acts of courage. A terrorist uses unlawful violence, often at the expense of civilians, to make a political point.…

Causes Of The Texas Revolution

Jacob Ashcraft 24 October 2016 Texas Revolution Was Inevitable In one of the first major scholarly works on the Texas Revolution, historian Eugene C. Barker in 1928 described the conflict as a “clash of cultures.” Barker maintained that Anglo-Texans and Mexicans had little in common and, as a result, concluded that the rebellion could not have been avoided. Barker is correct in his statement about war being inevitable. Some believe it was because the Anglo colonists wanted overrun Texas and break away to become a part of the United States in the venture westward.…

Was The Civil War Inevitable Essay

In order to determine if the Civil War was inevitable, we must first look at what the root cause of the Civil War was. The states seceded from the Union, because they had originally been free and were self governing. Since the federal government started to take powers away from the states, relations between the Southern states and the federal government started to become hostile. Had the federal government allowed the states to be self governing, there would not have been a Civil War, but since the federal government continued to trample on the states rights, they felt they had no choice but to secede. After the colonists fought for their freedom from a tyrannical overarching government, they were free…

Related Topics

• American Civil War
• United States
• Confederate States of America
• Southern United States

Ready To Get Started?

• Create Flashcards
• Mobile apps
•   Facebook
•   Twitter
• Cookie Settings

• Free Essays
• Citation Generator

Why Did Texas Fight In The Civil War Essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Texas declaration of secession analysis.

The Texas Declaration of Secession discusses the different reasons why Texas decided to succeed from the Union and side with the Confederacy. Texas cited the main reasons to be the promotion of welfare, insurance of domestic tranquility and security of blessings of peace and liberty of their residents. Due to differences of beliefs in politics, especially slavery between the Northern and Southern states, Texas realized their ideals sided with the Confederacy thus leading to the separation from the Northern states. Texas believed that with joining the Confederacy their best interests would be protected which included protection from their boarding country, Mexico.…

Sam Houston

First of all, under Sam Houston’s leadership, and thus Texas could become independent which separated itself from Mexico. There is no one can deny that Sam Houston’s good ability of communication, team building and conflict coordination. The fact in history indicated after two days the representatives signed the declaration of independence; Sam Houston was elected commander-in-chief of the military forces of the Texas Republic. Same Houston is a clever and resourceful man. Especially, the battle of San Jacinto was worth to be mentioned. After the Mexicans were completely defeated, Houston ordered the Texans to find Santa Anna in case he escaped, he could lead another army against Texas. Even though, many of Houston’s men wanted to kill the Mexican leader, Houston knew Santa Anna was more valuable alive than dead. Therefore, before Santa was returned home, he was ordered to sin an agreement recognizing the independence of Texas.…

Reasons Against the War with Mexico

Daniel Webster, along with other people also objected to Texas joining the Union due to its’ status as a slave state, but this was not due to slavery being evil, so much as it was a socio-economic issue for the North.…

Mexican American War

The Mexican American War was a conflict between the United States and Mexico. This was a battle for land where Mexico was fighting to keep what they thought was their property and the U.S. desired to retain the disputed land of Texas and obtain more of Mexico’s northern lands. There were two main causes of the Mexican War. First, the idea of “Manifest destiny” meaning the belief that America had a God-given right to occupy and civilize the whole continent. As large number of Americans migrated towards the west searching for land, the fact that most of those areas already had people living in them was ignored. Instead, an attitude and belief that democratic Americans would do a better job of running the lands than the Native Americans prevailed. President Polk shared and led the vision of Manifest Destiny, and did offer to buy the southwest land from Mexico. However, the Mexican government refused the offer, and because of this tensions continued to rise. The second major cause of the Mexican War actually started off with the Texas War of independence .During the 1830s, Mexico needed settlers in the under populated northern parts of the country and therefore allowed U.S. citizens to come and live in the Texas area as long as they took an oath of allegiance to Mexico and converted to Catholicism. Thousands of Americans accepted the invitation and migrated to the Mexican province of Texas. However, many of the new “Texans” were not satisfied with the way the Mexican government tried to run the province. So that led to the Texas Revolution began as both Mexicans and Americans living in Texas fought for independence from the Mexican government. A final victory resulted in the capture of the Mexican President who was forced to sign the Treaty of Velasco, granting Texas its…

