conclusion for charity essay

Essay on Charity

Students are often asked to write an essay on Charity in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Charity

What is charity.

Charity is when you give help to those in need. It can be giving money, food, clothes, or your time. This help is given freely and from the heart. It’s not just about giving things away; it’s about caring for others and wanting to make their lives better.

Types of Charity

There are many ways to give. Some people donate to big organizations that help lots of people. Others prefer to help directly, like giving food to a hungry person. Volunteering at places like schools and hospitals is also charity.

The Importance of Giving

Charity is important because it shows kindness. It can make a huge difference in someone’s life. Even a small act of giving can bring a lot of happiness. It’s a way to show that you think about others, not just yourself.

Charity Begins at Home

Charity starts with how we treat our family and friends. Being kind and sharing with them teaches us how to care for others. When we learn this at home, we can spread kindness to more people outside our homes.

Charity is all about giving and caring. It makes the world a better place. When we all do our part, even in small ways, we can help many people and spread joy.

Also check:

• Advantages and Disadvantages of Charity
• Paragraph on Charity
• Speech on Charity

250 Words Essay on Charity

Charity is when you give help to others without wanting anything back. This help can be in the form of money, food, clothes, or even your time. When you do charity, you make someone’s life better. It’s like sharing a piece of your heart with others.

Why Charity Matters

Charity is important because it shows kindness. It can make a big difference in someone’s life. For example, when you give food to a person who is hungry, you help them not to be hungry anymore. It’s not just about giving things; it’s about caring for others and making the world a nicer place.

How to Do Charity

You can do charity in many ways. You don’t need a lot of money. Even small acts can be a big help. You could give away toys you don’t play with anymore or help an older person cross the street. Remember, it’s the thought and love behind what you do that counts.

Learning from Charity

When you do charity, you also learn good things. You learn to be thankful for what you have. You understand that some people don’t have as much as you do. This can make you want to help more and be a better person.

Charity is not just about giving; it’s about sharing, caring, and learning. It makes both the person who gives and the person who receives feel good. So, think about how you can do charity today and help make someone smile!

500 Words Essay on Charity

What is charity.

Charity is the act of giving help to those in need. It is a kind and loving gesture that can take many forms. For example, charity might mean giving money, food, or clothes to people who do not have enough. It can also mean spending time with someone who is lonely or helping out in your community. When you do something good for others without expecting anything in return, that’s charity.

Why Is Charity Important?

Charity is important because it makes the world a better place. When you help others, you make their lives easier and happier. It is not just the people you help who feel better; you feel good too. Giving to others can make you feel proud and joyful. Also, when one person starts helping, it often encourages others to do the same. This can create a chain of kindness that spreads far and wide.

How Can We Practice Charity?

Practicing charity can be simple. You do not need a lot of money or free time to make a difference. Here are some ideas:

– Share your toys or books with other children who might not have any. – Help your parents, friends, or neighbors with tasks they find hard to do alone. – Save a part of your allowance to give to a charity that helps people or animals. – Join a group at school that does good things for your community.

Everyone can find their own way to be charitable. The key is to look around and see where help is needed.

Charity at Home and Around the World

Charity starts at home. This means that being kind and helpful to your family is a form of charity. From there, you can also think about your neighborhood, your school, and even places far away. There are people all over the world who need help. Some charities work to get clean water to places where there is none, or they send books to schools that do not have any. Even if these places are far away, your help can reach them.

Charity Throughout the Year

While many people think of giving during certain times like holidays, charity is needed all year round. There are always people in need, no matter the season. You can make a plan to do something charitable each month. Maybe in January, you could shovel snow for a neighbor. In July, you could share your summer toys with others. Every month offers a new chance to be kind.

The Impact of Charity

When you give to others, it has a big impact. The person who receives your help will have a better day because of you. They might then help someone else, and the goodness you started keeps moving forward. Even small acts of charity can change someone’s life. Imagine if every person did just one kind thing each day; the world would be full of happiness and care.

Charity is a powerful way to show love and support to those who need it. It does not matter how big or small your act of kindness is; what matters is that you do it with a full heart. Remember, when you give to others, you are not just helping them; you are making the whole world a little bit brighter. So, let’s all try to do our part and practice charity every day.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Chartered Accountant
• Essay on Cheating In A Relationship
• Essay on Cheerleading

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essay Examples >
• Essays Topics >
• Essay on Money

Essay On The Benefits Of Charity

Type of paper: Essay

Topic: Money , Life , Love , Happiness , Emotions , Taxes , Charity , Business

Published: 01/15/2020

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

Please nothe that while Wowessays offers a collection of  100% free essays , you can still order a unique paper that no one has used.

Introduction

It has often been said that sharing is good. Sharing not only benefits the recipient of the act of goodness, but the giver or contributor of goodness as well. Feelings of happiness and contentment are often associated with people who share what they have. It may be in the form of money, goods, services, time, or anything that can be of help to another person. As a result, more people are now open to doing charitable work without expecting anything in return. The best consolation that one gets out of being charitable is the knowledge and feeling that someone else is enjoying and finding good use for items shared or donated.

What Charity Does to Individuals

Charity is the voluntary giving of money, time, or other resources that one has. For various reasons, people consider being charitable towards others in need. For some, it is about the inner satisfaction that one gets out of knowing that they were able to help another person. Although the most common way of helping is through monetary support, it does not always have to be that way. Even an offer to teach less fortunate children on how to read and write will also bring forth the same happy feelings. Offering to take care of a neighbor's baby produces fulfilling and lasting emotions. Thus, regardless of the form of help an individual extends, the feelings of satisfaction and contentment are the same. The author of the book, Why Kindness is good for you, Dr. David Hamilton claims, "When you do something for someone else, your brain produces [the] hormones [called] Dopamine – which makes you feel happy, and gives you the feeling that what you are doing is right" (as cited in Herdman, 2011). Therefore, the happy factor works both ways, that is, for both the receiver and the giver. Furthermore, research proves that because of these happy feelings, people tend to repeat the actions more. With the idea that helping others makes the giver happier, people tend to give more, causing a circular motion of giving and receiving. The happier the person becomes, the more giving the individual is. Thus, people become more giving to and understanding of other people's needs. For some individuals, this is enough motivation to keep the spirit of giving alive. Apart from the emotional satisfaction that the giver feels, there are other benefits to sharing and being charitable. According to Hamilton, "The act of doing something for another person in any capacity has health benefits. Performing acts of kindness has been found to boost your immune system, keep your heart healthy and even slow the ageing process." (Herdman, 2011).

Other Benefits of Charitable Acts

Other reasons for donating to charity include reduced tax liability for the giver. Tax deduction depends on the value of the items an individual donates. The higher the value of the items, the higher the tax deduction an individual is allowed to claim (eHow contributor, n.d.). Another benefit is how donating to charity can help individuals remove clutter. Instead of simply throwing away items that can still be used or recycled, these items can be donated instead "to the less fortunate individuals or nonprofit organizations" (eHow contributor, n.d.). Giving also helps improve living conditions in communities that otherwise have no access to basic goods and services. As groups help raise the living standards of the less fortunate, karma comes in by bringing good tidings and better opportunities to the giver. It is believed that whatever individuals give to others is returned to them twofold or threefold of what they have shared to other people.