The Texas Revolution

Of course, there are always “conspiracy theories”, one of which holds the belief that the slaveholders wanted control of Texas which would have turned a great profit. The slave trade going on throughout the world at the time of the Revolution was a very successful, and profitable business to be involved in. if the slaveholders had gotten a hold of Texas, Texas would [probably have become on e…

Texas and California Annexation

According to O’Sullivan, Texas was acquired for many reasons one of them being slave labor needing to be “Drained Off” southwardly. It was sort of a pro-slavery measure calculated to increase that institution.…

History 201 Online Homework Ten

2. What were some of the reasons given here to explain why southerners enlisted to join the fight against the Union forces? (2 points)…

How Did Texas Join The Lone Star Republic?

was concerned, Texas was still a territory of Mexico, and would remain such. This is…

Texans Fight In The Civil War

Texans fought in the Civil War because of their love for Texas. “Tell Lissy not to talk to me about marrying up her, for if I ever marry it will be in Texas, I think.” (Document…

How Did Texas Fight In The Civil War

Why fight in a battle that you have no reason to fight in? Sometimes, you have your own causes that other people might not see. After Abraham Lincoln was elected as president in 1860, the southerners were not happy, and were afraid of losing their right to own slaves. They began to rebel and that was how the Civil War began. Texas was in the U.S., but this might not have been there fight, so why did Texans fight in the war? I believe they fought in the Civil War, because of states rights, Texas love and pride, and to preserve slavery.…

Why Texas Fought In The Civil War: Why Fight?

The love of Texas, Texans loved their state so much that they would die fighting for it. One of the many Texans who loved their state was John Wesley Rabb, who served in a famous cavalry unit called the Terry’s Texas Ranger, and fought in the civil war. John wrote letters to his family while he was serving, one of the letters to his sister stated, “Tell him not to inlist till just before they go to draft him, and only enlist for Texas service.” (Document D) John Rabb also stated in Document D, “For if I ever marry it will be in Texas, i think.” Which signals that he is fighting for his state.…

Texans During The Civil War

Many Texans fought during the Civil War, for so many different reasons. Some because they had to help the confederate army now that they were apart of it. The Union went against the Confederate in 1861. They wanted the country to be whole again. But, after the Confederacy seceded, they became two parts. Texas fought to protect slavery, state’s rights, and their love for Texas.…

The Importance Of Texas In The Civil War

To begin with, Texans fought in the Civil War to protect their states’ rights. Texans felt that Texas didn’t have enough power over the federal government. An editorial from the Texas State Gazette points…

Texans's Role In The Civil War

Texans fought in the Civil because of their love for Texas. “Tell him not to enlist till just before they go to draft…

What Are The Reasons For Texas Rebellion

To understand why the people of the Alamo fought, one must first examine the reasons for the Texas Revolution’s occurrence. Texas’ declaration of independence was caused by several things. First, in 1824, Mexico redefined their territories, with Texas being bound to Coahuila and the capital going from San Antonio to Saltillo. Secondly, the liberal constitution of 1824, which guaranteed equal rights to everybody on Mexican soil, was opposed by Santa Anna, who advocated the removal of all foreigners after he seized control of Mexico.…

Related Topics

• American Civil War
• Abraham Lincoln
• United States
• Slavery in the United States
• Confederate States of America
• Southern United States

Screen Rant

Why texas & california are really allies in civil war finally explained by director alex garland.

Civil War director Alex Garland explains his choice to make two unexpected states allies — California and Texas — in his upcoming political thriller.

• Texas and California unite against a fascist president in Civil War to challenge polarized political positions, says director Alex Garland.
• Garland's film seeks to shift focus from current political divides.
• Civil War 's release during an election year mirrors themes of democracy under threat in the United States.

Civil War director Alex Garland explains why Texas and California are allies in the film. Civil War is an upcoming political thriller that tells the story of a group of military-embedded journalists who race against time to save Washington DC from siege in a divided, dystopian version of the United States. Civil War is set for release on April 12 and stars Kirsten Dunst, Nick Offerman, Wagner Moura, Jefferson White, Nelson Lee, Evan Lai, and Cailee Spaeny.