Sharing is a contagious feeling. The more one gives, the happier one becomes, thus, the more an individual dares to share more. When other people see how happy a person is after the act of giving, that person becomes a testament to another, which helps create a ripple effect of people sharing and giving to others. Therefore, one's happiness and satisfaction does not only come from receiving gifts from other people, but also from knowing that an individual can also make a difference in another person's life through charitable acts.

eHow Contributor. What are the benefits of donating to charity? eHow. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about_5092658_benefits-donating-charity.html Herdman, S. (2011). Charity, giving, and good karma. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/health/cancer-research-uk/8792392/Charity-giving-and-good-karma.html

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 849

This paper is created by writer with

ID 256678123

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

Transport book reviews, brake term papers, porcelain term papers, debris term papers, overload term papers, servitude term papers, pile term papers, plaster term papers, auction term papers, thickness term papers, accomplice term papers, the new deal essay sample, example of course work on planets outside our solar system, power to control communication essay examples, essay on friendship 2, good applying the 4th amendment in the computer age research paper example, example of research paper on women menstruation in buddhism, the jefferson era and the jacksonian era essays examples, good term paper on the population of india past present and future, good example of facilitator research paper, the iron wall summary essay, use of insecticides regulated vs unregulated vs partially regulated use of insecticides essay, how reality is socially constructed essay sample, good essay on does technology make us more completely human or less human, good example of essay on a child called it, example of essay on the microcosm of gender inequality and discrimination, slide 1 social anxiety disorder research paper samples, research critique research paper sample, good reflective cover memo for final for now essay example, passion fruit and strawberry research paper sample, meriwether essays, newburn essays, meigs essays, anti ballistic missile essays, phyllis essays, socialization process essays, summer internship essays, microsoft monopoly essays, total freedom essays, quality service essays, president james essays, fat man essays, government oversight essays.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

Short Essay on Charity

The word ‘charity’ means generosity in giving some­thing to the needy out of loving kindness towards them; and a charitable organization is an institution with funds to help the needy.

There is a proverb: ‘Charity begins at home.’ A per­son, who is kind at heart and possesses compassion from his early days towards the weak and the needy in the society, is generally found to help and make gifts to the poor. He finds joy and satisfaction in giving alms to a beggar, or renders some financial relief to the needy persons who are near at hand.

Thus charity begins at home. In other words, it begins in the near neighbourhoods of a person. One first comes forward to help his neighbours, relatives and friends in the very beginning. Afterwards, he extends his, same helping hand to the distant places, where thousands of the needy and the weak people await his help and sympathy.

There are instances in India, of great men, who gave their all to the cause of charity. One such man was Deshbandhu Chittaranjan Das, the great political leader and a renowned barrister. He donated his house, wealth and all that he had in his possession to his countrymen. In his name, hos­pitals and similar other charitable institutions are still func­tioning successfully.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

The Birlas, in India, have donated and built many chari­table institutions in India for the benefit of the common peo­ple. The dharmasalas (a guest-house where pilgrims and travelers are accommodated temporarily free of cost), the hos­pitals, the educational institutions and numerous scholar­ships for the poor but meritorious students are their generous contributions towards their countrymen.

Charity, a noble quality in man, brings welfare in the society. It enlarges human hearts and spreads the message of brotherhood and innocent love among the people.

The prac­tice of charity was adored in ancient days. The saints and the sages lived on alms offered by the affluent people. It was then an accepted practice to give whatever was possible in charity for the welfare of the people and the society.

In a family, the parents should teach their children to be compassionate towards the poor and the distressed. They themselves should practice the noble act, citing bright exam­ples before their off springs, because charity makes one glori­ous and pure at heart. Selfishness and narrow-mindedness disappear from his character. And that can make him one day really great in his life.

Related Articles:

• Essay on Charity begins at home
• Short Essay on Haji Muhammad Mohsin
• Essay on Religion, charity and public welfare activities in Sur Empire
• 606 Words Essay on if I Won the Prize in a Lottery

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• How to conclude an essay | Interactive example

How to Conclude an Essay | Interactive Example

Published on January 24, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on July 23, 2023.

The conclusion is the final paragraph of your essay . A strong conclusion aims to:

• Tie together the essay’s main points
• Show why your argument matters
• Leave the reader with a strong impression

Your conclusion should give a sense of closure and completion to your argument, but also show what new questions or possibilities it has opened up.

This conclusion is taken from our annotated essay example , which discusses the history of the Braille system. Hover over each part to see why it’s effective.

Braille paved the way for dramatic cultural changes in the way blind people were treated and the opportunities available to them. Louis Braille’s innovation was to reimagine existing reading systems from a blind perspective, and the success of this invention required sighted teachers to adapt to their students’ reality instead of the other way around. In this sense, Braille helped drive broader social changes in the status of blindness. New accessibility tools provide practical advantages to those who need them, but they can also change the perspectives and attitudes of those who do not.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Step 1: return to your thesis, step 2: review your main points, step 3: show why it matters, what shouldn’t go in the conclusion, more examples of essay conclusions, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about writing an essay conclusion.

To begin your conclusion, signal that the essay is coming to an end by returning to your overall argument.

Don’t just repeat your thesis statement —instead, try to rephrase your argument in a way that shows how it has been developed since the introduction.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Next, remind the reader of the main points that you used to support your argument.

Avoid simply summarizing each paragraph or repeating each point in order; try to bring your points together in a way that makes the connections between them clear. The conclusion is your final chance to show how all the paragraphs of your essay add up to a coherent whole.

To wrap up your conclusion, zoom out to a broader view of the topic and consider the implications of your argument. For example:

• Does it contribute a new understanding of your topic?
• Does it raise new questions for future study?
• Does it lead to practical suggestions or predictions?
• Can it be applied to different contexts?
• Can it be connected to a broader debate or theme?

Whatever your essay is about, the conclusion should aim to emphasize the significance of your argument, whether that’s within your academic subject or in the wider world.

Try to end with a strong, decisive sentence, leaving the reader with a lingering sense of interest in your topic.

The easiest way to improve your conclusion is to eliminate these common mistakes.

Don’t include new evidence

Any evidence or analysis that is essential to supporting your thesis statement should appear in the main body of the essay.

The conclusion might include minor pieces of new information—for example, a sentence or two discussing broader implications, or a quotation that nicely summarizes your central point. But it shouldn’t introduce any major new sources or ideas that need further explanation to understand.

Don’t use “concluding phrases”

Avoid using obvious stock phrases to tell the reader what you’re doing:

• “In conclusion…”
• “To sum up…”

These phrases aren’t forbidden, but they can make your writing sound weak. By returning to your main argument, it will quickly become clear that you are concluding the essay—you shouldn’t have to spell it out.

Don’t undermine your argument

Avoid using apologetic phrases that sound uncertain or confused:

• “This is just one approach among many.”
• “There are good arguments on both sides of this issue.”
• “There is no clear answer to this problem.”