Speaking at a screening of the movie (via The Hollywood Reporter ), Garland explains why Texas and California have formed an alliance in Civil War . Garland wrote this alliance into the script in part “ to get around a kind of reflexive, polarizing position that people might fall into .” He instead wanted audiences to focus on “ how the president is presented ” and how people on polarized parts of the political spectrum can band together under a “ fascist president .” Check out the full quote from Garland below:

“[It was] partly to get around a kind of reflexive, polarizing position that people might fall into, that’s one thing, but actually that’s not the main thing. The main thing is to do with how the president is presented and what can be inferred from that. “Then it’s saying that two states that have a different political position have said, ‘Our political difference is less important than this.’ And then the counter to that is if you cannot conceive of that, what you’re saying is that your polarized political position would be more important than a fascist president. Which, when you put it like that, I would suggest, is insane. That’s an insane position to hold. So it’s sort of an oblique commentary and I think that’s how the film works in general. It’s not explaining this stuff but it’s also not avoiding this stuff.”

All 3 Alex Garland Films Ranked From Worst To Best

Even with this attempt at unity, civil war will likely still cause heated discourse.

The fact that Civil War shows California and Texas as allies is one of the boldest parts of the premise of the upcoming film. In the real-life, present-day United States, the two states have typically been politically divided , with Texas known for its far-right conservative government and California being one of the most liberal states in the nation. If the two had been similarly divided in Civil War , Garland is right in assuming that audiences might revert to their knee-jerk “ polarizing position ” that pits Texas and California as enemies.

Instead, Garland explains, the two are united against the common enemy of Offerman’s corrupt president. Even though Civil War shifts the focus away from current divides, this plot point is still likely to be one of great contention. Former President Donald Trump has often been likened to a fascist , so the parallels between him and Offerman’s fictionalized president will likely be drawn. Even with two politically disparate groups shown as allies in the film, the anti-Trump rhetoric is largely an opinion of the political left, leading to potential opposition to Civil War .

Given these themes, Civil War is also releasing at a fascinating time, in that it is coming out during an election year . 2024 will see current President Joe Biden run against Trump himself. Thus, the dystopian chaos caused in Civil War will likely seem all too familiar to those in the United States, who will soon face another critical election in which many feel the nation’s democracy is under threat. Civil War 's early reviews are strong thus far, so it will be interesting to see whether opinions shift upon its release.

Source: THR

Civil War is a 2024 action thriller from writer and director Alex Garland. Starring Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, and Stephen McKinley Henderson, Civil War takes place in the near future and shows the United States entering a new Civil War after California and Texas attempt to separate from the country.

Why Texas And California Are Allied Against The United States Government In Civil War

Y ou know what's the great thing about most movies? They're fiction, which means writers and directors can do whatever the heck they want. Simple! Okay, to put that a little less bluntly, creatives should ideally have free rein to put the needs of the script ahead of anything else and simply tell the best story that they possibly can. It feels like we as audiences used to understand that concept, which is why debates over so-called "plot holes" like why the Eagles didn't fly the Fellowship into Mordor or why Bruce Wayne doesn't just fund social services instead of beating up low-level criminals on the streets never pass the smell test for me. The obvious answer is that there would be no movie if they did -- or, at least, not a very entertaining one.

Well, it's with a heavy heart that we report the logic police have come for writer/director Alex Garland over his upcoming film, "Civil War." (Be sure to  read /Film's review by Jacob Hall here .) For months, A24's marketing team has taken its usual approach of combining multiple harrowing trailers with targeted social media posts to raise further interest in the movie. Since the premise has to do with the United States descending into another war pitting entire regions of the country against one another across bitterly divided political lines, the studio naturally thought a handy graphic on Twitter (only nerds call it "X") laying out the various alliances would prove helpful.

Well, they thought wrong. A bunch of people got weirdly riled up by the idea that political rivals like, say, Texas and California would ever even dream of teaming up together. And now Garland himself has had to wade into the fray and explain exactly why he did things the way he did.

Read more: The 20 Best Western Movie Actors Ranked

Turns Out It Was, In Fact, Intentional

Despite the title, "Civil War" isn't actually a Ken Burns documentary, believe it or not. Who knew? Half of the fun of a movie like this is that it takes eerily familiar trappings (in this case, a hopelessly divided American nation) and puts a unique genre twist on them, as opposed to rigidly abiding by the red state vs blue state geography that makes up current American politics. That's the main point Alex Garland attempts to get across in a recent interview with  The Hollywood Reporter , which caught up with the filmmaker at an early screening of the movie and asked him about the layout of his fictionalized, not-so-United States.