Even if your essay has explored different points of view, your own position should be clear. There may be many possible approaches to the topic, but you want to leave the reader convinced that yours is the best one!

• Argumentative
• Literary analysis

This conclusion is taken from an argumentative essay about the internet’s impact on education. It acknowledges the opposing arguments while taking a clear, decisive position.

The internet has had a major positive impact on the world of education; occasional pitfalls aside, its value is evident in numerous applications. The future of teaching lies in the possibilities the internet opens up for communication, research, and interactivity. As the popularity of distance learning shows, students value the flexibility and accessibility offered by digital education, and educators should fully embrace these advantages. The internet’s dangers, real and imaginary, have been documented exhaustively by skeptics, but the internet is here to stay; it is time to focus seriously on its potential for good.

This conclusion is taken from a short expository essay that explains the invention of the printing press and its effects on European society. It focuses on giving a clear, concise overview of what was covered in the essay.

The invention of the printing press was important not only in terms of its immediate cultural and economic effects, but also in terms of its major impact on politics and religion across Europe. In the century following the invention of the printing press, the relatively stationary intellectual atmosphere of the Middle Ages gave way to the social upheavals of the Reformation and the Renaissance. A single technological innovation had contributed to the total reshaping of the continent.

This conclusion is taken from a literary analysis essay about Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein . It summarizes what the essay’s analysis achieved and emphasizes its originality.

By tracing the depiction of Frankenstein through the novel’s three volumes, I have demonstrated how the narrative structure shifts our perception of the character. While the Frankenstein of the first volume is depicted as having innocent intentions, the second and third volumes—first in the creature’s accusatory voice, and then in his own voice—increasingly undermine him, causing him to appear alternately ridiculous and vindictive. Far from the one-dimensional villain he is often taken to be, the character of Frankenstein is compelling because of the dynamic narrative frame in which he is placed. In this frame, Frankenstein’s narrative self-presentation responds to the images of him we see from others’ perspectives. This conclusion sheds new light on the novel, foregrounding Shelley’s unique layering of narrative perspectives and its importance for the depiction of character.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

• Ad hominem fallacy
• Post hoc fallacy
• Appeal to authority fallacy
• False cause fallacy
• Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

• Choosing Essay Topic
• Write a College Essay
• Write a Diversity Essay
• College Essay Format & Structure
• Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

Your essay’s conclusion should contain:

• A rephrased version of your overall thesis
• A brief review of the key points you made in the main body
• An indication of why your argument matters

The conclusion may also reflect on the broader implications of your argument, showing how your ideas could applied to other contexts or debates.

For a stronger conclusion paragraph, avoid including:

• Important evidence or analysis that wasn’t mentioned in the main body
• Generic concluding phrases (e.g. “In conclusion…”)
• Weak statements that undermine your argument (e.g. “There are good points on both sides of this issue.”)

Your conclusion should leave the reader with a strong, decisive impression of your work.

The conclusion paragraph of an essay is usually shorter than the introduction . As a rule, it shouldn’t take up more than 10–15% of the text.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, July 23). How to Conclude an Essay | Interactive Example. Scribbr. Retrieved April 3, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/conclusion/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write an essay introduction | 4 steps & examples, how to write a thesis statement | 4 steps & examples, example of a great essay | explanations, tips & tricks, what is your plagiarism score.

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Student Essays

Essays-Paragraphs-Speeches

Essay on Charity [ Purpose & Benefits ]

Leave a Comment

The following essay talks about Charity, its meaning and concept, Main purpose & benefits of Charity in society, How giving charity gives us mental peace. This essay is written in simple English and in easy to understand words for children and students.

List of Topics

Essay on Charity For Students

Charity may be defined as giving help to the poor and needy people without any expectation of return or reward. It is an act of mercy which we show towards those who are less fortunate than ourselves. In other words, it may also be termed as selfless service to mankind.

Charity, Meaning & Concept

The word charity has been derived from a Latin word “caritas” which means “dearness”. The real meaning of charity is to help people who are in need or suffering. It can also be described as an act of kindness, love & goodwill towards others. Charity can either be in the form of giving money, clothes or food to the poor or providing them with shelter and education. It can also be in the form of giving time to work for a charitable organization.

The concept of charity has been mentioned in almost all religions across the world. All religions preach that helping others is a good deed and it will lead to our well-being & happiness. The act of charity is not just restricted to giving money, but it also includes volunteering our time & efforts for a good cause.

>>>>> Read Also:   ” Essay on Secularism “

Main Purpose & Benefits of Charity:

The main purpose of charity is to help those who are in need and cannot help themselves. It is also done to promote goodwill & peace in society. Charity can be given to anyone irrespective of their caste, creed or religion.

There are many benefits of giving charity. It not only helps the person in need but also gives us a sense of satisfaction & happiness. When we help others, it creates a positive feeling within us and we feel more connected to our society. Giving charity also inculcates values like empathy, kindness & compassion in us.

How Giving Charity Gives Us Mental Peace?

Giving charity not only benefits the person in need but also gives us mental peace. It is a proven fact that when we help others, our brain releases happy hormones like oxytocin & endorphins which make us feel happy & content. Volunteering for a good cause also reduces stress & anxiety. Thus, giving charity is a win-win situation for both the giver & the receiver.

Charity is a noble act and we should all try to do it as much as possible. It not only benefits others but also makes us feel good about ourselves. So, let’s pledge to give charity and make this world a better place.

Therefore, charity is an act of giving help to the poor and needy people without any expectation of return or reward. Charity is offering your time, money or resources to help the needy without any due expectations of favor etc. Its indeed one of the greatest virtue of humanity.

Related Posts:

Reader Interactions

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Talk to our experts

1800-120-456-456

• Charity Begins at Home Essay

Essay on Charity Begins at Home for Students and Children

Charity is done for the benefit, assistance, and relief of people in need. For instance, providing the victims of war, natural disasters, epidemics, poverty, with food, shelter, medical assistance, and other basic needs. When carried out selflessly, it is a one-way act where an individual gives and asks for nothing in return. The essay elaborates on this proverb and discusses its different interpretations while answering an important question: Is our interpretation of the proverb flawed?

Long and Short Essay on Charity Begins at Home for Students and Children in English

Long essay on charity begins at home in 600 words.

Charity is a commonly quoted but rarely practiced virtue. Life leaves us with little scope to understand anything beyond the narrow view of our vested interests. We forget that true happiness is beyond the definitions of owning and possessing and that It is the spiritual consciousness of defining various moments in our lives with love, grace, and gratitude.

The proverb ‘Charity Begins at Home’ can be interpreted in two different ways. 

The first interpretation is that one’s family comes first and their first duty is for their family and friends whereas the other interpretation is that kids learn charity first in their home. Charity is an act of humanitarianism that involves providing for the ones in need selflessly. Compassion and empathy shouldn’t be reserved for the ones we know.

People speculate that the phrase ‘Charity Begins at home’ is biblical, but the exact origin is still debated. It is said that this proverb is expressed in the King James Bible, verse 1 Timothy 5:4. This verse hints towards the second interpretation of the proverb, that one should learn piety at home. It implies that charity doesn’t necessarily mean giving goods or money, sometimes it’s being there for someone when they need someone to talk to, providing them comfort in tough times, even sharing food with the starved is a small act of charity. These minute gestures teach us compassion and empathy. The same idea was expressed in ‘Of prelates’ in 1382 by John Wyclif whereas the first person to put the phrase in the form we use now was Sir Thomas Browne in Religio Medici, 1642.

Since its existence, our world has been unequal in every way, guaranteeing the existence of rich and poor, strong and weak people living together. While poverty is extreme and widespread, let's not forget just how many rich and wealthy individuals are capable of giving in the developed world. It's high time we need to realize the power we have when pooled together in our hands.

Charity, however, originates from the heart as you feel the urge to give, starts from home, and eventually extends to others in society. Kids learn what they see around them. They absorb and mimic everything their parents or the adults around them do. The best way to teach them compassion and empathy is to practise it around them. Home is the first place where the child’s character and personality are developed and it plays a major role in making them charitable. Showing them the importance of charity at a young age will make them cherish those values when they grow old and also pass them down to their children. We can only teach ourselves the attitude of becoming kind to strangers by being sympathetic to our family.

In conclusion, we can say that the two interpretations of the proverb ‘Charity Begins at Home’ are closely interlinked. Basically, the proverb states that one learns compassion, empathy, and the joy of giving at home, and they perform charity towards their own family, in the first place. It can be something as small as sharing their food or listening to a family member in need, hence a child’s first charity is practised at home. Our prior understanding of the proverb was a bit flawed as it meant that our family is our top priority when it comes to charity. Our family is supposed to be the starting point and not the end of our charity. The proverb figuratively implies that every act of charity begins not in a grand scheme, but in one's home.

Short Essay on Charity Begins at Home in 200 Words

The realization that all the areas of life are dependent on one another, provides us with an understanding of how to be charitable. When it comes to health, by eating well, exercising, and sleeping optimally, you practice charity by being kind to yourself. Charity begins at home when it comes to your family, by loving and supporting them unconditionally. You can practice charity when it comes to work by training and mentoring someone at work or serving clients from the heart and not out of obligation or money. Simply listening to a friend is a form of charity, when your friend is in distress. You can be charitable to yourself when it comes to learning by taking time out for your personal development. Finally, by donating whatever you can afford to a charity whose mission resonates deeply within you, you can demonstrate charity when it comes to wealth. An individual has always been able to flaunt, preach, and educate others about the values of human beings who are kind, generous, and charitable. However, if that individual does not practice the same qualities that they preach about in themselves, their actions and words have no value or significance. Thus, we can conclude that If you want to bring about a change in the world, you should first change yourself and your loved ones.

An individual can never be patient and forbearing with others except if one is able to foster this attitude at home. It is unquestionably very much easier to bear with the weaknesses of those we love. Once you begin to pursue sympathy with your kith and kin, you will find it easier to do so with others. The home is the centre, and hence let the goodness that is within you radiate from the centre in ever-widening circles.

FAQs on Charity Begins at Home Essay

1. Does the proverb ‘Charity begins at home’ mean that we should prioritize our family first when it comes to charity?

No, when it comes to charity, the first ones on the list should be the ones who genuinely need it the most, not your family or whom you love the most. One can help others in need without depriving their family, it is very much possible. Compassion and empathy don’t come with eligibility criteria and they shouldn’t. The phrase hints towards the idea that the best way to instill the values of compassion in a child is to surround them with the idea at their home itself. As already mentioned in the essay, ‘Our family is supposed to be the starting point and not the end of our charity.’

2. Are only rich people capable of doing charity?

No, one has to be rich only in terms of compassion and empathy when it comes to charity. Charity does not mean only donating money. It can include a service or giving things or food to the ones who desperately need them. It can be something as minute as providing someone with days worth of food or clothes to cover themselves. It can include listening to someone in distress. One does not need to be a millionaire to be compassionate. Charity also means providing a child with education or taking care of a pup in need. It’s not limited to humans, it is not limited to donating money. All it takes is the will and ability to empathize and be compassionate.

Essay on Charity Begins at Home for Students and Children

500+ words essay on charity begins at home.

Charity begins at home it is a true saying as someone that cannot love her/his family then how can that person love someone else. This proverb is a lesson for all of us and Charity does and should begin at home. First, we need to learn to care and love our family wholeheartedly then we can shower love to the outside world.

Also, it is a person’s first and foremost responsibility to serve her/his family first then others. In addition, fulfill duties towards your family than others.

Another interpretation of Charity begins at home

It is largely believed that our family comes first and we should help them before helping others. But, there are people who debate that this is the misinterpretation of this proverb. According, to them, it means that children should be taught about charity at home. A child learns by seeing his elders, if the parents are loving and giving and pay importance to social cause them their children will also learn the same and make some efforts to improve the society.

Besides, in some way, it does make sense. It also sends a strong message to the people with this phrase . Furthermore, the children follow the footstep of their parents and do what they do.

Moreover, if they see their parents doing good deeds by helping the poor and needy then they will indulge them in doing the same. Also, they will pass this on to the next generation. But, on the contrary, if they see them misbehaving with poor and needy then they will also do the same. So, it is important to teach our children good things because it will build a better society .

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

How the two interpretation of charity begins at home are linked

The above-mentioned interpretation of the phrase may not be complete in itself. If in the above interpretation the parents completely ignore their children and devote themselves completely in helping others then will their children still like to help others? The answer will be no because they would think that these people are keeping them away from their parents. Also, they would rather hate them.

So, we can say that both the interpretation of the phrase is true and linked with each other. We must indulge in the habit of charity only when it runs in the family. The children will also inculcate only when we remain sensitive towards the need of children and family members. After that, we can go out and help others. And this is the best way to lead a decent life .

Also, we must learn to prioritize and the family should be on top of the list. Besides, ignoring the family and working for the benefit of society is bad for both our self and society.

In conclusion, ‘Charity begins at home’ sends a strong message in society. We should understand it’s important to lead a more satisfying life . Also, we must remember what we inculcate is what we teach our children. Besides, we must shower our children and family with an abundance of love and fulfill all their essential needs and after that, we can help the poor and needy around us.

FAQs about Essay on charity Begins at Home

Q.1 Does charity begins at home? A.1 Yes, charity begins at home because if you look after your children and family and after that be kind to others then your children will do the same thing when they grew up.

Q.2 Is love and charity are the same things? A.2 No, love and charity are different things but they are interlinked at some point.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

The Relationship Between Faith and Charity Essay

The Creed is a declaration of faith which has been abridged, granted legitimacy, and is intended to be used worldwide in religious rituals. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are each given three brief paragraphs in the Apostles Creed. The Creed proclaims that God is the righteous ruler of all and a spiritual Father to those who believe in Him. Furthermore, it teaches about Christ´s absolute divinity, which includes both his divine existence and his relation to other members of the Trinity, whereby he is both a son and a Lord. The part of God that dwells within Christians is the Holy Spirit, commonly described as “God within us.” He constantly draws attention to God and Jesus while guiding people towards God’s wisdom and truth.