Funny enough, Garland actually implies the entire (over)reaction to this proves the exact point he was trying to make, saying that he made this choice "...partly to get around a kind of reflexive, polarizing position that people might fall into. That's one thing, but actually that's not the main thing. The main thing is to do with how the President is presented and what can be inferred from that."

That President is played by Nick Offerman and happens to be the divisive leader presiding over the ongoing mess. We won't spoil anything here, but with various rebellions rising up against the federal government, it's clear that he's taken quite a few unpopular and increasingly extreme measures to maintain power -- measures that would lead to one-time partisans putting their differences aside and reaching across the aisle, perhaps? Although the exact details of the civil war may remain fuzzy , Garland goes on to note:

"Then it's saying that two states that have a different political position have said, 'Our political difference is less important than this.'"

'This Is Not Supposed To Represent The World As It Is'

Hmm, so you're telling me that simply waiting for the movie to come out and trusting that it might actually explain its own world-building might've been better than formulating hot takes based on a single image? There might be an important lesson in there for the rest of us, but who can say for sure!

In any case, one of the other stars of "Civil War" also weighed in on this unexpectedly hot-button issue. THR quotes Nick Offerman as saying that this shocking alliance between Texas and California "...serves a few purposes, but one of them is to immediately say, 'This is not supposed to represent the world as it is.' But I think it also serves to say the way the world is working these days, anything is possible and so quickly." 

Of course, it's worth noting that this movie didn't come together in the span of a few weeks, with the express intent of commenting on the highly-charged atmosphere of this current moment -- it's actually been in the works for well over four years, according to Garland. Perhaps it says more about us as a collective human race that the passage of time has done nothing to make this any less relevant. As the "Ex Machina" and "Annihilation" director put it:

"I think the film was written really not just about this country, about a weird state we're in to do with division and polarization and extremism, the things that flow from populism. At the moment I wrote it, I don't think I imagined it would take four years to get to this point, but also if it did take four years, that things would be so similar."

"Civil War" arrives in theaters April 12, 2024.

Read the original article on SlashFilm

Civil War Was Made in Anger

What would it take for California and Texas to unite against the White House? Nothing good, according to Alex Garland.

When the first trailer for Alex Garland’s new movie, Civil War —a harrowing depiction of conflict between American states in the near future—was revealed, a wave of bafflement spread across the internet. Incredulous articles questioned the conditions that would lead Texas and California to become allies against “loyalist states,” as was written on a promotional map . Others wondered how the film could dare to depict such conflict without really explaining its origins, given that Civil War takes place well into its titular war, with rebel forces descending on the White House to evict a president (played by Nick Offerman) who has refused to leave office.

This reaction only justified Garland’s reasons for making Civil War —not merely as a gnarly war drama, he told me in a recent interview, but as an argument against political polarization: “I find it interesting that people would say, ‘These two states could never be together under any circumstances.’ Under any circumstances? Any? Are you sure ?” The movie imagines a worst-case scenario in which American society unravels beyond comprehension, and centers the frontline journalists trying to make sense of the ensuing chaos. That potential viewers can’t understand why Texas and California might need to ally against a tyrant, he said, is a sign of how bad things have gotten in this alternative timeline.

Although the larger history within Civil War is oblique, Garland’s script lays out just enough to explain why tanks might be rolling across the country from California to Washington, D.C. Some of the facts are clear: Offerman’s character is a three-term president who has begun staging attacks on his own citizens. He’s also disbanded the FBI, and become what Garland calls “essentially Constitution-smashing and fascistic”; suddenly, “states that might not necessarily … be allied are allied against a threat that they consider greater than their partisan differences.”

The previous time I spoke with Garland was about his film Men , a disorienting piece of countryside horror that truly kept its audience at arm’s length. Back then, he seemed confident about the open-endedness of his storytelling, accepting that some viewers might not embrace the intended ambiguity. With Civil War , he’s both energized and exhausted by the movie’s prerelease discourse. The strange alliances that have formed are part of the challenge of the film, he told me—a dare for viewers to imagine a future where such action might be required. “Are you saying extremist politics would always remain more important than a president of this sort? That sounds crazy to me,” he said. (It’s worth noting that some visible supporters of Donald Trump have argued he should be allowed to serve more than two terms .)