The church and the Holy Spirit share a connection that involves the Holy Spirit infusing the church’s life with solidarity, devotion, and charity. As the church is susceptible to the guidance of the Holy Spirit, His participation is felt. All believers get spiritual gifts from the Holy Spirit in accordance with His sovereign designs and purposes (Catholic 190). The Bible lists a variety of gifts that are given for both church building and international ministry. The church selects leaders with the help of the Holy Spirit and the church has a duty to recognize and promote the use of the spiritual gifts in its life and ministry.

The Creed incorporates several teachings on the Church, the Resurrection, and Everlasting Life in addition to outlining the central beliefs of a given religion. The word church in the Apostles’ Creed, similarly to the Bible, refers to the people of God, the holy society made up of individuals who profess faith in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. When the Creed states to believe in the church, it teaches adherence to the Bible, educates Christians about the church, and stipulates that the church is fundamental to Christians.

The Creed teaches that the resurrection of the body is not only something to believe in but also something that inspires hope in individuals. The Creeds teachings exclusively focuse on the bodily resurrection in an effort to counter Hymeneus and Philetus’ heresy from the first century which stated that scriptural analogies to the resurrection only refer to the soul being raised from the dead to the life of salvation and has nothing to do with the physical (McClain 747). Ultimately, what the Creed teaches is a profession of belief in the actual resurrection of the body.

Last phrase of the Apostles’ Creed, “I believe in the life everlasting”, is a Christian affirmation that they believe in the bodily resurrection and that the resurrected body will enjoy life everlasting. The Apostles Creeds’ final verse teaches about everlasting life, and that God has promised all who believe and put their faith in Him everlasting life through resurrection.

The structure of the Creeds, which make up the ancient Catholic catechism, do provide framework for Part 1 of the Catholic Church’s Catechism. Nevertheless, this is completed by frequent references to the Creed, which is more specific and detailed. If there is hope for a future glory and a genuine friendship with God, which is charity, therefore faith evolves in charity and the existence of faith is truly restorative. The work of Christian faith is charity, the eternal prospect involved with it is hope, and the path of faith involves developing all these crucial attributes.

McClain, Daniel Wade. “Book Review: The Apostles’ Creed: A Guide to the Ancient Catechism.” Anglican Theological Review , vol. 101, no. 4, 2019, pp. 746–748.

Catholic Church. “A Guide to Themes in the Catechism.” The Catechism of The Catholic Church Second Edition , 2000, pp. 1–848., Web.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, November 23). The Relationship Between Faith and Charity. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-relationship-between-faith-and-charity/

"The Relationship Between Faith and Charity." IvyPanda , 23 Nov. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/the-relationship-between-faith-and-charity/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'The Relationship Between Faith and Charity'. 23 November.

IvyPanda . 2023. "The Relationship Between Faith and Charity." November 23, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-relationship-between-faith-and-charity/.

1. IvyPanda . "The Relationship Between Faith and Charity." November 23, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-relationship-between-faith-and-charity/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The Relationship Between Faith and Charity." November 23, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-relationship-between-faith-and-charity/.

• Infusing AI Technologies Into the Intelligence Analysis Process
• The Bible: Trinity and the Nicene Creed
• Whether or Not a New Scripture Would Get Into Scriptural Canon
• Scriptural Authority and Theological Interpretation: Importance of Distinction
• Everyday Bible Study: Scriptural Interpretation
• Response to Pelikan’s “The Need for Creeds”
• The Significance of Pontius Pilate and the Virgin Mary for the Creeds
• The Making of the Creeds by Frances Young - Book Critique
• Family Business, Its Philosophy and Strategy
• Spreading the True Gospel of Christ
• Secular Humanism Worldview: The Christian Perspective
• Role of Religion in "The Miseducation of Cameron Post" and "A Very Large Expanse"
• Islam and Christianity: Influence on Leadership
• The History of the Congregational Christian Church
• The Afro-Christian Connection and United Church of Christ

Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Charity — A Deeper Understanding of the Meaning of Charity

A Deeper Understanding of The Meaning of Charity

• Categories: Charity Personal Experience

About this sample

Words: 971 |

Published: Nov 20, 2018

Words: 971 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Sociology Life

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 654 words

3 pages / 1372 words

5 pages / 2250 words

3 pages / 1314 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Charity

Ben Mulholland. 'The Kurt Lewin Change Model: Is it still valid?' ChangeActivation, 10 May 2017, www.changeactivation.com/the-kurt-lewin-change-model-is-it-still-valid/.Big Foot Digital. 'Social Media Advertising vs Traditional [...]

Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544-555.Bazilian, E. (2012). Giving Is the Latest Status [...]

Charity, with its far-reaching impact, stands as a beacon of hope in a world facing multifaceted challenges. This essay delves into the profound importance of charity in fostering positive social change, emphasizing its role in [...]

Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. The American Economic Review, 94(5), 1717-1722.Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and [...]

Since the beginning of mankind, people have been looking for someone to look up to. Currently there are different stereotypes of whom people admire most. Young girls usually idolize other strong, independent women who seek for [...]

The Salvation Army, with its distinctive red kettles and humanitarian efforts, has long been recognized as a prominent nonprofit organization dedicated to helping those in need. This essay aims to explore the nature of the [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

The Moscow Trials and the "Great Terror" of 1937-1938: What the Evidence Shows

Grover Furr July 31 2010

[To be added at the end of Part One of "Stalin and the Struggle for Democratic Reform" ]

Since my two-part essay "Stalin and the Struggle for Democratic Reform" was written in 2004-5, a great deal more evidence has been published concerning the Opposition, the Moscow Trials of 1936, 1937, and 1938, the Military Purges or "Tukhachevsky Affair", and the subsequent "Ezhovshchina", often called "the Great Terror" after the title of the extremely dishonest book by Robert Conquest first published in 1968.

The newly-available evidence confirms the following conclusions:

* The defendants at the Moscow Trials of August 1936, January 1937, and March 1938, were guilty of at least those crimes to which they confessed. A "bloc of Rights and Trotskyites" did indeed exist. It planned to assassinate Stalin, Kaganovich, Molotov, and others in a coup d’�tat , what they called a "palace coup" ( dvortsovyi perevorot ). The bloc did assassinate Kirov.

* Both Rights and Trotskyites were conspiring with the Germans and Japanese, as were the Military conspirators. If the "palace coup" did not work they hoped to come to power by showing loyalty to Germany or Japan in the event of an invasion.

* Trotsky too was directly conspiring with the Germans and Japanese, as were a number of his supporters.

* Nikolai Ezhov, head of the NKVD from 1936 to late 1938, was also conspiring with the Germans.

We now have much more evidence about the role of NKVD chief Nikolai Ezhov than we had in 2005. Ezhov, head of the NKVD (People’s Commissar for Internal Affairs), had his own conspiracy against the Soviet government and Party leadership. Ezhov had also been recruited by German intelligence.

Like the Rights and Trotskyites, Ezhov and his top NKVD men were counting on an invasion by Germany, Japan, or other major capitalist country. They tortured a great many innocent people into confessing to capital crimes so they would be shot. They executed a great many more on falsified grounds or no grounds at all.

Ezhov hoped that this mass murder of innocent people would turn large parts of the Soviet population against the government. That would create the basis for internal rebellions against the Soviet government when Germany or Japan attacked.

Ezhov lied to Stalin, the Party and government leaders about all this. The truly horrific mass executions of 1937-1938 of almost 680,000 people were in large part unjustifiable executions of innocent people carried out deliberately by Ezhov and his top men in order to sow discontent among the Soviet population.

Although Ezhov executed a very large number of innocent people, it is clear from the evidence now available that there were also real conspiracies. The Russian government continues to keep all but a tiny amount of the investigative materials top-secret. We can’t know for sure exactly the dimensions of the real conspiracies without that evidence. Therefore, we don’t know how many of these 680,000 people were actual conspirators and how many were innocent victims.

As I wrote in 2005, Stalin and the Party leadership began to suspect as early as October 1937 that some of the repression was done illegally. From early in 1938, when Pavel Postyshev was sharply criticized, then removed from the Central Committee, then expelled from the Party, tried and executed for mass unjustified repression, these suspicions grew.

When Lavrentii Beria was appointed as Ezhov’s second-in-command Ezhov and his men understood that Stalin and the Party leadership no longer trusted them. They made one last plot to assassinate Stalin at the November 7, 1938 celebration of the 21 st anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. But Ezhov’s men were arrested in time.

Ezhov was persuaded to resign. An intensive investigation was begun and a huge number of NKVD abuses were uncovered. A great many cases of those tried or punished under Ezhov were reviewed. Over 100,000 people were released from prison and camps. Many NKVD men were arrested, confessed to torturing innocent people, tried and executed. Many more NKVD men were sentenced to prison or dismissed.

Under Beria the number of executions in 1938 and 1940 dropped to less than 1% of the number under Ezhov in 1937 and 1938, and many of those executed were NKVD men, including Ezhov himself, who were found guilty of massive unjustified repression and executions of innocent people.

Some of the most dramatic evidence published since 2005 are confessions of Ezhov and Mikhail Frinovsky, Ezhov’s second-in-command. I have put some of these on the Internet in both the original Russian and in English translation. We also have a great many more confessions and interrogations, mostly partial, of Ezhov, in which he makes many more confessions. These were published in 2007 in a semi-official account by Aleksei Pavliukov.

Anticommunist Scholars Hide the Truth

All "mainstream" – that is, anticommunist – and Trotskyist researchers falsely claim that there were no conspiracies. According to them, all the Moscow Trial defendants, all the military defendants, and all those tried and sentenced for espionage, conspiracy, sabotage, and other crimes, were innocent victims. Some claim that Stalin had planned to kill all these people because they might constitute a "Fifth Column" if the USSR were attacked. Other anticommunists prefer the explanation that Stalin just tried to terrorize the population into obedience.

This is an ideological, anticommunist stance masquerading as an historical conclusion. It is not based upon the historical evidence and is inconsistent with that evidence. Anticommunist historians ignore the primary source evidence available. They even ignore evidence in collections of documents that they themselves cite in their own works.

Why do the anticommunist "scholars", both in Russia and the West, ignore all this evidence? Why do they continue to promote the false notions that no conspiracies existed and that Stalin, not Ezhov, decided to execute hundreds of thousands of innocent people? The only possible explanation is that they do this for ideological reasons alone. The truth, as established by an examination of the primary source evidence, would make Stalin and the Bolsheviks "look good" to most people.

Collectivization of Agriculture Saved The World from Nazis and Japanese…

We have an example of this ideological bias in the way anticommunist scholars and writers treat the Bolshevik collectivization of agriculture. Anticommunists have long attacked it as immoral and unjustified. Yet collectivization provided the capital for the crash industrialization of the USSR. And only industrialization made a modern Red army possible.

Without a technologically-advanced modern army the Nazis would have conquered the USSR. Then, with the resources and manpower of the USSR and the rest of Europe behind them, the Nazis could have invaded the British Isles. Nazi armies would have been a far more formidable foe against all Allied powers. Meanwhile the Japanese, strengthened by the petroleum of the Soviet Far East, would have been a far more formidable enemy for the USA in the Pacific war.

Millions more Slavs and Jews – "Untermenschen" to the Nazis – and millions more Europeans and American soldiers – would have been killed. That this did not occur can be attributed, in large part, to the Soviet collectivization of agriculture. This is an obvious conclusion. There was simply no other way than by collectivizing agriculture that the USSR could have industrialized, and thus stood up to the Nazis and Japanese.

The only alternative was the one promoted by the Right and Trotskyite conspirators: to make peace with the Germans and Japanese, even if that meant granting them huge trade and territorial concessions. That would have greatly strengthened the Axis powers in their war against the U.K. and the USA.

For purely ideological reasons anticommunists cannot admit that collectivization made it possible for the Axis to be defeated.

… And So Did The Defeat of the Conspirators in 1936-1938

Whether they were able to seize political power through a "palace coup", or whether they would have to rely on a German and/or Japanese attack as they only way they might be able to overthrow the Stalin government, the Opposition conspirators were planning some kind of alliance with the Axis.

In fact they would have had no choice, as they realized themselves. A USSR weakened by internal revolt, with or without an invasion from abroad, would have had to make trade, territorial, and ideological concessions to its major potential adversaries simply in order to avoid invasion and inevitable conquest.

At a minimum, a USSR led by some combination of conspirators would have made treaties with Germany and Japan that would have provided the Axis powers with huge natural resources, possibly with manufactured goods as well. The military conspirators were contemplating going much farther than mere trade with the Axis. They were contemplating an outright military alliance with Germany. That would have meant millions more soldiers to fight alongside the German Wehrmacht.

Therefore, in foiling the machinations of the Rights, Trotsky and his supporters, and the Military conspirators, Stalin saved Europe from Naziism – again!

No doubt this is why anticommunist "scholars" insist, in the face of all the evidence, that there were no conspiracies in the USSR and no collaboration with the Germans and Japanese. Once again they refuse to admit these truths on purely ideological grounds because doing so would seem to justify Stalin’s actions.

Bukharin, Not Stalin, To Blame for the Massive Repressions

One interesting aspect of this is that Nikolai Bukharin, leading name among the Rightists and one of its leaders, knew about the "Ezhovshchina" as it was happening, and praised it in a letter to Stalin that he wrote from prison.

It gets even better. Bukharin knew that Ezhov was a member of the Rightist conspiracy, as he himself was. No doubt that is why he welcomed Ezhov's appointment as head of the NKVD -- a view recorded by his widow in her memoirs.