Garland has been in a hurry to make Civil War , completing its script in 2020 just as COVID lockdowns took hold. Though the film is rooted in his worries over our current political environment, his eagerness to pursue the project stemmed more from a concern that his passion might fade the longer he waited. “It’s a film that comes out of anger,” he said. “Anger gives you urgency.” That anger is about the great loss of objectivity he perceives in modern politics. “I feel like one of the bits of fabric that’s unraveling around us … is the way journalists are attacked and not trusted … We’re seeing the consequences of that happening like little wildfires all around us.”

Read: The men who started the war

The protagonist of Civil War is Lee (Kirsten Dunst), a seasoned war photographer named for the pioneering World War II journalist Lee Miller. Accompanied by two reporters and a cub photographer, Lee’s goal is to push behind enemy lines to reach the White House before invading forces do, hoping to capture the moment of the president’s surrender—or defeat. On the way, her group comes across various tableaus of chaos, social disorder, and bone-rattling combat, observing and documenting—but not intervening, despite the crisis that’s unfolding. Garland, who is 53 years old and was raised in London, said this dispassionate perspective was inspired by the “old-fashioned journalism” he grew up on, where reporters “deliberately removed bias”: “I wanted the film to function like that, and to put journalists at the heart of that narrative.”

To Garland, his characters’ neutral mission should be celebrated, but the trade-offs to their approach can be unsettling to think about. “I wanted to make them heroes,” he said. “They could be complex; they could be conflicted; they could be damaged; they could be uncertain; they could be compromised, actually. But they’re still doing something utterly necessary, with integrity.” The finale sees Lee and company thrust directly into scenes of combat, and although it’s engrossing—especially on IMAX screens—it’s lacking in thrilling do-goodery, partly because the journalists resolutely attempt to stay uninvolved. “Aversion, that’s what you should feel,” Garland said of the choices made by Lee in the film’s visceral closing act, where she must move through a full-scale invasion to try to capture the fall of the White House. “It’s too terrible … It needs to be repellent.”

Garland said he’s uninterested in force-feeding any particular ideology—he wants people leaving the theater without their mind made up about the way Civil War ’s denouement unfolds. “My daughter, who’s 17, [is] studying film, and the teacher said in one of her classes, ‘It’s unethical for filmmakers to present something without making it clear on which position they stand with regards to [an] issue’ … To me, to make that statement is unethical.” Garland is most resolute on this topic regarding the president in Civil War , whom the audience mostly glimpses in TV broadcasts. When I suggested that some viewers might see a hint of Donald Trump in Offerman’s performance, Garland shrugged. “Nowhere in this narrative does it let you know what political side this president began on,” he said. “He may be a fascist at the point we meet him, but he presumably in his first term didn’t say [that] … The film puts that in the viewers’ hands. Nick is interesting in the way that he refuses to let you read him … It is what the viewer is bringing to it.”

Still, Garland made plenty of stances clear during this interview—most important, his fear that the incrementally polarized news media are harming the public’s ability to process our present moment. “If you create a situation where the press cannot be trusted, everyone is screwed,” he said. “I think people forgot about the danger of extremism … Of course, politics should solve problems within countries; it absolutely should. But the biggest danger for everybody in the end is extremism. Journalism is one of our dams that mustn’t break.” But in Civil War , it’s everything else that’s already broken. For all the courage of Lee and her colleagues, Garland’s film leaves the viewer tragically unsure of their ability to undo the larger harm.

The Definitive Voice of Entertainment News

Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter

site categories

Why california and texas are allies in ‘civil war’.

Filmmaker Alex Garland explained that the states are united to bring down a fascist president: "If you cannot conceive of that, what you're saying is that your polarized political position would be more important."