In his first confession, in his now-famous letter to Stalin of December 10, 1937, and at his trial in March 1938 Bukharin claimed he had completely "disarmed" and had told everything he knew. But now we can prove that this was a lie. Bukharin knew that Ezhov was a leading member of the Rightist conspiracy -- but did not inform on him. According to Mikhail Frinovsky, Ezhov's right-hand man, Ezhov probably promised to see that he would not be executed if he did not mention his own, Ezhov's, participation (see Frinovsky's confession of April 11, 1939 ).

If Bukharin had told the truth -- if he had, in fact, informed on Ezhov -- Ezhov's mass murders could have been stopped in their tracks. The lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent people could have been saved.

But Bukharin remained true to his fellow conspirators. He went to execution -- an execution he swore he deserved "ten times over" * -- without revealing Ezhov's participation in the conspiracy.

This point cannot be stressed too much: the blood of the hundreds of thousands of innocent persons slaughtered by Ezhov and his men during 1937-1938, are on Bukharin's hands.

Objectivity and Evidence

I agree with historian Geoffrey Roberts when he says:

In the last 15 years or so an enormous amount of new material on Stalin … has become available from Russian archives. I should make clear that as a historian I have a strong orientation to telling the truth about the past, no matter how uncomfortable or unpalatable the conclusions may be. … I don’t think there is a dilemma: you just tell the truth as you see it. ("Stalin’s Wars", Frontpagemag.com February 12, 2007. At http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/35305.html )

The conclusions I have reached about the "Ezhovshchina" will be unacceptable to ideologically-motivated people. I have not reached these conclusions out of any desire to "apologize" for the policies of Stalin or the Soviet government. I believe these to be the only objective conclusions possible based on the available evidence.

I make no claim that the Soviet leadership was free from error. Stalin’s vision of a socialism leading to communism was obviously faulty in that it did not come to pass. During Stalin’s time, as during the short period of Lenin’s leadership, the Soviets made a great many errors. Error is, of course, inevitable in all human endeavor. And since the Bolsheviks were the first communists to conquer and hold state power, they were in unknown waters. It was inevitable, therefore, that they would make a great many mistakes – and they did.

However, any objective study of the evidence and the historical record shows that there was simply no alternative to forced collectivization and industrialization – except defeat at the hands of some combination of capitalist powers. Likewise, the fact that the Right, Trotskyite, and Military conspiracies really did exist but were snuffed out by the Soviet leadership, which managed to out-maneuver Ezhov and foil his conspiracy as well, proves that once again the USSR – "Stalin" – saved Europe from Naziism and all the Allies from an immense number of additional casualties at the hands of the Axis powers.

* Bukharin's two appeals for clemency, both dated March 13, 1938, were reprinted in Izvestiia September 2, 1992, p. 3. They were rejected, and Bukharin was executed on March 15, 1938. I have put them online in English here.

Additional Bibliography

Ezhov’s interrogations: I have translated all of Ezhov’s interrogations available to me as of July 2010 and put them online here:

http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/ezhovinterrogs.html (Russian original: http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/ezhovpokazaniia.html )

Lubianka. Stalin I NKVD – NKGB – GUKR "SMERSH". 1939 – mart 1946 . Moscow, 2006.

• Frinovsky confession of April 11, 1939, pp. 33-50. http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/frinovskyeng.html (Russian original here: http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/frinovskyru.html )
• Ezhov confession of April 26, 1939, pp. 52-72. http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/ezhov042639eng.html (Russian original: http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/ezhovru.html )

Petrov, Nikita, Mark Jansen. "Stalinskii pitomets" – Nikolai Ezhov . Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2008, pp. 367-379.

• Ezhov confession of August 4, 1939. http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/ezhov080439eng.html (Russian original: http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/ezhov080439ru.html )

Furr, Grover and Vladimir L. Bobrov, "Bukharin's Last Plea: Yet Another Anti-Stalin Falsification." http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/bukhlastplea.html - translation of Russian original published in Aktual’naia Istoriia for February 2009 at http://actualhistory.ru/bukharin_last_plea

Furr, Grover and Vladimir L. Bobrov, "Nikolai Bukharin's First Statement of Confession in the Lubianka" in English translation, Cultural Logic 2007 - http://clogic.eserver.org/2007/Furr_Bobrov.pdf

Furr, Grover and Vladimir L. Bobrov, "Pervye priznatel'nye pokazaniia N.I. Bukharina na Lubianke." Klio No. 1 (2007). http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/furrnbobrov_klio0107.pdf

Furr, Grover and Vladimir L. Bobrov, eds. "Lichnye pokazaniia N. Bukharina." Klio (St. Petersburg), No. 1 (2007). http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/furrnbobrov_klio0107.pdf

Furr, Grover. "Evidence of Leon Trotsky's Collaboration with Germany and Japan." In Cultural Logic for 2009. http://clogic.eserver.org/2009/Furr.pdf

Holmstr�m, Sven-Eric. "New Evidence Concerning the 'Hotel Bristol' Question in the First Moscow Trial of 1936". Cultural Logic 2008. At http://clogic.eserver.org/2008/Holmstrom.pdf

Furr, Grover.Khrushchev Lied: The Evidence That Every "Revelation" of Stalin's (and Beria's) Crimes in Nikita Khrushchev's Infamous "Secret Speech" to the 20th Party Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on February 25, 1956, is Provably False. Kettering, OH: Erythros Press & Media LLC, 2011. At Amazon.com ; at Erythros Press & Media : at Abebooks.com ; at Abebooks.co.uk (United Kingdom)

Furr (‘Ferr’), Grover Antistalinskaia podlost’ ("Anti-Stalin Villanies"). Moscow: Algoritm, 2007. Home page: http://www.algoritm-kniga.ru/ferr-g.-antistalinskaya-podlost.html Brief summary in this interview: "The Sixty-One Untruths of Nikita Khrushchev" (Interview with Grover Furr). http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/litrossiainterv0608_eng.html (original here: http://www.litrossia.ru/article.php?article=3003 )

Pavliukov, Aleksei. Ezhov. Moscow: Zakharov, 2007.

You are required to submit an essay in the Personal Comments Essay section. You must complete two additional essays if you apply to an MD-PhD program: the MD-PhD Essay and the Significant Research Experience Essay.  This essay should reflect your personal perspective and experiences accurately. Make sure you proofread carefully because no changes may be made after you submit your application.

Personal Comments Essay

Consider and write your Personal Comments Essay carefully; many admissions committees place significant weight on the essay. Here are some questions you may want to consider while writing the essay:

• Why have you selected the field of medicine?
• What motivates you to learn more about medicine?
• What do you want medical schools to know about you that has not been disclosed in other sections of the application?

In addition, you may wish to include information such as:

• Unique hardships, challenges, and obstacles that may have influenced your educational pursuits.
• Comments on significant fluctuations in your academic record not explained elsewhere in your application.

Formatting Your Essay:  Medical schools receive all text-entry responses as plain text. This means that formatting options such as bulleted lists, indented paragraphs, and bold and italic fonts do not appear for reviewers and are not available in the AMCAS application. You may want to include an extra space between paragraphs because the essay does not permit indentation.

To avoid formatting issues, we recommend typing your essay directly into your AMCAS application; copying formatted text into the application may result in formatting problems that can’t be edited after your application is submitted. If you do cut and paste your essay(s) into the application, you should draft your essay(s) in a plain text format, such as Microsoft Notepad or Mac TextEdit.

Please keep the following in mind:

• Proofread carefully! No changes (including corrections to grammatical or typographical errors) may be made to your essay after you submit your application to the AMCAS program.
• You can’t run a spell check in the AMCAS application, but most browsers have built-in spell checking that you can enable. Use English (United States) characters; other characters may not be accurately recognized.
• Medical schools prefer to receive applications that follow normal writing practices regarding the case of letters. You should avoid using all uppercase or all lowercase letters for the text responses in your application.
• Plagiarism or misrepresentations may result in an investigation. You may use artificial intelligence tools for brainstorming, proofreading, or editing your essays. However, it's essential to ensure that the final submission reflects your own work and accurately represents your experiences.
• It isn’t necessary to repeat information reported elsewhere on your application.
• The essay will be sent to all the medical schools you apply to.
• The space allotted for the essay is 5,300 characters, or about one page. Spaces are counted as characters. You will receive an error message if you exceed the character limit.

MD-PhD Essay

If you’re applying to MD-PhD programs, you’re required to provide two additional essays, the MD-PhD Essay and the Significant Research Experience Essay. Use the MD-PhD Essay to state your reasons for pursuing the combined MD-PhD degree. Your essay will be forwarded only to your designated MD-PhD programs. This essay is limited to 3,000 characters.

Below the MD-PhD Essay, you will be asked to enter your total hours of research experience.

Significant Research Experience Essay

If you’re applying to MD-PhD programs, you’re also required to write an essay that describes your significant research experiences. In this essay, please specify your research supervisor’s name and affiliation, the duration of the experience, the nature of the problem you studied, and your contributions to the research effort. This essay is limited to 10,000 characters.

If you were an author of a publication about your research, please enter the full citation in the Work/Activities section of your application.

Please note: If you change the program type to a Combined MD-PhD Program at a designated school after you submit your application to the AMCAS program, you will need to complete the MD-PhD and Significant Research Experience Essays before you can resubmit your application.

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

ESSAY; Moscow's China Card

By William Safire

• Sept. 8, 1986

Every decade or so, China undergoes a political convulsion. In 1948-49, the Communists threw out the Kuomintang; in 1956, Mao's ''Great Leap Forward'' plunged the country into a depression; in 1966, the Cultural Revolution to purify the party brought on a new Dark Ages; in 1976-78, we saw Mao's would-be radical successors, the ''Gang of Four,'' replaced by pragmatic Deng Xiaoping.

Now we are celebrating the 10th anniversary of the death of Mao, and some Pekingologists would have us believe that this decade's upheaval will not come.

Mr. Deng, at 82, has provided for his succession, we are assured: it's all set for Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang to succeed him, with Hu Qili of the next generation right behind. Not to worry, goes the current Edgar Snow-job: China's new era of ''commutalism,'' communism with a capitalist face, will march undisturbed into the next millennium.

I wonder. Maybe the conventional wisdom will prove right for once. But for argument's sake, let's look at what is happening in China through a different set of glasses, seeking truth from facts.

Fact number one is that a wave of materialism is sweeping across the billion people of China. After a generation of repression, good ol' greed is back in the saddle, and an I'm-all right-Deng attitude permeates the new entrepreneurs.

As a longtime expositor of the virtue of greed in powering the engine of social progress, I cannot cluck-cluck at this. But there is a difference between the materialism of the Chinese on Taiwan, who are accustomed to free enterprise, and the lust for the good life of available goods on the mainland, where a terrible thirst has been a-building.

Let us assume that the outburst of materialism in China leads to some reaction: that some spoilsport faction emerges to summon up the ghost of Mao's ideological purity, and that this new gang of fortyish Outs finds its way back in. It is at least a possibility.

I think that shrewd old Deng is well aware of this possibility. That is why, despite his ostentatious rejection of personal cultdom, he is preparing his most dramatic assault on the memory of Mao. That father of the revolution startled the world by breaking with the Soviet Union; Mr. Deng, playing a revisionist Lenin to Mao's Marx, wants to startle the world and overwhelm internal opposition by a rapprochement with Moscow.

Accordingly, fact two: He has abandoned his demand that Russia move back its huge army from the Chinese border, thereby double-crossing his own Army leaders. He has forgotten his requirement that Soviet forces be withdrawn from Afghanistan, thereby double-crossing his Westernish ally, Pakistan.

All Mr. Deng now asks of the Russians is that they try to squeeze their Vietnamese clients to pull out of Cambodia. Of course they'll try - ''best efforts'' is an easy promise - and since the Vietnamese are notoriously independent, Moscow cannot be blamed for not succeeding. Result: Mr. Deng takes the salute from atop the wall in Red Square.

That reestablishes his Communist credentials, defanging hard-left opposition at home. And it is Middle Kingdom orthodoxy; I suspect Chinese agents in the U.S. supply the K.G.B. with intelligence, just as Peking permits our Big Ears on its soil to overhear Kremlin transmissions. Chinese policy has always been to play the barbarians against each other.

This theory would also explain fact three: Mr. Gorbachev's seizure of a U.S. newsman as hostage. It is no coincidence that this particular hostage selection follows China's arrest and expulsion of a reporter for a U.S. newspaper. The Soviet leader, advised by Anatoly Dobrynin, must have known that this slap in the face would jeopardize a summit - and went ahead with his calculated humiliation, similar to Mr. Nixon's mining of Haiphong harbor before his Moscow summit in 1972.

Because the Russians now have the prospect of a pilgrimage to Moscow by Mr. Deng, they can taunt the U.S. President with impunity. As Mr. Dobrynin probably predicted, Mr. Reagan is reduced to begging for the hostage's release, in effect volunteering testimony to a Soviet court, in his eagerness to crown his Presidency with a peacemaking summit.

Now Mr. Gorbachev can hang tough, holding a show trial and thereby delaying negotiations with the U.S. until the Deng visit - or can graciously accede to the Reagan plea, thereby establishing his dominance. And the overconfident Mr. Reagan never suspected, as he sat down to summit poker, that this time the China card was in his opponent's hand.

Perry High School students win 2024 Perry Optimist essay contest

Perry Optimist Club handed out medals to the local essay contest winners during its meeting on Wednesday, April 3 at the Hotel Pattee.

Linda Andorf, who facilitated the contest, said DMACC VanKirk Career Academy's Linda Kaufman assigned a writing assignment to her Perry High School/DMACC students. The assignment was graded and was then judged anonymously by Perry Optimist Club members. This year, 32 essays were submitted and four places were awarded.

Erika Guardado won first place while Jennifer Ramos received second place. Mia Munoz and Kain Killmer tied for third place.

The prompt for this year’s contest was "Optimism: How it Connects Us."

Guardado’s essay has been sent to the district level. She will also receive a $500 scholarship during the senior awards assembly in May.