By Kirsten Chuba

Kirsten Chuba

Events Editor

• Share this article on Facebook
• Share this article on Twitter
• Share this article on Flipboard
• Share this article on Email
• Show additional share options
• Share this article on Linkedin
• Share this article on Pinit
• Share this article on Reddit
• Share this article on Tumblr
• Share this article on Whatsapp
• Share this article on Print
• Share this article on Comment

Civil War , the buzzy A24 film that follows a team of journalists as they race to Washington, D.C., to document American citizens fighting each other across the country and rebel forces descending on the White House, throws in one surprise right off the bat: California and Texas, typically political opposites, are allies in the war.

Related Stories

China box office: hayao miyazaki's 'the boy and the heron' soars to $73m over holiday weekend, director of tom holland-led 'romeo & juliet' responds to "deplorable racial abuse" of castmember.

“Then it’s saying that two states that have a different political position have said, ‘Our political difference is less important than this,'” Garland continued. “And then the counter to that is if you cannot conceive of that, what you’re saying is that your polarized political position would be more important than a fascist president. Which, when you put it like that, I would suggest, is insane. That’s an insane position to hold. So it’s sort of an oblique commentary and I think that’s how the film works in general. It’s not explaining this stuff but it’s also not avoiding this stuff.”

Director Alex Garland shares his reasoning for paring up California and Texas in #CivilWar at the premiere of the film pic.twitter.com/4SFfDrHKtq — The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) April 3, 2024

Offerman added that the two states working together — who in the film have formed the Western Forces — “serves a few purposes but one of them is to immediately say, ‘This is not supposed to represent the world as it is.’ But I think it also serves to say the way the world is working these days, anything is possible and so quickly.”

Garland first wrote the story in 2020, and said releasing it now — roughly six months before the major 2024 election — “is really strange, just the sense of déjà vu.”

Kirsten Dunst , Wagner Moura, Stephen McKinley Henderson and Cailee Spaeny star in the project as war journalists, and downplay any concerns that the film may incite any kind of real-life violence or political reaction.

Kirsten Dunst says she's not worried about #CivilWar causing any violence in the real-world pic.twitter.com/EqdRiC3u3A — The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) April 3, 2024

“It’s a movie and it’s meant to start conversations and I think it really lets the audience decide what they want to put onto it,” Dunst said. “It’s not partisan in any way, I think it’s actually more of an anti-war film if anything.”

Moura added that he hopes there isn’t any violence “because this is exactly what the film is not about. The film doesn’t have a political agenda, you really cannot say that this is a liberal film, a conservative film, it’s a film that says that polarization — I won’t say would lead to any civil war — but can lead to social conflict and it’s a problem for democracies.”

Offerman also weighed in, noting that after all the online chatter ahead of its release, “when you see the movie you’re like, ‘Oh shit, it’s actually just super-intelligent and a kickass movie that none of us can legitimately get mad about because it’s just a beautiful piece of art.'” He additionally noted that any comparisons to his character and Donald Trump while shooting “didn’t even come up. It’s so unrelated to any actual factions or politicians,” and commended Garland for not including real-life political points in the story.

Nick Offerman says there were zero discussions about Donald Trump during the making of #CivilWar pic.twitter.com/A97I8jgeiE — The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) April 3, 2024

Moura said he’s taken that into his own life as well, and after wrapping the film, “I really started to reach out to people who think differently politically and listen to them, because if you believe in democracy — if you’re not some crazy racist, homophobic, kind of crazy thing — I’m really willing to listen to you and I was very surprised to see that there’s a lot of common ground. If our differences are only like how the state deals with things, we should definitely listen to each other and talk to each other and avoid this hate.”

At the premiere, Wagner Moura says working on #CivilWar inspired him to talk to people who don't share his political views pic.twitter.com/B6Xc4rs0XE — The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) April 3, 2024

Civil War hits theaters April 12.

THR Newsletters

Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day

More from The Hollywood Reporter

Monsterverse future looks bright after ‘godzilla x kong’, jackie chan responds to fans concerned over his health: “don’t worry”, george miller on ‘furiosa’ star anya taylor-joy: “there’s something mystical about her”, francis ford coppola’s ‘megalopolis’ faces uphill battle for mega deal: “just no way to position this movie”, billy dee williams says actors should be allowed to wear blackface, zendaya says intimacy coordinator was “very helpful” for ‘challengers’: “important that we felt safe”.

Why Did Texas Fight In The Civil War Dbq

A war that started 1860 and ended 1865 there was blood shed all over Texas land, this was called the civil war. many people died while fighting in this battle and many people may ask why did Texas fight in the civil war? There were three main reason why Texans fought in the civil war, to protect state rights, there love for Texas, and to preserve slavery . Those are the reasons why many men sacrificed there life for Texas. One reason that Texas fought in the civil war was to protect state rights. Abraham lincoln did not want any states to secede saying “ I hold that...the union of these states is perpetual….(N)o state upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get out of the union”(Document c). But the state disagreed saying that the state was taking their rights away which …show more content…

In document B, a man says “...justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the almighty creator” (Document B) saying slavery was God's way saying they had no control over it and if God would have not made African American people if he did not want us to come about slavery. The author also stating that white males were the ones establishing the government and African race was not “were established exclusively by the white race for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no (part in their establishment”( Document B). There was 182,566 slaves in Texas which took up 30% of the population in Texas and 29% of white families owned slaves which was one there reasons they fought because without the slaves they would have less workers on farms and would bring down their economic structure.( Document A) why did Texas fight in the civil war? they fought for their state rights, their love for Texas and to preserve slavery. This civil war relates to present time because of how this war affected us for the better. Those are the reasons why many men sacrificed there life for

The Mexican American War : A Controversial Event

The Mexican American War was a very controversial event. The Americans believed in their “Manifest Destiny” which prompted them to annex the territory of Texas which, in turn, initiated the war on April 25, 1846. Texas was annexed to the Union as a slave state on December 29, 1845. This upset all of the Free states along with the Mexicans but the Southerners were in favor of the war because it gave them more strength when fighting for slavery. While there were many different beliefs about the Mexican-American War throughout the United States, these beliefs generally were the same within a region.

Essay On How Did Texas Fight In The Civil War

Way back when, the South had clashing opinions with the North. And like in most cases, the disagreement turned into a war. The US was divided into the North and South; one side strongly for slavery, and one strongly against. Everyone thought that they could live this way, divided, in harmony, but they were wrong. Southern states began to secede, and a month later war broke out. Why did Texans fight in the Civil War? The residents of Texas fought because they loved Texas, they wanted to have states’ rights, and they wanted to protect slavery.

Events Leading up to the Civil War Essay

After the Missouri Compromise was made, more conflict arose. New territories were beginning to fight over the issue of slavery. These territories included Texas, New Mexico, and California. After James Polk became president he annexed Texas, and it became a state. This was a cause of the Civil War because it caused was the war with Mexico, which as a result led to the Compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 made Northerners help catch runaway slaves. The South loved it, but the North hated it. Once again the North and South were spreading apart.

The Two Main Causes Of The Mexican-American War

The two main causes for the war were the American’s obsession with the concept and maintenance of ‘Manifest Destiny’ and, the second cause was, the Texas War for Independence/Annexation. Manifest Destiny is, basically, the belief that the United States had a God-given right to occupy and civilize the whole continent. With more Americans looking for land to occupy westward due to the fact that there wasn’t enough space on the east coast, the fact that most of those areas were occupied didn’t matter. Instead, an attitude that English speaking American would do a better job of taking care of the lands than Native Americans of Spanish Speaking Mexicans ruled the minds

Mexican War Justified

The Mexican War, or as it was called in Mexico, the American Invasion, was a very controversial event. Before the Mexican War, people from the US began moving to Texas. Texas was a disputed territory, as neither country agreed on who owned it. Mexico said they owned, while the US said that they did. There are many reasons to argue that the Mexican War should/should not have been started. The Mexican War should not have been started because US settlers in Texas broke Mexican law, the US invaded Mexico, and the countries had mixed up borders.

Dbq What Was The Pressure Of Abolitionists

Intro: Depending on if you lived in the north or in the south, the reason for fighting the war differed. The primary reason that the South was fighting the war was to protect their labor-based economy. In order to do that, they had to ensure that their slaves did not get confiscated or freed. The North, however, fought the war to reconnect the South with the rest of the Union, and to abolish slavery throughout the entire Union. The pressure of abolitionists and radical republicans led to an increase in Lincoln’s support of the slaves;

Usmen And Confederacy Dbq Essay

The American Civil War was a bloody battle fought between the Confederacy (CSA) and the Union. Many men died, especially those who fought for the south. The Missouri Compromise is what separated the North from the South, leaving slavery in the north outlawed and vice versa. When the Missouri Compromise was repealed and the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed, northerners were outraged. When Abraham Lincoln was elected president, he wasn’t an outright abolitionist, but he was anti-slavery, and therefore won no electoral votes from the south. His election made southerners fear for the abolition of slavery, and six states before Texas seceded to form the Confederate States of America. This sparked the Civil War, in which the CSA lost miserably and slavery was abolished. All of this leads to the question: why did Texans fight in the civil war? Texans fought in the civil war to protect states’ rights, for their love of Texas, and to preserve and protect slavery.

Civil War Dbq Essay

Have you ever loved something so much that you would do anything to protect it? That is what the Texans did to protect Texas. There are lots of interesting things that went down in the Civil War… two interesting facts of the civil war are: John Brown tried to start slaves again by attacking at Harper's Ferry, and Governor Houston refused to take the loyalty oath so then he was forced to resign. So why did Texas fight? Texans fought to protect their country because, they wanted to protect slavery, for their love of Texas, and the states rights.

Civil War DBQ The Civil War started because of the states wanted more independence than the federal government was willing to give them. The states wanted to be able to do whatever they wanted to do, even if it went against what the federal government was telling them to do. For example the Confederate states wanted to be able to choose for themselves whether slavery was abolished or not in their state. But on the Union side the federal government wanted to give the states some independence, but they wanted more say and control over the states.

Texans In The Civil War Dbq

Have you ever thought why the texans fought in the Civil War? The texans fought in the blood battle on their own territory, the civil war. There were tons of deaths and most of them were from diseases. The texans fought in the civil war only for states rights, love for texas, and slavery.

How Did Texas Fight In The Civil War Dbq

They fought because of states rights, their love of Texas, and slavery. One reason Texans fought was because of states rights. In document C it says that states have rights to secede or stay in a nation, such as the Union. This shows that Texas had the right to secede from the Union and Texans wanted to stay out of it. Northern and Southern states were completely opposite and Texas didn’t want to be a part of a nation with the Northern states.

Why Did Texas Fight

What caused thousands of people to fight in one of the bloodiest wars in American history for there homeland? Maybe it was because of the Missouri Compromise, or possibly the abolitionist who tried to start a slave uprising. This creates the question why did Texans Fight? I believe that Texans fought beacuse they wanted to protect states rights, love for Texas, and perserve slavery.

Civil War Dbq

Civil war, four long years of war between the North and South, was fought from 1861 to 1865. The main purpose of the war was to preserve the Union, which later changed to ending slavery. Thousands of people volunteered for this war but everyone had a different belief and goal. The soldiers for this war consisted of a large number of immigrants, women and even African Americans. The union soldiers (northerners) volunteered to fight for the country, they fought the war to defeat the new confederation formed by the southern states. The African American joined the Union soldiers to fight against the confederate who were pro-slavery. After the election of President Lincoln, the southern states refused to stay under the wing of United States of

The Impact Of Mexican American War On National Politics Essay

During the time of 1830, the Americans believed in “manifest destiny”. There was a spike in the population, as cheap and fertile land caught the attention of Americans to take on the hardships of the Overland Trails to Oregon and California. A lot of the Americans from the south ended up migrating to the Mexican part of Texas with their slaves, so that they would be able to grow cotton. But the Mexican government wouldn’t authorize slavery and once 1830 approached, they ended up prohibiting any further immigration. During the conflict between the Texas colonist and the Mexican government, this ended up resulting in the Texas Resolution, in which there became the creation of the separate Republic of Texas in 1836. As the US made it adamant that they were going to try everything in its power to not have a war with Mexico, this was one of the reasons as to why Texas didn’t become a state until another decade.

Who Is Responsible For The South In The Civil War Dbq

There were not many battles fought in Texas, but Texans did a lot for the south. Texans fought in the Civil War for State’s Rights, love of Texas, and slavery. The first reason Texas fought in the Civil War was to protect State’s Rights. The South was mad because they said that the State’s Rights allowed them to have their slaves. This was important because the North wanted to take them away.

Related Topics

• United States
• American Civil War
• Abraham Lincoln
• Confederate States of America
• Slavery in the United States
• Southern United States